Hello,
More of my philosophy about happiness and about artificial intelligence
and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have
just looked at the following french philosopher that is talking about
how to be happiness, so i invite you to look at it here:
Frédéric Lenoir: la quête du bonheur et autres échanges philosophiques avec Franck Nicolas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suaLY0Fwg90
I think i am a smart philosopher, and i think that the way to be happy
is not to seek happiness in not being harmony, but it is
seeking to be happiness in the being harmony, but you have to
understand my conception, i mean when you look at the conception
of what is suffering of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in my below previous thoughts, you will notice that what is lacking is the meaning
of human life that balances, so , i think that the key to success is
the knowing how to be tolerance, i mean that people have to know how
to be tolerance that creates harmony, so if you are smart , you will
notice that performance in the conception the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche doesn't unite people and it brings instability and disorder
and violence, so i think that so that to be safe you have to know
how to educate people at being tolerance that creates harmony, but tolerance doesn't mean to accept LGBT or sadists lifestyle or the like, but it is that even LGBT community has to know how to tolerate by not forcing their conception of their lifestyle
on others. So i think that the key to happiness is to know how to be tolerance that creates harmony.
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about Friedrich Nietzsche and about suffering
and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i have just looked at the following video about the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche, so i invite you to look at it here:
Nietzsche et l'importance de la souffrance dans le développement de la volonté de puissance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIn709qY6H8
So i think i am a smart philosopher and i think that Friedrich Nietzsche
has said in the above video that suffering is important and good for advancement, and he has also said that humans must suffer so that to advance, and he has also said that suffering has to be intense and cruel, but i think that i am a smart philosopher
and i said that the big weakness of the Friedrich Nietzsche conception is that there has to be meaning of human life, so if you say to people that they have to suffer and suffer more, so there will be a logical contradiction, since we also have to have
meaning of human life that balances the suffering, so the Friedrich Nietzsche conception about suffering is not the right one, so we have to know how to be tolerance and how to balance. And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about the meaning of human
life so that to understand more:
More of my philosophy about the relative meaning and the absolute meaning and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart philosopher, and i will explain more what i want to say about the meaning of human life or life, so what i mean
is that there is a meaning that is relative and there is a meaning that is absolute, and there is also the weight of importance that you have to take into account, so when you say that someone has a high IQ, so
it is not a correct measure since you are measuring relatively to
the normal distribution of the IQs, but it is not the correct measure since you can also say "like" absolutely that humans are so weak in front of life and that means that the highly IQ becomes in fact a not highly smart IQ, so i am a smart philosopher
that is measuring the meaning of human life in this kind of way, so i say that there is a relative meaning of saying like nazism or neo-nazism that for example the working in a job is good and it gives meaning to human life, but it is not the correct way
of measuring since humans will still believe strongly that human life or life is bad, so it is why we can say that since they say that human life is so bad, so it makes the meaning of human life or life not a worth meaning, and the not worth meaning
become like having no meaning of human life or life since it is a so strong
not worth meaning, so then read my below thoughts so that to understand more my views about it as a smart philosopher:
More of my philosophy about philosophy about the meaning of human life and life and more of my thoughts..
I think i am a smart philosopher, so i have to explain more
what i have just said, and here is what i have just said:
"So in the philosophy of Existentialism, the philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus said that the meaning of human life must be constructed through courageous choice in the face of this absurd situation of life, and this kind of choice cannot be
understood as achieving moral certainty; rather it is moral heroism within an essentially morally vague and chaotic world, but i think i am a philosopher and i say that the way of constructing the meaning of the philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre Sartre and
Albert Camus is not logical, since i say that the engine that is able to construct the meaning of human life can not come from the absurd situation of life and the fact that they want to use courage as an engine that constructs the
meaning is a weak way of doing it, since the absurd situation of life is so strong."
So i think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain my above thoughts, so when i say above:
"The philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus said that the meaning of human life must be constructed through courageous choice in the face of this absurd situation of life."
So what it means, it is what i say in french: Le sens de la vie est en devenir, mais le sens de la vie n'existe pas, et il faut s'appuyer sur le courage pour le construire, so what means the above thoughts of Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus is that the
meaning of human life doesn't exist, but the meaning of human life must be constructed through courageous choice in the face of this absurd situation of life, but i am saying as a smart philosopher that it is the defect of philosophy, since not everyone
is so courageous.
More of my philosophy about how vaccines for cancer and other diseases could be ready by 2030 and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
Vaccines for cancer and other diseases could be ready by 2030
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/health/vaccines-cancer-other-diseases-by-2030
More of my philosophy about my new web links and about cancer and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have just added an important web link to the following web link
of my thoughts about obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs, and here it is and read it carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/94PU9CGNLjY
An oxygen-eating battery implant cures 90 percent of cancer in mice
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/science/an-oxygen-eating-battery-implant-cures-90-percent-of-cancer-in-mice
And the days of cancer relapse are over, thanks to this novel chemoimmunotherapy
Novel nanoparticles know how to kill cancer for good.
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-chemoimmunotherapy-kill-cancer-for-good
And I think you will soon be able to pass a blood test that could detect cancers early, read about it here:
A blood test that could detect cancers early will undergo trials in the U.S.
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/health/blood-test-detect-cancers-trials
And i think the following new treatment will allow to beat cancer,
so i invite you to read about it carefully in the following article:
Scientists attempt to beat cancer by suffocating cells within four hours
https://interestingengineering.com/health/new-treatment-suffocating-cancer-cells
And read my following thoughts in the following web link about
obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs, and here it is:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/94PU9CGNLjY
More of my philosophy about Free Will and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
"Are we free to make our own choices, or are we automatons controlled by some mysterious conductor? Until recently, a debate raged in neuroscience circles concerning this very question because an experiment showed that the brain decides before we are
aware of it. Fortunately, the experiment was recently debunked, leaving us to face the hard reality that we must be responsible for our actions. Choose wisely."
Read more here on Big Think:
Do the laws of physics and neuroscience disprove free will?
https://bigthink.com/13-8/physics-neuroscience-free-will/
More of my philosophy about how to be optimistic about capitalism
and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I have just said , read it below, that we have to be optimistic
about capitalism, but you have to understand why, since i am saying in my following thoughts in the following web link, that we have to implement progressive capitalism so that to make capitalism be successful and you can read my thoughts about
progressive capitalism
and about productivity etc. in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
More of my philosophy Capitalism for the Long Term and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I have just read the following article from Harvard Business Review,
and i invite you to read it:
Capitalism for the Long Term
https://hbr.org/2011/03/capitalism-for-the-long-term
So it is saying the following:
"It’s fair to say, however, that such stories are countercultural. In the 1970s the average holding period for U.S. equities was about seven years; now it’s more like seven months. According to a recent paper by Andrew Haldane, of the Bank of England,
such churning has made markets far more volatile and produced yawning gaps between corporations’ market price and their actual value. Then there are the “hyperspeed” traders (some of whom hold stocks for only a few seconds), who now account for 70%
of all U.S. equities trading, by one estimate. In response to these trends, executives must do a better job of filtering input, and should give more weight to the views of investors with a longer-term, buy-and-hold orientation."
But i am not in accordance with what is saying the above person, since
the U.S. equities that is now like seven months, is not a good indicator , and the “hyperspeed” traders (some of whom hold stocks for only a few seconds), who now account for 70% of all U.S. equities trading, is not a good indicator too, since i
think that in the Stock investment you have to know how to avoid the Risk , so you have to understand that investing in the Stock prices of short-term fluctuations in the Stock market is not so attractive, since it is more Risky too, so then the above
indicators are not good indicators , since i think that there still who will invest on good and valuable Stock, so this will ensure to create the future good and valuable companies, so we have still to be optimistic about capitalism.
More of my philosophy about the limitations of artificial intelligence
such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
The most important limitations of GPT-4 are the following:
1- GPT-4 lacks on the understanding of context, since GPT-4 was trained
on large amounts of text data, but it has not the ability to
understand the context of the text. This means that it can generate
coherent sentences, but they may not always make sense in the context
of the conversation.
2- And GPT-4 is limited in its ability to generate creative or original content. GPT-4 is trained on existing text data, so it is not able to
generate new ideas or concepts. This means that GPT-4 is not suitable
for tasks that require creativity or originality.
And i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about GPT-4:
Exploring the Limitations and Potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4
https://ts2.space/en/exploring-the-limitations-and-potential-of-openais-gpt-4/
And read my following previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the objective function and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think i am understanding more GPT-4 with my fluid intelligence, so
i think that GPT-4 uses Deep learning and it uses the mechanism of self-attention so that to understand the context and it uses Reinforcement learning from human feedback that uses a reward mechanism so that
to learn from the feedback of the people that are using GPT-4 so that
to ensure that this or that data is truth or not etc. but i think that
the problem of GPT-4 is that it needs a lot of data and it is the first weakness, and it is dependent on the data and the quality of data and it is the second weakness of GPT-4, so in unsupervised learning that is
used so that to train GPT-4 on the massive data, the quality of the data is not known with certitude, so it is a weakness of artificial intelligence such as GPT-4, and about the objective function that guides, so i think that it is the the patterns that
are found by the neural network and that are learned by the neural network of GPT-4 that play the role of the objective function that guides, so the objective function comes from the massive data on wich GPT-4 has been trained, and it think it is also a
weakness of GPT-4, since i think that what is missing is what explains my new model of what is consciousness , since the meaning from human consciousness also plays the role of the objective function , so it makes it much better than artificial
intelligence and it makes it that it needs much less data, so it is why the human brain needs much less data than artificial intelligence such as GPT-4. So i invite you to read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:
More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i have just looked more carefully at GPT-4 , and i think that as i have just explained it, that it will become
powerful, but it is limited by the data and the quality of the data on wich it has been trained, so if it encounter a new situation to be solved and the solution of it can not be inferred from the data on wich it has been trained, so it will not be
capable of solving this new situation, so i think that my new model of what is consciousness is explaining that what is lacking is the meaning from human consciousness that permits to solve the problem, so my new model is explaining that artificial
intelligence such as GPT-4 will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, but eventhough , i think that artificial intelligence such as GPT-4 will become powerful, so i think that the problematic in artificial intelligence is about the low level
layers, so i mean look at assembler programming language, so it is a low level layer than high level programming languages, but you have to notice that the low level layer of assembler programming language can do things that the higher level layer can
not do, so for example you can play with the stack registers and low level hardware registers and low level hardware instructions etc. and notice how the low level layer like assembler programming can teach you more about the hardware, since it is really
near the hardware, so i think that it is what is happening in artificial intelligence such as the new GPT-4, i mean that GPT-4 is for example trained on data so that to discover patterns that make it more smart, but the problematic is that this layer of
how it is trained on the data so that to discover patterns is a high level layer such as the high level programming language, so i think that it is missing the low level layers of what makes the meaning, like the meaning of the past and present and the
future or the meaning of space and matter and time.. from what you can construct the bigger meaning of other bigger things, so it is why i think that artificial intelligence will not attain artificial general intelligence or AGI, so i think that what is
lacking in artificial intelligence is what is explaining my new model of what is consciousness, so you can read all my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand my views about it and about different other subjects:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/QSUWwiwN5yo
More of my philosophy about my being a philosopher and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think i have come with many new ideas of my philosophy, and there is one more new important idea of my
philosophy, and it is about the essence of philosophy, i mean that you can say that philosophy tries to find certitudes that makes us more happy, since the goal of philosophy is to be happy, and of course happiness is understood in philosophy as also
responsability that makes us happy, but i think that science comes with "certitudes" too, since i think that a "certitude" is absolute certainty, since i think that without this certitudes, we will "distrust" science, so i think that philosophy permits
us to become conscious about our world, and the becoming conscious can still be a consciousness without the necessary certitude that makes the system
decently stable and makes us hope, so i think that in philosophy we have
to know how to bring the necessary certitudes that makes the system
decently stable and that makes us hope, since i don't think that humans want to walk in a path that is too much dark, so you have to understand the way of my philosophy below, since the way of my philosophy is to make us conscious and it is also to bring
the necessary certitudes that makes the system decently stable and that makes us hope, so that to not make humans walk in a path that is too much dark, since darkness is not good.
More of my philosophy about self-esteem and about my philosophy and
about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think that the having self-esteem comes mostly from having a job,
so then we can logically infer that since when a human is not able
to do a kind of job, he can for example change and do another kind of job, so i think that self-esteem is much more safer, so then you are noticing that the having a job not only creates self-esteem , but it also reduces much more the class conflict and
the conflicts from inequalities of humans, but you have to know that when you have a "high" self-esteem and it is a "real" high self-esteem, so i think that it becomes an engine that can make you climb or move up much more the Ladder.
More of my philosophy about the logical proof of how the standard of living has improved much more and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I have just said the following:
"But you have to understand my new thoughts below where
i am saying that having a job reduces much more the class conflict
and the conflicts from inequalities of humans, since i think that in our
today world, the standard of living has improved much more, so then
having a job in the "context" of the improved standard of living, means
that it reduces much more the class conflict and the conflicts from inequalities of humans, so you have to take the "context" of the job into account."
And here is the logical proof of how the standard of living has improved much more: So read carefully the following interesting article of John V. C. Nye that is professor of economics at Washington University in St. Louis, professor of economics at
George Mason University, and holder of the Bastiat Chair in Political Economy at the Mercatus Center:
Standards of living and modern economic growth
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/StandardsofLivingandModernEconomicGrowth.html
And read my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views on different subjects:
More of my philosophy about the Class conflict theory and about my philosophy and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Class conflict theory argues that conflict between the producing class and the owning class is bound to erupt because the interests of the two classes act in opposition against each other. The worker, whether it be slave, vassal, or employee is always
attempting to acquire more free time, better working conditions, and increased pay; while the land owner/employer is constantly trying to increase the length of time the worker works and decrease the cost out of their own pocket to fund the work. These
two opposed objectives permeate throughout the rest of society and drive most, if not all of the conflict in which the society finds itself. But you have to understand my new thoughts below where i am saying that having a job reduces much more the class
conflict
and the conflicts from inequalities of humans, since i think that in our
today world, the standard of living has improved much more, so then
having a job in the "context" of the improved standard of living, means
that it reduces much more the class conflict and the conflicts from inequalities of humans, so you have to take the "context" of the job into account. But of course i have also talked about the subject of poverty in USA , and i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts in the following web link about it and
about productivity and capitalism:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And read my following previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about how to solve the human conflicts and about artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think that class conflict or class struggle and conflicts from inequalities of humans can be reduced much more by providing jobs to humans, so having a job permits to reduce much more those human conflicts, since a job can play a significant role in
emancipating a human in several ways. Firstly, having a job can provide a sense of financial independence, allowing an individual to support themselves and their families. This financial independence can lead to greater autonomy and freedom, as
individuals are no longer reliant on others for their basic needs. In addition, a job can provide a sense of purpose and fulfillment, allowing individuals to contribute to society and feel valued. This can lead to increased self-esteem and a greater
sense of worth, which can in turn lead to greater confidence and empowerment. Having a job can also provide opportunities for personal and professional development, including the acquisition of new skills and experiences. This can lead to increased
confidence and a greater sense of agency, as individuals become more capable and competent in their work. Overall, a job can play a vital role in the emancipation of a human, providing them with financial independence, a sense of purpose and fulfillment,
and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
Other than that those human conflicts can also be reduced by knowing that capitalism is not a zero-sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of
return to the owners of capital. Other than that i have also said that my way of doing business is like the way of a country, since the economy of a country has to be competitive, but how to be a competitive economy ? so the way of being competitive
economy is also to invent a thing or things that is or are useful and that the others have not invented so that to also not expose yourself to competition and so that you can also fix the price more easily, so it is my way of doing since i am an inventor
, so my way of doing in my business is the being an inventor of useful things, and not only that, since so that to be a competitive economy, the economy of a country has to be diversified so that to be "resilient" , and it is also my way of doing, since
i am also diversifying so that to be efficient by inventing many of my business plans that i think are successful and that i think are interesting , so i am diversifying by being an inventor of many useful things and i am diversifying by inventing many
business plans that i think will make me successful, so it is my way of doing, and of course i know how to do the good advertising too to my business. So it is, in an abstract way, my way of doing business. Also you have to know that i will help the poor
and needy with the money that i will earn
from selling my inventions.
And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/QSUWwiwN5yo
More of my philosophy about my contributions and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts
You can carefully notice that i have just grouped the following
new web links of my contributions of my new proverbs and of my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy and of my poems of Love and poems and of my other thoughts , and of course they show my kind of personality, and here they are:
And you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And read my following thoughts in the following web link about
obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/94PU9CGNLjY
And of course here is more of my philosophy about the mathematical modeling of the Jackson network and about mathematics and more of my thoughts, you can read it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA
And you can read my poems of Love and poems and my new proverbs
and my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/GW1DXed7uOU
And read more of my following thoughts about cancer and about health and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/k6_-3RpoSOA
And speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity ,
i invite you to read all my following interesting thoughts
about it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/bayBuSxhTEU
And here is more of my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)