• Re: King's Kinsfolk: Richard II's kinsman, Edmund Stafford

    From J. Sardina@21:1/5 to Peter Sutton on Sun May 1 11:16:19 2022
    On Monday, November 28, 2005 at 4:49:16 PM UTC-5, Peter Sutton wrote:
    Whoever she was, the following court case quoted in SC XV page 122, shown that the wife of Nicholas Beke and the mother of Elizabeth Beke, was married to Sir Nicholas by 30 March 1347.
    At a plea of Assize taken at Lichfield before Hugh Huls and Roger Horton, with whom was associated Thomas Heuster, Justices assigned, etc., on the Tuesday after the Feast of St. Peter ad Vincula 9 H. IV -
    "...............The jury stated that as regarded the manor of Teyne, one Nicholas Beek, chivaler, the grandfather of Matilda the plaintiff, and whose heir she was, viz. father of Elizabeth, mother of the said Matilda, was formerly seised in demesne as of fee of the manor, and by his deed which was given in evidence, and which was dated from Teyne the Friday after the Feast of the Annunciation 21 E.III, had granted it to one John Beek, the parson of Chekeley, and the said John Beek, being so seised of the manor, had reconveyed it to the said Nicholas, and to one Joan, late his wife, and to the heirs of their bodies, and after the deaths of Nicholas and Joan, the said manor of Teyne descended to one Elizabeth, as their daughter and heir ...................."
    Peter Sutton

    Hello,

    It has been quite a long time since this posting, but I would like to know if there are any alternatives to the wife of Nicholas Beke and mother of Elizabeth.

    Looking through the wikipedia article on John de Ipstones, it gives a footnote on his lawsuit against Matilda Swynnerton.
    It mentions that John claimed that Matilda was illegitimate and therefore could not inherit Beke properties.

    The reference for the footnote takes us a Collections for a History of Staffordshiere, listing Extracts from Plead Rolls, p. 169

    https://archive.org/details/collectionsforhi13staf/page/168/mode/2up?view=theater

    It has a footnote commenting on John's claim, which may have been that Matilda was illegitimate because her parents were within prohibited degrees of consanguinity, but the summary does not explain how, or if that was true. It seems that the bishop of
    Coventry was going to decide on the matter.


    J. Sardina

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)