Hello,
More of my philosophy about what is consciousness and about the most important weakness of artificial intelligence and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i think that the most important weakness of artificial intelligence is not the high cost of computational power, since i am showing how to solve it in my below thoughts, and it is not the wall of knowledge as i am writing about it in my below thoughts,
but the most important weakness of artificial intelligence is the one that i have talked about , and it is how to ensure the quality of the exactness of the output without using the mechanisms of human consciousness, so i think i have explained what is
human consciousness in a holistic way, read about it in my below thoughts, so i am explaining that human consciousness highers the quality of exactness of the output in a kind of way that avoids mistakes of artificial intelligence that hurts quality of
the output and that hurts a lot productivity of artificial intelligence as i am explaining it in my below thoughts, and it is why i say
that ChatGPT and such artificial intelligence will not replace a lot of jobs, but will replace just a few jobs, and here is how i have explained what is human consciousness so that you understand my views:
More of my philosophy about the process of reification and more about human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Reification is when you think of or treat something abstract as a physical thing. Reification is a complex idea for when you treat something immaterial — like happiness, fear, or evil — as a material thing, so i think that human conscicousness is by
logical analogy like the process of Reification, i mean that a concept in our brain is not just a class or object like in object oriented programming, since i mean that a class in object oriented programming is not just a class but it is also reification
by our brain, since we are also reifying the class with or by using the true meaning from our human consciousness, so it is like composability since we are composing with consciousness of time and space and reality from the low level to the high level,
so it is the same for what i am explaining below, since so that to compose the theorem that is known as the transitive property of implication, we have to understand the meaning of the low level constructs such as: If a then b and if b then c then a then
c, so then it is like a reification that we do, since when for example we say: a then b, we are like reifying from the low level constructs of consciousness of time and space and matter to the upper levels.
More of my philosophy about self-awareness or self-consciousness and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i have just explained more what is consciousness, and now i will explain what is self-awareness or self-consciousness:
So i think that self-awareness or self-consciousness of a human is also
like a reification + the smartness, since i think that consciousness of yourself is obtained by knowing about the true meaning of yourself by also using like a reification with sensations and feelings and consciousness of time and space and matter and
reality with wich you compose the consciousness, so then after smartness obtains like a true meaning by using consciousness of who you are by looking at yourself, so self-awareness or self-consciousness is developed. And it is my explanation of what is
consciousness.
More of my philosophy about my model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am really smart, but you have to understand my model that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so my model is not trying to explain all the low levels of consciousness, but what it explains is that human consciousness gives
like the true meaning by composing with our sensations of what is reality and with feelings and with consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so now you are then understanding that my model explains that it is like a dynamic reification,
i mean that when you have an "idea", so an idea can be just a word, but if you add like the true meaning to this word by using your sensations and feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter, so it become like an idea that is "
alive" with consciousness, so then if you have a sentence or many sentences or a text, so this kind of reification can become like a "movie" of meanings of consciousness that is played in your brain and that gives a consciousness of the text or sentence,
so it is why my model says that the human brain compose with those meanings of sensations and feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so then my model of what is consciousness permits to make you understand how
artificial intelligence is limited as i am explaining it above and below, and it permits to do predictions like i am doing it below, so i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:
More of my philosophy about the essence of smartness and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked at the following video of a french arab Algerian called Idriss Aberkane, so Idriss Aberkane has obtained three doctorate degrees in management science from Paris Saclay, in comparative literature from University of Strasbourg, and in
diplomacy from Centre d'Études Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, you can read about him in
wikipedia here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idriss_Aberkane
And here is his video about IQ, so i invite you to look at it:
Pourquoi le QI est une ESCROQUERIE ? | Idriss Aberkane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpA1dSHdqRQ
So i am not in accordance with Idriss Aberkane in the above video,
and i am finding him not so smart as me, since he is saying that the IQ is not important, but i think that the IQ is also important, but notice how i am defining smartness in my below proverb, and here is my proverb and read it carefully:
"Smartness is not just smartness of the IQ and smartness of the culture, but it is also the being precision in thinking that is not precision of smartness of the IQ and of the culture, and it is also the smartness of the being intellectually lively and
well attentive and it is also emotional smartness."
So I think i am a new smart philosopher, so I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will talk more about the essence of smartness, so i will ask a
philosophical question of:
What is smartness ?
So i think that you have to discover a pattern or patterns with your fluid intelligence that answers the question more precisely, and the patterns are the following:
Smartness is the quality of intellectual meaning of a pattern that you can discover with your fluid intelligence or of a system that permits to adapt well, since i think that the goal of smartness is that it permits to adapt well, so then we can define a
mechanism in the material reality that is mapped to an intellectual mechanism that brings precision as a smartness, so then you are noticing that in my above proverb i am defining the precision that is not the precision of smartness of the IQ or of the
culture as a smartness, and it is understandable by my way of defining smartness, so as you notice that we can not neglect the fact that the quality of human intellectual meaning enhances smartness, so then it is not logical to say that artificial
intelligence without the human intellectual meaning can be the same smartness or level of smartness as the human smartness, and i have given a logical proof of it by saying the following:
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will ask a philosophical question of:
How to beat artificial intelligence ?
So i think i am smart and i will start by giving you a good example so that you understand:
So if i say:
If a then b
and
if b then c
A human can logically infer that it means: then a then c
But the problem in artificial intelligence is that the patterns
comes from the data on wich artificial intelligence was trained ,
so how for example artificial intelligence does "generalize" the above example and make it a theorem in mathematics?, i mean that so that a human generalizes from the above example he also use the "meaning" from human consciousness, so i think that it is
the weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, i mean that human consciousness is able to make such generalizations with the help of the meaning from human consciousness when the pattern to be discovered is unknown to artificial
intelligence, so you have to understand that human consciousness is also consciousness of space and time and matter that permits to "compose" the meaning , so then you are understanding from my explanation that what is lacking to artificial intelligence
is this meaning from the human consciousness that permits smartness to be such sophisticated smartness such as constructing a mathematical theorem from the above example, so now i think you are getting more the bigger picture of it. So i will give you an
example of my interactions with ChatGPT so that you understand more,so here it is:
So i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:
"Make a theorem of the following: if a then b and if b then c then a then c"
And here is what answered ChatGPT:
"The theorem can be stated as follows:
If a implies b, and if b implies c, then a implies c.
This theorem is known as the transitive property of implication, or the principle of transitivity. It states that if a statement (a) implies another statement (b), and if that statement (b) in turn implies a third statement (c), then the original
statement (a) must also imply the third statement (c). This principle holds for all statements that have the logical structure of implication, regardless of the specific content of the statements."
So if you are smart you will notice that in the above answer of ChatGPT, ChatGPT is not understanding the meaning of the theorem, and it has
not constructed the theorem from the low level constructs such as in my above example, but it is just discovering the theorem from the patterns on the data on wich it has been trained, so now you are understanding the limit of the smartness of ChatGPT
and of artificial intelligence, and of course i think you are now understanding how to beat artificial intelligence, since i think that artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT needs patterns that help it compose other new patterns, but it can not compose
a pattern if the patterns that compose it are lacking from the data on wich it has been trained, so you can compose this pattern by using the meaning from human consciousness as in my above example.
More of my philosophy about how ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a lot of mistakes’ and provides inaccurate info and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that ChatGPT and such artificial intelligence will not replace a lot of jobs, so i think that they will
replace just a few jobs, since i think that ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a lot of mistakes’ and provides inaccurate info, so you have to understand the output of ChatGPT so that to find those mistakes, so it is detrimental to the quality of the output of
ChatGPT and of such artificial intelligence, and it is also why i think that this problematic also hurts productivity, so i invite you to look at the following interesting and smart video that smartly explains this problematic with ChatGPT and of such
artificial intelligence, so here it is and look at it carefully so that you understand:
ChatGPT Bot ‘makes a lot of mistakes’ and provides inaccurate info
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r97HMlS_LM8
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about how a flower a day keeps obesity away and
about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
A flower a day keeps obesity away? Study says yes
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/science/roselle-plant-obesity
And read my following thoughts in the following web link about
obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
More of my philosophy about the monopolistic practices of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts...
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that artificial intelligence like ChatGPT is a monopolistic practice, since ChatGPT is learning the
patterns from the creativity of humans such as software developers and the like, but the problematic is that those creative humans have not given the rights to artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT to monopolize creativity in such a way, since i think
that for example those creative people such as software developers and the like have to do business with there creativity and be able to make money, so i think that the philosophy of OpenAI and the like are not following the right philosophy, since i
think that the right way to do is to just use artificial intelligence in not a such monopolistic way that causes problems in such way, but to wait until humanity has advanced enough so that to permit artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT be used by the
people of the world.
More of my philosophy about the dominant currency and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will now invent more thoughts by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence so that you understand my
views, so here they are:
So let me take for example cryptocurrency , so cryptocurrency has a problem, since the value of the cryptocurrency is not like well diversified, i mean that the value is just coming from the rule of supply and demand, but the US dollar is not like the
cryptocurrency, since it comes with like diversified values, i mean that the US dollar follows the supply and demand rule, but the US dollar can be also that you can exchange it with goods and services, so it is by analogy like a more diversified economy
that is more resilient, since i think that it is a diversification of values that makes the currency has a much higher value, so i think that it also look like stock prices, since the stock shares are also composed of like from what is composed a
currency, and the stock shares come with diversified values like in the case of a currency, since the diversified values come not only from the supply and demand rule, but i think it is also the return of investment in stocks that also permits you to
sell much easily your shares of stock.
So notice that in my below proverb, i am saying the following:
"Not wanting the US dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency is like swimming against the tide, and it is like choosing communism as a system that is like swimming against the tide."
So notice that the dominant reserve currency comes from the strong and diversified economy, and the strong economy also can mean that it is much more self-sufficient. And of course you have to understand that
China can not be called communist, since it is not a fully implemented communism, since for example in China there is capitalistic zones etc.
so you have to understand the essence of new proverb above.
More of my philosophy about the US dollar and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
So i think you have to understand my below thoughts that say the following:
"So i think that US imports in percentage of GDP are at just 14.59% and US exports in percentage of GDP are only at 10%, so i think that US is much less dependent on the imports and exports , so i think it is much more self-sufficient than European
countries that are much more dependent on exports and imports, and since Canada too exports and imports from US at around 12% of GDP, and since Canada imports and exports in percentage of GDP are respectively at around 30%, so i think that Canada exports
and imports are much less risky in terms of dependence on exports and imports."
So here is my new proverb so that you understand my views:
"Not wanting the US dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency is like swimming against the tide, and it is like choosing communism as a system that is like swimming against the tide."
So you have to understand my above views, since of course USA is a
really resilient economy, since it is a strong and well diversified economy, and read my following thoughts so that to understand my views much better:
So i think that USA will solve its deficit problem efficiently,
and i think that's not the problem, since i also think that USA is
borrowing mostly at a low interest rates, since i think in a long-term the interest rates at wich it is borrowing are low since USA is also a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that the USA government can
handle a "much" heavier debt load since also USA is a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that USA debt is not problematic, also I think that USA will still be a super power in the future, since the USA
debt is not problematic as i am explaining it, and i also say that we can not compare USA to China, since China has many defects like the "productivity" of China is not good both qualitatively and quantitatively, and China has a debt problem, so China is
constrained by this factor of its debt problem, so China can not attain the level of productivity both quantitatively and qualitatively of that of USA in the near to medium future. But the productivity of USA is good both qualitatively and quantitatively,
and China has other problems such as the quality of education of its workforce is much less than that of USA, it is why China is also lacking much in productivity both qualitatively and quantitatively. And you can look at the following video so that to
understand more:
Why won't China Surpass the United States? - VisualPolitik EN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqowS-hlZ3M
More of my philosophy about US and Canada imports and exports in percentage of GDP and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that US imports in percentage of GDP are at just 14.59% and US exports in percentage of GDP are only at
10%, so i think that US is much less dependent on the imports and exports , so i think it is much more self-sufficient than European countries that are much more dependent on exports and imports, and since Canada too exports and imports from US at around
12% of GDP, and since Canada imports and exports in percentage of GDP are respectively at around 30%, so i think that Canada exports and imports are much less risky in terms of dependence on exports and imports. And of course US want to be much less
dependent on chips from Taiwan, and it is why Intel company from US orders more and more ASML systems. But of course US has to solve the following problematic of the neon supply, read about it in my following interesting thoughts in the following web
link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/NyDLpVAsnOE
More of my philosophy about my contributions and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts
You can carefully notice that i have just grouped the following
new web links of my contributions of my new proverbs and of my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy and of my poems of Love and poems and of my other thoughts , and of course they show my kind of personality, and here they are:
And you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And read my following thoughts in the following web link about
obesity and about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
And of course here is more of my philosophy about the mathematical modeling of the Jackson network and about mathematics and more of my thoughts, you can read it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA
And you can read my poems of Love and poems and my new proverbs
and my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/GW1DXed7uOU
And read more of my following thoughts about cancer and about health and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/k6_-3RpoSOA
And speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity ,
i invite you to read all my following interesting thoughts
about it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/bayBuSxhTEU
And here is more of my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs
More of my philosophy about High cost of computational power of running the inference of ChatGPT with the new GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Running ChatGPT is the true expense. Running the model, responding to people’s questions and queries, uses what AI experts call inference,
but running this inference is too much costly so that to scale it to billions of users, so it is why i think the new GPT-4 has almost the same number of parameters as GPT-3.5, even if OpenAI is not giving the number of parameters of GPT-4, so i think
there is still a problem of High cost of computational power of running the inference of ChatGPT with the new GPT-4.
So you can read the following article from Forbes so that to understand more:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/02/10/chatgpt-burns-millions-every-day-can-computer-scientists-make-ai-one-million-times-more-efficient/?sh=1501af896944
But i think that the above problem of high cost of computational power will be solved by the following kind of solution of IBM from USA, read about it in the following new interesting video of Anastasi In Tech:
IBM’s New Device Computes x10000 faster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTMTpcZGrRQ
So there remain the following problem of ChatGPT and the like artificial intelligence, read about it carefully in my following thoughts:
And the other problem of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is the following:
ChatGPT goes straight into the wall of knowledge!
Read more here (You can translate the web page from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/chatgpt-chatgpt-fonce-droit-mur-connaissance-103073/
And Biocomputing with mini-brains as processors could be more powerful than silicon-based AI
Read the following interesting article about it:
https://singularityhub.com/2023/03/07/biocomputing-with-mini-brains-as-processors-could-be-more-powerful-than-ai/
More precision of my philosophy about ChatGPT and about hallucinations and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Hallucinations Could Blunt ChatGPT’s Success, and OpenAI says the problem’s solvable, and Yann LeCun says we’ll see
Read more here:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-hallucination
More of my philosophy about GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
"We report the development of GPT-4, a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. While less capable than humans in many real-world scenarios, GPT-4 exhibits human-level performance on various
professional and academic benchmarks, including passing a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers. GPT-4 is a Transformer-based model pre-trained to predict the next token in a document. The post-training alignment process
results in improved performance on measures of factuality and
adherence to desired behavior. A core component of this project was developing infrastructure and optimization methods that behave predictably across a wide range of scales. This allowed us to accurately predict some aspects of GPT-4’s performance
based on models trained with no more than 1/1,000th the compute of GPT-4.
Other than that, GPT-4 significantly reduces hallucinations relative to previous models (which have themselves been improving with each iteration). GPT-4 scores 40% higher than our latest GPT-3.5 on our internal adversarial factuality evaluations."
Read more here:
pdf:
https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
blog:
https://openai.com/research/gpt-4
Read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the new version of ChatGPT that is coming next week and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
"The next version, GPT-4, was expected for this year, but the launch is now said to be imminent. At a German KI im Fokus conference on Artificial Intelligence, Andreas Braun, CTO of Microsoft Germany, said GPT-4 is expected to be announced in the coming
days. This new version of GPT is announced as being multimodal, in other words capable of understanding and generating several types of information such as images, audio and videos, unlike GPT-3.5 (and therefore ChatGPT ) which is limited to text . GPT-4
could integrate (or even replace) the firm's other AIs, such as Dall-E , which generates realistic images from a sentence, or Whisper , the next-generation voice recognition."
Read more here (And you can translate the article from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/intelligence-artificielle-nouvelle-version-chatgpt-arrive-semaine-prochaine-104014/
More of my philosophy about how to solve the computational power problem of ChatGPT and the like and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
and as i said previously that the other problem of ChatGPT and the like is the following:
I think one of the problems of ChatGPT is also the business model for it, since systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power, and i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about it:
"High cost of computational power
Systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power. The cost of running ChatGPT is $100,000 per day. It’s possible to make it work for a few million daily users, but scaling it up to billions of people will be extremely expensive. A single AI
answer costs more than ten regular Google search requests."
Read more here:
https://uxplanet.org/chatgpt-why-its-such-a-big-deal-for-all-industries-and-will-it-kill-google-796e83f93e69
But i think that the above problem of computational power will be solved by the following kind of solution of IBM from USA, read about it in the following new interesting video of Anastasi In Tech:
IBM’s New Device Computes x10000 faster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTMTpcZGrRQ
So there remain the following problem of ChatGPT and the like artificial intelligence, read about it carefully in my following thoughts:
And the other problem of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is the following:
ChatGPT goes straight into the wall of knowledge!
Read more here (You can translate the web page from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/chatgpt-chatgpt-fonce-droit-mur-connaissance-103073/
More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and about the exponential progress of our humanity and more of my thoughts..
Biocomputing with mini-brains as processors could be more powerful than silicon-based AI
Read the following interesting article about it:
https://singularityhub.com/2023/03/07/biocomputing-with-mini-brains-as-processors-could-be-more-powerful-than-ai/
And i invite you to read carefully the following, since notice
how Amazon launches its AI that is more powerful than ChatGPT
and that significantly reduces hallucinations:
Amazon launches its AI and claims it's more advanced than ChatGPT
"Amazon researchers have just posted an article and the source code for a new language model. They were interested in a type of reasoning called "chain-of-thought" (CoT) which could be translated as "thread of thought", a way of asking questions by
adding steps to the reasoning through the use examples or demonstrations. It's not completely new, but this time they used a multimodal approach ( Multimodal-CoT ). In other words, their AI was able to understand the examples in images in addition to the
text, as a child would. They tested their model on the new ScienceQA test, a battery of 21,208 multimodal multiple-choice science questions. They compared the results to other language models, like GPT 3.5 found in ChatGPT . Amazon's AI scored 91.68%,
beating the benchmark score for humans by 88.40% and significantly reducing hallucinations. And above all, with only 738 million parameters, it beat GPT 3.5 which obtained only 73.97% despite its 175 billion parameters."
Read more here (And you can translate the article from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/intelligence-artificielle-amazon-lance-son-ia-affirme-quelle-plus-evoluee-chatgpt-103523/
And here is more of my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs
And I think that you have to understand how our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, so for example when you acquire more and more knowledge, so the things become more and more easy for you, so you start to go more and more faster in learning
and progressing, so then you can learn the hard way or you can learn the easy way, so for example with ChatGPT you can learn the easy way and that means that you can go
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)