Hello,
More of my philosophy about the value-added and about quality and
about capitalism and about my philosophy and about technology and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
So as you are noticing , i am not only using below the following way:
"Adding additional features or economic value to a product and service"
But notice that i am also using below the following way:
"Adding additional features or economic value over a product and service"
Since i think that the using "to a product or service" implies that the feature is being added as a part or extension of the product or service. On the other hand, using "over a product or service" can be interpreted to mean that the feature is being
added in addition to, or on top of, the existing product or service. This could suggest that the feature is not an integral part of the product or service, but rather an extra or bonus capability.
More of my philosophy about the thinking and about quality and about the value added and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
notice that in my below thoughts i am saying the following:
"So a philosopher like me will say that you have to think with sophistication your philosophy and you have after that to be disciplined and follow the path of the successful philosophy"
So i think i have to explain more, since you can for example say to me
how i am saying above: "follow the path of the successful philosophy", so you have to understand that it is an abstraction that means that
the fact that it is thought with "sophistication" can mean that it is successful, since the fact that it is a sophisticated philosophy is a high sophistication that is relative to the other philosophies in terms
of sophistication of thinking, so it is like a high IQ that is relative
to the normal distribution of IQs.
More of my philosophy about racism and about my philosophy and about
capitalism and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i have not talked about racism, but you have to understand me, since i think that white supremacists or
neo-nazis are not understanding correctly, since i think i am a new philosopher and i say that most of humans or most of white europeans are not easily lovable, since you can also notice that most of humans or most of white europeans are not beautiful,
so i think that this "not easily lovable" and "not beautiful" is what cause racism, so a wise type of person like me, will say that you can logically infer that the way to become more lovable or the way to become more beautiful is the way of discipline,
so i also say that look for example at white european german people, so i say that the secret of why germany is powerful is that they are disciplined, so a philosopher like me will say that you have to think with sophistication your philosophy and you
have after that to be disciplined and follow the path of the successful philosophy, and i think that it is the way of how to be successful and it is the way of why germany was and is successful.
And so that to understand more, i invite you to read the following
article that also talks about this subject so that to understand more:
Not everyone is beautiful
https://theconversation.com/not-everyone-is-beautiful-35915
More of my philosophy about the value-added and about capitalism and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so I think that USA is a great country, since it permits you to make good business, since i think that the most
important thing in economy is the value-added that is the additional features or economic value that a company adds to its products and services before offering them to customers. And adding value to your product or service helps your company attracts
more customers, which can boost revenue and profits. But i say that you have to be a smart business man, since i think that economy is more sophisticated since the value-added can be that you add additional features or economic value over another product
or service (from USA or from Europe etc.) that is not made by you, and i think that adding this kind of value over a product or service helps companies attract customers which can boost revenue and profits, so i think that it is what is happening in our
today globalized economy, so i think we have to be optimistic about it, and you have also to know that capitalism is not a zero-sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still
ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, and of course that diversifying the economy of a country is really important since it makes your economy a resilient economy, and of course that trade diversification is also important,
since notice that even Canada is doing it, since we can ask a question of is Canada too dependent on the US for Trade? and the answer is: “Not necessarily”, and you can read carefully the following interesting article about it:
https://www.policyschool.ca/news/canada-too-dependent-us-trade-not-necessarily/
And i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts in the following web link of my new ideas of my philosophy and of my new proverbs and about why we have to be optimistic about capitalism etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mtXYr2TXL0U
More of my philosophy about my contributions and about technology and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you have just noticed that i am coming to you with my contributions that are my new ideas of my philosophy
and my new proverbs and my new thoughts about the future of technology and about obesity and cancer and about the new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc. and of course that i have grouped my contributions of my thoughts in the following post,
so for example you can read carefully my following thoughts in the following web link about obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/94PU9CGNLjY
And i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts in the following web link of my new ideas of my philosophy and of my new proverbs etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mtXYr2TXL0U
And you can read carefully my thoughts about progressive capitalism and about productivity etc. in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And here is more of my philosophy about the mathematical modeling of the Jackson network and about mathematics and more of my thoughts, you can read it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA
And of course you can read my new other thoughts below:
More of my philosophy about the future of technology and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think that we have to look carefully at the future of technology so that to know what will happen, so as you have just noticed , i have just talked about the future of supercomputers that looks bright, since i think it will use the new HBM3, and i also
think that the next Intel CPU after the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU will support HBM3, and read about it in my below thoughts, since i think that Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) and Stream Triad benchmarks are memory bound, and the HPCG
benchmark generates a synthetic discretized three-dimensional partial differential equation model problem, and computes preconditioned conjugate gradient iterations for the resulting sparse linear system, and you have to know that Sparse linear system
solvers, that also uses and solves with preconditioned conjugate gradient, are ubiquitous in high performance computing (HPC) and often are also the most computational intensive parts in scientific computing codes. A few of the many applications relying
on them include fusion energy simulation, space weather simulation, climate modeling, and environmental modeling, and finite element method, and large-scale reservoir simulations to enhance oil recovery by the oil and gas industry, and of course i am
also talking below about what looks like the future of artificial intelligence , so i invite you to read my below interesting thoughts
about it, and now i will talk about the future of the PC industry
and about the future of Microsoft Windows, so I think that the next Windows of Microsoft that will be called Windows 12, will generate much more PC sales, since i think that Windows 12 will integrate ChatGPT and will integrate Bing search engine and will
integrate DALL-E 2 image generation software into its Bing search engine and will integrate other AI functionalities, but you have to understand that so that to integrate those AI functionalities on the next Windows 12, Microsoft is working closely with
Intel and AMD companies so that there powerful next CPUs will allow the next Windows 12 to run the AI functionalities efficiently, so it is why i think that the near future of the PC industry looks bright, since i think that the next Windows 12 will
generate "much" more PC sales.
And i invite you to read the following new article so that to
notice it more (And you can translate it from french to english):
https://windows.developpez.com/actu/343725/Windows-12-Microsoft-se-prepare-a-une-integration-plus-profonde-de-l-IA-dans-son-systeme-d-exploitation-Cette-version-pourrait-etre-disponible-l-annee-prochaine-en-2024/
More of my philosophy about how the “smart fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country and about technology and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Let's look for example at USA, so read the following article from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:
"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart
fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance
of that country, for example, its GDP."
And it also says the following:
"“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight
Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.”
But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every
other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.
What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead
in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing
on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."
Read more here:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world
So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese
and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are
making USA a rich country.
And read also the following to understand more:
Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants
"There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech.
Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies.
Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from
American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that
technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B
system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.
But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it
misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in
that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in
the world to fill a particular role.
But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories.
They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do
in the first place.
“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief
executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”
Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with
those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture
capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5
percent of the world’s population; it stands to reason that most of the world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.
If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority
of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands
of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran,
and Eric Veach, from Canada.
But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
new ideas."
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html
And i invite you to read carefully my below thoughts so that to understand my views, and i also invite you to read my new ideas of my philosophy and my new proverbs in the following web link
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mtXYr2TXL0U
More of my philosophy about Indian american immigrants and about Arab american immigrants and about technology and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked at the following video about Indian american immigrants and i invite you to look at it carefully:
Why Indian immigrants become rich and raise successful kids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eMLAFV4cx8
But i have to talk more about Indian american immigrants, and here is my writing about it:
More philosophy about Indian Americans: The New Model Minority..
"So why do Indian Americans perform so well? A natural answer is self-selection. Someone willing to pull up roots and move halfway around the world will tend to be more ambitious and hardworking than the average person.
The only direct evidence we have comes from the 2003 New Immigrant Survey, in which a basic cognitive test called "digit span" was administered to a sample of newly arrived immigrant children. It is an excellent test for comparing people with disparate
language and educational backgrounds, since the test taker need only repeat lengthening sequences of digits read by the examiner. Repeating the digits forward is simply a test of short-term memory, but repeating them backward is much more mentally taxing,
hence a rough measure of intelligence.
When statistical adjustments are used to convert the backward digit span results to full-scale IQ scores, Indian Americans place at about 112 on a bell-shaped IQ distribution, with white Americans at 100. 112 is the 79th percentile of the white
distribution. For more context, consider that Ashkenazi Jews are a famously intelligent ethnic group, and their mean IQ is somewhere around 110."
Read more here:
https://www.forbes.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-indian-americans-opinions-contributors_immigrants_minority.html?sh=48b60817583b
And I invite you to look at the following video:
Why is INDIA the 2nd biggest software power in the world?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPZkNwhshiU
But i is not only Indian american immigrants that are smart, but it is
also Arab american immigrants that are smart, and here is more of my thoughts about how Arab american immigrants are really smart:
As the jews are smart people, I think that Arabs are smart people too, since other than the smart Arab from Egypt who won a Nobel prize for Chemistry in year 1999, read about it below, there is a new smart Arab from Egypt who has just invented the
fastest optical “transistor” that is a million times faster than the speed of the current semiconductor-based transistor, and you can read about it in the following two articles:
Egyptian world of attoseconds.. the fastest optical “transistor”
Read more here:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/egyptian-world-of-attoseconds-the-fastest-optical-transistor.761639/
And read also in the following article:
Optical switching at record speeds opens door for ultrafast, light-based electronics and computers
Read more here:
https://phys.org/news/2023-03-optical-door-ultrafast-light-based-electronics.html
And you can read the following web page about the arab from Egypt who won a Nobel prize for Chemistry in year 1999:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ahmed-Zewail
And I think that arabs are smart people, read also the following article about arab american immigrants so that to notice it:
In fact, the U.S. is the main home for Arab inventors globally, distantly followed by France (513 patent applications), Canada (361), Germany (342), Saudi Arabia (307), Japan (279) and the United Kingdom (273)
The innovative flair arab Inventors bring to America
Read more here:
https://knowledge.insead.edu/blog/insead-blog/the-innovative-flair-arab-inventors-bring-to-america-5431
And read the following interesting article about arabs:
Research: Arab Inventors Make the U.S. More Innovative
It turns out that the U.S. is a major home for Arab inventors. In the five-year period from 2009 to 2013, there were 8,786 U.S. patent applications in our data set that had at least one Arab inventor. Of the total U.S. patent applications, 3.4% had at
least one Arab inventor, despite the fact that Arab inventors represent only 0.3% of the total population.
Read more here:
https://hbr.org/2017/02/arab-inventors-make-the-u-s-more-innovative
And so that to notice how Arabs are smart people, i invite you to read
my following thoughts about them on the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/MPEszysNKhw
More of my philosophy about HBM3 and about technology and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I invite you to read the following new article:
SK Hynix Samples 24GB HBM3 Modules: Up to 819 GB/s
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/sk-hynix-samples-24-gb-hbm3-modules
So, SK Hynix Inc. is a South Korean supplier of dynamic random-access memory chips and flash memory chips. Hynix is the world's second-largest memory chipmaker and the world's third-largest semiconductor company.
So, HBM3 offers several enhancements over HBM2E, most notably the doubling of bandwidth from HBM2E at 3.6 Gbps up to 6.4Gbps for HBM3, or 819 GBps of bandwidth per device.
So, i think that increasing memory capacity is getting more difficult, since memory is coming under Moore’s Law pressures, since making increasingly dense as well as increasingly faster memory is getting more and more difficult, and hence the price of
memory has not come down as much. Other than that, i think that High Performance Linpack (HPL) matrix math test is not particularly memory bound. But the High Performance Conjugate Gradients (HPCG) and Stream Triad benchmarks are memory bound, and the
HPCG benchmark generates a synthetic discretized three-dimensional partial differential equation model problem, and computes preconditioned conjugate gradient iterations for the resulting sparse linear system. So, we don’t yet know what the HBM2e
memory on the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU will cost, so if the bandwidth of HBM2e is 4X more on the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU , i think that it is not enough for supercomputers, since the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU costs 3X more, so i think it
is why HBM3 that doubles the bandwidth from HBM2E is i think an interesting option and it is why i think that the next Intel CPU after the new Intel Sapphire Rapids CPU has to support HBM3 so that it be an interesting option for supercomputers too.
More of my philosophy about the future Apps and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked at the following new video of techlead that i know, and i invite you to look at it:
Why ChatGPT AI Will Destroy Programmers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1flF5WOeNc
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the above techlead in the above video is not thinking correctly since he is saying that software
programming is dying, since i say that software programming is not dying, since the future Apps are for example Metaverse, and of course we need Zettascale or ZettaFLOP so that Metaverse be possible, and as you notice the article below, with of Intel’s
Raja Koduri talking, says that the architecture is possible and it will be ready around 2027 or 2030 and it is the following:
An architecture jump of 16x, power and thermals are 2x, data movement is 3x, and process is 5x. That is about 500x, on top of the two ExaFLOP Aurora system, gets to a ZettaFLOP.
Interview with Intel’s Raja Koduri: Zettascale or ZettaFLOP? Metaverse what?
Read more here:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/17298/interview-with-intels-raja-koduri-zettascale-or-zettaflop-metaverse-what
And also the other future Apps are for example the one that use data to be smart in real time (Read about it here:
https://www.cxotoday.com/cxo-bytes/data-driven-smart-apps-are-the-future/ ) , and i also say that software programming is not dying since
GPT-4 and such artificial intelligence will replace just a small percentage of software programmers, since software programming also needs to care about accuracy and reliability, so you have to look at the following most important limitations of GPT-4
and such artificial intelligence so that to notice it:
1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.
2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.
And i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about GPT-4:
Exploring the Limitations and Potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4
https://ts2.space/en/exploring-the-limitations-and-potential-of-openais-gpt-4/
And more of my philosophy about the objective function and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding more GPT-4 with my fluid intelligence, so
i think that GPT-4 uses Deep learning and it uses the mechanism of self-attention so that to understand the context and it uses Reinforcement learning from human feedback that uses a reward mechanism so that
to learn from the feedback of the people that are using GPT-4 so that
to ensure that this or that data is truth or not etc. but i think that
the problem of GPT-4 is that it needs a lot of data and it is the first weakness, and it is dependent on the data and the quality of data and it is the second weakness of GPT-4, so in unsupervised learning that is
used so that to train GPT-4 on the massive data, the quality of the data is not known with certitude, so it is a weakness of artificial intelligence such as GPT-4, and about the objective function that guides, so i think that it is the the patterns that
are found by the neural network and that are learned by the neural network of GPT-4 that play the role of the objective function that guides, so the objective function comes from the massive data on wich GPT-4 has been trained, and i think it is also a
weakness of GPT-4, since i think that what is missing is what explains my new model of what is consciousness , since the meaning from human consciousness also plays the role of the objective function , so it makes it much better than artificial
intelligence and it makes it that it needs much less data, so it is why the human brain needs much less data than artificial intelligence such as GPT-4. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:
More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked more carefully at GPT-4 , and i think that as i have just explained it, that it will become
powerful, but it is limited by the data and the quality of the data on wich it has been trained, so if it encounter a new situation to be solved and the solution of it can not be inferred from the data on wich it has been trained, so it will not be
capable of solving this new situation, so i think that my new model of what is consciousness is explaining that what is lacking is the meaning from human consciousness that permits to solve the problem, so my new model is explaining that artificial
intelligence such as GPT-4 will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, but eventhough , i think that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will become powerful, so i think that the problematic in artificial intelligence is about the low level
layers, so i mean look at assembler programming language, so it is a low level layer than high level programming languages, but you have to notice that the low level layer of assembler programming language can do things that the higher level layer can
not do, so for example you can play with the stack registers and low level hardware registers and low level hardware instructions etc. and notice how the low level layer like assembler programming can teach you more about the hardware, since it is really
near the hardware, so i think that it is what is happening in artificial intelligence such as the new GPT-4, i mean that GPT-4 is for example trained on data so that to discover patterns that make it more smart, but the problematic is that this layer of
how it is trained on the data so that to discover patterns is a high level layer such as the high level programming language, so i think that it is missing the low level layers of what makes the meaning, like the meaning of the past and present and the
future or the meaning of space and matter and time.. from what you can construct the bigger meaning of other bigger things, so it is why i think that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so i think that what is
lacking in artificial intelligence is what is explaining my new model of what is consciousness, so you can read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand my views about it and about different other subjects:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/QSUWwiwN5yo
And I think that there is a law called Eroom’s law that says that the cost of new medical drug roughly doubles every nine years, so i think that Eroom’s law comes from the basis idea of the fact that it takes 80% of the effort to solve the last 20%
of the problems, but of course we have not to be pessimistic about it, since i invite you to read the following very interesting article of the following scientist that is talking about it and that is giving the reasons to be optimistic about it:
The exponential cost of progress
https://lemire.me/blog/2015/08/10/the-exponential-cost-of-progress/
More of my philosophy about HP and about the Tandem team and more of my thoughts..
I invite you to read the following interesting article so that
to notice how HP has been smart by also acquiring Tandem Computers, Inc.
with there "NonStop" systems and by learning from the Tandem team
that has also Extended HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform, you can read about it in my below writing and you can read about Tandem Computers here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandem_Computers , so notice that Tandem Computers, Inc. was the dominant
manufacturer of fault-tolerant computer systems for ATM networks, banks, stock exchanges, telephone switching centers, and other similar commercial transaction processing applications requiring maximum uptime and zero data loss:
Read more here:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/tandem-returns-to-its-hp-roots/
More of my philosophy about HP "NonStop" to x86 Server Platform fault-tolerant computer systems and more..
Now HP to Extend HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform
HP announced in 2013 plans to extend its mission-critical HP NonStop technology to x86 server architecture, providing the 24/7 availability required in an always-on, globally connected world, and increasing customer choice.
Read the following to notice it:
https://www.ciol.com/hp-extend-hp-nonstop-x86-server-platform/
And today HP provides HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform, and here is
an example, read here:
https://www.hpe.com/ca/en/pdfViewer.html?docId=4aa5-7443&parentPage=/ca/en/products/servers/mission-critical-servers/integrity-nonstop-systems&resourceTitle=HPE+NonStop+X+NS7+%E2%80%93+Redefining+continuous+availability+and+scalability+for+x86+data+sheet
More of my philosophy about Crucial T700 SSD Preview...
Crucial from USA is the only brand whose parent company, Micron
(Read more here about it:
https://www.micron.com/), innovated the NAND2 inside the T700 Gen5 SSD. Micron’s 45-year reputation for industry innovation and leadership backs up the end-to-end quality, reliability, superior testing and OEM qualification in
every Crucial SSD.
And Crucial T700 SSD Preview: Fastest Consumer SSD Hits 12.4 GB/s
Read more here:
https://www.tomshardware.com/features/crucial-t700-ssd-preview-fastest-consumer-ssd-hits-124-gbs
And read more here:
https://www.crucial.com/products/ssd/crucial-t700-ssd
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)