I've noticed in the past couple of days that many resources - the 1900 US >census comes to mind - which previously had images available at the >familysearch.org website now say "Images Available", but you have to go
to a family history center or affiliated library. Does anybody know
what's going on? Why are these resources less available?
I've noticed in the past couple of days that many resources - the 1900 US >census comes to mind - which previously had images available at the >familysearch.org website now say "Images Available", but you have to go
to a family history center or affiliated library. Does anybody know
what's going on? Why are these resources less available?
I've noticed in the past couple of days that many resources - the 1900 US census comes to mind - which previously had images available at the familysearch.org website now say "Images Available", but you have to go
to a family history center or affiliated library. Does anybody know
what's going on? Why are these resources less available?
New York > Los Angeles; STECKER: New York > FloridaWICHMAN: Syczkowo (Bobruisk), Belarus > Milwaukee > Los Angeles
I've reported the bug to the FS support staff. I'll let the group know when I hear back
from them.
New York > Los Angeles; STECKER: New York > FloridaWICHMAN: Syczkowo (Bobruisk), Belarus > Milwaukee > Los Angeles
Heard back from my contacts:Â Â "This is an upgrade issue that has
disabled some collections. We are working to restore it, but it is a
very large issue affecting many collections and it’s going to take
several days to fix."
Heard back from my contacts: "This is an upgrade issue that has
disabled some collections. We are working to restore it, but it is a
very large issue affecting many collections and itƒ Ts going to take
several days to fix."
On 13/03/20 15:58, David Oseas wrote:
Heard back from my contacts:Â Â "This is an upgrade issue that has
disabled some collections. We are working to restore it, but it is a
very large issue affecting many collections and it’s going to take
several days to fix."
Another upgrade that breaks stuff. Has testing gone out of fashion? >(Rhetorical question)
Ian
On 13/03/20 15:58, David Oseas wrote:
Heard back from my contacts:Â Â "This is an upgrade issue that has
disabled some collections. We are working to restore it, but it is a
very large issue affecting many collections and it’s going to take
several days to fix."
Another upgrade that breaks stuff. Has testing gone out of fashion? >(Rhetorical question)
Another upgrade that breaks stuff. Has testing gone out of fashion? (Rhetorical question)
New York > Los Angeles; STECKER: New York > FloridaWICHMAN: Syczkowo (Bobruisk), Belarus > Milwaukee > Los Angeles
On 3/13/2020 5:11 PM, Ian Goddard wrote:
Another upgrade that breaks stuff. Has testing gone out of fashion?
(Rhetorical question)
[off topic]
As a software developer for a tech company, I can state that with
today's multi-tier, distributed architectures, even the most rigorous
testing won't uncover every issue.
On 14/03/20 20:34, David Oseas wrote:
On 3/13/2020 5:11 PM, Ian Goddard wrote:
Another upgrade that breaks stuff. Has testing gone out of fashion?
(Rhetorical question)
[off topic]
As a software developer for a tech company, I can state that with
today's multi-tier, distributed architectures, even the most rigorous
testing won't uncover every issue.
And as an antique sometime developer I can only offer this advice:
don't build what you can't test.
Ian
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:46:16 |
Calls: | 6,495 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,097 |
Messages: | 5,276,962 |