Hello,
More precision of my philosophy about the monopolistic practices of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts...
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that artificial intelligence like ChatGPT is a monopolistic practice, since ChatGPT is learning the
patterns from the creativity of humans such as software developers and the like, but the problematic is that those creative humans have not given the rights to artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT to monopolize creativity in such a way, since i think
that for example those creative people such as software developers and the like have to do business with there creativity and be able to make money, so i think that the philosophy of OpenAI and the like are not following the right philosophy, since i
think that the right way to do is to just use artificial intelligence in not a such monopolistic way that causes problems in such way, but to wait until humanity has advanced in an enough way that permits to use artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT by
the people of the world.
More of my philosophy about the dominant currency and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will now invent more thoughts by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence so that you understand my
views, so here they are:
So let me take for example cryptocurrency , so cryptocurrency has a problem, since the value of the cryptocurrency is not like well diversified, i mean that the value is just coming from the rule of supply and demand, but the US dollar is not like the
cryptocurrency, since it comes with like diversified values, i mean that the US dollar follows the supply and demand rule, but the US dollar can be also that you can exchange it with goods and services, so it is by analogy like a more diversified economy
that is more resilient, since i think that it is a diversification of values that makes the currency has a much higher value, so i think that it also look like stock prices, since the stock shares are also composed of like from what is composed a
currency, and the stock shares come with diversified values like in the case of a currency, since the diversified values come not only from the supply and demand rule, but i think it is also the return of investment in stocks that also permits you to
sell much easily your shares of stock.
So notice that in my below proverb, i am saying the following:
"Not wanting the US dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency is like swimming against the tide, and it is like choosing communism as a system that is like swimming against the tide."
So notice that the dominant reserve currency comes from the strong and diversified economy, and the strong economy also can mean that it is much more self-sufficient. And of course you have to understand that
China can not be called communist, since it is not a fully implemented communism, since for example in China there is capitalistic zones etc.
so you have to understand the essence of new proverb above.
More of my philosophy about the US dollar and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
So i think you have to understand my below thoughts that say the following:
"So i think that US imports in percentage of GDP are at just 14.59% and US exports in percentage of GDP are only at 10%, so i think that US is much less dependent on the imports and exports , so i think it is much more self-sufficient than European
countries that are much more dependent on exports and imports, and since Canada too exports and imports from US at around 12% of GDP, and since Canada imports and exports in percentage of GDP are respectively at around 30%, so i think that Canada exports
and imports are much less risky in terms of dependence on exports and imports."
So here is my new proverb so that you understand my views:
"Not wanting the US dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency is like swimming against the tide, and it is like choosing communism as a system that is like swimming against the tide."
So you have to understand my above views, since of course USA is a
really resilient economy, since it is a strong and well diversified economy, and read my following thoughts so that to understand my views much better:
So i think that USA will solve its deficit problem efficiently,
and i think that's not the problem, since i also think that USA is
borrowing mostly at a low interest rates, since i think in a long-term the interest rates at wich it is borrowing are low since USA is also a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that the USA government can
handle a "much" heavier debt load since also USA is a well diversified and powerful economy that is really resilient, so it is why i think that USA debt is not problematic, also I think that USA will still be a super power in the future, since the USA
debt is not problematic as i am explaining it, and i also say that we can not compare USA to China, since China has many defects like the "productivity" of China is not good both qualitatively and quantitatively, and China has a debt problem, so China is
constrained by this factor of its debt problem, so China can not attain the level of productivity both quantitatively and qualitatively of that of USA in the near to medium future. But the productivity of USA is good both qualitatively and quantitatively,
and China has other problems such as the quality of education of its workforce is much less than that of USA, it is why China is also lacking much in productivity both qualitatively and quantitatively. And you can look at the following video so that to
understand more:
Why won't China Surpass the United States? - VisualPolitik EN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqowS-hlZ3M
More of my philosophy about US and Canada imports and exports in percentage of GDP and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i think that US imports in percentage of GDP are at just 14.59% and US exports in percentage of GDP are only at
10%, so i think that US is much less dependent on the imports and exports , so i think it is much more self-sufficient than European countries that are much more dependent on exports and imports, and since Canada too exports and imports from US at around
12% of GDP, and since Canada imports and exports in percentage of GDP are respectively at around 30%, so i think that Canada exports and imports are much less risky in terms of dependence on exports and imports. And of course US want to be much less
dependent on chips from Taiwan, and it is why Intel company from US orders more and more ASML systems. But of course US has to solve the following problematic of the neon supply, read about it in my following interesting thoughts in the following web
link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/NyDLpVAsnOE
More of my philosophy about my contributions and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts
You can carefully notice that i have just grouped the following
new web links of my contributions of my new proverbs and of my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy and of my poems of Love and poems and of my other thoughts , and of course they show my kind of personality, and here they are:
And you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And you can read my new thoughts about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
And of course here is more of my philosophy about the mathematical modeling of the Jackson network and about mathematics and more of my thoughts, you can read it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA
And you can read my poems of Love and poems and my new proverbs
and my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/GW1DXed7uOU
And read more of my following thoughts about cancer and about health and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/k6_-3RpoSOA
And speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity ,
i invite you to read all my following interesting thoughts
about it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/bayBuSxhTEU
And here is more of my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs
More of my philosophy about High cost of computational power of running the inference of ChatGPT with the new GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Running ChatGPT is the true expense. Running the model, responding to people’s questions and queries, uses what AI experts call inference,
but running this inference is too much costly so that to scale it to billions of users, so it is why i think the new GPT-4 has almost the same number of parameters as GPT-3.5, even if OpenAI is not giving the number of parameters of GPT-4, so i think
there is still a problem of High cost of computational power of running the inference of ChatGPT with the new GPT-4.
So you can read the following article from Forbes so that to understand more:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/02/10/chatgpt-burns-millions-every-day-can-computer-scientists-make-ai-one-million-times-more-efficient/?sh=1501af896944
But i think that the above problem of high cost of computational power will be solved by the following kind of solution of IBM from USA, read about it in the following new interesting video of Anastasi In Tech:
IBM’s New Device Computes x10000 faster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTMTpcZGrRQ
So there remain the following problem of ChatGPT and the like artificial intelligence, read about it carefully in my following thoughts:
And the other problem of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is the following:
ChatGPT goes straight into the wall of knowledge!
Read more here (You can translate the web page from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/chatgpt-chatgpt-fonce-droit-mur-connaissance-103073/
And Biocomputing with mini-brains as processors could be more powerful than silicon-based AI
Read the following interesting article about it:
https://singularityhub.com/2023/03/07/biocomputing-with-mini-brains-as-processors-could-be-more-powerful-than-ai/
More precision of my philosophy about ChatGPT and about hallucinations and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
Hallucinations Could Blunt ChatGPT’s Success, and OpenAI says the problem’s solvable, and Yann LeCun says we’ll see
Read more here:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-hallucination
More of my philosophy about GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
"We report the development of GPT-4, a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. While less capable than humans in many real-world scenarios, GPT-4 exhibits human-level performance on various
professional and academic benchmarks, including passing a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers. GPT-4 is a Transformer-based model pre-trained to predict the next token in a document. The post-training alignment process
results in improved performance on measures of factuality and
adherence to desired behavior. A core component of this project was developing infrastructure and optimization methods that behave predictably across a wide range of scales. This allowed us to accurately predict some aspects of GPT-4’s performance
based on models trained with no more than 1/1,000th the compute of GPT-4.
Other than that, GPT-4 significantly reduces hallucinations relative to previous models (which have themselves been improving with each iteration). GPT-4 scores 40% higher than our latest GPT-3.5 on our internal adversarial factuality evaluations."
Read more here:
pdf:
https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
blog:
https://openai.com/research/gpt-4
Read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the new version of ChatGPT that is coming next week and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
"The next version, GPT-4, was expected for this year, but the launch is now said to be imminent. At a German KI im Fokus conference on Artificial Intelligence, Andreas Braun, CTO of Microsoft Germany, said GPT-4 is expected to be announced in the coming
days. This new version of GPT is announced as being multimodal, in other words capable of understanding and generating several types of information such as images, audio and videos, unlike GPT-3.5 (and therefore ChatGPT ) which is limited to text . GPT-4
could integrate (or even replace) the firm's other AIs, such as Dall-E , which generates realistic images from a sentence, or Whisper , the next-generation voice recognition."
Read more here (And you can translate the article from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/intelligence-artificielle-nouvelle-version-chatgpt-arrive-semaine-prochaine-104014/
More of my philosophy about how to solve the computational power problem of ChatGPT and the like and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
and as i said previously that the other problem of ChatGPT and the like is the following:
I think one of the problems of ChatGPT is also the business model for it, since systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power, and i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about it:
"High cost of computational power
Systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power. The cost of running ChatGPT is $100,000 per day. It’s possible to make it work for a few million daily users, but scaling it up to billions of people will be extremely expensive. A single AI
answer costs more than ten regular Google search requests."
Read more here:
https://uxplanet.org/chatgpt-why-its-such-a-big-deal-for-all-industries-and-will-it-kill-google-796e83f93e69
But i think that the above problem of computational power will be solved by the following kind of solution of IBM from USA, read about it in the following new interesting video of Anastasi In Tech:
IBM’s New Device Computes x10000 faster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTMTpcZGrRQ
So there remain the following problem of ChatGPT and the like artificial intelligence, read about it carefully in my following thoughts:
And the other problem of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is the following:
ChatGPT goes straight into the wall of knowledge!
Read more here (You can translate the web page from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/chatgpt-chatgpt-fonce-droit-mur-connaissance-103073/
More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and about the exponential progress of our humanity and more of my thoughts..
Biocomputing with mini-brains as processors could be more powerful than silicon-based AI
Read the following interesting article about it:
https://singularityhub.com/2023/03/07/biocomputing-with-mini-brains-as-processors-could-be-more-powerful-than-ai/
And i invite you to read carefully the following, since notice
how Amazon launches its AI that is more powerful than ChatGPT
and that significantly reduces hallucinations:
Amazon launches its AI and claims it's more advanced than ChatGPT
"Amazon researchers have just posted an article and the source code for a new language model. They were interested in a type of reasoning called "chain-of-thought" (CoT) which could be translated as "thread of thought", a way of asking questions by
adding steps to the reasoning through the use examples or demonstrations. It's not completely new, but this time they used a multimodal approach ( Multimodal-CoT ). In other words, their AI was able to understand the examples in images in addition to the
text, as a child would. They tested their model on the new ScienceQA test, a battery of 21,208 multimodal multiple-choice science questions. They compared the results to other language models, like GPT 3.5 found in ChatGPT . Amazon's AI scored 91.68%,
beating the benchmark score for humans by 88.40% and significantly reducing hallucinations. And above all, with only 738 million parameters, it beat GPT 3.5 which obtained only 73.97% despite its 175 billion parameters."
Read more here (And you can translate the article from french to english):
https://www.futura-sciences.com/tech/actualites/intelligence-artificielle-amazon-lance-son-ia-affirme-quelle-plus-evoluee-chatgpt-103523/
And here is more of my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs
And I think that you have to understand how our humanity is progressing in an exponential way, so for example when you acquire more and more knowledge, so the things become more and more easy for you, so you start to go more and more faster in learning
and progressing, so then you can learn the hard way or you can learn the easy way, so for example with ChatGPT you can learn the easy way and that means that you can go
more and more faster in learning and progressing too, and by the inventions of tools such as internet and ChatGPT and the like, you start to learn and to progress much and much faster, and of course there is Moore’s law and there is Bezos’ Law that
makes us progress in an exponential way, and Bezos’ Law says that the cost of cloud computing will be cut in half every 18 months, so like Moore’s law, Bezos’ Law is about exponential improvement over time. If you look at AWS history, they drop
prices constantly. In 2013 alone they’ve already had 9 price drops. The difference; however, between Bezos’ and Moore’s law is this: Bezos’ law is the first law that isn’t anchored in technical innovation. Rather, Bezos’ law is anchored in
confidence and market dynamics, and will only hold true so long as Amazon is not the aggregate dominant force in Cloud Computing (50%+ market share). Monopolies don’t cut prices. And for RAM chips and flash memory, Moore's Law means that in eighteen
months you'll pay the same price as today for twice as much storage. But other computing components are also seeing their price versus performance curves skyrocket exponentially. And data storage doubles every twelve months. And i think that we have "
just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just"
already started to go exponentially even much faster, and it means that in about 10 years to 15 years from now, we will be much more advanced, and of course so that to know more about the exponential progress of our humanity , i invite you to look at the
following interesting video:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ
And don't forget to subscribe to ChatGPT Plus at only 20$ per month, read about it in the following web link:
OpenAI launches ChatGPT Plus at $20 per month: what to know
Read more here:
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/openai-launches-chatgpt-subscription
And speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity ,
i invite you to read all my following interesting thoughts
about it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/bayBuSxhTEU
And here is more of my thoughts of my philosophy about the exponential progress of our humanity and about artificial intelligence:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FratfAng3vs
And you can read more about my thoughts about productivity and capitalism and more in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And you can read my thoughts about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
And read more of my following thoughts about cancer and about health and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/k6_-3RpoSOA
And of course here is more of my philosophy about the mathematical modeling of the Jackson network and about mathematics and more of my thoughts, you can read it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA
And you can read my poems of Love and poems and my new proverbs
and my new thoughts and new ideas of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/GW1DXed7uOU
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)