Hello,




I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



Here is my new smart proverb:


"I think that the problematic is that we are inequal humans
and we are diversity of humans, so this inequality and this diversity of humans create problems and it makes it easy to be hate and to be violence, so the wise man will say that you have not to waste too much time with hating this inequality and
diversity, but the best way is to learn humans how to be good adaptation so that to behave wisely, so you have to be selective and know how to learn efficiently the good things that a human needs to be good adaptation. So when for example you learn a
prisoner how to be good adaptation, he will have something really valuable that makes him happy. So learning the the good adaption is the way to go, and it is also my way of doing here, since i invite you to read all my following thoughts so that to
notice it."


More of my philosophy about state planning or the too much state planning and more of my thoughts..


I think what is happening today in our world is that the world Bank and IMF and many powerful western countries are wanting countries such as Russia and Algeria and many other Arab countries and such, by also forcing many of them in a kind of way with
some mechanisms, to transition from the state planning or too much state planning to minimum state intervention by boosting competition and by enlarging the private sector and shrinking the public sector so that to be efficient economies, and
specialization in a job is of course required so that to be efficient, and also they are wanting them to be Democratic and to have a separation of powers like in the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law) so that to be efficient, and i think it is what is lacking in countries such
as Russia and Algeria and many arab countries and such that prevent
them from being efficient economies, and so that to understand more ,
i invite you so that to look at the following interesting video
of how Israel was not long ago an inefficient economy like of that of Russia and it has transitioned to an efficient economy in the Time of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and here is the video and look at it carefully:

The Israeli Way of Doing Business

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhH5OiAiD-0



More of my philosophy about how Algeria or many arab countries can boost there economy and more of my thoughts..

I have just read the following interesting article about how Algeria
can boost its economy, and i think it is also the way to follow
for many arab countries, so i invite you to read it here:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/04/how-to-liberate-algeria-s-economy/

And as you notice in the above article that the boosting competition is essential, so competition is important as i have just explained it in my previous post, other than that read my following thoughts about Algeria so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about corruption and about statistics and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i invite you to look at the following new video of an algerian
journalist that is speaking about the algerian system of governance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq7oXarkGMc


So i think i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence
in the above video, so notice that the algerian journalist in the above video is saying that the algerian system of governance is fondamentally corrupt and he is saying it hurts a lot the system and it is why it is not working, but notice the mistake
that he is making, that he has first to ask if Algeria has a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics have to be macrostatistics or macroscale
statistics and microstatistics or microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system, so we can not just say as the algerian journalist above that the algerian system of governance is not working
because it is corrupt, since we have to speak and give good statistics as i am saying above, so it is why i think that the above algerian journalist is not objective, so i think that we can logically infer from my thoughts that one of the most important
thing to have as a country is a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics has to be macrostatistics or macroscale statistics and microstatistics or
microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system.


More of my philosophy about the way of prevention and about the way of statistics and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you notice that we have to be vigilant, since i think that Algeria is not Haiti, so i think that Algeria is
not in a bad shape as Haiti or such, but of course i have to be more objective, so as you have just noticed that i have just talked about the good way of statistics as i am explaining it below, so as you notice we can monitor more the system with the
way of statistics, but i think that there is also the way of "prevention", since there is for example the way of learning by making mistakes, but you have to be more smart and know how to be the right prevention from making mistakes, so i think it is the
wise way, so then we can then talk about Democracy and about the separation of powers like in the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces
the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think we can ask a philosophical question such as of how to "ensure" the separation of powers so that to not corrupt the system and so that to be the right dose of meritocracy or quality ? so i
think that Democracy has the mechanism of "competition" between the actors of Democracy like of that between the medias and congress and the government and the people, and i think that the separation of powers also comes with a kind of competition too
that prevent corruption, so then we have to understand from it that statistics as i am explaining it below are not enough , since the basis of the system has to provide with the right mechanisms such as of Democracy and the separation of powers.



More of my philosophy about Israel and about white supremacists of national vanguard and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



I have just read the following article about Israel from the white supremacist website called national vanguard, and i invite you to read it(and you can translate it from french to english):

Israel, Land of Asylum of the Great Scam

https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/01/israel-terre-dasile-de-la-grande-arnaque/


So i am not in accordance with what is saying the above article about Israel, since there can be "some" corruption in Israel, but i don't think that jews in general or jews of Israel are corrupt people, since there is the engine of the fact that so that
to be Liberty of our today and our future we have to be responsability, so then we have to adapt correctly, and i think that quality also comes from "competition", so then so that to be quality , competition is first and foremost the will to fight, since
even America’s military argues that “will to fight” is the disposition and decision to fight, act, or persevere, and notice that this will to fight is a cause of quality that precedes the good smartness or good education as causes of quality, and i
think that competition is also the acts of competition of the acts of being good smartness or/and the acts of being good wisdom and such , so then what we have to be is to be competition that brings the right quality, so then you have to be for example a
competition in a fight for life, and you have to be economic competition of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and i also think that the seeking the big profit by being competition is also regulated by antitrust laws, and individual self-
interest and egoism creates competition and by the mechanism of competition we become self-interest and egoism of a group and of a society or of a zone such as the European union and then we become collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a
society or in a zone such as the European union or in global world and this creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and also we have to say that when we get a big profit we can also help the others by being solidarity, but we have to be patience
since it takes some time so that this individual self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity, and of course we have to be much more optimistic since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level
of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital and we have to be much more optimistic since self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to
not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and notice that we have to look at competition from a broader point of view since competition is also competition inside a Democracy
that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress and the like and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S.
constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is much less corrupt
than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers. Also i invite
you to read my below thoughts about the other engine that i am talking about:


More of my philosophy about adaptation and about the standard and more of my thoughts..

So think i am talking philosophy about the how we are perfected , and i just said about it the following:


"Since philosophically i can say that we are also perfected by the engine of the taking care of our own "image" in front of the others so that to not be discriminated or hated, so this permit us to take care of our dignity. And of course i say that our
own image is judged by a standard, but this standard by wich we judge the others is also perfected by the exponential progress of our humanity and by our experience and by our education, and i think even the standard by wich we judge a product or service
is perfected the same way, but i say we have not to be pessimistic about the standard by wich we judge the others since we are progressing in an exponential way."


But you are noticing that i am not saying that we have to adapt or to survive, since we can adapt or survive and not be correctly perfected, so as you are noticing i am showing above wich engine is perfecting us and in wich way by talking about how to
make the standard by wich
we judge the others or by wich we judge the product or service , and i am talking this way so that to make it clear that so that to progress or advance correctly we have to take care of what i am saying above.


More of my philosophy about Eric Zemmour and about dignity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have just looked at Eric Zemmour in the following french video, and
i invite you to look at it:

Eric Zemmour dénonce la décadence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBMF4n9J_wA


So i am noticing in the above video of Eric Zemmour that he is saying
that the West is living a decadence or in what we call moral or cultural decline, but i think that Eric Zemmour is not right , since philosophically i can say that we are also perfected by the engine of the taking care of our own "image" in front of the
others so that to not be discriminated or hated, so this permit us to take care of our dignity, so for example i don't think that maghrebis or maghrebians in France have no dignity, since they are also perfected by this same engine, also we have not to
forget that we are advancing very fast in an exponential way, so it is why i think that humans will rapidly advance much more , but of course we have to know how to manage our exponential progress, so it is why we have not to be pessimistic as Eric
Zemmour is pessimistic, also i invite you to read all my following views about artificial intelligence and about white supremacists and about the meaning of life or human life:


More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i have just read the following article from white supremacists of
the national vanguard, i invite you to read it:


https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/01/one-shot-and-one-shot-only/


So as you are noticing that the white supremacists are saying in the
above article the following:

"THE DAY IS UPON us. The West is, in all senses of the word, now dead. We lie in the catacombs of our once great civilization."


So i think i am smart , and when i look at the statistics i can
not say that the West is, in all senses of the word, now dead,
so then i say that we have to learn how to look at the statistics,
and we have to learn that the West is not idiot, since if the statistics say that the West is now dead, you will notice it, and if the statistics say that jews are hurting the West, you will notice it in the statistics, so i think that the jews are not
hurting the West since the statistics are not saying it, so i think that the West is not dead as is saying it the above white supremacist website, and i think that the West is smart and we have to be optimistic about the West, and of course i invite you
to read all my following views about artificial intelligence and about the meaning of human life:

More precision of my philosophy about the distribution of quality of the data on wich is trained generative AI and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i think that there is an important thing that i have to explain,
and it is that generative AI like ChatGPT was trained on data so that
to learn by detecting patterns and using them, but we can ask if
the distribution of the quality of data on wich generative AI like ChatGPT was trained on is looks like the normal distribution of IQs ? so i think that it is not like the normal distribution of IQs, since for example in technicality of software
development, ChatGPT was trained on Stack Overflow and on Gitub and on many technical books, so i think that those that ask questions and answers them in Stack Overflow are more smart than average smartness of people, and i think that the ones that make
softwares on Gitub are more smart than average smartness of people and it is the same for technical books, so it is why the data of technicality of software development on wich ChatGPT was trained or the next GPT-4 will be trained is of higher quality
than when it comes from average smartness, so it is why i think that generative AI like ChatGPT is dangerous, so read my following previous thoughts to understand my views about it:


More of my philosophy about what is exactly the problem with the lawsuit against Microsoft and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
i have just read again another new article about the lawsuit against Microsoft , here it is:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-09/github-s-openai-powered-copilot-sparks-legal-debate


And i think that the problematic is that generative AI such as ChatGPT
detects and use patterns of creativity, and those patterns can be
the high smartness of a human or creativity of a human, so i think it is the main problem, since if for example Microsoft and OpenAI have to train there generative AI with gitub open source softwares, so it will for example detect "smart" patterns that
are made by high smartness of individuals, so it will get much more smart by using them, but i think that using those patterns by generative AI is not lawful, since the generative AI will get much more smart by using those smart patterns of smart people
that belong to open source developers and it will then hurt them since the generative AI will become a too much concentration of power that hurts in a not lawful way, so from my thoughts you are understanding that there is even smart patterns on books
and on gitub that come from smart people that makes generative AI dangerous.

More of my philosophy about the lawsuit against Microsoft that could change the future of AI and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to read the following interesting new article about the lawsuit against Microsoft that could change the future of AI:


"With ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and what it can do is suddenly all the rage. But an intellectual property lawsuit against Microsoft could undermine the future of AI before it gets off the ground."

Read more here:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3684734/this-lawsuit-against-microsoft-could-change-the-future-of-ai.html


More of my philosophy about ChatGPT and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following video of what is saying
Yann LeCun, that is a known French computer scientist working primarily in artificial intelligence , about ChatGPT, so i invite you to look at it in the following youtube link:

What Yann LeCun thinks of ChatGPT?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RPzfZIhw3s


So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
and i think that Yann LeCun in the above video is saying that ChatGPT
is entertaining, but it is not useful, so i think that he is not thinking correctly, since i have already tested ChatGPT , and i think that it is useful, since it can make you much more productive and it can also make creativity much more easy for you,
also i think that ChatGPT can score well on many technical subjects and other subjects, and i mean that even if it doesn't score 100% all the time , it can be useful by scoring near by approximating well the right solution, and i think it will improve
much more in the next version with GPT-4
that will be ready in 2023, so it is why i am optimistic about the performance of ChatGPT and the next GPT-4, and of course i have just talked about my new model that explains consciousness and self-consciousness and what is the role they play in what we
call smartness and it explains why we will not attain general artificial intelligence, but of course i am explaining that even if we will not attain general artificial intelligence , ChatGPT and the next GPT-4 will still be really powerful and useful,
and of course read in my below thoughts so that to know about the business model of ChatGPT and the like so that to understand correctly, so i invite you to read about my new model below:


More of my philosophy about how ChatGPT takes a lot of computational power and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think one of the problems of ChatGPT is also the business model for it, since systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power, and i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about it:

"High cost of computational power

Systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power. The cost of running ChatGPT is $100,000 per day. It’s possible to make it work for a few million daily users, but scaling it up to billions of people will be extremely expensive. A single AI
answer costs more than ten regular Google search requests."


Read more here:

https://uxplanet.org/chatgpt-why-its-such-a-big-deal-for-all-industries-and-will-it-kill-google-796e83f93e69


And read also the following article so that to understand more:

https://bdtechtalks.com/2023/01/02/chatgpt-google-search/


More of my philosophy about what can’t do artificial intelligence and
about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I invite you to read the following new article about artificial intelligence:

AI Might Be Seemingly Everywhere, but There Are Still Plenty of Things It Can’t Do—For Now

https://singularityhub.com/2023/01/13/ai-might-be-seemingly-everywhere-but-there-are-still-plenty-of-things-it-cant-do-for-now/


Also i invite you to read in my thoughts below about my new model about what is consciousness and what is self-consciousness and what is the role they play in what we call smartness:


More of my philosophy about transhumanism and about OpenAI and about Google and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i say that you have to read about my model below of what is consciousness and what is self-consciousness and
about what is the role they play in what we call smartness, so it is why i say that you have to understand my views about ChatGPT holistically taking into account my below model, so what i also want to say is that OpenAI and Google are like
Transhumanists and i think they are not thinking correctly, since i think that they are wanting to make acceptable there kind of model of ChatGPT and the like by saying that we are going soon to attain general artificial intelligence that will permit us
to solve most of our problems, but i think that there model is not correct, since i say that you have to read about my model below so that to understand, so my model below says artificial intelligence, as we know it, will not attain general artificial
intelligence, so it is why i say that we have to know how to manage our world, since i mean that ChatGPT is also too much concentration of the power of smartness in the hands of humans that can hurt our system, since for example i can say that ChatGPT
and the like makes creativity so easy , so it can hurt the value of creativity, since what makes also the value is the inequality between humans, but i think that ChatGPT and the like are also equalizing too much too much rapidly and relatively of what
is saying my model below that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness. And read all my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about my model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, but you have to understand my model that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so my model is not trying to explain all the low levels of consciousness, but what it explains is that human consciousness gives
like the true meaning by composing with our feelings of what is reality and with consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so now you are then understanding that my model explains that it is like a dynamic reification, i mean that when
you have an "idea", so an idea can be just a word, but if you add like the true meaning to this word by using your feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter, so it become like an idea that is "alive" with consciousness, so then
if you have a sentence or many sentences or a text, so this kind of reification can become like a "movie" of meanings of consciousness that is played in your brain and that gives a consciousness of the text or sentence, so it is why my model says that
the human brain compose with those meanings of feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so then my model of what is consciousness permits to make you understand how artificial intelligence is limited as i am
explaining it below, and it permits to do predictions like i am doing it below, so i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about self-awareness or self-consciousness and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i have just explained more what is consciousness, read it below, and now i will explain what is self-awareness or self-consciousness:

So i think that self-awareness or self-consciousness of a human is also
like a reification + the smartness, since i think that consciousness of yourself is obtained by knowing about the true meaning of yourself by also using like a reification with feelings and consciousness of time and space and matter and reality with wich
you compose the consciousness, so then after smartness obtains like a true meaning by using consciousness of who you are by looking at yourself, so self-awareness or self-consciousness is developed. And it is my explanation of what is consciousness.


More of my philosophy about the process of reification and more about human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


Reification is when you think of or treat something abstract as a physical thing. Reification is a complex idea for when you treat something immaterial — like happiness, fear, or evil — as a material thing, so i think that human conscicousness is by
logical analogy like
the process of Reification, i mean that a concept in our brain is not just a class or object like in object oriented programming, since i mean that a class in object oriented programming is not just a class but it is also reification by our brain, since
we are also reifying the class with or by using the true meaning from our human consciousness, so it is like composability since we are composing with consciousnesses of time and space and reality from the low level to the high level, so it is the same
for what i am explaining below, since so that to compose the theorem that is known as the transitive property of implication, we have to understand the meaning of the low level constructs such as: If a then b and if b then c then a then c, so then it is
like a reification that we do, since when for example we say: a then b, we are like reifying from the low level constructs of consciousness of time and space and matter to the upper levels. So i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to
understand my views:


More of my philosophy about are we going to have an artificial intelligence winter and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am really smart, and now i will make a prediction,
so from my below kind of logical proof(but of course that i will soon make it a more sophisticated proof), i think it permits me to make a prediction, and it is that there will be an artificial intelligence winter, i mean that what is lacking to
artificial intelligence is the meaning from human consciousness, since without this "meaning", it is like a closed system that is limited as i am explaining it below, since the meaning from human consciousness permits to construct from the low level of
consciousness of time and space and matter that permits to construct the higher levels, but human smartness with its consciousness is an open system, so it means so that to make it an open system we have to crack the code and understand what is human
consciousness.

More of my philosophy about how to beat artificial intelligence and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will ask a philosophical question of:


How to beat artificial intelligence ?


So i think i am smart and i will start by giving you a good example so that you understand:

So if i say:

If a then b
and
if b then c

A human can logically infer that it means: then a then c

But the problem in artificial intelligence is that the patterns
comes from the data on wich artificial intelligence was trained ,
so how for example artificial intelligence does "generalize" the above example and make it a theorem in mathematics?, i mean that so that a human generalizes from the above example he also use the "meaning" from human consciousness, so i think that it is
the weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, i mean that human consciousness is able to make such generalizations with the help of the meaning from human consciousness when the pattern to be discovered is unknown to artificial
intelligence, so you have to understand that human consciousness is also consciousness of space and time and matter that permits to "compose" the meaning , so then you are understanding from my explanation that what is lacking to artificial intelligence
is this meaning from the human consciousness that permits smartness to be such sophisticated smartness such as constructing a mathematical theorem from the above example, so now i think you are getting more the bigger picture of it. So i will give you an
example of my interactions with ChatGPT so that you understand more,
so here it is:

So i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:

"Make a theorem of the following: if a then b and if b then c then a then c"

And here is what answered ChatGPT:

"The theorem can be stated as follows:

If a implies b, and if b implies c, then a implies c.

This theorem is known as the transitive property of implication, or the principle of transitivity. It states that if a statement (a) implies another statement (b), and if that statement (b) in turn implies a third statement (c), then the original
statement (a) must also imply the third statement (c). This principle holds for all statements that have the logical structure of implication, regardless of the specific content of the statements."


So if you are smart you will notice that in the above answer of ChatGPT, ChatGPT is not understanding the meaning of the theorem, and it has

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)