• Subject: The Joyeuse Ancestry of the Couvents

    From JPD@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 25 13:53:57 2023
    It has come to my attention that Charles Cawley of Medieval Lands has criticized the Anne Couvent royal gateway, in particular, the connection of the Joyeuse de Champigneulle family to the Joyeuse de Grandpré family. I have prepared a rebuttal of his
    criticism entitled “The Joyeuse Ancestry of the Couvents.” It is posted to https://habitant.org/joyeuse/index.htm. In addition, I have also included the following documents: (1) Roland-Yves Gagné and Laurent Kokanosky, “The Origins of Phillipe
    Amiot (Hameau), His Spouse Anne Couvent, and Their Nephew Toussaint Ledran,” Michigan's Habitant Heritage, courtesy of the French-Canadian Heritage Society of Michigan; (2) the 1733 Joyeuse Genealogy, found in the papers of Pierre Hanonnet, royal
    notary, courtesy of the Departmental Archives of Meuse; (3) the 1733 Proxy Letter attached to the genealogy; and (4) a transcription of the 1733 Joyeuse Genealogy and Proxy Letter, done by Baptiste Étienne. This should be all the information you need to
    judge for yourself the validity of the connection between these two Joyeuse families.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 25 17:03:05 2023
    My response from our Facebook group French Canadian Royal Gateways:

    After reading The Joyeuse Ancestry of the Couvents by John P. DuLong I recommend everyone who is a descendant of Anne Couvent read it. This amazingly well prepared research documents a full throated response to the questions out there regarding the de
    Joyeuse and des Ancherins lineages from Francois de Joyeuse to include Charles Cawley and others.

    I am more than satisfied that what remains at this present moment gives us all confidence to call ourselves descendants of Robert de Joyeuse. Thank you so much John for this gift, and I call it a gift because it is rare to find someone who takes in all
    of the criticisms and responds with such a mastery of analytical research.

    Thank you!!!

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jinny Wallerstedt/Girl 57@21:1/5 to Darrell E. Larocque on Sun Feb 26 12:08:55 2023
    On Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 8:03:06 PM UTC-5, Darrell E. Larocque wrote:
    My response from our Facebook group French Canadian Royal Gateways:

    After reading The Joyeuse Ancestry of the Couvents by John P. DuLong I recommend everyone who is a descendant of Anne Couvent read it. This amazingly well prepared research documents a full throated response to the questions out there regarding the de
    Joyeuse and des Ancherins lineages from Francois de Joyeuse to include Charles Cawley and others.

    I am more than satisfied that what remains at this present moment gives us all confidence to call ourselves descendants of Robert de Joyeuse. Thank you so much John for this gift, and I call it a gift because it is rare to find someone who takes in all
    of the criticisms and responds with such a mastery of analytical research.

    Thank you!!!

    Darrell
    Darrell, Thanks for letting us know this. What a great development, after the exchanges we had on the other thread recently about evidence for Anne Couvent gateway. Eager to read the new information!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jinny Wallerstedt/Girl 57@21:1/5 to Darrell E. Larocque on Tue Feb 28 07:48:38 2023
    On Saturday, February 25, 2023 at 8:03:06 PM UTC-5, Darrell E. Larocque wrote:
    My response from our Facebook group French Canadian Royal Gateways:

    After reading The Joyeuse Ancestry of the Couvents by John P. DuLong I recommend everyone who is a descendant of Anne Couvent read it. This amazingly well prepared research documents a full throated response to the questions out there regarding the de
    Joyeuse and des Ancherins lineages from Francois de Joyeuse to include Charles Cawley and others.

    I am more than satisfied that what remains at this present moment gives us all confidence to call ourselves descendants of Robert de Joyeuse. Thank you so much John for this gift, and I call it a gift because it is rare to find someone who takes in all
    of the criticisms and responds with such a mastery of analytical research.

    Thank you!!!

    Darrell
    Darrell, Have read through Mr. DeLong's paper and feel great on two levels.

    First, as a descendent of Anne Couvent, I'd been mourning the possible loss -- with the criticisms of Mr. Gagne and Mr. Kokanosky's work -- of a possible royal connection (this is my sole known line with a possible such connection). While remaining open
    to any future developments either way, it's exciting.

    Second, absorbing Mr. DeLong's material is not only interesting but so instructive to a novice genealogical researcher: the history -- national, regional, and local, and how these bring context to, and illuminate, the study of a medieval family. The
    thorough, logical, and nuanced consideration. And the explicit acknowledgement of the legitimacy of Mr. Cawley's and others' concerns.

    Thanks again, Darrell, for your attention to this. And if John DeLong is here, thank you for your work and its great example for those starting to learn how to think "genealogically."

    What a pleasure!

    Jinny

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JPD@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 28 15:14:10 2023
    Not to be too petty, but my surname is DuLong, not Delong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jinny Wallerstedt/Girl 57@21:1/5 to JPD on Wed Mar 1 06:21:40 2023
    On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 6:14:12 PM UTC-5, JPD wrote:
    Not to be too petty, but my surname is DuLong, not Delong.
    Misspelling names is a particular pet peeve of mine! My apologies, John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JPD@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 1 08:44:19 2023
    No problem. I am a bad speller now in English and French.

    By the way, I hope to post an English translation of the 1733 genealogy of the Joyeuse family by next week. I am slowly working my way through the translation done by a friend adding substantive footnotes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jinny Wallerstedt/Girl 57@21:1/5 to JPD on Wed Mar 1 11:24:22 2023
    On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 11:44:20 AM UTC-5, JPD wrote:
    No problem. I am a bad speller now in English and French.

    By the way, I hope to post an English translation of the 1733 genealogy of the Joyeuse family by next week. I am slowly working my way through the translation done by a friend adding substantive footnotes.
    John, Am so glad to hear this translation will come out soon. Am looking forward to reading it. My French is miniscule and what there is of it is rusty...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JPD@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 2 08:59:29 2023
    Today I posted an English translation of the 1733 de Joyeuse genealogy. You can find it at: http://habitant.org/joyeuse/1733_Joyeuse_genalogy_translation.pdf.

    I want to thank Paul-Antoine Lavoie for doing this translation. He worked off the transcription done by Baptiste Étienne. I have made some editorial changes, mostly formatting, and added explanatory footnotes. Frankly, I think this is the sort of
    document that when I return to it in a couple of months I will see more things that need to be explained or clarified. Please do let me know if you spot any mistakes.

    I am confident that between my rebuttal and the evidence posted on my website that all of you can now judge for yourself whether or not François de Joyeuse was indeed the prodigal son of Robert de Joyeuse, Count of Grandpré, and Marguerite Barbançon.

    We owe a debt of gratitude to Roland-Yves Gagné and Laurent Kokanosky for all their hard and exhaustive research they did on the Amiots, Couvents, Longuevals, Joyeuses, and Ancherins families.

    Enjoy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 09:42:13 2023
    John,

    I have a question about one of the armorial lineages you have, namely the one for Thibault I, King of Navarre. The one marriage which I don't see the sourcing for is here:

    "Gaucher de Châtillon, lord of La Fère and St-Lambert, viscount of Blaigny, and Jeanne de Coucy, dame of Havrincourt, married about 1344/1345."

    So far the only source I have found is Duchesne from Medieval Lands:

    Gaucher of Châtillon (-after 10 Mar 1404, bur Igny) Mr JEANNE, daughter of --- (-bur Igny). Duchesne says that “François d'Allouette” records that Gaucher married “ [a] daughter of Enguerran Seigneur de Coucy and Catherine of Austria” and that
    some unprinted memoirs bear that she was from the House of Piqueny ”, noting that the couple founded “ La Chapelle de Fère ” at Igny (no date specified). Duchesne records that and was buried at Igny with his wife

    https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/champorret.htm#GuyChatillondied1362

    The problem is that it contradicts him saying that Jeanne de Coucy married Charles de Châtillon:

    CHARLES de Châtillon (-1401) m firstly JEANNE de Coucy , daughter of ENGUERRAND [VI] Seigneur de Coucy & his wife Katharina of Austria. Duchesne notes that “ François l'Allouette attributes to him one of the daughters of Enguerran lord of Coucy and
    Catherine of Austria as his wife”, called “Jeanne de Coucy by some Memoirs ” [without specifying which], but comments that “ je n 'en ay vu de tiltre”. The accuracy of this information cannot be guaranteed.

    https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/champorret.htm#CharlesChatillondied1401

    Also for Jeanne de Coucy, wife of Charles:

    de Sainte Marie, Père Anselme, and Du Fourny. Histoire généalogique Et Chronologique De La Maison Royale De France: Des Pairs, Grands Officiers De La Couronne Et De La Maison Du Roy, Et Des Anciens Barons Du Royaume ....Tome 6, troisième édition.
    p114. Paris, France: La Compagnie des Libraires, 1730.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ZdlEAAAAcAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JPD@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 13:37:32 2023
    Regarding the armorial lineages for Thibault I, King of Navarre. Checking my memory, I believe I relied on Père Anselme’s Maison royale de France for generation XII. However, I did not use the citation you give, that is, 6:114, but rather 6:125-126.
    This indicates that Gaucher de Châtillon, lord of La Fère and St-Lambert, viscount of Blaigny, was married to Jeanne de Coucy, the daughter of Guillaume, seigneur of Coucy and Marle, and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol. However, when you check 8:544-545
    under Coucy, Jeanne is not listed as a child of Guillaume de Coucy and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol.

    I also checked Duchesne, Preuves de l'histoire des maisons de Guines, d'Ardres, Gand, et Coucy (1631), and find that Jeanne is not mentioned as a child of Enguerrand VI de Coucy and Catherine of Austria or of Guillaume de Coucy and Isabeau of Châtillon-
    St-Pol (see pp. 260-261 and 264). She is not mentioned either in Europäische Stammtafeln, 7, part 2:80-82 under Coucy but is found listed without parents on 7, part 2:19, under Châtillon-sur-Marne.

    I referred to Jeanne as dame of Havrincourt, but I do not see Père Anselme mentioning that title nor any of these other sources. I frankly cannot recall where I got that from as it is not in my notes.

    I would say that there is enough doubt here that it would be better to just say that she was probably of the Coucy family, but her parents are not known with any certainty. I would also drop the dame of Havrincourt. I will adjust the armorial lineage
    accordingly.

    The important point is the Jeanne de Châtillon, the wife of Jean VI de Ghistelles, is still the daughter of Gaucher de Châtillon and the granddaughter of Guy de Châtillon and Marie de Lorraine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 16:24:20 2023
    I referred to Jeanne as dame of Havrincourt, but I do not see Père Anselme mentioning that title nor any of these other sources. I frankly cannot recall where I got that from as it is not in my notes.

    I would say that there is enough doubt here that it would be better to just say that she was probably of the Coucy family, but her parents are not known with any certainty. I would also drop the dame of Havrincourt. I will adjust the armorial lineage
    accordingly.

    The important point is the Jeanne de Châtillon, the wife of Jean VI de Ghistelles, is still the daughter of Gaucher de Châtillon and the granddaughter of Guy de Châtillon and Marie de Lorraine.

    Thank you, John. I thought it was odd that the references to Jeanne de Coucy jumped all over the place. I'm trying to connect the WikiTree profiles of Jeanne de Châtillon backwards and create them as needed. I had no issues placing her within the de Châ
    tillon line but her mother was the only head scratcher at this time.

    If I run across any other snags I'll discuss them here, but for now I don't see any for now.

    Thanks!

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 16:33:33 2023
    I referred to Jeanne as dame of Havrincourt, but I do not see Père Anselme mentioning that title nor any of these other sources. I frankly cannot recall where I got that from as it is not in my notes.

    I would say that there is enough doubt here that it would be better to just say that she was probably of the Coucy family, but her parents are not known with any certainty. I would also drop the dame of Havrincourt. I will adjust the armorial lineage
    accordingly.

    John,

    Thanks to David Kearns (Kearns-867 on WikiTree), he identified the sources of the information you mention.

    "Gaucher de Châtillon ° 1330 + après 10/03/1404 seigneur de La Fèreen-Tardenois et Saint-Lambert, vicomte de Blaigny, X en Flandres (1382), X à Roosebeke et Cassel (transige avec le duc de Lorraine 1365 sans régler tous leurs différends ; vend sa
    châtellenie de La Fère au duc d’Orléans 1394) ép. Jeanne de Coucy ° ~1330 dame d’Havrincourt (62) (fille de Guillaume, seigneur de Coucy et de Marle, et d’Isabeau de Châtillon-Saint-Pol) (ses armes : «Ecartelé, aux 1 & 4, de Châtillon-La F
    re ; aux 2 & 3, de Lorraine»)

    Page 30.

    http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Chatillon.pdf

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 17:03:04 2023
    John,

    I also found on Leo's Genealogics sourcing for this Jeanne de Coucy:

    https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00026227&tree=LEO

    Sources he names:

    Kwartieren van Hendrik III en Willem de Rijke van Nassau, Geldrop, 1965, Roo van Alderwerelt, G. F. de.
    127

    Europäische Stammtafeln, J.A. Stargardt Verlag, Marburg, Schwennicke, Detlev (Ed.).
    26:4 for her parents

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stewart@21:1/5 to Peter Stewart on Sun Mar 12 14:39:26 2023
    On 12-Mar-23 2:32 PM, Peter Stewart wrote:
    On 12-Mar-23 8:37 AM, JPD wrote:
    Regarding the armorial lineages for Thibault I, King of Navarre.
    Checking my memory, I believe I relied on Père Anselme’s Maison royale
    de France for generation XII. However, I did not use the citation you
    give, that is, 6:114, but rather 6:125-126. This indicates that
    Gaucher de Châtillon, lord of La Fère and St-Lambert, viscount of
    Blaigny, was married to Jeanne de Coucy, the daughter of Guillaume,
    seigneur of Coucy and Marle, and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol. However,
    when you check 8:544-545 under Coucy, Jeanne is not listed as a child
    of Guillaume de Coucy and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol.

    I also checked Duchesne, Preuves de l'histoire des maisons de Guines,
    d'Ardres, Gand, et Coucy (1631), and find that Jeanne is not mentioned
    as a child of Enguerrand VI de Coucy and Catherine of Austria or of
    Guillaume de Coucy and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol (see pp. 260-261
    and 264). She is not mentioned either in Europäische Stammtafeln, 7,
    part 2:80-82 under Coucy but is found listed without parents on 7,
    part 2:19, under Châtillon-sur-Marne.

    I referred to Jeanne as dame of Havrincourt, but I do not see Père
    Anselme mentioning that title nor any of these other sources. I
    frankly cannot recall where I got that from as it is not in my notes.

    I would say that there is enough doubt here that it would be better to
    just say that she was probably of the Coucy family, but her parents
    are not known with any certainty.  I would also drop the dame of
    Havrincourt. I will adjust the armorial lineage accordingly.

    According to Maxime de Sars in *Le Laonnais féodal*, vol. 4 (1931) p.
    209, Guillaume, seigneur of Coucy, and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol did
    have a daughter named Jeanne, but she was not married - she was a nun at Notre-Dame de Soissons, where she died on 6 July 1379.

    Her epitaph can be found here (no. 1219) https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k415622q/f578.item.

    Peter Stewart

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stewart@21:1/5 to JPD on Sun Mar 12 14:32:35 2023
    On 12-Mar-23 8:37 AM, JPD wrote:
    Regarding the armorial lineages for Thibault I, King of Navarre. Checking my memory, I believe I relied on Père Anselme’s Maison royale de France for generation XII. However, I did not use the citation you give, that is, 6:114, but rather 6:125-126.
    This indicates that Gaucher de Châtillon, lord of La Fère and St-Lambert, viscount of Blaigny, was married to Jeanne de Coucy, the daughter of Guillaume, seigneur of Coucy and Marle, and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol. However, when you check 8:544-545
    under Coucy, Jeanne is not listed as a child of Guillaume de Coucy and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol.

    I also checked Duchesne, Preuves de l'histoire des maisons de Guines, d'Ardres, Gand, et Coucy (1631), and find that Jeanne is not mentioned as a child of Enguerrand VI de Coucy and Catherine of Austria or of Guillaume de Coucy and Isabeau of Châ
    tillon-St-Pol (see pp. 260-261 and 264). She is not mentioned either in Europäische Stammtafeln, 7, part 2:80-82 under Coucy but is found listed without parents on 7, part 2:19, under Châtillon-sur-Marne.

    I referred to Jeanne as dame of Havrincourt, but I do not see Père Anselme mentioning that title nor any of these other sources. I frankly cannot recall where I got that from as it is not in my notes.

    I would say that there is enough doubt here that it would be better to just say that she was probably of the Coucy family, but her parents are not known with any certainty. I would also drop the dame of Havrincourt. I will adjust the armorial lineage
    accordingly.

    According to Maxime de Sars in *Le Laonnais féodal*, vol. 4 (1931) p.
    209, Guillaume, seigneur of Coucy, and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol did
    have a daughter named Jeanne, but she was not married - she was a nun at Notre-Dame de Soissons, where she died on 6 July 1379.

    She had a brother named Jean (died without issue after 1350) who was
    seigneur of Havrincourt.

    Any information ascribed to François de l'Alouëte, a 16th-century lawyer
    in Sedan, should be treated with extreme caution - he called the
    Austrian wife of Enguerrand VI of Coucy (numbering him V) alternately
    Catherine and Marguerite, says that he died in 1344 (actually 1346),
    that his wife was buried with him at Ourscamp (she married a second
    husband after his death and was buried at Königsfelden), and that they
    had four sons and five daughters (actually only one son is recorded
    apart from l'Alouëte's inventions).

    Peter Stewart

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to Peter Stewart on Sun Mar 12 05:46:03 2023
    On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 7:33:35 PM UTC-5, Peter Stewart wrote:
    According to Maxime de Sars in *Le Laonnais féodal*, vol. 4 (1931) p.
    209, Guillaume, seigneur of Coucy, and Isabeau of Châtillon-St-Pol did
    have a daughter named Jeanne, but she was not married - she was a nun at >Notre-Dame de Soissons, where she died on 6 July 1379.

    I will create a source for this information and add it to the research notes to prevent any duplication of this error.

    Thank you!

    Darrell

    I removed my previous messages relating to the error after the information Peter just presented.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JPD@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 12 07:11:59 2023
    Given the lack of evidence regarding Jeanne, the wife of Gaucher de Châtillon, I think the best thing to do on the armorial lineage is to remove the Coucy arms and just identify her as of unknown or uncertain parentage. The connection to Thibault IV,
    King of Navarre, does not run through her anyway, but through her husband.

    I wonder if something regarding Jeanne could be found in the Cabinet de titres. However, I imagine the Châtillon and Coucy dossiers are huge and would take some time to go through. And likely the most relevant evidence would probably be in the Pièces
    originales which are not all digitized. Frankly, I am happy just leaving her a mystery woman. I have enough other genealogical problems to solve and keep my busy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JPD@21:1/5 to Peter Stewart on Sun Mar 12 07:05:24 2023
    On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 10:39:29 PM UTC-5, Peter Stewart wrote:
    Her epitaph can be found here (no. 1219) https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k415622q/f578.item.
    Peter Stewart

    Thank you for posting this. I would say this removes her from being the wife of Gaucher de Châtillon.

    Duchesne, according to Medieval Lands, also mentioned she might be from the maison de Piqueny. I wonder if this is supposed to be the Picquigny family of Picardy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to JPD on Sun Mar 12 07:47:27 2023
    On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:12:01 AM UTC-4, JPD wrote:
    Given the lack of evidence regarding Jeanne, the wife of Gaucher de Châtillon, I think the best thing to do on the armorial lineage is to remove the Coucy arms and just identify her as of unknown or uncertain parentage. The connection to Thibault IV,
    King of Navarre, does not run through her anyway, but through her husband.

    I created her profile already as Jeanne Unknown and added all of the information presented here in the research notes.

    This is how I phrased it:

    "Jeanne's parents are unknown, and there is no concrete evidence that she fits in with the de Coucy lineage that has been identified. See the Research Notes section for conflated Jeanne de Coucy individuals."

    Thanks again!

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Darrell E. Larocque@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 29 19:28:05 2023
    RE: Nicole de Beauvais, wife of Francois de Joyeuse and mother of Jean de Joyeuse

    I have been looking over the de Beauvais, Seigneur d'Autruche line and I think that Pellot might have missed a son. Pellot provides a Nicolas de Beauvais, Seigneur d'Autruche as the father of Didier and Jean and states he had "at least two sons". The
    approximate chronology suggests that Didier might have been his second son and Francois, father of Nicole de Beauvais, may have been his eldest son and died a young man before 1520 in which he states that Didier was the Seigneur d'Autruche, and of course
    the marriage record he provides on 9 Oct 1536, which names the then deceased Didier, his daughter Marie, brother Jean, and brother Francois de Pouilly.

    Nicole could have been born just before her father died and Didier assumed the title in 1520- the timeline is tight but very possible. It is also not a stretch to assume that her name Nicole could have honored his father Nicolas. I have found the note in
    John DuLong's Cawley response (Note 41) and I think this would be something that would definitely aid in bolstering it. Another nagging question... I have no idea how Pellot knows that Nicolas was the father of Didier and Jean, which is another mystery.
    Where did he get him from?

    Paul Pellot, ''La Famille de Beauvais, Revue d’Ardenne et d’Argonne, 7th year (1899/1900)'', p. 2, p. 8.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=ZTdNAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=snippet&q=%22Didier%20de%20Beauvais%22&f=false

    Darrell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)