• a proper birth/baptism date for Jan van Gent/John of Gaunt

    From Enno Borgsteede@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 21 13:49:53 2021
    On the English Wikipedia page for John of Gaunt

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Gaunt

    it is suggested that he was born 6 March 1340 in Ghent, without further qualification of the exact location. On the Dutch page however,

    https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_van_Gent

    there is a specific location, Saint Bavo's Abbey, and a later date: 24 June 1340.

    Can anyone enlighten me on the option that both dates may be true, meaning that the first is of his birth, and the second of his baptism, 3 months later, for which an abbey seems like a proper location.

    Or was he born in the abbey, and should I either select one of these dates, or take both with a grain of salt?

    Confused ...

    Enno

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stewart@21:1/5 to Enno Borgsteede on Mon Nov 22 08:20:07 2021
    On 21-Nov-21 11:49 PM, Enno Borgsteede wrote:
    On the English Wikipedia page for John of Gaunt

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Gaunt

    it is suggested that he was born 6 March 1340 in Ghent, without further qualification of the exact location. On the Dutch page however,

    https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_van_Gent

    there is a specific location, Saint Bavo's Abbey, and a later date: 24
    June 1340.

    Can anyone enlighten me on the option that both dates may be true,
    meaning that the first is of his birth, and the second of his baptism, 3 months later, for which an abbey seems like a proper location.

    Or was he born in the abbey, and should I either select one of these
    dates, or take both with a grain of salt?

    24 June 1340 is the date of the battle of Sluys, won by John's father. Afterwards Edward went back to Ghent, where he had spent the winter (he
    awarded himself the title 'king of France' there in January 1340). John
    had been born in Ghent during the king's absence in March (Edward had
    left for England in February).

    The birth happened at the abbey of St Bavo because that is where the
    pregnant queen lodged from her arrival. The precise date 6 March is not certain.

    Peter Stewart

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Stewart@21:1/5 to Peter Stewart on Mon Nov 22 11:18:10 2021
    On 22-Nov-21 8:20 AM, Peter Stewart wrote:
    On 21-Nov-21 11:49 PM, Enno Borgsteede wrote:
    On the English Wikipedia page for John of Gaunt

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Gaunt

    it is suggested that he was born 6 March 1340 in Ghent, without
    further qualification of the exact location. On the Dutch page however,

    https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_van_Gent

    there is a specific location, Saint Bavo's Abbey, and a later date: 24
    June 1340.

    Can anyone enlighten me on the option that both dates may be true,
    meaning that the first is of his birth, and the second of his baptism,
    3 months later, for which an abbey seems like a proper location.

    Or was he born in the abbey, and should I either select one of these
    dates, or take both with a grain of salt?

    24 June 1340 is the date of the battle of Sluys, won by John's father. Afterwards Edward went back to Ghent, where he had spent the winter (he awarded himself the title 'king of France' there in January 1340). John
    had been born in Ghent during the king's absence in March (Edward had
    left for England in February).

    The birth happened at the abbey of St Bavo because that is where the
    pregnant queen lodged from her arrival. The precise date 6 March is not certain.

    John's baptism presumably took place in Ghent shortly after the sea
    battle on 24 June 1340 - Edward landed at Sluys and rode on to Ghent
    after sending news of the victory to his allies including Jean III of
    Brabant and supporters including Jacob van Artevelde at Thun-l'Évêque
    near Cambrai. Jean of Brabant was the godfather after whom John of Gaunt
    was named, and he held him at the font according to Froissart. An early-15th-century chronicle written at Saint-Denis claims that Jakob
    van Artevelde was the boy's godfather and held him at the font, but it
    is scarcely plausible that a burgess of Ghent was chosen as godfather to
    an English prince, or that if this actually happened it would not have
    been widely reported as a very extraordinary incident.

    Peter Stewart

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)