• =?UTF-8?B?6YeR54G/6I2j77ya5aSq5ZCT5Lq65LqG77yB576O5Zu96L+Z5biu55av5a2Q5

    From ltlee1@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 08:34:24 2023
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_2AHUcFpI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From White@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 11 19:56:56 2023
    😀


    On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 6:34:25 PM UTC+2, ltlee1 wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_2AHUcFpI

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ltlee1@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 12 18:00:01 2023
    On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 4:34:25 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_2AHUcFpI

    He was referring to the article by the ex-GlobalTimes editor: https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1187766.shtml

    "China needs to expand the number of its nuclear warheads to 1,000 in a relatively short time. It needs to have at least 100 Dongfeng-41 strategic missiles. We are a peace-loving nation and have committed to never being the first to use nuclear weapons,
    but we need a larger nuclear arsenal to curb US strategic ambitions and impulses toward China. Maybe we have to deal with challenges with stronger determination in the near future, which requires the support of the Dongfeng and Julang missiles.

    Don't be naïve. Don't assume that nuclear warheads are useless. In fact, they are being used every day as a deterrent to shape the attitudes of US elites toward China. Some Chinese experts say we don't need more nuclear weapons, I think they are as naï
    ve as children.

    Some people may call me a"war monger"because I want the country to have more nuclear warheads. They should instead give this label to US politicians who are openly hostile to China. I always hope China and the US can get along with each other, but
    peaceful coexistence between the two countries is not a thing that can be begged for; it's shaped by strategic tools. This is particularly true as we are facing an increasingly irrational US, which only believes in strength. We don't have much time
    debating the need for increased nuclear warheads, we just need to accelerate the steps that make it happen. "

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From stoney@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 13 01:54:43 2023
    On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 9:00:09 AM UTC+8, ltlee1 wrote:
    On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 4:34:25 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_2AHUcFpI

    He was referring to the article by the ex-GlobalTimes editor: https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1187766.shtml

    "China needs to expand the number of its nuclear warheads to 1,000 in a relatively short time. It needs to have at least 100 Dongfeng-41 strategic missiles. We are a peace-loving nation and have committed to never being the first to use nuclear weapons,
    but we need a larger nuclear arsenal to curb US strategic ambitions and impulses toward China. Maybe we have to deal with challenges with stronger determination in the near future, which requires the support of the Dongfeng and Julang missiles.

    Don't be naïve. Don't assume that nuclear warheads are useless. In fact, they are being used every day as a deterrent to shape the attitudes of US elites toward China. Some Chinese experts say we don't need more nuclear weapons, I think they are as naÃ
    ¯ve as children.

    Some people may call me a"war monger"because I want the country to have more nuclear warheads. They should instead give this label to US politicians who are openly hostile to China. I always hope China and the US can get along with each other, but
    peaceful coexistence between the two countries is not a thing that can be begged for; it's shaped by strategic tools. This is particularly true as we are facing an increasingly irrational US, which only believes in strength. We don't have much time
    debating the need for increased nuclear warheads, we just need to accelerate the steps that make it happen. "


    He is well said. IMHO, it is clear that China has to have more nuclear warheads will lead to peaceful coexistence between two countries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ltlee1@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 15 06:31:59 2023
    On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 4:34:25 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr_2AHUcFpI

    As long as the US and its allies believe that they alone have the final say regarding
    good and evil, a kind of absolute power, nuclear war is inevitable.

    The US and the Russia have traveled on this road for while and the danger is increasing.

    "Russian Jet Collides With U.S. Drone Over Black Sea
    The collision forced the U.S. to bring the Reaper drone down in international waters,
    in one of the first direct military confrontations between the two nations’ forces since
    the war in Ukraine began more than a year ago." https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-jet-collides-with-u-s-drone-over-black-sea-7ae82d2f?mod=hp_lead_pos8

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)