• Partingale surname

    From Jenny M Benson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 25 23:20:24 2021
    Does anyone know if the surname Partingale is one of those delightfully idiosyncratic names that are designed to trap the unwary? (Like
    Mainwaring, Cholmondeley, Happisburgh, etc.)

    I came across mention in a Will of someone named as Maria Partingale. I
    have found her in a Census as Partingale, but it has been "corrected" by
    a user to Portnell. I have also found the Marriage Register entry
    where her husband and the vicar have written his surname as Portnell.

    It wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that Partingale is correctly
    pronounced Portnell.

    --
    Jenny M Benson
    Wrexham, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nigel Reed@21:1/5 to Jenny on Fri Mar 5 00:52:36 2021
    + User FidoNet address: 1:124/5016
    Jenny wrote:
    From: Jenny M Benson <NemoNews@hotmail.co.uk>

    Does anyone know if the surname Partingale is one of those delightfully idiosyncratic names that are designed to trap the unwary? (Like
    Mainwaring, Cholmondeley, Happisburgh, etc.)

    I came across mention in a Will of someone named as Maria Partingale. I
    have found her in a Census as Partingale, but it has been "corrected" by
    a user to Portnell. I have also found the Marriage Register entry
    where her husband and the vicar have written his surname as Portnell.

    It wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that Partingale is correctly pronounced Portnell.

    This message only just showed up here. That may explain the lack of success you've had, as you mention in the Google group.

    Also, according to Google, there are plenty of references to the name Partingale. Maybe the person who submitted the correction was mistaken?
    --
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    + The FidoNet News Gate (Huntsville, AL - USA) +
    + The views of this user are strictly his or her own. + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ian Goddard@21:1/5 to Nigel Reed on Fri Mar 5 10:24:37 2021
    On 05/03/2021 00:52, Nigel Reed wrote:
    + User FidoNet address: 1:124/5016

    This message only just showed up here. That may explain the lack of success you've had, as you mention in the Google group.

    Also, according to Google, there are plenty of references to the name Partingale. Maybe the person who submitted the correction was mistaken?
    --
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    + The FidoNet News Gate (Huntsville, AL - USA) +
    + The views of this user are strictly his or her own. + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


    Nigel,

    It showed up on my ISP's feed, which is essentially Giganews, so maybe
    the delay you're seeing is the FidoNet gateway's.

    Ian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john@21:1/5 to Jenny M Benson on Fri Mar 5 22:52:25 2021
    On 26/02/2021 00:20, Jenny M Benson wrote:
    Does anyone know if the surname Partingale is one of those delightfully idiosyncratic names that are designed to trap the unwary?  (Like Mainwaring, Cholmondeley, Happisburgh, etc.)

    I came across mention in a Will of someone named as Maria Partingale.  I have found her in a Census as Partingale, but it has been "corrected" by
    a user to  Portnell.  I have also found the Marriage Register entry
    where her husband and the vicar have written his surname as Portnell.

    It wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that Partingale is correctly pronounced Portnell.


    Perhaps Partingale is another variation of Portingale?

    from https://tinyurl.com/ybaxls2c
    Portingale Spelling Variations
    Spelling variations of this family name include: Petingale, Pettengill, Pettingale, Pettengill, Pettingall, Petnal, Pettnall, Pettnel,
    Pettinell, Pettinall, Pettengell and many more.
    and also https://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Portingale

    In the 1881 census it is very rare https://britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/partingale/
    As are Portnell https://britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/portnell/stats
    and Portingale https://britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/portingale/stats

    You could explore links in https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/England_Personal_Names

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jenny M Benson@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 6 13:10:56 2021
    from https://tinyurl.com/ybaxls2c
    Portingale Spelling Variations
    Spelling variations of this family name include: Petingale, Pettengill, Pettingale, Pettengill, Pettingall, Petnal, Pettnall, Pettnel,
    Pettinell, Pettinall, Pettengell and many more.
    and also https://www.surnamedb.com/Surname/Portingale

    I've looked at the Will again and it is definitely spelled Partingale or Partingall there, but that doesn't mean it wasn't spelled with an o
    elsewhere. I'm more than ever convinced that Portnell was the (local) pronunciation of the "correct" Partingale or Portingale.

    In the 1881 census it is very rare https://britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/partingale/
    As are Portnell https://britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/portnell/stats
    and Portingale https://britishsurnames.co.uk/surname/portingale/stats

    You could explore links in https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/England_Personal_Names

    Thank you, there's some interesting stuff there.

    One of these days I'm going to find the time (I wish!) to check my tree
    to see how often the "usual British naming convention" was followed.



    --
    Jenny M Benson
    Wrexham, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 6 14:05:11 2021
    On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 13:10:56, Jenny M Benson <NemoNews@hotmail.co.uk>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    One of these days I'm going to find the time (I wish!) to check my tree

    (-:

    to see how often the "usual British naming convention" was followed.

    By "uBnc", do you mean just the "took husband's surname" (and children
    did too) convention, or are you referring to something else, like the Partingale/Portnell thing?

    (FWIW, I don't think I have _anyone_ in my tree that doesn't use
    patriarchal surnames, apart from illegitimate births, or where people
    with the same surname married [so you can't tell anyway, or a _few_ from
    late 20th century on [but even then, it's rare].)

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    There is no character, howsoever good and fine, but it can be destroyed by ridicule, howsoever poor and witless. -Mark Twain, author and humorist (1835-1910)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 6 17:52:21 2021
    On 06/03/2021 15:05, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 13:10:56, Jenny M Benson <NemoNews@hotmail.co.uk> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    One of these days I'm going to find the time (I wish!) to check my tree

    (-:

    to see how often the "usual British naming convention" was followed.

    By "uBnc", do you mean just the "took husband's surname" (and children
    did too) convention, or are you referring to something else, like the Partingale/Portnell thing?

    (FWIW, I don't think I have _anyone_ in my tree that doesn't use
    patriarchal surnames, apart from illegitimate births, or where people
    with the same surname married [so you can't tell anyway, or a _few_ from late 20th century on [but even then, it's rare].)


    From one section (Naming Pattern) of the link I gave earlier https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/England_Personal_Names#Naming_Pattern

    the usual British naming convention was as follows:

    • The first son was named after the paternal grandfather
    • The second son was named after the maternal grandfather
    • The third son was named after the father
    • The fourth son was named after the oldest paternal uncle
    • The fifth was named after the second oldest paternal uncle or the
    oldest maternal uncle

    • The first daughter was named after the maternal grandmother
    • The second daughter was named after the paternal grandmother
    • The third daughter was named after the mother
    • The fourth daughter was named after the oldest maternal aunt
    • The fifth was named after the second oldest maternal aunt or the
    oldest paternal aunt

    If there was duplication (for example, the paternal grandfather and the
    father had the same name), then the family moved to the next position on
    the list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 6 18:07:18 2021
    On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 17:52:21, john <john1@s145802280.onlinehome.fr>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On 06/03/2021 15:05, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    []
    By "uBnc", do you mean just the "took husband's surname" (and
    children did too) convention, or are you referring to something else,
    like the Partingale/Portnell thing?
    []
    From one section (Naming Pattern) of the link I gave earlier >https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/England_Personal_Names#Naming_Patte
    rn

    the usual British naming convention was as follows:

    Thanks for this; I'd never come across it. I wonder how widely-known it
    was.

    • The first son was named after the paternal grandfather
    • The second son was named after the maternal grandfather
    • The third son was named after the father
    • The fourth son was named after the oldest paternal uncle
    • The fifth was named after the second oldest paternal uncle or the
    oldest maternal uncle

    • The first daughter was named after the maternal grandmother
    • The second daughter was named after the paternal grandmother
    • The third daughter was named after the mother
    • The fourth daughter was named after the oldest maternal aunt
    • The fifth was named after the second oldest maternal aunt or the
    oldest paternal aunt

    If there was duplication (for example, the paternal grandfather and the >father had the same name), then the family moved to the next position
    on the list.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    It costs a lot to look this cheap - Dolly Parton

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jenny M Benson@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 6 21:15:58 2021
    On 06/03/2021 18:07, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    Thanks for this; I'd never come across it. I wonder how widely-known it
    was.

    I've come across frequent mention of this "British naming convention"
    but have always been a bit sceptical about it. I think I might have
    heard that it's more common in Scotland - or that a slightly different
    version is/was practised in Scotland. (But I could be mis-remembering.)

    --
    Jenny M Benson
    Wrexham, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 6 21:34:26 2021
    On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 21:15:58, Jenny M Benson <NemoNews@hotmail.co.uk>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On 06/03/2021 18:07, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    Thanks for this; I'd never come across it. I wonder how widely-known
    it was.

    I've come across frequent mention of this "British naming convention"
    but have always been a bit sceptical about it. I think I might have
    heard that it's more common in Scotland - or that a slightly different >version is/was practised in Scotland. (But I could be mis-remembering.)

    Come to think of it, the "name after grandfather" part could explain the alternating forenames (Ralph/William Weightman) in one of my lines.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The main and the most glorious achievement of television is that it is killing the art of conversation. If we think of the type of conversation television is helping to kill, our gratitude must be undying. (George Mikes, "How to be Inimitable" [1960].)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Ellson@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Tue Mar 9 11:39:27 2021
    On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:34:26 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 21:15:58, Jenny M Benson <NemoNews@hotmail.co.uk>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On 06/03/2021 18:07, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    Thanks for this; I'd never come across it. I wonder how widely-known
    it was.

    I've come across frequent mention of this "British naming convention"
    but have always been a bit sceptical about it. I think I might have
    heard that it's more common in Scotland - or that a slightly different >>version is/was practised in Scotland. (But I could be mis-remembering.)

    Come to think of it, the "name after grandfather" part could explain the >alternating forenames (Ralph/William Weightman) in one of my lines.

    IME the pattern is mostly Scottish. I have encountered it on a more
    localised basis in parts of England (e.g. Ripley in Derbyshire) which
    there could possibly be the consequence of either or both of
    immigrating miners/ironworkers or ministers of local non-conformist
    churches.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)