Lexpress.fr had published its interview with David Petraeus yesterday. https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/idees-et-debats/david-petraeus-ex-cia-une-force-dirigee-par-les-etats-unis-pourrait-intervenir-en-ukraine_2182249.htmlwould be so shocking and so horrific that the United States and other countries might react in one way or another, but as a force multinational led by the United States and not as a NATO force."
I don't know French and don't know how much to rely on Google Translate. Yet, the following stands out.
"I think the red line for NATO is directly related to the collective self-defense commitment of article 5, that is to say an attack against a NATO member country. Having said that, I think it is possible that Russia could take an action in Ukraine that
Looks like the US is trying to set a precedence for using NATO ally forces world wide.
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 8:44:47 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:that would be so shocking and so horrific that the United States and other countries might react in one way or another, but as a force multinational led by the United States and not as a NATO force."
Lexpress.fr had published its interview with David Petraeus yesterday. https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/idees-et-debats/david-petraeus-ex-cia-une-force-dirigee-par-les-etats-unis-pourrait-intervenir-en-ukraine_2182249.html
I don't know French and don't know how much to rely on Google Translate. Yet, the following stands out.
"I think the red line for NATO is directly related to the collective self-defense commitment of article 5, that is to say an attack against a NATO member country. Having said that, I think it is possible that Russia could take an action in Ukraine
Looks like the US is trying to set a precedence for using NATO ally forces world wide.Another reason for direct intervention is America/NATO appears to be weak and ineffective.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, "Putin bears full responsibility for this war.
And it is his responsibility to end it. To end the immense suffering of the brave Ukrainian
people. To end the energy and food crisis that is affecting so many around the world.
If Russia stops fighting, there will be peace. If Ukraine stops fighting, it will cease to exist
as an independent sovereign nation in Europe."
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_207788.htm
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 8:44:47 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:that would be so shocking and so horrific that the United States and other countries might react in one way or another, but as a force multinational led by the United States and not as a NATO force."
Lexpress.fr had published its interview with David Petraeus yesterday. https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/idees-et-debats/david-petraeus-ex-cia-une-force-dirigee-par-les-etats-unis-pourrait-intervenir-en-ukraine_2182249.html
I don't know French and don't know how much to rely on Google Translate. Yet, the following stands out.
"I think the red line for NATO is directly related to the collective self-defense commitment of article 5, that is to say an attack against a NATO member country. Having said that, I think it is possible that Russia could take an action in Ukraine
Looks like the US is trying to set a precedence for using NATO ally forces world wide.Another reason for direct intervention is America/NATO appears to be weak and ineffective.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, "Putin bears full responsibility for this war.
And it is his responsibility to end it. To end the immense suffering of the brave Ukrainian
people. To end the energy and food crisis that is affecting so many around the world.
If Russia stops fighting, there will be peace. If Ukraine stops fighting, it will cease to exist
as an independent sovereign nation in Europe."
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_207788.htm
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 2:53:42 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:that would be so shocking and so horrific that the United States and other countries might react in one way or another, but as a force multinational led by the United States and not as a NATO force."
On Friday, November 4, 2022 at 8:44:47 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
Lexpress.fr had published its interview with David Petraeus yesterday. https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/idees-et-debats/david-petraeus-ex-cia-une-force-dirigee-par-les-etats-unis-pourrait-intervenir-en-ukraine_2182249.html
I don't know French and don't know how much to rely on Google Translate. Yet, the following stands out.
"I think the red line for NATO is directly related to the collective self-defense commitment of article 5, that is to say an attack against a NATO member country. Having said that, I think it is possible that Russia could take an action in Ukraine
Looks like the US is trying to set a precedence for using NATO ally forces world wide.Another reason for direct intervention is America/NATO appears to be weak and ineffective.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, "Putin bears full responsibility for this war.
And it is his responsibility to end it. To end the immense suffering of the brave Ukrainian
people. To end the energy and food crisis that is affecting so many around the world.
If Russia stops fighting, there will be peace. If Ukraine stops fighting, it will cease to exist
as an independent sovereign nation in Europe."
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_207788.htmA French answer via its former Chief of Staff. https://twitter.com/BFMTV/status/1590250009282449409
Pierre de Villiers: "La guerre en Ukraine n'est pas l'intérêt des pays européens, certainement pas de la France, peut-être des Américains"
Internet translation:
"The war in Ukraine is not in the interest of European countries, certainly not of France, perhaps of the Americans."
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 117:11:46 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,334,237 |