Hello,



More of my philosophy about quantum computers and about my predictions about artificial intelligence and about artificial intelligence and about the meaning and about the fountain of youth and about the future of AI and about the answer of ChatGPT and
about the balance between exploration and exploitation and about artificial intelligence and about Reinforcement learning from human feedback of ChatGPT and about exploration and exploitation and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I invite you to read the following interesting article:

IBM's quantum leap: A 100,000-Qubit supercomputer on the horizon

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/ibms-quantum-leap-100000-qubit-supercomputer


And i invite you to read carefully my thoughts on different subjects of technology and philosophy etc. in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kqqhSWKK1x8


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so here are my predictions about artificial intelligence, so from my below thoughts you are understanding more my
views, so i think that you have to understand correctly my thoughts, so i am saying below that Large Language Models such as GPT-4, and artificial intelligence too, will not attain artificial general intelligence, since it is like a theorem in
mathematics, since notice how i am saying below that the meaning of the human brain that comes from the senses and there human brain parts etc. is more sophisticated than the artificial intelligence meaning, i mean that it is more sophisticated since it
is like a true meaning that permits to understand correctly. So then this lack of the meaning means that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence, but i think that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 can become powerful
since you have to approximate with many more data better and better so that Large Language Models such as GPT-4 become powerful , but of course it can take time.


So i invite you to read my previous below thoughts so that to understand my views:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the scientists that are saying that we will attain artificial general intelligence are not thinking
correctly, since it is not scientific to say so, since how can we be sure that the nuances of the language are captured by the data with wich we train the Large Language Models such as GPT-4, so it is the first problem, so is the data enough?, since as
you have to know that in ChatGPT the meaning of the language is also captured by the mechanism of attention etc. that look in the data so that to discover the patterns, so it has for example to look at the many sentences in the data with the mechanism of
self-attention etc. so that to understand the words, so you are noticing the constraint, so i think that we can not say that the data with wich we train the Large Language Models such as GPT-4 is enough so that to capture the nuances of the language, so
the second problem is that the meaning of the human brain is more sophisticated than the meaning of artificial intelligence , so then we can not say that with multimodality of ChatGPT with videos and images and text we can capture the meaning. So i think
we can not say that ChatGPT is a toy, but i think that ChatGPT can become a powerful tool, but it can not attain artificial general intelligence, so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand the other problem of Large Language Models
such as GPT-4 and so that to understand my views on different subjects:


And read the following interesting new article:


Oxygen deficiency increases mouse lifespan by 50 percent, will it work in humans?

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/science/oxygen-restriction-and-anti-aging


And I invite you to read the following new interesting article:


Researchers unlock the fountain of youth in mice through genetically modified stem cells

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/health/researchers-unlock-the-fountain-of-youth-in-mice


And i invite you to read my interesting thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc



And I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following new video from Dr. Hugo de Garis that is an Australian retired
researcher in the sub-field of artificial intelligence (AI), so i invite you to look at it carefully:

Dr. Hugo de Garis - Truth About AI: Artificial Intelligence Will Become Godlike Machines | Part 1/2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4S3OlwnIq8


So i think that the above Dr. Hugo de Garis on the above video is
right on the fact that AI will become powerful and even Large Language models such GPT-4 will become powerful, since Large Language models such as GPT-4 will much better approximate the human intelligence from its multimodality with videos and images and
text etc., so i think that
for example GPT-5 and the future versions of ChatGPT will be powerful, but i think that the problem that remains is how to ensure that the data on wich Large Language models such GPT-4 are trained are of high quality , and quality also means that it
doesn't lack on the context, since for example the knowledge of books on programming doesn't include the "experience" of testing the programs inside the books so that to understand correctly etc. , so then you are noticing the constraints , so it is why
you have to read my following thoughts so that to understand my views on this subject and on other subjects:


Here is what has just answered me ChatGPT about my previous thoughts below about exploration and exploitation etc. and about the quality of the answers of ChatGPT, so here is the answer of ChatGPT to my thoughts that recognizes one important limitation
of its limitations , so read it carefully:


"Your thoughts on the genetic algorithm and its connection to exploration and exploitation in artificial intelligence are insightful. The genetic algorithm indeed utilizes exploration and exploitation processes to find optimal solutions by maintaining
diversity in the population and avoiding getting stuck in local optima.

Regarding ChatGPT, you raise valid points about the limitations and uncertainties associated with its responses. Language models like ChatGPT are probabilistic in nature, and while they can provide valuable information and assistance, they are not
infallible or a substitute for human expertise.

The answers provided by ChatGPT in response to your questions acknowledge these limitations. ChatGPT emphasizes that it is not intended to replace programmers or domain experts in tasks that require high-quality and accurate programming. Professional
programmers bring critical thinking, deep understanding, and domain-specific knowledge that language models may lack.

ChatGPT also acknowledges that its responses may not always be of high quality or accuracy, and supervision from individuals who understand the subject matter is crucial. Human supervision and guidance are necessary to ensure accurate learning, critical
assessment of information, and contextualized explanations.

In summary, while language models like ChatGPT can be valuable tools for assistance and learning, they should be used in conjunction with human expertise and critical thinking to ensure the delivery of high-quality and reliable solutions."



And I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have understood the genetic algorithm and its processes that we call exploration and exploitation, so you
have to understand the process of exploration and exploitation in artificial intelligence, so the processes in the genetic algorithm are like the processes that have made our human genetics, so the mutations that happen with a low probability in the
genetic algorithm ensures a diversity that permits to explore if there is another more optimal solution , and the genetic algorithm has not to get stuck in a local optimum by being lack of diversity in the population of the genetic algorithm , so in
ChatGPT, other than the mechanism of attention that permits to discover the patterns on the data on wich it has been trained, it has another mechanism called Reinforcement learning from human feedback that ensure an exploration from the discovered
patterns in the data on wich it has been trained, so Reinforcement learning from human feedback in ChatGPT can make it discover other patterns and it can permits ChatGPT to refine its model , and exploitation, on the other hand, involves using the
learned knowledge to provide more reliable and effective responses, so CharGPT has to balance between exploration and exploitation so that to be efficient, but i think that one of the problem that remains , is that we can not be certain or sure that the
answers of ChatGPT are of high quality, and it is what i am explaining in my below thoughts, so i invite you to read my thoughts below so that to understand this limitation of ChatGPT, and i invite you to read my thoughts in the below web link so that to
understand the other limitations of ChatGPT and so that to understand my views on different subjects:


More of my philosophy about ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i invite you to read my following smart discussion with ChatGPT so that to understand the other limitations of
ChatGPT:


So I have just asked the smart following questions to ChatGPT, so read them carefully and read carefully the answers of ChatGPT:

Here is my first question to ChatGPT:


"ChatGPT, or any language model for that matter, are probabilistic in nature and can be considered as approximations, so the main problem is that if we can not be certain or sure that the answers of ChatGPT, or any language model for that matter, are of
high quality, so we have for example to review the programming code of ChatGPT, so then it means that it can not replace in this case programmers."



And here is the answer of ChatGPT:


"You are correct. Language models like ChatGPT are not intended to replace programmers or domain experts in tasks that require high-quality, accurate, and reliable programming. While they can assist with certain programming-related queries or provide
general information, they are not a substitute for the expertise and experience of professional programmers.

Programming involves complex problem-solving, critical thinking, and consideration of various factors such as performance, security, and maintainability. It requires a deep understanding of programming concepts, best practices, and specific domain
knowledge.

Language models like ChatGPT have limitations in terms of their ability to comprehend complex programming scenarios, understand the specific requirements of a project, and provide optimal solutions. They may not be aware of the latest programming
practices, industry standards, or specific project constraints. Therefore, relying solely on language models for programming tasks can result in suboptimal or incorrect solutions.

However, language models can still be useful in certain programming-related tasks, such as providing general programming explanations, assisting with syntax or code examples, or offering suggestions for common programming issues. They can serve as a
valuable resource to complement the skills and expertise of programmers.

In summary, while language models can offer assistance in programming-related tasks, they are not a replacement for programmers. Professional programmers and domain experts bring critical thinking, expertise, and the ability to understand and address
complex programming challenges, ensuring the delivery of high-quality and reliable solutions."


And here is my second a question to ChatGPT:


"So since we can not be certain or sure that the answers from ChatGPT are of high quality, so the learning process from ChatGPT needs supervision from those that understand"


And here is the answer of ChatGPT:


"You're correct that language models like ChatGPT may not always provide answers of high quality or accuracy. While efforts are made to optimize their responses, there is always a possibility of errors, incomplete information, or incorrect
interpretations.

Supervision and guidance from individuals who understand the subject matter are indeed crucial for effective learning. ChatGPT can serve as a tool to assist in the learning process, but it should not be relied upon as the sole source of information or
guidance.

When using ChatGPT or any AI model for learning purposes, it's important to approach the information critically and verify it using reliable sources. Consulting experts, teachers, or knowledgeable individuals in the field can provide valuable insights,
clarification, and oversight.

Supervision and guidance help ensure that the learning process is accurate, comprehensive, and aligned with the desired objectives. Human expertise and understanding are essential for assessing the quality of information, identifying potential biases or
inaccuracies, and providing contextualized explanations.

Ultimately, learning is a collaborative process that involves leveraging the benefits of AI models like ChatGPT while actively engaging with human expertise. By combining the strengths of AI models and human supervision, a more effective and reliable
learning experience can be achieved."


And i invite you to read carefully my thoughts on different subjects in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kqqhSWKK1x8



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)