Hi I have only been following this site for about six months , so I don't know if prior to that time these questions have been asked and answered . I have several questions about the illegitimate offspring of England's Kings . 1.) Did King Henry I havethe most ? 2.) Does King Charles II have the most "prominent" ? 3.) Have all of the illegitimate offspring of England's Kings been identified ? (So there shouldn't be anyone in the 21st century being able to prove that they are a direct illegitimate
Hi I have only been following this site for about six months , so I don't know if prior to that time these questions have been asked and answered . I have several questions about the illegitimate offspring of England's Kings . 1.) Did King Henry I havethe most ? 2.) Does King Charles II have the most "prominent" ? 3.) Have all of the illegitimate offspring of England's Kings been identified ? (So there shouldn't be anyone in the 21st century being able to prove that they are a direct illegitimate
I have several questions about the illegitimate offspring of England's Kings . 1.) Did King Henry I have the most ?
2.) Does King Charles II have the most "prominent" ?
3.) Have all of the illegitimate offspring of England's Kings been identified ?
(So there shouldn't be anyone in the 21st century being able to prove that they are a direct illegitimate descendant of a certain King ?)
2.) Does King Charles II have the most "prominent" ?I guess it depends on how one defines prominent. Seems subjective
to me. I would argue that Robert of Gloucester was the most prominent
of them all,
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 65:36:49 |
Calls: | 6,654 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,331,846 |