Hello,




More of my philosophy about adaptation and about the standard and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So think i am talking philosophy about the how we are perfected , and i just said about it the following about it:


"Since philosophically i can say that we are also perfected by the engine of the taking care of our own "image" in front of the others so that to not be discriminated or hated, so this permit us to take care of our dignity. And of course i say that our
own image is judged by a standard, but this standard by wich we judge the others is also perfected by the exponential progress of our humanity and by our experience and by our education, and i think even the standard by wich we judge a product or service
is perfected the same way, but i say we have not to be pessimistic about the standard by wich we judge the others since we are progressing in an exponential way."


But you are noticing that i am not saying that we have to adapt or to survive, since we can adapt or survive and not be correctly perfected, so as you are noticing i am showing above wich engine is perfecting us and in wich way by talking about how to
make the standard by wich
we judge the others or by wich we judge the product or service , and i am talking this way so that to make it clear that so that to progress or advance correctly we have to take care of what i am saying above.


More of my philosophy about Eric Zemmour and about dignity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have just looked at Eric Zemmour in the following french video, and
i invite you to look at it:

Eric Zemmour dénonce la décadence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBMF4n9J_wA


So i am noticing in the above video of Eric Zemmour that he is saying
that the West is living a decadence or in what we call moral or cultural decline, but i think that Eric Zemmour is not right , since philosophically i can say that we are also perfected by the engine of the taking care of our own "image" in front of the
others so that to not be discriminated or hated, so this permit us to take care of our dignity, so for example i don't think that maghrebis or maghrebians in France have no dignity, since they are also perfected by this same engine, also we have not to
forget that we are advancing very fast in an exponential way, so it is why i think that humans will rapidly advance much more , but of course we have to know how to manage our exponential progress, so it is why we have not to be pessimistic as Eric
Zemmour is pessimistic, also i invite you to read all my following views about artificial intelligence and about white supremacists and about the meaning of life or human life:


More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i have just read the following article from white supremacists of
the national vanguard, i invite you to read it:


https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/01/one-shot-and-one-shot-only/


So as you are noticing that the white supremacists are saying in the
above article the following:

"THE DAY IS UPON us. The West is, in all senses of the word, now dead. We lie in the catacombs of our once great civilization."


So i think i am smart , and when i look at the statistics i can
not say that the West is, in all senses of the word, now dead,
so then i say that we have to learn how to look at the statistics,
and we have to learn that the West is not idiot, since if the statistics say that the West is now dead, you will notice it, and if the statistics say that jews are hurting the West, you will notice it in the statistics, so i think that the jews are not
hurting the West since the statistics are not saying it, so i think that the West is not dead as is saying it the above white supremacist website, and i think that the West is smart and we have to be optimistic about the West, and of course i invite you
to read all my following views about artificial intelligence and about the meaning of human life:

More precision of my philosophy about the distribution of quality of the data on wich is trained generative AI and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i think that there is an important thing that i have to explain,
and it is that generative AI like ChatGPT was trained on data so that
to learn by detecting patterns and using them, but we can ask if
the distribution of the quality of data on wich generative AI like ChatGPT was trained on is looks like the normal distribution of IQs ? so i think that it is not like the normal distribution of IQs, since for example in technicality of software
development, ChatGPT was trained on Stack Overflow and on Gitub and on many technical books, so i think that those that ask questions and answers them in Stack Overflow are more smart than average smartness of people, and i think that the ones that make
softwares on Gitub are more smart than average smartness of people and it is the same for technical books, so it is why the data of technicality of software development on wich ChatGPT was trained or the next GPT-4 will be trained is of higher quality
than when it comes from average smartness, so it is why i think that generative AI like ChatGPT is dangerous, so read my following previous thoughts to understand my views about it:


More of my philosophy about what is exactly the problem with the lawsuit against Microsoft and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
i have just read again another new article about the lawsuit against Microsoft , here it is:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-09/github-s-openai-powered-copilot-sparks-legal-debate


And i think that the problematic is that generative AI such as ChatGPT
detects and use patterns of creativity, and those patterns can be
the high smartness of a human or creativity of a human, so i think it is the main problem, since if for example Microsoft and OpenAI have to train there generative AI with gitub open source softwares, so it will for example detect "smart" patterns that
are made by high smartness of individuals, so it will get much more smart by using them, but i think that using those patterns by generative AI is not lawful, since the generative AI will get much more smart by using those smart patterns of smart people
that belong to open source developers and it will then hurt them since the generative AI will become a too much concentration of power that hurts in a not lawful way, so from my thoughts you are understanding that there is even smart patterns on books
and on gitub that come from smart people that makes generative AI dangerous.

More of my philosophy about the lawsuit against Microsoft that could change the future of AI and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to read the following interesting new article about the lawsuit against Microsoft that could change the future of AI:


"With ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and what it can do is suddenly all the rage. But an intellectual property lawsuit against Microsoft could undermine the future of AI before it gets off the ground."

Read more here:

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3684734/this-lawsuit-against-microsoft-could-change-the-future-of-ai.html


More of my philosophy about ChatGPT and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following video of what is saying
Yann LeCun, that is a known French computer scientist working primarily in artificial intelligence , about ChatGPT, so i invite you to look at it in the following youtube link:

What Yann LeCun thinks of ChatGPT?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RPzfZIhw3s


So I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
and i think that Yann LeCun in the above video is saying that ChatGPT
is entertaining, but it is not useful, so i think that he is not thinking correctly, since i have already tested ChatGPT , and i think that it is useful, since it can make you much more productive and it can also make creativity much more easy for you,
also i think that ChatGPT can score well on many technical subjects and other subjects, and i mean that even if it doesn't score 100% all the time , it can be useful by scoring near by approximating well the right solution, and i think it will improve
much more in the next version with GPT-4
that will be ready in 2023, so it is why i am optimistic about the performance of ChatGPT and the next GPT-4, and of course i have just talked about my new model that explains consciousness and self-consciousness and what is the role they play in what we
call smartness and it explains why we will not attain general artificial intelligence, but of course i am explaining that even if we will not attain general artificial intelligence , ChatGPT and the next GPT-4 will still be really powerful and useful,
and of course read in my below thoughts so that to know about the business model of ChatGPT and the like so that to understand correctly, so i invite you to read about my new model below:


More of my philosophy about how ChatGPT takes a lot of computational power and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think one of the problems of ChatGPT is also the business model for it, since systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power, and i invite you to read the following article so that to understand more about it:

"High cost of computational power

Systems like ChatGPT take a lot of computational power. The cost of running ChatGPT is $100,000 per day. It’s possible to make it work for a few million daily users, but scaling it up to billions of people will be extremely expensive. A single AI
answer costs more than ten regular Google search requests."


Read more here:

https://uxplanet.org/chatgpt-why-its-such-a-big-deal-for-all-industries-and-will-it-kill-google-796e83f93e69


And read also the following article so that to understand more:

https://bdtechtalks.com/2023/01/02/chatgpt-google-search/


More of my philosophy about what can’t do artificial intelligence and
about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I invite you to read the following new article about artificial intelligence:

AI Might Be Seemingly Everywhere, but There Are Still Plenty of Things It Can’t Do—For Now

https://singularityhub.com/2023/01/13/ai-might-be-seemingly-everywhere-but-there-are-still-plenty-of-things-it-cant-do-for-now/


Also i invite you to read in my thoughts below about my new model about what is consciousness and what is self-consciousness and what is the role they play in what we call smartness:


More of my philosophy about transhumanism and about OpenAI and about Google and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i say that you have to read about my model below of what is consciousness and what is self-consciousness and
about what is the role they play in what we call smartness, so it is why i say that you have to understand my views about ChatGPT holistically taking into account my below model, so what i also want to say is that OpenAI and Google are like
Transhumanists and i think they are not thinking correctly, since i think that they are wanting to make acceptable there kind of model of ChatGPT and the like by saying that we are going soon to attain general artificial intelligence that will permit us
to solve most of our problems, but i think that there model is not correct, since i say that you have to read about my model below so that to understand, so my model below says artificial intelligence, as we know it, will not attain general artificial
intelligence, so it is why i say that we have to know how to manage our world, since i mean that ChatGPT is also too much concentration of the power of smartness in the hands of humans that can hurt our system, since for example i can say that ChatGPT
and the like makes creativity so easy , so it can hurt the value of creativity, since what makes also the value is the inequality between humans, but i think that ChatGPT and the like are also equalizing too much too much rapidly and relatively of what
is saying my model below that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness. And read all my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:


More of my philosophy about my model of what is consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, but you have to understand my model that explains what is consciousness and self-consciousness, so my model is not trying to explain all the low levels of consciousness, but what it explains is that human consciousness gives
like the true meaning by composing with our feelings of what is reality and with consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so now you are then understanding that my model explains that it is like a dynamic reification, i mean that when
you have an "idea", so an idea can be just a word, but if you add like the true meaning to this word by using your feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter, so it become like an idea that is "alive" with consciousness, so then
if you have a sentence or many sentences or a text, so this kind of reification can become like a "movie" of meanings of consciousness that is played in your brain and that gives a consciousness of the text or sentence, so it is why my model says that
the human brain compose with those meanings of feelings and meaning of consciousness of time and space and matter and of reality, so then my model of what is consciousness permits to make you understand how artificial intelligence is limited as i am
explaining it below, and it permits to do predictions like i am doing it below, so i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about self-awareness or self-consciousness and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i have just explained more what is consciousness, read it below, and now i will explain what is self-awareness or self-consciousness:

So i think that self-awareness or self-consciousness of a human is also
like a reification + the smartness, since i think that consciousness of yourself is obtained by knowing about the true meaning of yourself by also using like a reification with feelings and consciousness of time and space and matter and reality with wich
you compose the consciousness, so then after smartness obtains like a true meaning by using consciousness of who you are by looking at yourself, so self-awareness or self-consciousness is developed. And it is my explanation of what is consciousness.


More of my philosophy about the process of reification and more about human consciousness and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


Reification is when you think of or treat something abstract as a physical thing. Reification is a complex idea for when you treat something immaterial — like happiness, fear, or evil — as a material thing, so i think that human conscicousness is by
logical analogy like
the process of Reification, i mean that a concept in our brain is not just a class or object like in object oriented programming, since i mean that a class in object oriented programming is not just a class but it is also reification by our brain, since
we are also reifying the class with or by using the true meaning from our human consciousness, so it is like composability since we are composing with consciousnesses of time and space and reality from the low level to the high level, so it is the same
for what i am explaining below, since so that to compose the theorem that is known as the transitive property of implication, we have to understand the meaning of the low level constructs such as: If a then b and if b then c then a then c, so then it is
like a reification that we do, since when for example we say: a then b, we are like reifying from the low level constructs of consciousness of time and space and matter to the upper levels. So i invite you to read my previous thoughts so that to
understand my views:


More of my philosophy about are we going to have an artificial intelligence winter and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am really smart, and now i will make a prediction,
so from my below kind of logical proof(but of course that i will soon make it a more sophisticated proof), i think it permits me to make a prediction, and it is that there will be an artificial intelligence winter, i mean that what is lacking to
artificial intelligence is the meaning from human consciousness, since without this "meaning", it is like a closed system that is limited as i am explaining it below, since the meaning from human consciousness permits to construct from the low level of
consciousness of time and space and matter that permits to construct the higher levels, but human smartness with its consciousness is an open system, so it means so that to make it an open system we have to crack the code and understand what is human
consciousness.

More of my philosophy about how to beat artificial intelligence and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so now i will ask a philosophical question of:


How to beat artificial intelligence ?


So i think i am smart and i will start by giving you a good example so that you understand:

So if i say:

If a then b
and
if b then c

A human can logically infer that it means: then a then c

But the problem in artificial intelligence is that the patterns
comes from the data on wich artificial intelligence was trained ,
so how for example artificial intelligence does "generalize" the above example and make it a theorem in mathematics?, i mean that so that a human generalizes from the above example he also use the "meaning" from human consciousness, so i think that it is
the weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, i mean that human consciousness is able to make such generalizations with the help of the meaning from human consciousness when the pattern to be discovered is unknown to artificial
intelligence, so you have to understand that human consciousness is also consciousness of space and time and matter that permits to "compose" the meaning , so then you are understanding from my explanation that what is lacking to artificial intelligence
is this meaning from the human consciousness that permits smartness to be such sophisticated smartness such as constructing a mathematical theorem from the above example, so now i think you are getting more the bigger picture of it. So i will give you an
example of my interactions with ChatGPT so that you understand more,
so here it is:

So i have just asked ChatGPT the following question:

"Make a theorem of the following: if a then b and if b then c then a then c"

And here is what answered ChatGPT:

"The theorem can be stated as follows:

If a implies b, and if b implies c, then a implies c.

This theorem is known as the transitive property of implication, or the principle of transitivity. It states that if a statement (a) implies another statement (b), and if that statement (b) in turn implies a third statement (c), then the original
statement (a) must also imply the third statement (c). This principle holds for all statements that have the logical structure of implication, regardless of the specific content of the statements."


So if you are smart you will notice that in the above answer of ChatGPT, ChatGPT is not understanding the meaning of the theorem, and it has
not constructed the theorem from the low level constructs such as in my above example, but it is just discovering the theorem from the patterns on the data on wich it has been trained, so now you are understanding the limit of the smartness of ChatGPT
and of artificial intelligence, and of course i think you are now understanding how to beat artificial intelligence, since i think that artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT needs patterns that help it compose other new patterns, but it can not compose
a pattern if the patterns that compose it are lacking from the data on wich it has been trained, so you can compose this pattern by using the meaning from human consciousness as in my above example.

More of my philosophy about energy consumption of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..



So as you have just noticed that I have just talked about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT, and of course i have also to talk about energy consumption of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT or GPT-4, so i invite you to read the following new
article about it that talks
about Memristors that are a highly promising lead to provide low-energy consumption artificial intelligence:

Read more here in the following article:


https://spectrum.ieee.org/memristor-devices-ai



More of my philosophy about the other weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, i think that the other weakness of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is that when in mathematics you have a
differentiable function , you can find the derivative of it and be exact, but artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is not this kind of exactness, since it approximates more and more by being trained on the data , so the quality is dependent on the
data on wich artificial intelligence is trained, other than that how to be sure that the solution given by ChatGPT is exact? or how to be sure of the quality of the solutions given by ChatGPT?, since for example ChatGPT and even GPT-4 is trained on a
data from internet that is of a variable quality, but still ChatGPT or GPT-4 can become really powerful and really useful.

And i think that the genetic algorithm has the same problem,
read my following thoughts about it so that you understand my views:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YwW7mgTaJOw


More of my philosophy about sex and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think that sex is not a sophisticated thing, since it is so easy to have sex and you can easily waste your too much time with sex and you can easily become stupid with sex and such, so sex is not really efficient, but i think that artificial
intelligence like ChatGPT can make you really efficient since it is efficient, so i think we have not to waste our time with sex, but we have to learn how to be efficient with such artificial intelligence tools as ChatGPT so that to be much more smart so
that to "adapt" efficiently, but of course so that you understand my views i invite you to read all my following thoughts:


More of my philosophy of does ChatGPT has a kind of common sense reasoning and more of my thoughts..



So today i will ask a question of: Does ChatGPT has some kind of common sense reasoning ? i think it has a kind common sense reasoning since it
can logically infer it from the patterns of the data on wich it has been trained on, and even if it is limited by the smartness of the data on wich it has been trained, i think that ChatGPT can become really powerful and really useful, and notice on my
following interactions with ChatGPT how it has logically inferred a kind of common sense reasoning from the patterns of the data on wich it has been trained on, here it is and read it carefully so that to notice:


I have asked ChatGPT the following:


If a car goes from Casablanca to Rabat and if it goes from Rabat to Fez , how many kilometers does the car has traveled ?


ChatGPT has answered:


"I'm sorry, but I don't have enough information to accurately determine how many kilometers the car has traveled. The distance between Casablanca and Rabat is about 95 kilometers, and the distance between Rabat and Fez is about 210 kilometers. However, I
don't know the exact route the car took, so it is possible that it traveled a greater distance. Additionally, I don't know if the car made any other trips beyond the ones you mentioned. Without this information, it is not possible to accurately determine
how many kilometers the car has traveled."

And i have answered ChatGPT:

"Just give an approximation"


And ChatGPT has answered:

"Based on the information you have provided, it is possible that the car traveled a distance of around 305 kilometers, if it went directly from Casablanca to Rabat and then from Rabat to Fez. However, it is important to note that this is just an
approximation and the actual distance traveled could be different, depending on the exact route the car took and any other trips it may have made."


More of my philosophy about is ChatGPT going to replace jobs and about the law of accelerating returns and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following new video about ChatGPT with GPT4,
and i invite you to look at it:

This A.I. will Change the World Forever

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7KfELRxc3E


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i am not in accordance with the above video, since i can do predictions about ChatGPT, so is it going to replace many jobs ? so i will say that the problem of the quality of data on wich ChatGPT is trained is not solved, i mean that ChatGPT even with
GPT4 is trained on enormous amounts of text of variable quality from the internet, so then it causes that we can not be sure about the quality of ChatGPT, so it is why i don't think that ChatGPT will replace jobs as is saying it the above video, other
than that, ChatGPT can cause problems to the value of products and services since ChatGPT makes creativity much more easy and this hurts the value as i am saying it below, the other problem that ChatGPT creates is the one of the law of accelerating
returns, so i mean that those that are "apt" to use efficiently ChatGPT will advance so rapidly and in an accelerating returns way, so this will create much more inequality, other than that , if you want to understand the weaknesses of ChatGPT even with
GPT4, you can read my following previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about supervised and unsupervised learning in artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I have to explain something important, so GPT of ChatGPT uses a combination of unsupervised pre-training and supervised fine-tuning,
so i think that the patterns are discovered from the data in the
unsupervised pre-training, so it means that ChatGPT doesn't for example know about what is a verb or an adverb, but it is just the doing calculations of finding the patterns that make GPT recognize what is a verb or an adverb, so as you notice that this
process of recognizing by GPT is not the understanding the "meaning", but it is just discovering patterns with calculations in the data that make you recognize the things.


More of my philosophy about creativity of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT and more of my thoughts..


I invite you to read the following article that says the following
about artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT:

"Stakeholders in the IT development sector are nevertheless of the opinion that artificial intelligence is only good for automating redundant tasks and will not go beyond this level. The development of specifications or specifications for large IT
projects remains a task that requires the creativity of a human brain that an artificial intelligence will never have."

Read more in the following web link (and you have to translate the article from french to english):

AI startup predicts 'relying on humans to write programs will be outdated in the future'

https://intelligence-artificielle.developpez.com/actu/339951/Une-startup-specialisee-en-IA-predit-que-s-appuyer-sur-des-humains-pour-ecrire-des-programmes-sera-depasse-a-l-avenir-et-ravive-le-debat-sur-la-possible-disparition-du-metier-de-developpeur/


So i think that the above saying from Stakeholders in the IT development sector is not so correct, since artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT
can be "creative" by also composing patterns that it discovers from the data it has been trained on, so i say that language models like ChatGPT are as good as the data they have been trained on, they are simply programmed to generate text based on
patterns in the data they have been trained on. But i invite you to read about the weaknesses of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT in my following previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about the weaknesses of ChatGPT and about
artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..



[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)