I'd like to add some evidence relevant to this old discussion. Despite what Blomefield says, the IPM of John de Vaux seems to say that Maud the daughter of John Vaux, first married William Gyney and then secondly remarried to William de Ros? https://archive.org/details/cu31924011387804/page/402/mode/2up
Maybe Blomefield is not wrong? He says that John's own wife Joan de Pelevile was first married to Roger Gyney, evidently the father of that William. I suppose this is not impossible, but if I am reading right then this is extra evidence against Joan dePelevile being mother of Maud de Ros. That would mean that her first husband Roger Gyney was her half brother.
On Sunday, 18 September 2022 at 17:21:44 UTC+1, lancast...@gmail.com wrote:archive.org/details/cu31924011387804/page/402/mode/2up
I'd like to add some evidence relevant to this old discussion. Despite what Blomefield says, the IPM of John de Vaux seems to say that Maud the daughter of John Vaux, first married William Gyney and then secondly remarried to William de Ros? https://
de Pelevile being mother of Maud de Ros. That would mean that her first husband Roger Gyney was her half brother.Maybe Blomefield is not wrong? He says that John's own wife Joan de Pelevile was first married to Roger Gyney, evidently the father of that William. I suppose this is not impossible, but if I am reading right then this is extra evidence against Joan
Douglas Richardson explains John Vaux's widow Sibyl as being the mother of Maud de Ros, and not his first wife Joan de Peleville. In his comment (first post above) he explains that his first wife Joan must have died before 1254. -leaves Sir John's surviving wife, Sibyl, as the candidate to be the mother of the Vaux girls."
"Inasmuch as Joan de Peleville, 1st wife of Sir John de Vaux, must have died sometime between 1250 and 1254, she obviously can not be Sir John's wife who was the mother of his two daughters, Pernel and Maud, both of whom were born after 1254. That
Thank you.
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 4:34:07 PM UTC+2, Richard Ebdon wrote:/archive.org/details/cu31924011387804/page/402/mode/2up
On Sunday, 18 September 2022 at 17:21:44 UTC+1, lancast...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to add some evidence relevant to this old discussion. Despite what Blomefield says, the IPM of John de Vaux seems to say that Maud the daughter of John Vaux, first married William Gyney and then secondly remarried to William de Ros? https:/
Joan de Pelevile being mother of Maud de Ros. That would mean that her first husband Roger Gyney was her half brother.Maybe Blomefield is not wrong? He says that John's own wife Joan de Pelevile was first married to Roger Gyney, evidently the father of that William. I suppose this is not impossible, but if I am reading right then this is extra evidence against
leaves Sir John's surviving wife, Sibyl, as the candidate to be the mother of the Vaux girls."Douglas Richardson explains John Vaux's widow Sibyl as being the mother of Maud de Ros, and not his first wife Joan de Peleville. In his comment (first post above) he explains that his first wife Joan must have died before 1254. -
"Inasmuch as Joan de Peleville, 1st wife of Sir John de Vaux, must have died sometime between 1250 and 1254, she obviously can not be Sir John's wife who was the mother of his two daughters, Pernel and Maud, both of whom were born after 1254. That
might be worth mentioning.Thank you.Hi Richard, yes, I think I understood that correctly, and it was not the aim of my post to question that reasoning. I came to this family from a different direction and noticed a different line of evidence which leads to a similar conclusion. I felt it
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 05:14:19 |
| Calls: | 6,666 |
| Files: | 12,213 |
| Messages: | 5,335,948 |