Hello,



More of my philosophy about quantum computing and about the human values and about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about the good
businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, so i have just talked about artificial intelligence and about my new model of what is consciousness, read about it in my below thoughts, and now i will
talk about quantum computing, so i have just looked at the following video about the powerful parallel quantum computer of IBM from USA that will be soon available in the cloud, and i invite you to look at it:

Quantum Computing: Now widely available!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laqpfQ8-jFI


But i have just read the following paper and it is saying that the powerful Quantum algorithms for matrix operations and linear systems of equations are available, so as you notice in the following paper that many matrix operations and also the linear
systems of equations solver can be done in a quantum computer, read about it here in the following paper:

Quantum algorithms for matrix operations and linear systems of equations

Read more here:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.04888.pdf


So i think that IBM will do the same for there powerful parallel quantum computer that will be available in the cloud, but i think that you will have to pay for it since i think it will be commercial, but i think that there is a weakness with this kind
of configuration of the powerful quantum computer from IBM, since the cost of bandwidth of internet is exponentially decreasing , but the latency of accessing the internet is not, so it is why i think that people will still use classical computers for
many mathematical applications that uses mathematical operations such as matrix operations and linear systems of equations etc. and that needs a much faster latency, so i think that the business of classical computers will still be great in the future
even with the coming of the powerful parallel quantum computer of IBM, so as you notice this kind of business of quantum computers is also dependent on the latency of accessing internet, and speaking about latency , i invite you to look at the following
interesting video about the latency numbers programmer should know:

Latency numbers programmer should know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqR5vESuKe0



More of my philosophy about the human values and the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and
about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i
think i am a new smart philosopher and i say that the problem is not
just what i am talking about below about the sexual decadence that needs rules of decency, but i think in philosophy there is still a problem that is related to sexual decadence, and it is abstracted in my following philosophical question in french: "
Comment donner de la valeur à l'être human?", and its translation in english is: "How to give value to the human being?", so i think that the problem is that money or big money don't give value to the human being, since it comes with its too much
negativity, since big money is in the economic model created by egoism that creates competition and there is also the too much negativity that comes from competition between people, so now you are understanding the philosophical question, so then i think
that in philosophy we need to give value to the human being, and i think that we give value to the human being by being decency, and decency is the recognized standards of decent or proper behavior, and we also give value to the human being by being
positivity that creates a meaning of human life that is efficient, and of course i have just said below that a meaning of human life that is efficient doesn't come from negativity , but from positivity, and of course positivity and its positive energy
also comes from the listening to or being with positive people or surrounding yourself with positive people and positive things, and this positivity and positive energy play the role of like a lever that allows you to lift the heavy weights. So i invite
you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about the sexual decadence and about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the
language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..




I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i have just looked at the following french song:


La décadanse (Bande originale du film "Sex Shop")


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b02pkq7ulrI



So i think that the above french singers are not at all wise, since the above french song is a kind of sexual behavior provocation and it is sexual decadence, but i think i am a new philosopher and i will explain a very important thing, so i think that
we humans come with differences between us, so this one is beautiful and that one is not beautiful and this one has a big penis and that one has not a big penis and this one has a genetical handicap and this one is strong and that one is not strong etc.
so i think that the good philosophy also says that those differences of humans also requires "decency" so that to bring "harmony" to the society, so i think that sex also requires rules of decency so that to bring harmony. So i think that it is also the
civilized way of doing in philosophy.


More of my philosophy about philosophy and about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical
meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and you have to understand what is philosophy, so i think that if you say that
we humans are animals that come with "bugs" or "defects" and we are like animals, so you have to understand that talking this way is not the good way of the good philosophy, since i mean that the good philosophy is like a good software programmer that
has not to be pessimistic about the existence of bugs in the software, but he has like a good professional to correct the bugs of the software, so then we have not to be pessimistic about our human conditions, but we have like a good software programmer
to correct the bugs of humans and to correct the bugs in the reality. And that's the good philosophy, and it is why i am coming with my thoughts and ideas of my philosophy. So i invite you to read all my below thoughts and ideas of my philosophy so that
to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about personal responsability and about the "looks like" and about Jesus Christ and about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about
Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


Also i think i am a new philosopher and i say that we can not say in
political philosophy that the way to transcend human suffering is by being human suffering, since in philosophy we have to to define correctly what is personal responsability so that to "tune" it correctly, so i think that this subject of defining
correctly personal responsability is a hot subject in political philosophy.

And you have to understand that the "looks like" that i am using in my sentence below by saying that Jesus Christ also looks like the positivity that we have to be so that to create a meaning of human life that is efficient, is a phrase used to convey an
impression or judgment based on "appearance", so the "looks like" doesn't mean that Christianity is the required and necessary positivity. So i invite you to reread all my thoughts below so that to understand my views:


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think that Jesus Christ also looks like the positivity that we have to be so that to create a meaning of human
life that is efficient , and i invite you to look carefully at the following interesting video of a good movie where Ben Hur meets Jesus of Nazareth so that to understand how Jesus Christ is positivity:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8u7J5AwzK4



More of my philosophy about the way of positivity and about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just talked in my below previous thoughts about how to grow or how to grow as a big and interesting
civilization, but i have to clarify more so that you understand, so my philosophy says that a meaning of human life that is efficient comes from positivity and not from negativity, and i think that positivity comes from a kind of discipline, i mean that
so that to be the positivity and the positive energy, you can listen to or be or surround yourself with positive people and positive things, and this positive energy plays the role of like a lever that allows you to lift the heavy weights. So i invite
you to read my following previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about how to create a civilization and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, so i will ask a smart philosophical question of:


How to create an interesting and big civilization ?


So when you are not so smart, you will say that a big and interesting civilization can be created by the way of technology and science , but i think it is not so smart to answer this way, because in philosophy , this kind of smartness is not really the
problem, since it is like inherent , since egoism creates competition and competition creates this kind of smartness , so how can we create an interesting and big civilization ? so i think that the problem is the following: so i think it is the way in my
philosophy of how to create a meaning of human life that is efficient, i mean that a meaning of human life that is efficient doesn't come from negativity , but from positivity, and i am explaining it in my new ideas of my philosophy that you can read in
the below web link, so it is why you are noticing that in my below thoughts i am saying the following:

"But now i have to explain something really important, and it is about the as we say in french: "La démarche", or in english we say: "The approach", i mean that you have to also know how to be the approach that makes you grow, so i mean that if you have
a sadistic or violent approach, it doesn't make you grow and it is not the successful way of doing."


So now you are understanding that the way of how to grow or how to grow to a big and interesting civilization is the way of being positivity
that attracts people, so then positivity is good for business.



So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts:



More of my philosophy about is programming dead and about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following new video and i invite you to look at it:


Is programming dead? | Stephen Wolfram and Lex Fridman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD353DeOM-4



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the known computer scientist that we call Stephen Wolfram that is a Jewish that lives in United
Kingdom is not thinking correctly in the above video, since he is talking without defining consciousness, but you will say to me: how can we define consciousness ? so i think i am highly smart and i say that even if we don't define completely
consciousness, my new model of what is consciousness defines to a certain level what is consciousness and how the human meaning is composed by brain and my new model of what is consciousness permits to predict what will be artificial intelligence, so i
think it is the defect of thinking of Stephen Wolfram , so my new model of what is consciousness predicts that artificial intelligence will not attain
artificial general intelligence, but it says that it will become powerful, and it also predicts that artificial intelligence will just
replace a small percentage of software programmers of about around 25%,
so i think that software programming will not be dead , and so that to understand my new model of what is consciousness, i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:


More of my philosophy about the future Apps and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..



I have just looked at the following new video of techlead that i know, and i invite you to look at it:

Why ChatGPT AI Will Destroy Programmers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1flF5WOeNc



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the above techlead in the above video is not thinking correctly since he is saying that software
programming is dying, since i say that software programming is not dying, since the future Apps are for example Metaverse, and of course we need Zettascale or ZettaFLOP so that Metaverse be possible, and as you notice the article below, with of Intel’s
Raja Koduri talking, says that the architecture is possible and it will be ready around 2027 or 2030 and it is the following:

An architecture jump of 16x, power and thermals are 2x, data movement is 3x, and process is 5x. That is about 500x, on top of the two ExaFLOP Aurora system, gets to a ZettaFLOP.

Interview with Intel’s Raja Koduri: Zettascale or ZettaFLOP? Metaverse what?

Read more here:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/17298/interview-with-intels-raja-koduri-zettascale-or-zettaflop-metaverse-what

And also the other future Apps are for example the one that use data to be smart in real time (Read about it here: https://www.cxotoday.com/cxo-bytes/data-driven-smart-apps-are-the-future/ ) , and i also say that software programming is not dying since
GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence will replace just a small percentage of software programmers, since software programming also needs to care about accuracy and reliability, so you have to look at the following most important limitations of GPT-4
and such artificial intelligence so that to notice it:


1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.


2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.


And i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about GPT-4:

Exploring the Limitations and Potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4

https://ts2.space/en/exploring-the-limitations-and-potential-of-openais-gpt-4/



And more of my philosophy about the objective function and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding more GPT-4 with my fluid intelligence, so
i think that GPT-4 uses Deep learning and it uses the mechanism of self-attention so that to understand the context and it uses Reinforcement learning from human feedback that uses a reward mechanism so that
to learn from the feedback of the people that are using GPT-4 so that
to ensure that this or that data is truth or not etc. but i think that
the problem of GPT-4 is that it needs a lot of data and it is the first weakness, and it is dependent on the data and the quality of data and it is the second weakness of GPT-4, so in unsupervised learning that is
used so that to train GPT-4 on the massive data, the quality of the data is not known with certitude, so it is a weakness of artificial intelligence such as GPT-4, and about the objective function that guides, so i think that it is the the patterns that
are found by the neural network and that are learned by the neural network of GPT-4 that play the role of the objective function that guides, so the objective function comes from the massive data on wich GPT-4 has been trained, and i think it is also a
weakness of GPT-4, since i think that what is missing is what explains my new model of what is consciousness , since the meaning from human consciousness also plays the role of the objective function , so it makes it much better than artificial
intelligence and it makes it that it needs much less data, so it is why the human brain needs much less data than artificial intelligence such as GPT-4. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:



More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked more carefully at GPT-4 , and i think that as i have just explained it, that it will become
powerful, but it is limited by the data and the quality of the data on wich it has been trained, so if it encounter a new situation to be solved and the solution of it can not be inferred from the data on wich it has been trained, so it will not be
capable of solving this new situation, so i think that my new model of what is consciousness is explaining that what is lacking is the meaning from human consciousness that permits to solve the problem, so my new model is explaining that artificial
intelligence such as GPT-4 will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, but eventhough , i think that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will become powerful, so i think that the problematic in artificial intelligence is about the low level
layers, so i mean look at assembler programming language, so it is a low level layer than high level programming languages, but you have to notice that the low level layer of assembler programming language can do things that the higher level layer can
not do, so for example you can play with the stack registers and low level hardware registers and low level hardware instructions etc. and notice how the low level layer like assembler programming can teach you more about the hardware, since it is really
near the hardware, so i think that it is what is happening in artificial intelligence such as the new GPT-4, i mean that GPT-4 is for example trained on data so that to discover patterns that make it more smart, but the problematic is that this layer of
how it is trained on the data so that to discover patterns is a high level layer such as the high level programming language, so i think that it is missing the low level layers of what makes the meaning, like the meaning of the past and present and the
future or the meaning of space and matter and time.. from what you can construct the bigger meaning of other bigger things, so it is why i think that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so i think that what is
lacking in artificial intelligence is what is explaining my new model of what is consciousness, so you can read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand my new model of what is consciousness and so that to understand my
views about different other subjects:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/QSUWwiwN5yo




More of my philosophy about the usage of the language and about the logical meaning and about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..




I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am saying in my below previous thoughts: "being publicity"

So we can ask if it is correct in english to say: "being publicity"

So i will say that there is two things , it can be that it is not commonly used in english, but it is logical to say "being publicity", and it can be that it is not commonly used in english , but it is not logical to say "being publicity", but i have
just discussed this subject with ChatGPT, and i think i have just won the game against ChatGPT, since i have just explained to ChatGPT that it is logical to say "being publicity". And here is my discussion with ChatGPT:


Here is my first question to ChatGPT:


"Can we say: "you have to know how to be efficient at the being publicity""



And ChatGPT has just answered the following:


"The sentence "you have to know how to be efficient at the being publicity" is not grammatically correct. Here are a few possible rephrasings that could convey a similar idea:

"You need to know how to be efficient in promoting yourself."
"Being efficient in publicizing yourself requires certain skills and knowledge."
"To be effective in promoting yourself, you need to understand the principles of publicity and how to apply them.""



And my second question to ChatGPT is the following:


"What is: publicity"


And ChatGPT has just answered the following:


"Publicity refers to the practice of creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, or organization through various forms of media communication. It involves generating public interest, attention, and awareness
about a particular entity or its offerings, with the goal of increasing visibility, reputation, and ultimately, sales or support.

Publicity can be achieved through various means, such as media coverage (i.e., appearing on TV, radio, newspapers, or online news outlets), social media marketing, advertising, events, and sponsorships, among others. It is an essential component of
marketing and public relations, as it helps build brand recognition, establish credibility, and differentiate from competitors. Effective publicity strategies involve targeting the right audience, crafting compelling messages, and delivering them through
the appropriate channels."


So i have just again asked the following question to ChatGPT:


"But the practice of creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, is also the being, so we can logically say being publicity"


And ChatGPT has just answered the following:


"I see what you mean. While it's true that creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness of a person, brand, product, or organization is a key aspect of publicity, it's not common to use the phrase "being publicity" to describe this
practice.

Instead, we usually use phrases like "doing publicity" or "engaging in publicity" to refer to the actions involved in creating and maintaining a positive public image. For example, "She is doing publicity for her new book" or "The company is engaging in
a publicity campaign to promote its latest product."

That being said, language is always evolving, and new phrases and expressions can emerge over time. It's possible that "being publicity" could become a more widely accepted phrase in the future."


And again i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:


But i think it is logical to say "being publicity", so we can say it.


And ChatGPT has just answered the following:


"Language is a tool for communication, and its meaning and usage depend on how people use it. While it's true that language can be flexible and adaptable, it's also important to consider how a particular phrase or expression might be perceived and
understood by others.

In the case of "being publicity," while it may be logically sound in terms of the meaning you intend to convey, it is not a commonly used or accepted phrase in English. If you use it in conversation or writing, there is a risk that it may be unclear or
confusing to your audience.

Instead, to ensure clear and effective communication, it might be better to use more commonly accepted phrases such as "doing publicity" or "engaging in publicity" to describe the practice of creating and maintaining a positive public image or awareness
of a person, brand, product, or organization."



And i have also just asked the following question about the "being" to ChatGPT:


"When we say being kind , it also means the doing the kind."


And ChatGPT has also just answered the following:


"You are correct that the phrase "being kind" can also be interpreted as "doing the kind thing" or "acting kindly.""



More of my philosophy about Islam and about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, and i will talk more about Islam in a philosophical way, so i think that Islam
is "mostly" about the low level layer of morality of for example how to be humble and how to be more trust between people and how to be the good way of behaving and how to be the good family values, and the Qur'aan was a sophisticated way of thinking
that makes you believe and makes you be the good morality of the low level layer, so the low level layer of morality is also in relationship with politics, and you have to notice that philosophy thinks with sophistication so that to make you follow the
rules or the laws of the good philosophy, but i say that Islam is not like philosophy, since in philosophy we can ask of how to make follow correctly those rules of the low level layer of morality that Islam has wanted to make us follow ? so now you are
understanding the goal of the believing in God or the being faith in God, and now you are understanding why i have also invented a new monotheistic religion, and you can read about it in the below web link, but so that to understand my new ideas of my
philosophy, i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nybxAsTXy6A



And read my following thoughts so that to understand better:




More of my philosophy about the good businessman and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i am a new philosopher, but of course i am posting about other subjects too, so i have showed you my new
ideas of my philosophy, and you can read them in the below web link, but now i have to explain something really important, and it is about the as we say in french: "La démarche", or in english we say: "The approach", i mean that you have to also know
how to be the approach that makes you grow, so i mean that if you have a sadistic or violent approach, it doesn't make you grow and it is not the successful way of doing, so what is the good approach in philosophy ? so i think that it is also like the
good
business, since i am for example showing how i am doing it in my below thoughts, so for example in business you have to be good at publicity ,
so as you are noticing in my below thoughts, that i am also making publicity about arabs, but of course i am trying to be objective about it, so the good approach is also the knowing how to make publicity, so in publicity you have to know that you have
to know how to be objective and how to be efficient at the being publicity, so as you notice that the good approach is also that you have to know how to talk and how to walk and how to think, since
the knowing how to talk and how to walk(and the walk here is also symbolic) and how to think is also the basis of the making publicity to yourself, so as you notice that the good approach is also like the good business, so as you are noticing that my
below new poem in french is also like the good publicity and the good diplomacy , since it needs the good approach so that you be successful, and as you are understanding that the being the good Diplomacy is also essential to your way of doing business
with humans, so now you are understanding the why i have also invented my new ideas of my philosophy and the why i am talking as i am talking in such manner, so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following below web link so that to
understand my kind of personality and so that to understand my philosophy:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nybxAsTXy6A



And you can read my other new thoughts below:


More of my philosophy about africans and about black Africans and more of my thoughts..


I have just said, read it below, that ancient Egyptians were whites, but you have not to think that i am this or that, but it is just that i am in north america that is "mostly" white europeans, so i have to be "pragmatic" by talking as i am talking
about the facts, since i have also to be careful about it, since am i in arab countries ? or am i in Africa ? So then i will say that even if there is violence in USA between some violent groups of people, so i invite you to read my following new poem in
french about Africans and "black" africans so that you understand more my kind of personality:


Here is my new poem in french:

--

L'Africain n'est pas comme le tibétain

Car l'africain aime bien manger comme le méditerranéen

Car l'africain sait comment être le joli comédien

Car l'africain n'est pas comme un bédoin

Car l'africain aime bien être habillé comme un joli félin

Alors c'est que l'africain aime aussi bien jouer au médecin

Alors c'est aussi que l'africain aime bien être le bon lycéen


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)