Hello,



More of my philosophy about happiness and about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have just looked at the following
video about how to buy happiness with money, so i invite you to look at it:

How to Buy Happiness With Money

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lgf3NuWFngk

So i think i am smart, and i say that buying happiness with money doesn't work, since it is by logical analogy like saying that we have to be like
a warrior that gets the meaning of human life from him being courageous or brave and having a warrior type of mindset, so it is stupid to think this way,
and it is stupid to manage people this way, since there is constraints that prevent people from being happy, since for example that even the equal opportunity means in political philosophy that people are all given an equal chance to compete, so notice
carefully the previous word of "compete", so even equal opportunity comes with competition, and this competition of capitalism creates egoism and creates suffering, so i think that the best way to be happy is by for example to smartly maximize at best "
simplicity" of learning by maximizing at best efficiency of learning to easy the things for you, and it is after that to "smartly" reusing your knowledge and smartness so that to easy the things for you, so efficient reusability is also an important
thing, and of course you have to know how to rejuvenate or to revitalize yourself by using the positive energy and the positive spirit, and notice that it is also the basis of my just new philosophy, read it below, and i think that the good vibes are
also my poems of Love below.


More of my philosophy about competition of the equal opportunity
in political philosophy and about competition and more of my thoughts..

So i have just said that there is some constraints like even the equal opportunity means in political philosophy that people are all given an equal chance to compete, so notice carefully the previous word of "compete", so even equal opportunity comes
with competition, so it is
why i think that in pedagogy you have to know how to maximize at best "simplicity" by maximizing at best efficiency, and you have to also know
how to balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking, and read
my following thoughts so that to know more about my views on this
important subject:

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so now i will talk more about pedagogy
and how to be efficient education, so i am for example knowing
how to learn really fast and efficiently the following programming languages: C++ and C# and Go and Rust and Raku(formerly known as Perl6), so i think that my pedagogical way of doing is working, since i think that my way of learning is also mostly about
quality, not quantity, since my way of doing is that i have to smartly spot or detect the most efficient high level paths(not the inside as learning) as wich tutorials and wich books and wich chapters that permit me to learn efficiently and fast, and
after that i am also smartly maximizing at best efficiency of learning and smartly maximizing at best simplicity of learning, so i think that it is a good way of doing since i am doing it and it is working.

More of my philosophy about cleverness and about the wise man and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i have just read the following
proverb or saying of Albert Einstein in the following web page of Wise Sayings, Quotes & Phrases:


https://everydaypower.com/wise-sayings-about-life/


Here it is:


174. “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.” – Albert Einstein


So i will analyse or analyze it quickly with my fluid intelligence
by discovering patterns in it, so the first pattern is:

Notice you can analyse the system of the above proverb or saying of
Albert Einstein by looking if it is logically consistent, so notice that it is not logically consistent, since the good avoidance of problems
needs good cleverness and we can not logically say that avoidance of problems is not solving problems, since the good avoidance of problems can be solving problems, also the second pattern that i am discovering
with my fluid intelligence is that we can also look at the definition
of wisdom or a wise man and it is the following:

"Wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment, and being wise is having or showing experience, knowledge, and good judgment, so then having and showing the good judgment is also being genetically apt at being or showing the
good judgment , so i think that being wise needs from you to be smart and clever , so it comes from both the genetical and cultural"


So then the above definition of Wisdom or the being wise shows that
the above proverb of Albert Einstein is not correct and is not smart.

More of my philosophy about abstraction and intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?

So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are
not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the
thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and
technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that we find in
technical languages like software programming languages, but i think that they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in
software programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and
non-preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w

Also i say that the meaning of a language is so important, so
the modality of thoughts is so important, and here is my
thoughts about it:

More of my philosophy about smartness and about discovering patterns and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, i think that inventing sophisticated theorems in mathematics is also discovering smart patterns with your fluid intelligence, it is why i am inventing my thoughts by also discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence , but
notice that discovering patterns in mathematics is like a low level way of doing like in microeconomics, but discovering patterns can be in a high level way like in macroeconomics, and here is an example of how i am doing it quickly, read my following
thoughts about Nikola Tesla and about Garry Tan that i have invented quickly so that to notice how i am discovering smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a high level way:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(
and notice below the other smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMgd7ATObGg

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person, since for example he is saying the following saying in the
above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all, since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so that to be efficient, and i also think
that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called "The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is saying that doing many things at the same
time is not good for productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be like convergent
thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking, and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems
Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the
demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is
it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as
Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.


More precision of my philosophy about how to be happy and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

How to be happy ?


I think that there is some constraints like even the equal opportunity means in political philosophy that people are all given an equal chance to compete, so notice carefully the previous word of "compete", so even equal opportunity comes with
competition, since notice how the private
sector is around 76% and i think the private sector is around 86% in USA, so it is why we are being competition , and of course we are being competition in capitalism since i think it is an engine that is good for progress, and of course there must be a
reward in this competition in capitalism, and the reward is of course the becoming wealthy or more wealthy, and it is why we are allowing a human to be rich, but how then to be happy ? i think that the way to be happy is by the way of the positive energy
and the positive spirit in for example a form of good vibes, and i think that you have to rejuvenate or to revitalize yourself by using the positive energy and the positive spirit, and notice that it is also the basis of my just new philosophy, read it
below, and i think that the good vibes are also my poems of Love below.

More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called National Vanguard:

Why Capitalism Fails

https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/

And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:

"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men
that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."

So i will answer with my fluid intelligence:

I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so
that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the
previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become
rich). And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

But i think i am really smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in
the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked correctly, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the
dictatorship of neo-nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism.

More of my philosophy about credibility and about morality and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", so i have to talk more about myself so that you understand me:


So i am not naive since i know that i have to be "credible", so how
to be credible ? so i think that you have to know how to walk
and how to talk and how to think, and you have to know how to
be enough wise or wise, so it is my way of doing, and i think
that political credibility works the same way, it is why i am
speaking as i am speaking about human identity in my below thoughts,
since i know that so that to adapt efficiently, you have to be credible,
so as you notice that i am showing that i can invent philosophies and that i can invent algorithms and that i can invent religions and that i can invent new proverbs and that i am an educated person, and since you have also seen that i can talk about
sophisticated subjects in technology, and that i can write and read and think in arabic and english and french, so you are noticing the why of this tendency of mine, so hope you are understanding my kind of personality and my views,
and :

More of my philosophy about human identity and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", so i will ask
a philosophical question of:

What is my human identity ? and what is a human identity ?

So i think the human identity comes from the fact that humans
want to be better and better, i mean that the human identity comes from
the act of "perfecting" oneself so that to adapt efficiently, so i am speaking generally , so i mean that humans are seeking to perfect themselves by using the better things of our world, i mean that for example a french is seeking to perfect himself by
the using the better things from USA or from the Arab world and from other countries, and an arab or russian or american is also seeking to perfect himself in the same manner, so i think it is the most important part that makes the identity of a human.


And read my following philosophy about my new religions since i have
just brought some more precision to it:

More of my philosophy about my new religions and about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", so as you have just noticed, i have invented two religions, one that is a monotheistic religion and the other that is not a
monotheistic religion, and why i have done it this way? since when i was a child of around 11 years old, i have met an Angel in form of light, and he was dressed like muslim, but he has not talked with me, but he has just read some sacred scripture on my
body and soul, so there is two possibilities, the first one that it was an Angel from God , and the second possibility that it was an Angel but there no God but there is another world of spirits, and it is why i have invented quickly two religions and
here they are, you can read them carefully in the following web links:

Here is my just new not monotheistic religion that i have invented quickly, you can read about it in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Ad2tRwDxdjA


And here is my other monotheistic religion that i have invented quickly(click on the "Amine Moulay Ramdane" post so that to read it):

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.usa/c/vKBlK160YR0

And here is my other new philosophy and many proverbs that i have invented quickly, you can take a look at them in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WDPcc45utLQ


And you can read my just new other philosophy in my below thoughts:


More of my philosophy about healthy competition in capitalism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", i think the competition in capitalism is the act of striving against one another to gain or win something, but i think that
humans have to understand
that capitalism has to be a healthy competition, i mean that it has
to be like a sportive spirit of sportive competition that brings progress, but not a sadistic competition, and i think it is how people have to be educated so that to be this sportive spirit of sportive competition in capitalism that bring progress. And
i invite you to read more of my following thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about extreme patriotism and extreme nationalism and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", so i have to explain more one more very important thing, so as you have just noticed , i have just spoken , read it below,
about egoism of patriotism or egoism of a group such as european union that creates solidarity, but here again you have to understand a very important thing, and it is that this egoism of capitalism or patriostism has not to create an extreme patriotism
or extreme nationalism such as the not buying the useful things from the other countries or individuals that are not part of your group, i mean for example if an arab has invented an algorithm or algorithms that is or are useful, so then so that to
encourage progress, you have also to buy this useful algorithm or algorithms from this arab, since i think that you have to know how to not be this extreme patriotism or extreme nationalism that is not correctly in accordance with human progress.

More of my philosophy about capitalism and about the Hobbes vs Rousseau point of views and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", so as you have noticed, i have just posted about the Hobbes vs Rousseau point of views, but i think i am wise and i think i
am a philosopher, and i think that we need capitalism, but capitalism creates competition and egoism, but i think that competition of capitalism is an engine that is good for progress, and egoism brought by capitalism also creates solidarity, since for
example there is also what we call egoism of patriotism or egoism of a group such as european union that creates a kind of solidarity, so i think that we have not to look simplistically at egoism brought by capitalism , also we have not to look at job
specialization in a capitalistic system as something bad, since we know that job specialization higher productivity , but not only that but i think
that the more general way of doing of for example being a "scientific management" is not too much specialization and it is good for the capitalistic system, and i will also say that i am optimistic since read my below previous thoughts so that to
understand my views,


More of my philosophy about Hobbes vs Rousseau and the are we inherently evil and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above", i have just read the following article, and i invite you to read it:

Hobbes vs Rousseau: are we inherently evil ?

https://iai.tv/articles/hobbes-vs-rousseau-are-we-inherently-evil-or-good-auid-1221


And i think that i am optimistic about human life, since my philosophy
doesn't just say that we have to make people enough wise or wise,
but it says the following important thing, and read it carefully since i have just brought more precision to it:


I will talk to you more about happiness so that you understand
my views, so notice how our world lacks too much wisdom and that our world is too much sexualized, so i think that the meaning also comes from when you live the beautifulness and the charm of the day, it makes you appreciate the beautifulness and the
charm of the night, so the meaning of human life comes also from like this "alternance" of the day and night, since the too much sexualized and too much lacking wisdom of our world also make you appreciate the being wise and the being beautiful too and
the being Love too and the being the romanticize too, so i think that in philosophy you have to know how to be this "alternance", as the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty, so what i also mean that we are in a kind of conjunction, i mean
a combination of circumstances or events usually producing a crisis, but i think that this conjunction will bring beauty since it makes us appreciate the beautifulness of the day such as the being enough wise or wise, so i am optimistic about humanity,
and i also just said the following so that you understand more my views:

More of my philosophy about the good business and about Madonna and more of my thoughts..


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)