Hello,
More of my philosophy about US dollar and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have just looked at the following new video about the US dollar,
and i invite you to look at it:
Are fears about a dying dollar exaggerated?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTd_YC-dOgQ
So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the US dollar is not dying, since you have to look at the underlying strong and diversified and
really resilient economy of USA and the stability of USA Democracy that all makes US dollar a dominant reserve currency, so as you notice that you have to look at the underlying values that makes a currency a dominant reserve currency, and here is my new
proverb about it:
"Not wanting the US dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency is like swimming against the tide, and it is like choosing communism as a system that is like swimming against the tide."
So i also think that USA will solve its deficit problem efficiently, and i think that's not the problem, since i also think that USA is borrowing mostly at a low interest rates, since i think in a long-term the interest rates at wich it is borrowing are
low since USA is also a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that the USA government can handle a "much" heavier debt load since also USA is a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient,
so it is why i think that USA debt is not problematic, also I think that USA will still be a super power in the future, since the USA debt is not problematic as i am explaining it, and i also say that we can not compare USA to China, since China has many
defects like the "productivity" of China is not good both qualitatively and quantitatively, and China has a debt problem, so China is constrained by this factor of its debt problem, so China can not attain the level of productivity both quantitatively
and qualitatively of that of USA in the near to medium future. But the productivity of USA is good both qualitatively and quantitatively, and China has other problems such as the quality of education of its workforce is much less than that of USA, it is
why China is also lacking much in productivity both qualitatively and quantitatively. And you can look at the following video so that to understand more:
Why won't China Surpass the United States? - VisualPolitik EN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqowS-hlZ3M
And about the underlying values of a currency, read my following thoughts about it so that to understand my views:
And let me take for example cryptocurrency , so cryptocurrency has a problem, since the value of the cryptocurrency is not like well diversified, i mean that the value is just coming from the rule of supply and demand, but the US dollar is not like the
cryptocurrency, since it comes with like diversified values, i mean that the US dollar follows the supply and demand rule, but the US dollar can be also that you can exchange it with goods and services, so it is by analogy like a more diversified economy
that is more resilient, since i think that it is a diversification of values that makes the currency has a much higher value, so i think that it also look like stock prices, since the stock shares are also composed of like from what is composed a
currency, and the stock shares come with diversified values like in the case of a currency, since the diversified values come not only from the supply and demand rule, but i think it is also the return of investment in stocks that also permits you to
sell much easily your shares of stock.
More of my philosophy about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith
and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so the philosopher and economist Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism has said that: "Egoism is the engine
of prosperity and happiness of nations", and it has to also be understood that egoism creates competition too, but i think that the pattern that you have to discover is also that individual egoism or individual self-interest creates egoism or self-
interest of a group or nation or zone like European Union , so you have not just to look at individual egoism or individual self-interest , since it is also transformed into a much bigger egoism or self-interest of a group or nation or zones such as
European union and this creates responsability towards the nation or zone such as European Union or the world and it even creates solidarity, so i think it has to be understood as such, and you have also to know that self-interest or egoism is most of
the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and we can enlarge the point of view of economic competition of Adam Smith by being competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by
using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and by being competition that fights efficiently corruption that is for example the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three
separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so you have not to lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers,
and i invite you to read all my below thoughts about different subjects so that you understand my views:
More of my philosophy about fusion energy and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
UK fusion energy company reveals what its power plant will look like
The plant could be up and running within the next ten years.
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/uk-fusion-energy-company-power-plant-design
More of my philosophy about the self-esteem and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
you are noticing my second just new idea of my philosophy below and it is the following:
2- So about self-esteem, i think that self-esteem comes mostly from having a job, so i think that there is no problem in philosophy about self-esteem.
So when you look at its abstraction above, so it will look like a little
bit strange, but here is my explanation of it so that you understand my views correctly:
I think that the having self-esteem comes mostly from having a job,
so then we can logically infer that since when a human is not able
to do a kind of job, he can for example change and do another kind of job, so i think that self-esteem is much more safer, so then you are noticing that the having a job not only creates self-esteem , but it also reduces much more the class conflict and
the conflicts from inequalities of humans, but you have to know that when you have a "high" self-esteem and it is a "real" high self-esteem, so i think that it becomes an engine that can make you climb or move up much more the Ladder.
More of my philosophy about the logical proof of how the standard of living has improved much more and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have just said the following:
"But you have to understand my new thoughts below where
i am saying that having a job reduces much more the class conflict
and the conflicts from inequalities of humans, since i think that in our
today world, the standard of living has improved much more, so then
having a job in the "context" of the improved standard of living, means
that it reduces much more the class conflict and the conflicts from inequalities of humans, so you have to take the "context" of the job into account."
And here is the logical proof of how the standard of living has improved much more: So read carefully the following interesting article of John V. C. Nye that is professor of economics at Washington University in St. Louis, professor of economics at
George Mason University, and holder of the Bastiat Chair in Political Economy at the Mercatus Center:
Standards of living and modern economic growth
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/StandardsofLivingandModernEconomicGrowth.html
And read my other new ideas of my philosophy below:
More of my philosophy about philosophy and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that the just new ideas of my philosophy are the following:
1- Since there is like no meaning of human life, read about it in my below thoughts, so you have to construct a meaning of human life by first knowing how to create the positive energy , like by using the good vibes and by creating hope, and of course
you have to understand the other ideas of my philosophy where i have also invented a new monotheistic religion so that to create the meaning of human life.
2- So about self-esteem, i think that self-esteem comes mostly from having a job, so i think that there is no problem in philosophy about self-esteem.
4- And tolerance that creates harmony is the key to happiness and is
also the key to success.
5- So i think that the most important thing in politics is Transparency,
and Transparency implies openness, communication, and accountability. Transparency is practiced in companies, organizations, administrations, and communities, so i also mean that you have to monitor, with indicators, the efficiency and performance of the
system of a country and you have to know how to criticize it and to talk about it in a serious way, and i think that it needs the good Transparency and i think that it is also the basis of morality, since when people look at the seriousness of the good
Transparency , they have more the tendency to be good morality.
And you can read my poems of Love and poems and my new proverbs
and my other new thoughts and my other new ideas of my philosophy in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/GW1DXed7uOU
More of my philosophy about password security and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
"Researchers from cybersecurity firm Home Security Heroes have trained an AI to crack millions of passwords. It took him less than a minute to find most of them. The researchers explain that, to radically curb the ardor of the AI, the ideal is to compose
a password combining lowercase and uppercase letters, numbers and special characters, out of a total of fifteen characters. At this level of security , it would currently take 14 billion years for the AI to crack the password."
Read more here (And you can translate the article from french to english)
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/cybersecurite-ia-casse-plupart-mots-passe-moins-minute-voici-ceux-resistent-104682/
More of my philosophy about white supremacists and about Hitler and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following video about Hitler, and i invite you to look at it carefully:
Hitler's Creatures: The Nazis' Obsession with the Animal Kingdom | Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ApMQ2yePpU
So i think i am smart, and i am discovering a pattern in the above video, so notice how the above video is saying that nazis were ultra-nationalists, but i think that it is a big mistake to say so, since the pattern that you have to discover with your
fluid intelligence is the following:
So Hitler and nazis were not only ultra-nationalists and racists, but Hitler has wanted to rapidly to racially perfect his own german white people , so it is the defect, since for example he has not only wanted to rapidly eliminate the low IQs of his own
german white people, but he has even wanted to eliminate the average IQs of his own german people and to multiply the high IQs of his own german white people so that to become a powerful master race, but i think that it is the defect, since the pattern
is that Hitler has been an extremist of performance, so he has wanted to rapidly to racially perfect his white german people so that they become a powerful master race so that they be a performant system, so the problematic of nazism and neo-nazism and
white supremacism is that they are too much violent philosophies and it is not good for the stability of the system, and they look like the defect of the below thoughts of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, i mean that Friedrich Nietzsche says that you
have to suffer and the suffering has to be intense and cruel so that the system be performant, but i think that it is an extremism , since suffering this kind of way is not good for the stability of the system , so as i am saying below that you have to
know how to "balance" by knowing how to create the meaning of human life that balances, so it is why i am saying below that you have to know how to be tolerance that creates harmony.
More of my philosophy about Democracy and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following video about neo-nazism and i invite you to look at it:
What neo-Nazis have inherited from original Nazism | DW Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcCu3Yia6WU
So i think that the above video is not talking about a so important thing, and it is that neo-nazism has the tendency to seek the exactness,
so they want the system to be exact so that to be performant, so they want for example to calculate with exactness who is useful and who is not useful to the system so that to persecute them or kill them, but i think that the big weakness of neo-nazism
is that science says that we have to be a level of doubt about this kind of exactness since it is so difficult to do exact calculations about it, so a level of Doubtfulness about it in science is something to welcome and is something to be encouraged,
also neo-nazism has to be a dictatorship so that to proceed with such actions, but i think that here again dictatorship has also the same problem that i have just talked about it just before, so it is why i think that the best way is also to be tolerance
that creates harmony and to be tolerance brought by Democracy.
More of my philosophy about how to monitor the performance of a system and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of thougths..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will
ask a philosophical question of:
How to monitor the performance of a system?
So i have just talked about the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, read it below, but you have to notice by reading below my
thoughts about it, that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is giving too much weight of importance to performance, i mean that he is for
example saying that you have to suffer and the suffering has to be intense and cruel so that the system be performant, but i think
that it is an extremism , since suffering this kind of way hurts
the meaning of human life, so it is not good for the stability of the system and it can hurt the system, so as i am saying below that you have to know how to "balance" by knowing how to create the meaning of human life that balances, so it is why i am
saying below
that you have to know how to be tolerance that creates harmony.
More of my philosophy about morality and about artificial intelligence
and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i have just discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is an important pattern and it
is related to morality and it is the following:
So i think that the most important thing in politics is Transparency,
and Transparency implies openness, communication, and accountability. Transparency is practiced in companies, organizations, administrations, and communities, so i also mean that you have to monitor, with indicators, the efficiency and performance of the
system of a country and you have to know how to criticize it and to talk about it in a serious way, and i think that it needs the good Transparency and i think that it is also the basis of morality, since when people look at the seriousness of the good
Transparency , they have more the tendency to be good morality. And of course the other pattern is that the key to happiness is to know how to be tolerance that creates harmony, and you can read all my below thoughts so that to understand my views on
different subjects.
More of my philosophy about happiness and about artificial intelligence
and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have
just looked at the following french philosopher that is talking about
how to be happiness, so i invite you to look at it here:
Frédéric Lenoir: la quête du bonheur et autres échanges philosophiques avec Franck Nicolas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suaLY0Fwg90
I think i am a smart philosopher, and i think that the way to be happy
is not to seek happiness in not being harmony, but it is
seeking to be happiness in the being harmony, but you have to
understand my conception, i mean when you look at the conception
of what is suffering of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in my below previous thoughts, you will notice that what is lacking is the meaning
of human life that balances, so , i think that the key to success is
the knowing how to be tolerance, i mean that people have to know how
to be tolerance that creates harmony, so if you are smart , you will
notice that performance in the conception the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche doesn't unite people and it brings instability and disorder
and violence, so i think that so that to be safe you have to know
how to educate people at being tolerance that creates harmony, but tolerance doesn't mean to accept LGBT or sadists lifestyle or the like, but it is that even LGBT community has to know how to tolerate by not forcing their conception of their lifestyle
on others. So i think that the key to happiness is to know how to be tolerance that creates harmony.
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about Friedrich Nietzsche and about suffering
and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i have just looked at the following video about the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to look at it here:
Nietzsche et l'importance de la souffrance dans le développement de la volonté de puissance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIn709qY6H8
So i think i am a smart philosopher and i think that Friedrich Nietzsche
has said in the above video that suffering is important and good for advancement, and he has also said that humans must suffer so that to advance, and he has also said that suffering has to be intense and cruel, but i think that i am a smart philosopher
and i said that the big weakness of the Friedrich Nietzsche conception is that there has to be meaning of human life, so if you say to people that they have to suffer and suffer more, so there will be a logical contradiction, since we also have to have
meaning of human life that balances the suffering, so the Friedrich Nietzsche conception about suffering is not the right one, so we have to know how to be tolerance and how to balance. And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about the meaning of human
life so that to understand more:
More of my philosophy about the relative meaning and the absolute meaning and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart philosopher, and i will explain more what i want to say about the meaning of human life or life, so what i mean
is that there is a meaning that is relative and there is a meaning that is absolute, and there is also the weight of importance that you have to take into account, so when you say that someone has a high IQ, so
it is not a correct measure since you are measuring relatively to
the normal distribution of the IQs, but it is not the correct measure since you can also say "like" absolutely that humans are so weak in front of life and that means that the highly IQ becomes in fact a not highly smart IQ, so i am a smart philosopher
that is measuring the meaning of human life in this kind of way, so i say that there is a relative meaning of saying like nazism or neo-nazism that for example the working in a job is good and it gives meaning to human life, but it is not the correct way
of measuring since humans will still believe strongly that human life or life is bad, so it is why we can say that since they say that human life is so bad, so it makes the meaning of human life or life not a worth meaning, and the not worth meaning
become like having no meaning of human life or life since it is a so strong
not worth meaning, so then read my below thoughts so that to understand more my views about it as a smart philosopher:
More of my philosophy about philosophy about the meaning of human life and life and more of my thoughts..
I think i am a smart philosopher, so i have to explain more
what i have just said, and here is what i have just said:
"So in the philosophy of Existentialism, the philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus said that the meaning of human life must be constructed through courageous choice in the face of this absurd situation of life, and this kind of choice cannot be
understood as achieving moral certainty; rather it is moral heroism within an essentially morally vague and chaotic world, but i think i am a philosopher and i say that the way of constructing the meaning of the philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre Sartre and
Albert Camus is not logical, since i say that the engine that is able to construct the meaning of human life can not come from the absurd situation of life and the fact that they want to use courage as an engine that constructs the
meaning is a weak way of doing it, since the absurd situation of life is so strong."
So i think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain my above thoughts, so when i say above:
"The philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus said that the meaning of human life must be constructed through courageous choice in the face of this absurd situation of life."
So what it means, it is what i say in french: Le sens de la vie est en devenir, mais le sens de la vie n'existe pas, et il faut s'appuyer sur le courage pour le construire, so what means the above thoughts of Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus is that the
meaning of human life doesn't exist, but the meaning of human life must be constructed through courageous choice in the face of this absurd situation of life, but i am saying as a smart philosopher that it is the defect of philosophy, since not everyone
is so courageous.
More of my philosophy about how vaccines for cancer and other diseases could be ready by 2030 and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
Vaccines for cancer and other diseases could be ready by 2030
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/health/vaccines-cancer-other-diseases-by-2030
More of my philosophy about my new web links and about cancer and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have just added an important web link to the following web link
of my thoughts about obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs, and here it is and read it carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/94PU9CGNLjY
An oxygen-eating battery implant cures 90 percent of cancer in mice
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/science/an-oxygen-eating-battery-implant-cures-90-percent-of-cancer-in-mice
And the days of cancer relapse are over, thanks to this novel chemoimmunotherapy
Novel nanoparticles know how to kill cancer for good.
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-chemoimmunotherapy-kill-cancer-for-good
And I think you will soon be able to pass a blood test that could detect cancers early, read about it here:
A blood test that could detect cancers early will undergo trials in the U.S.
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/health/blood-test-detect-cancers-trials
And i think the following new treatment will allow to beat cancer,
so i invite you to read about it carefully in the following article:
Scientists attempt to beat cancer by suffocating cells within four hours
https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-treatment-suffocating-cancer-cells
And read my following thoughts in the following web link about
obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs, and here it is:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/94PU9CGNLjY
More of my philosophy about Free Will and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
"Are we free to make our own choices, or are we automatons controlled by some mysterious conductor? Until recently, a debate raged in neuroscience circles concerning this very question because an experiment showed that the brain decides before we are
aware of it. Fortunately, the experiment was recently debunked, leaving us to face the hard reality that we must be responsible for our actions. Choose wisely."
Read more here on Big Think:
Do the laws of physics and neuroscience disprove free will?
https://bigthink.com/13-8/physics-neuroscience-free-will/
More of my philosophy about how to be optimistic about capitalism
and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I have just said , read it below, that we have to be optimistic
about capitalism, but you have to understand why, since i am saying in my following thoughts in the following web link, that we have to implement progressive capitalism so that to make capitalism be successful and you can read my thoughts about
progressive capitalism
and about productivity etc. in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
More of my philosophy Capitalism for the Long Term and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I have just read the following article from Harvard Business Review,
and i invite you to read it:
Capitalism for the Long Term
https://hbr.org/2011/03/capitalism-for-the-long-term
So it is saying the following:
"It’s fair to say, however, that such stories are countercultural. In the 1970s the average holding period for U.S. equities was about seven years; now it’s more like seven months. According to a recent paper by Andrew Haldane, of the Bank of England,
such churning has made markets far more volatile and produced yawning gaps between corporations’ market price and their actual value. Then there are the “hyperspeed” traders (some of whom hold stocks for only a few seconds), who now account for 70%
of all U.S. equities trading, by one estimate. In response to these trends, executives must do a better job of filtering input, and should give more weight to the views of investors with a longer-term, buy-and-hold orientation."
But i am not in accordance with what is saying the above person, since
the U.S. equities that is now like seven months, is not a good indicator , and the “hyperspeed” traders (some of whom hold stocks for only a few seconds), who now account for 70% of all U.S. equities trading, is not a good indicator too, since i
think that in the Stock investment you have to know how to avoid the Risk , so you have to understand that investing in the Stock prices of short-term fluctuations in the Stock market is not so attractive, since it is more Risky too, so then the above
indicators are not good indicators , since i think that there still who will invest on good and valuable Stock, so this will ensure to create the future good and valuable companies, so we have still to be optimistic about capitalism.
More of my philosophy about the limitations of artificial intelligence
such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
The most important limitations of GPT-4 are the following:
1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.
2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.
And i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about GPT-4:
Exploring the Limitations and Potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4
https://ts2.space/en/exploring-the-limitations-and-potential-of-openais-gpt-4/
And read my following previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the objective function and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding more GPT-4 with my fluid intelligence, so
i think that GPT-4 uses Deep learning and it uses the mechanism of self-attention so that to understand the context and it uses Reinforcement learning from human feedback that uses a reward mechanism so that
to learn from the feedback of the people that are using GPT-4 so that
to ensure that this or that data is truth or not etc. but i think that
the problem of GPT-4 is that it needs a lot of data and it is the first weakness, and it is dependent on the data and the quality of data and it is the second weakness of GPT-4, so in unsupervised learning that is
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)