• 9th air force operational tempo

    From Rich Rostrom@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 20 11:28:05 2016
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    ...an awesome compilation. Saved, and will use for
    reference in the future, I'm sure.

    Aircraft Credit Sortie: An aircraft credit sortie is deemed to
    have taken place when an airplane, ordered on an operational
    mission and In the performance of that mission, has entered
    an area where enemy anti-aircraft fire may be effective, or
    where usual enemy fighter patrols occur, or when the airplane
    is in any way subjected to enemy attack. (Definition previously
    used for sortie to the ETO)

    Hmm.

    To count Coastal Command ASW patrols, the possibility
    of AA fire from a U-boat would have to be sufficient.
    This even though by 1945, very few patrols even
    encountered a surfaced U-boat.

    But as long as there was any possibility of combat...
    --
    The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

    http://originalvelvetrevolution.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 21 10:38:52 2016
    "Rich Rostrom" <rrostrom@comcast.net> wrote in message news:rrostrom-5686C9.10210820092016@news.eternal-september.org...
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:
    Aircraft Credit Sortie: An aircraft credit sortie is deemed to
    have taken place when an airplane, ordered on an operational
    mission and In the performance of that mission, has entered
    an area where enemy anti-aircraft fire may be effective, or
    where usual enemy fighter patrols occur, or when the airplane
    is in any way subjected to enemy attack. (Definition previously
    used for sortie to the ETO)

    Hmm.

    The above definition is for the USAAF and for a tactical air
    force which is mainly going after enemy air and ground
    targets. The anti submarine statistics are from RAF
    Coastal Command.

    To count Coastal Command ASW patrols, the possibility
    of AA fire from a U-boat would have to be sufficient.
    This even though by 1945, very few patrols even
    encountered a surfaced U-boat.

    But as long as there was any possibility of combat...

    I would expect for anti submarine sorties in the Bay of Biscay
    for much of the war to meet the fighter patrols criteria and all
    to meet the possibility of encountering the enemy but essentially
    anti submarine patrols are counted differently to the above
    definition.

    The USN had action sorties, defined as the aircraft, or one aircraft
    in a raid/formation saw action, in the latter case all the aircraft in
    the formation/raid are counted as action sorties. in 1944/45 USN
    carriers in the Pacific generated 387,499 sorties of which 138,758
    saw action. Not surprisingly most anti submarine sorties were non
    action. Some 42% of fleet carrier sorties saw action (36% of fighter,
    55% of bomber), 30% of light fleet and 27% of escort carriers. All
    up 70% of USN carrier sorties were by fighters and the overall
    average was 15.4 flights per aircraft per month.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Rostrom@21:1/5 to Geoffrey Sinclair on Wed Sep 21 15:08:56 2016
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    More excellent information.

    But as long as there was any possibility of combat...

    I would expect for anti submarine sorties in the Bay of Biscay
    for much of the war to meet the fighter patrols criteria and all
    to meet the possibility of encountering the enemy but essentially
    anti submarine patrols are counted differently to the above
    definition.

    "the possibility of encountering the enemy..." yes.

    Any ASW patrol, even in waters far from Germany, had a
    risk of enemy action, because surfaced U-boats sometimes
    shot back (rather than diving at once).

    U-505, on her second or third war patrol (IIRC) in the
    Caribbean, was attacked by an Allied patrol bomber and
    shot it down. The fate of this aircraft was not known
    to the Allies till U-505 was captured.

    Not surprisingly most anti submarine sorties were
    non action. Some 42% of fleet carrier sorties saw
    action (36% of fighter, 55% of bomber)...

    This makes sense - bombers would launch only when
    there was a target, and would usually go to the
    target, whereas fighters would often go up on
    defensive patrols when the enemy _might_ attack -
    but often didn't.

    30% of light fleet...

    That would be the INDEPENDENCE class. Why the
    substantial difference from the "fleet carriers"
    (i.e. ESSEX class plus ENTERPRISE and SARATOGA)?
    Did the CVLs carry proportionally more fighters?

    and 27% of escort carriers.

    Again, why the difference - presumably different
    missions for the ships, most of the time; also
    different mix of a/c carried. Also, were there
    many ASW patrols in the Pacific? There were far
    fewer Japanese submarines than U-boats, and they
    were not deployed as a threat to shipping. (There
    would still be ASW patrols around U.S. task forces,
    as Jap subs _were_ tasked with attacking warships,
    e.g. SARATOGA, WASP, etc.)
    --
    The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

    http://originalvelvetrevolution.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Dallman@21:1/5 to Rich Rostrom on Thu Sep 22 09:10:13 2016
    In article <rrostrom-688CAA.14042021092016@news.eternal-september.org>, rrostrom@comcast.net (Rich Rostrom) wrote:

    This makes sense - bombers would launch only when
    there was a target

    Carrier-based bombers were also used as scouts, which will make up a substantial proportion of the sorties without action.

    John

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 22 10:54:58 2016
    "Rich Rostrom" <rrostrom@comcast.net> wrote in message news:rrostrom-688CAA.14042021092016@news.eternal-september.org...
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    Not surprisingly most anti submarine sorties were
    non action. Some 42% of fleet carrier sorties saw
    action (36% of fighter, 55% of bomber)...

    This makes sense - bombers would launch only when
    there was a target, and would usually go to the
    target, whereas fighters would often go up on
    defensive patrols when the enemy _might_ attack -
    but often didn't.

    I do not have a definition of sortie, for example if training
    was included, transfers between carriers, etc. or whether
    they were flights that were non training, strike, combat air
    patrol, anti submarine etc,

    30% of light fleet...

    That would be the INDEPENDENCE class. Why the
    substantial difference from the "fleet carriers"
    (i.e. ESSEX class plus ENTERPRISE and SARATOGA)?
    Did the CVLs carry proportionally more fighters?

    Yes. However remember the ratio of fighters to bombers
    in the fleet carriers went up in 1944/45 and these are
    average figures for the two years.

    For 1944 and 1945 in the Pacific only.

    Breakdown, fleet carrier, 42.2% action sorties
    F6F 37% action, 52% of all sorties
    F4U Navy 29.1% action, 10.6% of all sorties
    F4U Marine 35.1% action, 3.6% of all sorties
    SB2C/SBW 60.8% action, 14.6% of all sorties
    SBD 42.8% action, 3.7% of all sorties
    TBF/TBM 52.9% action, 15.5% of all sorties

    So almost exactly 2 fighter to 1 bomber sorties,
    with 35.6% of fighter and 55.2% of bomber sorties
    seeing action.

    Light fleet carrier, 29.9% action sorties
    F6F 28% action, 75.3% of all sorties
    TBF/TBM 35.5% action, 24.7% of all sorties

    So almost exactly 3 fighter to 1 bomber sorties.

    As far as I know the light fleet carriers were used more
    for patrols than strikes. That enabled the fleet carriers
    to range full strikes without having to rotate defensive
    fighters.

    and 27% of escort carriers.

    Escort carriers, 27.3% action sorties
    FM (F4F) 25.2% action, 47% of all sorties
    F6F Navy 32.2% action 13.5% of all sorties
    F6F Marine 28.5% action, 0.5% of all sorties
    F4U marine 19.8% action, 2.1% of all sorties
    SBD 15.2% action, 0.8% of all sorties
    TBF/TBM Navy 28.8% action, 34.6% of all sorties
    TBF/TBM Marine 30.7% action, 1.5% of all sorties

    So 63% fighter, 37% bomber with 26.5% of fighter
    and 28.5% of bomber sorties seeing action. Sortie
    ratio close to fleet carriers.

    Again, why the difference - presumably different
    missions for the ships, most of the time; also
    different mix of a/c carried. Also, were there
    many ASW patrols in the Pacific? There were far
    fewer Japanese submarines than U-boats, and they
    were not deployed as a threat to shipping. (There
    would still be ASW patrols around U.S. task forces,
    as Jap subs _were_ tasked with attacking warships,
    e.g. SARATOGA, WASP, etc.)

    CVE, fly protection over convoys, the fleet during stand
    downs or replenishment, do beach head protection
    and strikes, act as mobile aircraft depots, issuing new
    aircraft and taking "flyable duds". And any other general
    task needed. I do not think there were any specific CVE
    centred anti submarine units as in the Atlantic.

    For replenishment think of a tanker in the middle of
    2 carriers moving in a straight line, think what a target.
    Want to take a chance of no anti submarine air patrols?

    At Philippine Sea the fleet carriers generally had a
    mix of 4 fighters to 5 strike aircraft, the light fleet
    had a 2.7 fighters to 1 strike aircraft mix.

    At Leyte Gulf the fleet carriers had made it to 16 fighters
    to 17 bombers so near parity, the light fleet had not changed.
    Going into Philippine Sea the fleet carriers had around 80
    more bombers that fighters, at Leyte Gulf around 30.

    The escort carriers at Leyte Gulf had two different aircraft
    arrangements, 4 had air groups with around 2.5 fighters
    per bomber, 14 had composite squadrons which had
    4 fighters per 3 bombers.

    For the attack on Okinawa the fleet carriers had 2.3 fighters
    per bomber, or around 400 more fighters than bombers,
    the light fleet carriers remained the same, the escort carriers
    used composite squadrons.

    Despite an apparently consistent ratio of 2.7 fighters per
    bomber the light fleet carriers overall flew about 3 fighter
    sorties per bomber.

    So the fleet carriers were the main offensive weapon, the
    light fleet more defensive, along with the escort carriers.

    The rough ratio of the chance a sortie would see action is
    8 for fleet carrier based bombers
    5 for fleet carrier based fighters and light fleet carrier bombers.
    4 for light carrier based fighters and escort carrier aircraft.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 19 09:09:48 2016
    Basic definitions,
    Sortie: A sortie is an aircraft airborne on a mission against
    the enemy (synonymous with terms 'aircraft dispatched",
    "aircraft airborne", and "aircraft taking off", previously used.

    Aircraft Credit Sortie: An aircraft credit sortie is deemed to
    have taken place when an airplane, ordered on an operational
    mission and In the performance of that mission, has entered
    an area where enemy anti-aircraft fire may be effective, or
    where usual enemy fighter patrols occur, or when the airplane
    is in any way subjected to enemy attack. (Definition previously
    used for sortie to the ETO)

    Non-Effective Sortie: A non-effective sortie is a sortie which
    for any reason fails to carry out the purpose of the mission.
    (Synonymous with the term "abortive".)

    It is assumed operational flying hours are for credit sorties.

    The USAAF compiled quite detailed statistics about its
    activities which makes analysis much simpler. So for
    the 9th Air Force in the European Theatre, October 1943
    to April 1945.

    The A-20 averaged 13.1 credit sorties per aircraft per month
    in sorties lasting an average of 3.31 hours (about 3 hours 20
    minutes). A total of 67,917 hours of operational flying,
    37,351 hours of non operational flying. So on average
    of 43.46 hours of operational flying per month. All up
    22,999 sorties, 20,522 credit and 15,855 effective sorties.
    90 A-20 MIA, 79 write offs, 0.82% losses per credit sortie.

    Note in November 1944 two of the three A-20 groups
    officially converted to A-26.

    The A-26 averaged 12.4 credit sorties per aircraft per month
    in sorties lasting an average of 3.55 hours (about 3 hours 33
    minutes). A total of 35,513 hours of operational flying,
    40,796 hours of non operational flying. So on average
    of 44.02 hours of operational flying per month. All up
    10,441 sorties, 10,009 credit and 9,201 effective sorties.
    35 A-26 MIA, 28 write offs, 0.63% losses per credit sortie.

    The B-26 averaged 11.0 credit sorties per aircraft per month
    in sorties lasting an average of 3.44 hours (about 3 hours 26
    minutes). A total of 267,941 hours of operational flying,
    113,975 hours of non operational flying. So on average
    of 37.8 hours of operational flying per month. All up
    85,706 sorties, 77,785 credit and 62,686 effective sorties.
    Four of the B-26 groups were operational with the 8th Air Force
    before being transferred to the 9th while in February and again
    in April 1945 a B-26 group was converted to A-26. 320 B-26
    MIA, 253 write offs, 0.74% losses per credit sortie.

    Unfortunately crew and aircraft status is only given for
    bombers as a group, so A-20, A-26 and B-26.

    The 9th Air Force reported its average authorised bomber
    strength was 764.2 aircraft, with 827.1 on hand in the air force
    of which 611.6 were in the tactical units of which 497.7 were
    operational, there was an average total of 851.6 crews
    authorised, 917 assigned.and 681.3 available in the tactical
    units giving an average strength of 471.6 operational aircraft
    with crews.

    The bomber units had about the same number of aircraft and
    crews from October 1943 to February 1944, the 10 to 20%
    more aircraft than crews until July 1944, then parity again in
    August and September, then 25% more crews in October and
    November peaking at 50% more crews in March 1945.

    There were effectively 4 bomb groups operational from
    October to January 1944, 4.5 in February, 7 in March,
    9 in April and 11 in May 1944.

    Bomber groups were authorised to have 85 aircraft and
    96 crews until October 1944 when the number of aircraft
    was raised to 88.

    The P-38 averaged 17.3 credit sorties per aircraft per month
    in sorties lasting an average of 2.51 hours (about 2 hours 30
    minutes). A total of 82,581 hours of operational flying,
    18,905 hours of non operational flying. So on average
    of 43.4 hours of operational flying per month. All up
    34,038 sorties, 32,928 credit and 31,868 effective sorties.
    317 P-38 MIA, 77 write offs, 1.2% losses per credit sortie.

    On 20 February 1945 the 367th Fighter Group officially
    converted from P-38 to P-47, on 9 March 1945 the 370th
    Fighter Group officially converted from P-38 to P-51.

    The P-47 averaged 18.9 credit sorties per aircraft per month
    in sorties lasting an average of 2.41 hours (about 2 hours 25
    minutes). A total of 475,052 hours of operational flying,
    134,029 hours of non operational flying. So on average
    of 47.4 hours of operational flying per month. All up
    201,546 sorties, 197,191 credit and 190,450 effective sorties.
    1,208 P-47 MIA, 249 write offs, 0.74% losses per credit sortie.

    Due to a shortage of P-51 and changes in designations the
    9th air force fighter units peaked at 2,944 P-51 credit sorties
    in July 1944, was down to 826 in September, 506 in October,
    555 in November, 38 in December, 0 in January 1945, 474 in
    February then 3,359 in March.

    On 10 September 1944 the 363rd Fighter Group with P-51
    officially became the 363rd Tactical Reconnaissance Group,
    after which its activities were recorded under reconnaissance.
    On 22 November 1944 the other 9th AF P-51 unit, the 354th
    Fighter Group officially converted to P-47, it officially converted
    back to P-51 on 15 February 1945.

    The P-51 averaged 16.8 credit sorties per aircraft per month
    in sorties lasting an average of 2.96 hours (about 2 hours 58
    minutes). A total of 72,609 hours of operational flying,
    21,933 hours of non operational flying. So on average
    of 49.7 hours of operational flying per month. All up
    25,546 sorties, 24,505 credit and 23,932 effective sorties.
    253 P-51 MIA, 19 write offs, 1.1% losses per credit sortie.

    As with bombers crew and aircraft status is only given for
    fighters as a group, so P-38, P-47 and P-51.

    Fighter groups were authorised to have 96 aircraft and 108
    crews until November 1944 when it became 100 aircraft
    and 126 crews. It means there was an average of 1,224.6
    authorised aircraft strength of which 1,180 were on hand in
    the 9th Air Force of which 885.8 were in the tactical units of
    which 718.8 were operational. Average authorised crew
    strength was 1,486, 1,654 were assigned, 1,164.6 available
    in the tactical units, giving an average effective strength of
    696.8 aircraft with crews.

    The fighter units had 10 to 20% more aircraft than crews to
    May 1944, by July 1944 there were 30% more crews and
    growing, peaking at 70% more crews in January 1945.

    There were an average of 0.4 fighter groups operational in
    December 1943, 1 in January 1944, 3.2 in February, 6.2 in
    March, 8.9 in April, 17 in May, 18 in June, 18 in July 1944.
    Some 9th Air Force Fighter Groups were transferred to the
    1st Tactical Air Force dropping average Fighter Group
    strength to 15.17 in November 1944, it then stayed between
    14.67 and 15,67 to end April 1945.

    Operational flying hours per aircraft per month were
    more uniform, A-20 43.46, A-25 44.02, B-26 37.8, P-38
    43.4, P-47 47.4, P-51 49.7, which would indicate overall
    the allocation of crew and maintenance personnel was
    well matched to the aircraft type. The light twin engined
    bombers and the P-38 are in one group, the single
    engined fighters did better, the heavier bomber with the
    larger crew did worse, am indication of crew sizes is the
    average number of men posted missing in 1944 was 2.25
    for each A-20 listed as MIA, for the B-26 is was 5.41.

    For the P-38 0.84, P-47 0.75 and P-51 0.87 men MIA per
    aircraft MIA, the final figure fitting with the 30 minute longer
    average flight time compared to the P-38 and P-47.

    The bomber and P-47 loss rates were 0.6 to 0.8%
    the P-51 1.1% and the P-38 1.2%. around 45% of all
    bomber losses were write offs, versus 7% for the P-51,
    17% for the P-47 and 19% for the P-38. This probably
    initially relates to the amount of air combat the types saw,
    the bombers claimed a total of 65 kills, the P-38 266 kills,
    the P-47 1,130 kills and the P-51 748 kills. Then comes
    the radial engine in the P-47 and the twin engines of the
    P-38 in terms of making it back when heavily damaged.

    As fighters the P-38 claimed a kill every 124 sorties, the
    P-47 one every 174 sorties and the P-51 one every 33
    sorties which again should mean a lower write off rate
    for the P-51, fighters were more lethal than flak.

    Table is month \ average operational hours flown by by
    available bomber crews \ average operational hours
    flown by by available bomber aircraft \\ average
    operational hours flown by by available fighter crews \
    average operational hours flown by by available fighter
    aircraft.

    Oct-43 \ 7.14 \ 6.29 \ \ \
    Nov-43 \ 15.52 \ 14.49 \\ \
    Dec-43 \ 20.54 \ 22.85 \\ 9.24 \ 14.56
    Jan-44 \ 17.69 \ 19.00 \\ 15.50 \ 14.49
    Feb-44 \ 32.88 \ 35.30 \\ 23.47 \ 22.57
    Mar-44 \ 29.92 \ 28.96 \\ 34.46 \ 25.98
    Apr-44 \ 39.98 \ 33.43 \\ 40.13 \ 33.12
    May-44 \ 48.86 \ 39.66 \\ 48.15 \ 43.29
    Jun-44 \ 45.56 \ 39.00 \\ 46.00 \ 52.97
    Jul-44 \ 34.59 \ 28.06 \\ 32.38 \ 43.68
    Aug-44 \ 40.72 \ 42.15 \\ 37.08 \ 49.43
    Sep-44 \ 22.58 \ 22.63 \\ 31.18 \ 44.05
    Oct-44 \ 12.43 \ 15.31 \\ 22.62 \ 32.61
    Nov-44 \ 16.84 \ 21.16 \\ 16.99 \ 27.19
    Dec-44 \ 20.44 \ 26.58 \\ 21.80 \ 34.84
    Jan-45 \ 12.23 \ 16.50 \\ 15.31 \ 26.20
    Feb-45 \ 26.48 \ 36.96 \\ 23.65 \ 35.68
    Mar-45 \ 47.31 \ 72.21 \\ 47.59 \ 65.21
    Apr-45 \ 30.88 \ 45.23 \\ 42.31 \ 58.61

    So peaking in the mid 40 hours per crew per month.

    The A-20 flew 1.82 operational hours for every 1 hour of
    non operational flight, the A-26 0.87 (reflecting the need to
    retrain crews and its late arrival), the B-26 2.35, P-38 4.34,
    P-47 3.54, P-51 3.31, P-61 1.01 (Night fighter), F-3 0.41
    (Presumably mostly used for training), F-5 1.74, F-6 3.22.

    I would not stretch this too far but in weight terms,
    A-20K 17,000 pounds empty, 10,000 pounds load
    A-26B 22,400 pounds empty 12,600 pounds load
    B-26G 23,800 pounds empty, 14,400 pounds load.

    P-38J 12,800 pounds empty, 8,800 pounds load
    P-47D-25 10,000 pounds empty, 9,400 pounds load.
    P-51D 7,125 pounds empty, 4,500 pounds load

    A sort of match to flying hours in terms of empty weights
    (basic equipment needing care) and loads (the time and
    effort to crew, arm and fuel) with the note engines tended
    to require plenty of maintenance. Then add the extra crew
    for a B-26.

    Comparing these figures to others has the hazard October
    1943 to April 1945 is not two full years and includes two
    winters, plus the surge in activity in June 1944, the 9th Air
    Force flew 110,966 hours that month, only exceeded in
    March and April 1945. Add the inevitable disruptions in
    moving from England to France and then into Germany.

    Even using May 1944 to April 1945 has problems given
    the effect weather had on operations, for bombers the
    average for the above year was 12.75 operational days,
    6.1 part operational and 11.6 non operational due to
    weather. Operational days ranged from 24 in March 1945
    to 5 in October 1944, part operational from 9 in November
    1944 and February 1945 to 1 in June 1944. However even
    this needs qualification as the bomber units received radar
    bombing equipment towards the end of 1944 and so could
    operate in worse weather.

    For fighters the averages were 14.75 operational days, 8.4
    part operational days, ranging from 24 operational days in
    August 1944 to 6 in November 1944 and January 1945, part
    operational ranged from 16 days in November and December
    1944 to 2 in June 1944 and March 1945.

    Missions were still run on declared weather non operational
    days, 10.7% of total bomber, 7.1% of total fighter and 6.9% of
    total reconnaissance sorties.

    Some better figures for the 8th Air force versus some earlier
    estimates.

    From the Statistical Summary of Eighth Air Force Operations,
    Figures include 24 credit sorties by light bombers in September
    and 12 in October 1942 versus 106 and 157 by heavy bombers
    for those months. Also 23 credit sorties in May, 245 in July, 996
    in August, 2,344 in September and 485 in October 1943 by
    medium bombers versus 1,340, 2,334, 2,058, 2,561 and 2,159 by
    heavy bombers for those months, hence the drop in average sortie
    length in August and September.

    Table is month \ operational hours per sortie \ sorties per crew
    assigned \ sorties per aircraft on hand tactical units \ operational
    hours per crew \ operational hours per aircraft. For bomber aircraft.

    Aug-42 \ \ 2.4 \ 2.9 \
    Sep-42 \ \ 1.4 \ 1.6 \
    Oct-42 \ \ 2 \ 2.2 \
    Nov-42 \ 4.8 \ 2.5 \ 2.5 \ 12.0 \ 12.0
    Dec-42 \ 4.3 \ 2.4 \ 2.1 \ 10.3 \ 9.0
    Jan-43 \ 4.7 \ 2.4 \ 2.3 \ 11.3 \ 10.8
    Feb-43 \ 4.3 \ 3.7 \ 3.6 \ 15.9 \ 15.5
    Mar-43 \ 4.1 \ 6.3 \ 5 \ 25.8 \ 20.5
    Apr-43 \ 4.4 \ 2.4 \ 1.9 \ 10.6 \ 8.4
    May-43 \ 3.7 \ 5.2 \ 4.8 \ 19.2 \ 17.8
    Jun-43 \ 4.1 \ 5.1 \ 4.7 \ 20.9 \ 19.3
    Jul-43 \ 5 \ 6.1 \ 4.8 \ 30.5 \ 24.0
    Aug-43 \ 3.5 \ 4.5 \ 3.9 \ 15.8 \ 13.7
    Sep-43 \ 3.9 \ 5.2 \ 5.2 \ 20.3 \ 20.3
    Oct-43 \ 5.6 \ 3.3 \ 3.6 \ 18.5 \ 20.2
    Nov-43 \ 5.2 \ 4.2 \ 5.1 \ 21.8 \ 26.5
    Dec-43 \ 5.9 \ 4.1 \ 6.1 \ 24.2 \ 36.0
    Jan-44 \ 5.2 \ 4.2 \ 6.4 \ 21.8 \ 33.3
    Feb-44 \ 6.2 \ 6.2 \ 7 \ 38.4 \ 43.4
    Mar-44 \ 6.5 \ 7.4 \ 8.1 \ 48.1 \ 52.7
    Apr-44 \ 5.8 \ 8.3 \ 8.9 \ 48.1 \ 51.6
    May-44 \ 6.2 \ 9.2 \ 9.7 \ 57.0 \ 60.1
    Jun-44 \ 5.6 \ 10.2 \ 11.5 \ 57.1 \ 64.4
    Jul-44 \ 6.4 \ 7.7 \ 10.2 \ 49.3 \ 65.3
    Aug-44 \ 6.3 \ 7.1 \ 9.7 \ 44.7 \ 61.1
    Sep-44 \ 6.7 \ 6 \ 8.8 \ 40.2 \ 59.0
    Oct-44 \ 6.3 \ 5.5 \ 7.6 \ 34.7 \ 47.9
    Nov-44 \ 6.5 \ 4.9 \ 6.9 \ 31.9 \ 44.9
    Dec-44 \ 6.6 \ 5.1 \ 8 \ 33.7 \ 52.8
    Jan-45 \ 6.6 \ 4.7 \ 7.7 \ 31.0 \ 50.8
    Feb-45 \ 7.4 \ 6 \ 10.5 \ 44.4 \ 77.7
    Mar-45 \ 6.9 \ 8 \ 13.8 \ 55.2 \ 95.2
    Apr-45 \ 7.9 \ 5.4 \ 8.7 \ 42.7 \ 68.7

    Averages November 1942 to April 1945, sortie length 5.55
    hours, 5.44 sorties per crew per month, 6.64 per aircraft,
    31.18 hours per crew, 39.42 hours per aircraft.

    The figures indicate if there is a limit of around mid 40's hours
    of operational flying per month it is more the limits on crew
    strength that determined this, from July 1944 onwards the
    average aircraft in the tactical units flew at least 30% more
    hours on operations than the average crew, for 1945 it was
    57 to 75% more.

    For the 8th Air Force's heavy bomber units the number of crews
    assigned to the combat units was around the same as the number
    of aircraft August 1942 to February 1943, for March to August
    1943 the units generally had 10 to 20% more aircraft than crews,
    then the ratio rapidly shifted so crews outnumbered aircraft by
    nearly 1.5 to 1 in January 1944 which seems to be a surge of
    crews arriving before aircraft, by May there were about 5% more
    crews than aircraft, in June the 8th hit peak average aircraft
    strength in the units, 2,547, while average crew strength went from
    2,180 in May to 3,213 in July, stabilised at around 3,400 to 3,500
    for most of 1944, then jumped to 3,835 in February 1945 for
    2,230 aircraft.

    For another contrast, long duration flights,

    Coastal Command Sorties per month per aircraft, 1941, 1942, 1943
    Catalina 2.87, 2.19, 3.95
    Hudson 3.83, 4.56, 7.35
    Liberator 1.13, 1.90, 2.597
    Sunderland 3.90, 2.81, 3.35
    Wellington 3.67, 3.22, 3.77

    Hours per sortie
    Catalina 13.7, 13.5, 15.44
    Hudson 4.8, 5.28, 5.96
    Liberator 10.88, 10.92, 12.27
    Sunderland 8.42, 10.78, 11.56
    Wellington 6.68, 8.14, 8.35

    Hours per month
    Catalina 39.32, 29.57, 60.99
    Hudson 18.38, 24.08, 43.81
    Liberator 12.29, 20.75, 31.87
    Sunderland 32.84, 30.29, 38.73
    Wellington 24.52, 26.21, 31.48

    For those who want to consider an earlier operation Overlord, the
    8th Air Force went from 37 operational groups at the end of
    December 1943, to 44 end March 1944 to 57 end June.

    The 9th Air Force had 4 bomb and 1 fighter groups operational
    at the end of December 1943, 5 bomb and 5 fighter groups by
    end March 1944 and 11 bomb and 18 fighter groups by end
    May 1944, the final 8 groups being made operational between
    1 and 9 May.

    And it needs to be pointed out the number of aircraft per group
    was going up. The 8th air force on average had 723 operational
    heavy bombers with crews in December 1943, and 1,855 in June,
    fighter effective strength grew from 565 to 885 over the same time.

    The 9th Air Force had an effective strength, aircraft with crews, of
    224 bombers and 50 fighters in December 1943, versus 620 and
    1,009 respectively in June.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)