When the rich dine in a fancy restaurant, it is a non-issue, no problem.
But when a low-income individual eat a gourmet pizza, it become a big deal.
Is it wrong that low-income individual eat a slice of the gourmet pizza?
You are not telling the whole truth.
You came online to tell the whole world that you were so down and out that you wanted to commit suicide.
Then you went on to enjoy a $20 lunch and later on more expensive food like gourmet pizza which do not fit the situation you are in. You make people cynical.
Burger King is offering $2 burger. Have you tried it? A few years back, it even offered $1 burger. You could order two in one go and had a free cup of water to go with them, a full meal to $2. Did you try them?
On 6/6/2018 12:24 PM, moodynerdy@gmail.com wrote:
You are not telling the whole truth.
You came online to tell the whole world that you were so down and out that you wanted to commit suicide.
Then you went on to enjoy a $20 lunch and later on more expensive food like gourmet pizza which do not fit the situation you are in. You make people cynical.
Burger King is offering $2 burger. Have you tried it? A few years back, it even offered $1 burger. You could order two in one go and had a free cup of water to go with them, a full meal to $2. Did you try them?
You are right on the dot.
He does not know what is really to be poor.
He has not suffered even one tenth of our Sam Sui women.
--
The Inquirer
The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 6:29:16 AM UTC, independent individual wrote:
When the rich dine in a fancy restaurant, it is a non-issue, no problem.
But when a low-income individual eat a gourmet pizza, it become a big deal.
Is it wrong that low-income individual eat a slice of the gourmet pizza?
You are not telling the whole truth.
You came online to tell the whole world that you were so down and out that you wanted to commit suicide.
Then you went on to enjoy a $20 lunch and later on more expensive food like gourmet pizza which do not fit the situation you are in. You make people cynical.
Burger King is offering $2 burger. Have you tried it? A few years back, it even offered $1 burger. You could order two in one go and had a free cup of water to go with them, a full meal to $2. Did you try them?
On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 12:24:14 PM UTC+8, moody...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people are cynical not because I make them cynical.
It is their nature that they are cynical.
Beyond my control.
On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 6:18:09 PM UTC+8, The_Inquirer wrote:
You have improve your English but you like
to jump in with others to attack me with no basis.
And sound like you know a lot.
On 7/6/2018 6:26 PM, independent individual wrote:
On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 12:24:14 PM UTC+8, moody...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people are cynical not because I make them cynical.
When you say things and do another, you hurt your own credibility.
It is their nature that they are cynical.
Beyond my control.
It is not beyond your control. Just stop being a hypocrite, take a real
hard look at your sorry wretched loser self first, then
DEAL WITH IT LIKE A MAN !!!
--
The Inquirer
The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 6:42:17 PM UTC+8, The_Inquirer wrote:
Everyone here witness you asking lots of questions, usually in broken English.
And you also like to call people names, lots of names.
Very good question. Singapore love you.
You should ask CECB how come they can dine and eat gourmet foods in fancy restaurant.
In recent weeks, they have been talking in parliament about wide spread inequality in the country.
So they should ask why the poor is denied of their eating of gourmet food in fancy restaurants in this unequal country.
CECB should be asked when will these unequal poor will become an equal poor?
"independent individual" wrote in message news:7814660c-f5ab-4ad7-ac6c-607897e2b7ee@googlegroups.com...
When the rich dine in a fancy restaurant, it is a non-issue, no problem.
But when a low-income individual eat a gourmet pizza, it become a big deal.
Is it wrong that low-income individual eat a slice of the gourmet pizza?
On 7/6/2018 7:00 PM, independent individual wrote:
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 6:42:17 PM UTC+8, The_Inquirer wrote:
Everyone here witness you asking lots of questions, usually in broken English.
why don't you speak for yourself? is your English good enough to know
what "speak for yourself" means?
And you also like to call people names, lots of names.
And not justifiably so? For example, if i say you are a loser, is it me merely saying that you are a loser, or, as your words and action thus
far show, that you are indeed a loser?
You know courtesy not.
really?
do you know that a true friend is not someone who talks sweet things to
you, but someone who holds you accountable, deal with your own issues,
so that you get out of your rut and perhaps have a better future life?
--
The Inquirer
The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both
sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc
side, I will also whack!
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 11:21:26 PM UTC+8, The_Inquirer wrote:
On 7/6/2018 7:00 PM, independent individual wrote:
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 6:42:17 PM UTC+8, The_Inquirer wrote:
Everyone here witness you asking lots of questions, usually in broken English.
why don't you speak for yourself? is your English good enough to know what "speak for yourself" means?
And you also like to call people names, lots of names.
And not justifiably so? For example, if i say you are a loser, is it me merely saying that you are a loser, or, as your words and action thus
far show, that you are indeed a loser?
You know courtesy not.
really?
do you know that a true friend is not someone who talks sweet things to you, but someone who holds you accountable, deal with your own issues,
so that you get out of your rut and perhaps have a better future life?
--
The Inquirer
The most unbiased and independent participant on Usenet. I whack both sides of any debate with my questions. If there is a 3rd, 4th, ... etc side, I will also whack!
I should not engage you because you will use every opportunity
to boast your own abilities and to attack me.
On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 11:21:26 PM UTC+8, The_Inquirer wrote:
I should not engage you
to boast your own abilities
On Friday, June 8, 2018 at 6:30:06 PM UTC+8, independent individual wrote:
Cdo
Realnews
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 294 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 245:29:11 |
| Calls: | 6,626 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,175 |
| Messages: | 5,320,569 |