What was the age requirement, if any, for an individual to be involved, as deforcient or plaintiff?1557).
Sir Thomas Palmer, Kt & Katherine (Spalding), deforcients, John & Thomas Cooke, Plaintiffs, "Manor of Heen", etc QC'd to plaintiffs and heirs of John Cooke" (Feet of Fines, East., 3&4 Ph. & Mary [1557])
Ditto, deforcients, to EDWARD COOKE, plaintiff…"Manors of Feeld and Knell... quitclaimed to plaintiff and heirs" (East., 3&4 Ph. & Mary [1557]
Curiously, 1557 was the year that John Cooke of Brodewater died, naming brothers John & Edward. He also mentioned, in his will, sons Anthony, Peter, John, and Thomas. Only Thomas was above 10 years, but not yet 21 yrs, at the writing of the will (8 Sep
Trying to ascertain WHICH "John & Thomas, plaintiffs" were involved in the 1557 Quitclaim.
Jim Cooke
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 1:50:22 PM UTC-5, Jay Cee wrote:Sep 1557).
What was the age requirement, if any, for an individual to be involved, as deforcient or plaintiff?
Sir Thomas Palmer, Kt & Katherine (Spalding), deforcients, John & Thomas Cooke, Plaintiffs, "Manor of Heen", etc QC'd to plaintiffs and heirs of John Cooke" (Feet of Fines, East., 3&4 Ph. & Mary [1557])
Ditto, deforcients, to EDWARD COOKE, plaintiff…"Manors of Feeld and Knell... quitclaimed to plaintiff and heirs" (East., 3&4 Ph. & Mary [1557]
Curiously, 1557 was the year that John Cooke of Brodewater died, naming brothers John & Edward. He also mentioned, in his will, sons Anthony, Peter, John, and Thomas. Only Thomas was above 10 years, but not yet 21 yrs, at the writing of the will (8
Trying to ascertain WHICH "John & Thomas, plaintiffs" were involved in the 1557 Quitclaim.
Jim CookeActually, that should read "John Cooke of Brodewater died, naming brother Edward & a Thomas Cooke [..."relation not given]
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 05:28:00 |
| Calls: | 6,666 |
| Files: | 12,213 |
| Messages: | 5,335,949 |