I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travelfrom North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
How did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?There is no one size fits all during the Middle Ages. What might be a longish way for a knight with just a few manors would be comparatively insignificant for an earl with manors in six different counties. Nonetheless, travel would be a normal part of
On Sunday, 27 March 2022 at 14:27:32 UTC+1, Girl57 wrote:from North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travel
a lord and lady's life (see the illustration in the Luttrell Psalter at https://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/ttp/luttrell/accessible/pages25and26.html#content). They would travel from one demesne to another (manors used personally by the lord rather thanHow did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?There is no one size fits all during the Middle Ages. What might be a longish way for a knight with just a few manors would be comparatively insignificant for an earl with manors in six different counties. Nonetheless, travel would be a normal part of
The well-to-do would send a servant as a messenger with verbal instructions, often confirmed in writing. Peasants might be illiterate, although not necessarily so; judging by the number of psalters and books of hours that were produced, knightlyfamilies and their officers could read well enough. Sir Thomas Gray of Heton, a professional soldier and son of a professional soldier, read works in French and Latin before dictating his 'Scalachronica'. (Compare twentieth-century business men dictating
Peter HowarthThank you so much, Peter. So helpful and interesting. I have no earls in my direct ancestry but do have some knights and non-knighted gentry..."gentlemen." My question was mostly for understanding of gentlemen who lived in Notts and Derby, whose
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travelfrom North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
How did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?
On 27/03/2022 14:27, Girl57 wrote:from North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travel
How did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?
It depended on who you were and on circumstances.Ian, thanks so much for this. So interesting to start learning about the details of daily life. All that walking must have kept people fit! I haven't been sure about the lives of tenants-in-chief and "gentlemen," and whether these folks would have
The king and the larger landowners had estates up and down the country
and their courts would travel around them. Anyone under obligation to
attend one of the courts would also have to travel. The courts would,
of course, provide a common meeting point, both time and place, for
people whose homes might be further apart so in your example of marriage contract negotiation attendance at court might provide the opportunity.
At the other extreme a non-free manorial tenant would be confined to the lord's lands and be subject to arrest if he left (enforcing this on
another lord's lands might be problematic, of course).
Nevertheless the tenant would have occasion to attend the manorial
court. This might not be a big deal if the court was in the village but
in a large manor such as Wakefield for a tenant in one of the outlying townships this would take a full day, about 20 miles each way, probably walking, plus attendance at court. The elected officers would have to
do that every three weeks so quite often anyone with routine property transactions would have someone who had to attend on other business do
it for them. However, if the lord had to contribute to the army a
tenant might find himself in Scotland (an experience of some Wakefield tenants) or wherever.
On the other hand drovers, carters and carriers would depend on making
long distance journeys to major cities and fairs. In the post-medieval
there were certainly pack-horse operators running a regular service
between Kendal and London. It seems likely that this would extend back
into the medieval - without maps a regular journey from Kendal to London would be feasible, taking on odd commisions - Kendal to Tavistock, then Exeter to Norwich, Kings Lynn to Swansea, Cardiff to London - would be a recipe for getting lost. That sort of regular travel would provide a
means of conveying messages for those who could not afford their own messengers.
He had served as esquire of the body to King Henry VII. Would that have been considered a good marriage for Thomas's FitzRandolph family of gentlemen?
On 27/03/2022 17:39, Girl57 wrote:I am encountering mention of Chesterfield quite a lot, and Aldwarke re: Foljambes. And finding that my FitzRandolphs were both Notts and Derby folks. The FitzRandolph pedigree in one of the Visitations has a note that Christopher Fitz -- whose son
He had served as esquire of the body to King Henry VII. Would that have been considered a good marriage for Thomas's FitzRandolph family of gentlemen?Someone in daily contact with the king was in a very privileged
position. Plenty of opportunities for "Could you put in a good word for
me with His Majesty?" along with a suitable consideration.
Your Foljambes probably transplanted my Knuttons across the Pennines.
They administered the Forest of the Peak and Knutton, now part of
Newcastle under Lyme, would have come under their remit. The place name doesn't seem to have given rise to a surname over on that side; the
first Knuttons I've found were settled close to Chesterfield but seem to have been thinly scattered where the Foljambes had property. The
earliest records are in the Foljambe documents. I think somebody "de Knutton" was taken into their employ and he or a descendent was granted
land in Barlow.
Ian
Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 6:27:32 AM UTC-7, Girl57 wrote:disparate holdings, while likewise, a major tenant at one holding might be brought together with a major tenant of another, for the purposes of negotiating an intermarriage, though the intercession of their lord.
Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?To supplement what others have said by addressing this particular point, it was not unusual. As early as Domesday, one can see more prominent men with holdings spread across the country, and in turn their vassals might show up in multiple of their
Separately, London was a magnet, drawing younger sons and those politically inclined into its orbit from all over the country, and as such it served as a venue for the mid-level gentry from all over the country to intermix and intermarry. In additionto those going to London to, for example, serve in Parliament, a look at court cases and wills from the countryside often name younger sons as being 'of London', and they can sometimes be found in London records as, for example, Livery Company or Inns of
taftaf, this makes complete sense. It doesn't sound all that easy being a younger son, does it...though I'm sure heirs had lots of challenges of their own. This brings up another question: Did noble and gentry families tend to stay pretty "united" or what
It doesn't sound all that easy being a younger son, does it...though I'm sure heirs had lots of challenges of their own.
This brings up another question: Did noble and gentry families tend to stay pretty "united" or what we might think of as close-knit, or was this hard due to soldiering and wars, far-flung land holdings, arranged marriages that might have takendaughters a long way, etc.? Or did those relationships depend largely on the same things that they do now?
Also wondering if many of the immigrants to America were younger sons, or younger sons of younger sons of younger sons, whose own resources and prospects weren't all that good.
It must have been hard to take that leave, and for families and emigrants to realize they would likely never see each other again. How hard was it for families separated by an ocean to get news to one another? Thank you, as always.
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 6:14:14 AM UTC-7, Girl57 wrote:marriage settlement, for a younger son to be entailed with some property. If a family was overendowed with sons (or underendowed with land), such that there was not enough property to go around without endangering the financial viability of the main
It doesn't sound all that easy being a younger son, does it...though I'm sure heirs had lots of challenges of their own.I would suggest that it depended on whom one was a younger son of, and how far down the pecking order one fell, both in society and within the family. We think of land being inherited entirely by the eldest son, but it was quite common, as part of a
daughters a long way, etc.? Or did those relationships depend largely on the same things that they do now?This brings up another question: Did noble and gentry families tend to stay pretty "united" or what we might think of as close-knit, or was this hard due to soldiering and wars, far-flung land holdings, arranged marriages that might have taken
I would say the latter, pretty much as now. Baring some intrafamily conflict, they were relatively close at first, but as they became separated by time and generations and distance the threads of connection became progressively thinner.Virginia and Maryland, before the system evolved into one of race-based enslavement, there was a huge demand for indentured servants to carry out the often-deadly labors, to the degree that there would be occasional sweeps through the poor neighborhoods
Also wondering if many of the immigrants to America were younger sons, or younger sons of younger sons of younger sons, whose own resources and prospects weren't all that good.Certainly some of the imigrants were such, but many were not gentry at all. They were tradesmen, religious dissenters, grass-is-greener types, or those with wanderlust. There were also substantial numbers who were extremely poor. Particularly for
inland). Given the volume of immigration, and the return of those immigrant ships with cargo, one could usually find a ship to take your letter, subject to the vicissitudes of the sea. Much less frequetly, while in most cases it was a one-off crossing,It must have been hard to take that leave, and for families and emigrants to realize they would likely never see each other again. How hard was it for families separated by an ocean to get news to one another? Thank you, as always.This would have dependend on circumstance. Someone living in Boston or Philadelphia would have had an easier time than someone living significantly inland (and likewise in England if they were communicating with someone in a port city versus someone
tafThere certainly were younger sons of the gentry who didn't suceeed in the trades and whose descendants fell further down the social ladder, though.
There certainly were younger sons of the gentry who didn't suceeed in the trades and whose descendants fell further down the social ladder, though.
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 4:15:00 PM UTC-7, Paulo Ricardo Canedo wrote:in any of the rebellions/conflicts of the era, or simply losing one's property due to profligate spending, even the lines of eldest sons could find themselves in this condition.
There certainly were younger sons of the gentry who didn't suceeed in the trades and whose descendants fell further down the social ladder, though.Indeed, the church registers are replete with common people bearing surnames suggesting derivation from gentry families, but one didn't have to be a younger son to fall on hard times. With a finite chance of being attainted for picking the wrong side
taf
A terça-feira, 29 de março de 2022 à(s) 04:59:09 UTC+1, taf escreveu:in any of the rebellions/conflicts of the era, or simply losing one's property due to profligate spending, even the lines of eldest sons could find themselves in this condition.
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 4:15:00 PM UTC-7, Paulo Ricardo Canedo wrote:
There certainly were younger sons of the gentry who didn't suceeed in the trades and whose descendants fell further down the social ladder, though.Indeed, the church registers are replete with common people bearing surnames suggesting derivation from gentry families, but one didn't have to be a younger son to fall on hard times. With a finite chance of being attainted for picking the wrong side
rate such ocurrences? Yeomen were in between gentlemen and husbandmen.tafI know, but it was certainly was more common among younger sons.
Also, what do you think of the case of Mary Melford, daughter of gentleman Thomas Melford, who married husbandma Humphrey Need? See https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Melford-7. The profile says Humphrey was said to have gotten lucky. How rare would you
Also, what do you think of the case of Mary Melford, daughter of gentleman Thomas Melford,
who married husbandma Humphrey Need? See https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Melford-7.
The profile says Humphrey was said to have gotten lucky. How rare would you rate such
ocurrences? Yeomen were in between gentlemen and husbandmen.
taf, thank you for all the great learning. And Paulo, I'll be interested to hear the answer
to your question. Also...could "yeoman" mean tradesman or artisan...not a gentleman,
not a worker of the land?
I'm also wondering about the artisans and tradesmen, and where they worked, and whether
manors sometimes had their own or whether they tended to live and work in villages?
About education, I recently found my Edward FitzRandolph -- or one of his cousins of the same
name -- on a list of Oxford students. It says he matriculated in the 1570s or 1580s and that he
was 10 years old at the time. Is this probably correct or a transcription error...it sounds young.
Did gentlemen like Edward's father send their sons to university in those times for prestige, or
was the aim a much more practical one related to professional prospects?
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 1:28:30 AM UTC-7, Paulo Ricardo Canedo wrote:Humphrey 'getting lucky' is just a modern person viewing things through a static class-based perspective that equates social status with success.
Also, what do you think of the case of Mary Melford, daughter of gentleman Thomas Melford,Entirely ordinary. On a local level, there would not have been that much of a social distinction between a lowest-level gentleman who held a small farm and a respected neighboring husbandman operating a farm for an absentee owner. The comment about
who married husbandma Humphrey Need? See https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Melford-7.
The profile says Humphrey was said to have gotten lucky. How rare would you rate such
ocurrences? Yeomen were in between gentlemen and husbandmen.
While there is a tendency to view social status as distinct rungs on a ladder, on the ground it was more like a continuous gradient (except for the very highest level), with people theoretically occupying the same rung in actuality being quitedifferent, and at the same time people ostensibly occupying different rungs having equivalent or even inverted status, depending on property, money, proximity to court, etc.
tafThanks for the reply, Todd.
Also...could "yeoman" mean tradesman or artisan...not a gentleman, not a worker of the land?
On 29/03/2022 14:26, Girl57 wrote:Thank you, Ian. So interesting. This helps give me a better idea of continuum of societal positions rather than clear-cut strata. It makes sense that a single household could have junior members producing and senior members doing more of the marketing
Also...could "yeoman" mean tradesman or artisan...not a gentleman, not a worker of the land?In Wills of clothiers on both sides of the Pennines testators were
likely to describe themselves as yeomen. "Clothier" was a fairly wide-ranging description but generally covered a combination of farming
and participation in the woollen business.
The business participation might vary. At one end would be a household
with junior members and/or wife carding and spinning with the clothier weaving and going to market to sell the cloth and buy wool. At the
other extreme he might be an entrepreneur travelling very widely buying
and selling backed up by other family members and out-workers. The
Beardsell family of Holme climbed the ladder from the one to the other.
My 5xggfather John Goddard who died in the 1750s left a will in which
the residual legatee was his first grandson (there seems to have been a problem with his eldest son which made him unreliable). Unfortunately
the grandson died intestate and the property ended up being listed in
the manorial rolls - Wakefield manorial rolls vol x p172 et seq,
available at archive.org. Excerpts form will online at http://www.jearnshaw.me.uk/tree/956.htm He was probably at the higher
end of the property scale.
There are a number of other Wills, largely clothiers, at http://familytree.dearnley.com/reports/index.htm including one apparent clothier who was a Sir John Goddard. I think he was probably from
Sheffield in the retinue of the Talbots, Lords of Sheffield and Glossop
and settled in Glossop in retirement.
Ian
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travelfrom North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
How did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?
On Sunday, 27 March 2022 at 14:27:32 UTC+1, Girl57 wrote:from North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travel
1700. This is a 'medieval' group and so you are going to get a bias towards the early years (for instance, in what the term 'yeoman' means). Ian Goddard is unusual in that he comes originally from an Early Modern research experience and has movedHow did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?I think you have a problem here with the Medieval/Early Modern generalisations. Historians have 'separated' the two 'periods' because they have distinct differences. What's a fair description for 1400 is not necessarily applicable to 1500, 1600, or
To give you a fact. My ancestor, Daniel Dickinson, was employed as a courier between Penrith in the north of England and London in the 1660s. The journey took him three days, using a postal system for exchange of horses that wasn't available 20 yearsearlier.
https://archiveweb.cumbria.gov.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=BDHJ%2f220%2f1%2f14&pos=1Urgent business for the King...how wonderful! And Daniel Dickinson's fresh horse is a great example of how things change, isn't it? A straight line of your surname from Daniel to you must make you feel specially connected to him.
Chris
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 1:28:30 AM UTC-7, Paulo Ricardo Canedo wrote:Humphrey 'getting lucky' is just a modern person viewing things through a static class-based perspective that equates social status with success.
Also, what do you think of the case of Mary Melford, daughter of gentleman Thomas Melford,Entirely ordinary. On a local level, there would not have been that much of a social distinction between a lowest-level gentleman who held a small farm and a respected neighboring husbandman operating a farm for an absentee owner. The comment about
who married husbandma Humphrey Need? See https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Melford-7.
The profile says Humphrey was said to have gotten lucky. How rare would you rate such
ocurrences? Yeomen were in between gentlemen and husbandmen.
While there is a tendency to view social status as distinct rungs on a ladder, on the ground it was more like a continuous gradient (except for the very highest level), with people theoretically occupying the same rung in actuality being quitedifferent, and at the same time people ostensibly occupying different rungs having equivalent or even inverted status, depending on property, money, proximity to court, etc.
tafAlso, note their son also named Humphrey Need was a yeoman which indicates the family was rising.
Ian Goddard is unusual in that he comes originally from an Early Modern research experience and has moved medieval over the last 20 years (I hope, Ian, you don't mind me saying that!
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business.
On 27/03/2022 14:27, Girl57 wrote:Ian, thank you. This is enormously helpful. As an American who never studied medieval history, even becoming familiar with entry-level terminology from the periods being worked on here is proving challenging. The PBS program sounds fantastic.
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business.Here's one I came across yesterday. It would be fair to say the Greens
became a local gentry family in the Holmfirth area but in the C13th they
were definitely villeins. We find them in the 1st volume of the
Wakefield manorial rolls (archive.org).
In the 1280s (p 183) we discover that Richard del Grene nevertheless had
a servant.
In the 1290s (p242) it's confirmed that he was a villein and that he had bought property in Pontefract, Barnsley and Skelmanthorpe. We don't
know exactly where he was living but it may well have been at
Greenhouse, unlabelled but pointed to by the arrow here: https://streetmap.co.uk/map?x=411765&y=405547&z=115&sv=411765,405547&st=4&ar=y&mapp=map&searchp=ids&dn=784&ax=411765&ay=405547&lm=0
You can zoom out to find the relationship to the places mentioned.
Leaving aside the fact that a villein could buy what would almost
certainly have been free property in his manorial lord's rival's
territory Pontefract would have been about 30 miles distant, Barnsley a little over half that and Skelly about half that to Barnsley.
He was subsequently (p252) required to find pledges that he would not
remove his goods out of the manor. He found pledges (p257) and his
stock is listed at 3 oxen, 3 cows, 24 sheep & 10 quarters of oats (the principle grain in the area).
Ian
On Sunday, 27 March 2022 at 14:27:32 UTC+1, Girl57 wrote:from North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to travel
1700. This is a 'medieval' group and so you are going to get a bias towards the early years (for instance, in what the term 'yeoman' means). Ian Goddard is unusual in that he comes originally from an Early Modern research experience and has movedHow did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?I think you have a problem here with the Medieval/Early Modern generalisations. Historians have 'separated' the two 'periods' because they have distinct differences. What's a fair description for 1400 is not necessarily applicable to 1500, 1600, or
To give you a fact. My ancestor, Daniel Dickinson, was employed as a courier between Penrith in the north of England and London in the 1660s. The journey took him three days, using a postal system for exchange of horses that wasn't available 20 yearsearlier.
https://archiveweb.cumbria.gov.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=BDHJ%2f220%2f1%2f14&pos=1
Chris
On Monday, 4 April 2022 at 19:06:05 UTC+1, Chris Dickinson wrote:travel from North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
On Sunday, 27 March 2022 at 14:27:32 UTC+1, Girl57 wrote:
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to
1700. This is a 'medieval' group and so you are going to get a bias towards the early years (for instance, in what the term 'yeoman' means). Ian Goddard is unusual in that he comes originally from an Early Modern research experience and has movedHow did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?I think you have a problem here with the Medieval/Early Modern generalisations. Historians have 'separated' the two 'periods' because they have distinct differences. What's a fair description for 1400 is not necessarily applicable to 1500, 1600, or
earlier.To give you a fact. My ancestor, Daniel Dickinson, was employed as a courier between Penrith in the north of England and London in the 1660s. The journey took him three days, using a postal system for exchange of horses that wasn't available 20 years
London guilds (who had interests everwhere). There were long established routes dating back to the Romans, both inland and local. Local activity would have centered on a nearby market town, which everyone would have used; and maybe a nearby biggerhttps://archiveweb.cumbria.gov.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=BDHJ%2f220%2f1%2f14&pos=1
ChrisThere was probably more travelling than you imagine. Pre-Reformation, there were links between religious houses and by pilgrimage (Chaucer's prologue to the Canterbury Tales give a flavour). Universities provided further population mix, as did the
At a more local level, certain trades required not only specialist skills but capital as well. Smithery and milling especially. At the end of your apprenticeship, you would be prepared to travel quite far to find a position and a mill or forge all ofyour own.
Daniel Dickinson's father, William, was steward to the Lamplugh family of Lamplugh Hall in Lamplugh in Cumberland . As well as travelling off with his master to do battle at Marston Moor in Yorkshire, a set of accounts have survided that detail takinghis 'Mistress' [ie Mrs Lamplugh] to visit her family in County Durham. They travelled with her maid and two men. I get the impression that one of the men was sent ahead to find accommodation, with the other remaining as a guard. The 'holiday' lasted
ChrisChris, This is exactly the kind of context I need...and what great "color." Thank you so much. It must have been thrilling for you to discover these details about William. It just occurred to me that I need to return to the Canterbury Tales! The thing
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 3:57:35 PM UTC-4, Chris Dickinson wrote:travel from North Yorkshire to London? Was it usual for parents to make marriage contracts with a son or daughter's prospective spouse who lived a "long" way away? For a man to acquire an advowson in another shire?
On Monday, 4 April 2022 at 19:06:05 UTC+1, Chris Dickinson wrote:
On Sunday, 27 March 2022 at 14:27:32 UTC+1, Girl57 wrote:
I haven't yet learned about how medieval and early modern English families traveled for visiting and business. Was it typical for people to go 100 miles or more, for example, to visit family? Was it a big deal and did it take a lot of prep to
1700. This is a 'medieval' group and so you are going to get a bias towards the early years (for instance, in what the term 'yeoman' means). Ian Goddard is unusual in that he comes originally from an Early Modern research experience and has movedHow did people communicate in those times...by letter? How did word of a death or another important event happen quickly? How did people who lived some distance from each other work on the details of a marriage contract, for example?I think you have a problem here with the Medieval/Early Modern generalisations. Historians have 'separated' the two 'periods' because they have distinct differences. What's a fair description for 1400 is not necessarily applicable to 1500, 1600, or
years earlier.To give you a fact. My ancestor, Daniel Dickinson, was employed as a courier between Penrith in the north of England and London in the 1660s. The journey took him three days, using a postal system for exchange of horses that wasn't available 20
London guilds (who had interests everwhere). There were long established routes dating back to the Romans, both inland and local. Local activity would have centered on a nearby market town, which everyone would have used; and maybe a nearby biggerhttps://archiveweb.cumbria.gov.uk/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=BDHJ%2f220%2f1%2f14&pos=1
ChrisThere was probably more travelling than you imagine. Pre-Reformation, there were links between religious houses and by pilgrimage (Chaucer's prologue to the Canterbury Tales give a flavour). Universities provided further population mix, as did the
your own.At a more local level, certain trades required not only specialist skills but capital as well. Smithery and milling especially. At the end of your apprenticeship, you would be prepared to travel quite far to find a position and a mill or forge all of
taking his 'Mistress' [ie Mrs Lamplugh] to visit her family in County Durham. They travelled with her maid and two men. I get the impression that one of the men was sent ahead to find accommodation, with the other remaining as a guard. The 'holiday'Daniel Dickinson's father, William, was steward to the Lamplugh family of Lamplugh Hall in Lamplugh in Cumberland . As well as travelling off with his master to do battle at Marston Moor in Yorkshire, a set of accounts have survided that detail
that strikes me is how much activity, interaction, and travel there were...This probably sounds silly to historians and others educated in these periods of history...but somehow it's easy to imagine things being much more spare, and even primitive, thanChrisChris, This is exactly the kind of context I need...and what great "color." Thank you so much. It must have been thrilling for you to discover these details about William. It just occurred to me that I need to return to the Canterbury Tales! The thing
And of course cathedral-building required all kinds of skills beyond local. I live in United States, and I remember the first time I saw Washington Cathedral, in D.C....A thing of such wonder. I decided I had to work there during college and did...Exploring all the nooks and crannies and almost feeling like it was my house. We just don't HAVE that stuff here, for the most part, as Europeans do!! I love to imagine the market towns and fairs. I have read the will of one ancestor who lived in
Thank you again, Chris, for your time. Hoping to get better up to speed with my (old) new Oxford Companion to Family and Local History...It covers basics, including definitions, that will really help, too.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 292 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 207:17:31 |
Calls: | 6,618 |
Files: | 12,168 |
Messages: | 5,317,001 |