• Re: Loomis family

    From taf@21:1/5 to Peter Stewart on Thu Feb 9 15:13:16 2023
    On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 2:35:07 PM UTC-8, Peter Stewart wrote:
    According to a legend in the family of Mabel Loomis Todd, who had a double-adulterous affair with Emily Dickinson's brother Austin, her
    paternal grandfather Nathan Loomis was a direct descendant of Richard
    the Lionheart.

    Does anyone know how this fanciful link was supposedly traced?

    I had not seen this specific claim before. The Loomis family by the end of the 19th century had conjured for their immigrant ancestor a bogus gentry connection, thence royalty, but not specifically to Richard I. I have to think this was a secondary
    embellishment, the specific king chosen for his heroic nature, independent of genealogy, to suit some type of narrative.

    taf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 10 09:35:04 2023
    According to a legend in the family of Mabel Loomis Todd, who had a double-adulterous affair with Emily Dickinson's brother Austin, her
    paternal grandfather Nathan Loomis was a direct descendant of Richard
    the Lionheart.

    Does anyone know how this fanciful link was supposedly traced?

    Peter Stewart

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stewart@21:1/5 to taf on Fri Feb 10 11:29:28 2023
    On 10-Feb-23 10:13 AM, taf wrote:
    On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 2:35:07 PM UTC-8, Peter Stewart wrote:
    According to a legend in the family of Mabel Loomis Todd, who had a
    double-adulterous affair with Emily Dickinson's brother Austin, her
    paternal grandfather Nathan Loomis was a direct descendant of Richard
    the Lionheart.

    Does anyone know how this fanciful link was supposedly traced?

    I had not seen this specific claim before. The Loomis family by the end of the 19th century had conjured for their immigrant ancestor a bogus gentry connection, thence royalty, but not specifically to Richard I. I have to think this was a secondary
    embellishment, the specific king chosen for his heroic nature, independent of genealogy, to suit some type of narrative.

    Ah, perhaps Mabel invented it herself in order to impress Amherst
    society when she first arrived there.

    She was an inveterate embellisher - although she never set eyes on Emily Dickinson until she saw her in an open coffin at her funeral, she
    claimed an intimate friendship with her and became the first editor of
    those gnomic ditties that somehow still have an embellished reputation
    as "great" poetry.

    Peter Stewart


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)