• More of my philosophy about C# and Delphi and about technology and more

    From Amine Moulay Ramdane@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 3 07:45:35 2022
    Hello,



    More of my philosophy about C# and Delphi and about technology and more of my thoughts..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I invite you to read the following article:

    Why C# coders should shut up about Delphi

    Read more here:

    https://jonlennartaasenden.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/why-c-coders-should-shut-up-about-delphi/


    More of my philosophy about Delphi and Freepascal compilers and about technology and more of my thoughts..

    According to the 20th edition of the State of the Developer Nation report, there were 26.8 million active software developers in the world at the end of 2021, and from the following article on Delphi programming language, there is 3.25% Delphi software
    developers this year, so it is around 1 million Delphi software developers in 2022. Here are the following articles, read them carefully:

    https://blogs.embarcadero.com/considerations-on-delphi-and-the-stackoverflow-2022-developer-survey/

    And read here:

    https://www.future-processing.com/blog/how-many-developers-are-there-in-the-world-in-2019/


    I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, of course that i have already programmed in C++, for example you can download my Open source software project of Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear
    System Solver Library that scales very well from my website here:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-parallel-c-conjugate-gradient-linear-system-solver-library

    But why do you think i am also programming in Delphi and Freepascal ?

    Of course that Delphi and Freepascal compilers support modern Object Pascal, it is not only Pascal, but it is modern Object Pascal, i mean
    that modern Object Pascal of for example Delphi and Freepascal support object oriented programming and support Anonymous methods or typed Lambdas , so i think that it is a decent programming language, even if i know that the new C++ 20 supports generic
    Lambdas and templated Lambdas, but i think that Delphi will soon also support generic Lambdas, and in Delphi and Freepascal compilers there is no big runtime like in C# and such compilers, so you get small native executables in Delphi
    and Freepascal, and inline assembler is supported by both Delphi
    and Freepascal, and Lazarus the IDE of Freepascal and Delphi come
    both with one of the best GUI tools, and of course you can make .SO, .DLL, executables, etc. in both Delphi and Freepascal, and both Delphi
    and Freepascal compilers are Cross platform to Windows, Linux and Mac
    and Android etc. , and i think that modern Object Pascal of Delphi
    or Freepascal is more strongly typed than C++ , but less strongly typed than ADA programming language, but i think that modern Object Pascal of Delphi and Freepascal are not Strict as the programming language ADA and are not strict as the programming
    language Rust or the pure functional programming languages, so it can also be flexible and advantageous to not be this kind of strictness, and the compilation times of Delphi is extremely fast , and of course Freepascal supports the Delphi mode so that
    to be compatible with Delphi and i can go on and on, and it is why i am also programming in Delphi and Freepascal.

    And you can read about the last version 11.2 of Delphi from here:

    https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi

    And you can read about Freepascal and Lazarus from here:

    https://www.freepascal.org/

    https://www.lazarus-ide.org/


    More of my philosophy about Asynchronous programming and about the futures and about the ActiveObject and about technology and more of my thoughts..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, i think from my new implementation of
    future below, you can notice that Asynchronous programming is not a simple task, since it can get too much complicated , since you can
    notice in my implementation below that if i make the starting of the thread of the future out of the constructor and if i make the passing of the parameter as a pointer to the future out of the constructor , it
    will get more complex to get the automaton of how to use
    and call the methods right and safe, so i think that there is
    still a problem with Asynchronous programming and it is that
    when you have many Asynchronous tasks or threads it can get
    really complex, and i think that it is the weakness of Asynchronous programming, and of course i am also speaking of the implementation
    of a sophisticated ActiveObject or a future or complex Asynchronous programming.


    More of my philosophy about my new updated implementation of a future and about the ActiveObject and about technology and more of my thoughts..



    I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, so i have just updated my implementation
    of a future, and now both the starting the thread of the future and the passing the parameter as a pointer to the future is made from the constructor so that to make safe the system of the automaton of the how to use and call the methods, and I have just
    added support for exceptions, so you have to know that programming with futures is asynchronous programming, but so that to be robust the future implementation has to deal correctly with "exceptions", so in my implementation of a future when an exception
    is raised inside the future you will receive the exception, so i have implemented two things: The HasException() method so that to detect the exception from inside the future, and the the exception and its address is returned as a string in the
    ExceptionStr property, and my implementation of a future does of course support passing parameters as a pointer to the future, also my implementation of a future works in Windows and Linux, and of course you can also use my following more sophisticated
    Threadpool engine with priorities as a sophisticated ActiveObject or such and pass the methods or functions and there parameters to it, here it is:

    Threadpool engine with priorities

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/threadpool-engine-with-priorities

    And stay tuned since i will enhance more my above Threadpool engine with priorities.

    So you can download my new updated portable and efficient implementation of a future in Delphi and FreePascal version 1.32 from my website here:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/a-portable-and-efficient-implementation-of-a-future-in-delphi-and-freepascal


    And here is a new example program of how to use my implementation of a future in Delphi and Freepascal and notice that the interface has changed a little bit:


    --

    program TestFuture;

    uses system.SysUtils, system.Classes, Futures;

    type

    TTestFuture1 = class(TFuture)
    public
    function Compute(ptr:pointer): Variant; override;
    end;

    TTestFuture2 = class(TFuture)
    public
    function Compute(ptr:pointer): Variant; override;
    end;

    var obj1:TTestFuture1;
    obj2:TTestFuture2;
    a:variant;


    function TTestFuture1.Compute(ptr:pointer): Variant;
    begin

    raise Exception.Create('I raised an exception');

    end;

    function TTestFuture2.Compute(ptr:pointer): Variant;
    begin

    writeln(nativeint(ptr));
    result:='Hello world !';

    end;


    begin

    writeln;

    obj1:=TTestFuture1.create(pointer(12));

    if obj1.GetValue(a) then writeln(a)
    else if obj1.HasException then writeln(obj1.ExceptionStr);

    obj1.free;

    writeln;

    obj2:=TTestFuture2.create(pointer(12));


    if obj2.GetValue(a) then writeln(a);

    obj2.free;

    end.

    ---



    More of my philosophy about quantum computing and about matrix operations and about scalability and more of my thoughts..


    I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, i have just looked at the following
    video about the powerful parallel quantum computer of IBM from USA that will be soon available in the cloud, and i invite you to look at it:

    Quantum Computing: Now Widely Available!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laqpfQ8-jFI


    But i have just read the following paper and it is saying that the powerful Quantum algorithms for matrix operations and linear systems of equations are available, read about them on the below paper, so as you notice in the following paper that many
    matrix operations and also the linear systems of equations solver can be done in a quantum computer, read about it here in the following paper:

    Quantum algorithms for matrix operations and linear systems of equations

    Read more here:

    https://arxiv.