Hello,



More of my philosophy about the essence of human or artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will explain more my views,
so since human intelligence is by essence an efficiency, since the highly human intelligence is an efficiency that comes from like the interactions of objects of the lower level layers of the universe and that works well and produces good results, so
then intelligence is not only the sophisticated plan that permits you to adapt efficiently, but it is by essence an efficiency that permits to adapt, so i think this abstraction permits us to say that a delicious maghrebian couscous is an efficiency, and
i think that we can call it an intelligence, since it is an efficiency that comes from like the interactions of objects of the lower level layers of the universe, so then we can consider tools such a static or dynamic system that gives an appreciable
efficiency as artificial intelligence or intelligence, and the tools can be constructed by human or by mother nature, so then human smartness is not only genetical and cultural , but it is also the smartness or intelligence of the tool that can make
humans much more smart, and how to measure the greatness of the artificial intelligence or intelligence ? so for example a tool can become much more efficient if it it is bought by many customers , so then it is also relative and you have to
contextualize so that to measure the value of the tool.


Read my previous thoughts:

More philosophy about efficiency and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a really smart philosophical question so that you understand my views:

So how can we define an artificial intelligence ?

So there is two ways to measure it, there is the relative way and the absolute way, so then notice carefully that can we say that we have
to measure artificial intelligence by comparing with human intelligence ? so i will answer this question by asking: Can we say that a monkey is not smart since a human is much smarter than a monkey ? so now you are understanding my kind of smartness, so
where have we to set the limit that defines artificial intelligence ? since i say that artificial intelligence can not just be measured by comparing with human intelligence, so now you are understanding that i am saying below that smartness is an
efficiency, so then i can logically infer that we can also set the limit by saying that we can consider an efficiency of a tool of a product or of a static system or of a dynamic system as being a kind of artificial intelligence. So read my previous
thoughts now:

More of my philosophy about efficiency and about smartness and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Is smartness an efficiency ?


So i think that smartness is an efficiency, since
something that is efficient works well and produces good results by using the available time, money, supplies etc. in the most effective way,
so it is why i think i can logically infer that a tool of a product or service that is more efficient is like an "artificial" smartness that can make you much more smart than average smartness, so i think that smartness is not only the genetical
smartness or cultural smartness, but it is also smartness of the tool, so then i can logically infer that we can also become sophisticated smart Cyborgs by using powerful tools such as internet or the like, so we are not today just dealing with humans ,
but we are also dealing with Cyborgs,
so when you are creative or inventive and you invent tools , you can become a sophisticated Cyborg using those tools.

More of my philosophy about success and failure and more of my thoughts..


First you have to know that when i am saying the following:

"So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ."

It is the truth , but i am not narcissistic or arrogant by saying so,
since a highly smart IQ can also mean that it is 115 IQ.


Other than that i will ask a very important philosophical question of:

How to define the being success and failure ?


I think that you have to define it by looking at the weights of importance so that to "prioritize" by weights of importance so that
to be successful, so i think that the success can not be defined by having big money but by your level of good adaptation, since the best way to being success is to be smart and wise that both permit to be a good adaptation that makes you rich and
successful, but not only that, but by measuring by weights of importance we can also say that when you are smart and wise and success is just near of you or at hand, so it like means that you can easily become successful since success is so near of you
and is at hand and an easy thing, we can also say of it that it is a kind of success, since we are measuring it too with the level of good adaptation, since the being smart and wise is so important. So i can also ask a smart question of: Is the being
creative the being smart? so we have to contextualize, since the being creative or being inventive can bring the creative tool of a product of service that can make you smarter than the average smartness, so it can make you smart, so the genetical
smartness is not the only smartness, the creative tool can also make you much smarter than average smartness, and read carefully
my following thoughts so that to understand more about what is smartness:

More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..

I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or
human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively
or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a
value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so
can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is
not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it
is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of
human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start
by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain
human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.

Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..

So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people
can understand, so here it is:

If i say: 2 + 2 = 4

So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints
of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so
mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and
learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the
same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,
so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and
technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on
science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high
human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human
IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human
IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart
you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it
is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making
others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this
is not so efficient.

Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:

Is Science Going To End?

Read more here:

https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End

And read also the following

The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era

More political philosophy about what is smartness..


I give you an example so that you understand:

If i give the following three words:

I, love, you.

It is not the same as if i give the following five words:

I, love, you, very, much

So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since
the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency
is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is
brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the
tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to
be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so
now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural,
but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very
important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very
much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to
understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet
that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart.

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question:


So how do you think i am creating a meaning for my human life and
is it the meaning of human life ?


So i think i am highly smart, so i think that a meaning of human life
that doesn't create a positive energy is not a meaning of human life,
so i think for me the meaning of human life is also that i have to be wise,
so why have i to be wise?, since the being wise is like a good professionalism, and the good professionalism is something "respectable"
and is something that "attracts" confidence and that attracts customers,
so it is also good for business, and notice that this good professionalism of the being wise is a positive energy too, so the being wise is so important for me, so the meaning of human life is not only this positive energy of the being wise but it is
also the following:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?


I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things,
it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also
to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the
way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights
of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is
the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years
from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.


More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU


So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but
it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings
a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are
genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say
that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and
it is why i have just said the following:


More of my philosophy about the essence of philosophy and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about an important
subject in philosophy, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the goal of philosophy ?


So i think i am highly smart, and i will answer it quickly by saying the following:


So if i say that the goal of philosophy is to be Happy or Happiness, you will think that it is stupid, but it is not stupid since Happiness is by logical analogy like Liberty, since i think that humans understand that Liberty is not being free and
happiness is not the just having pleasures of life, since so that to be Liberty or Happiness of your today and of your tomorrow or future, you have to be the right responsability, since Liberty or Happiness are not only Liberty or Happiness of your today,
but it is also that you have to ensure to be Liberty or Happiness of your tomorrow or your future, and this being responsability of humans is a much more sophisticated responsability than that of animals, and it is the basis of why humans are not
animals, since humans are also pushed forward by this engine of responsability so that to be Liberty or so that to be Love, and of course there is not only this kind of engine , but there is also the engines of human laws that are enforced by the police
and the army so that to be Liberty, but as you notice that we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that humans are not animals since they have to be organized in much more sophisticated manner than animals so that to be this Liberty, so i
think that i can logically infer that you have not just to compare the genetics of humans and that of monkeys and for example say that researchers sequenced the chimp genome and have known that humans share about 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, making
them our closest living relatives, but you have to understand that the 1% difference in genetics of humans, compared to chimp genome, has made humans much more perfect than chimpanzees or animals, and you can for example look at how animals and humans
are organized, and notice again that this kind of organization of humans is "much" more sophisticated than animals, so then i can finally logically infer that humans are not animals , and you can also easily notice it by reading my following thoughts of
my philosophy and noticing how it is much more sophisticated, but there still remains a problem in philosophy, and it is the fact that saying
that the goal of philosophy is Happiness is too much abstraction since
we have to show clearly one of the most important thing so that to attain the goal of Happiness, and it is what i call in french:
La philosophie a aussi pour important objectif de vous permettre
de vous tenir debout face aux difficultés de la vie, and my translation
of it in english is: Philosophy also has the important objective of enabling you to stand tall in the face of life's difficulties, and
here is what i have just said about this really important goal:

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask the following important
question in philosophy:

What is the most important thing in philosophy ?


I think that the most important thing in philosophy is the basis principle in philosophy that you have to know how to stand up so that to make morality stand up correctly , even if you are rich, and i think that this first so important principle is the
basis principle of an organization or institution like the USA army. I mean that for example the hippies mindset had been that the hippies had fallen rapidly, without the being the right resistance, in being too much liberty that has not made there
morality stand up correctly, so then you have to know how to "resist" and make stand up morality and not rapidly fall into immorality by looking at the human reality and saying that life is not worth it, and i think it is the basis first principle of
philosophy.

More of my philosophy about my contributions and more of my thoughts..

Here is some of my contributions, so here is first a part of my thoughts of my philosophy that i have invented quickly in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/TwTnJw-EsHA

And read about my other new philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FcCeH_UqGoU

And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY

And read also here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY

And i invite you to read my following other thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0


And here is my new proverbs that i have invented quickly:

And here is one of my proverb that talks about the being wise:

"There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony"

Here is my other proverbs:

"Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

Here is my other new proverb:

"When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
much more successful than successful."

And read all my other new proverbs in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

Here is also one important proverb of mine about Resourcefulness that
permits you to understand it:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."


And here is my poems in french and english that i have invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mEGKavIJbUU


More of my philosophy about the good adaptation and more of my thoughts..


Here is what i just said yesterday about black americans and about black africans and maghrebians:


--

"More of my philosophy about the black africans and about the maghrebis of France and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart and i have just looked to the following video
of black africans and maghrebians or maghrebis of France:

Quartiers difficiles : le vrai visage des nouveaux ghettos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9kT1PCPLY8

I think i am understanding quickly the human life condition of black africans and maghrebis or maghrebians of France, since i think that the main problem is that they are not equipped correctly with the right tools that permits them to adapt efficiently,
so for example the simply looking at a good or beautiful movie doesn't make you adapt much more efficiently, or the simply cooking a Maghrebian couscous doesn't make you adapt much more efficiently, so the most important thing is to teach black africans
and maghrebis or maghrebians of France how they adapt much more efficiently or efficiently, since i think that it is a matter of good adaptation, so i think we have not to hate black africans or maghrebis or maghrebians, but we have to learn them how to
adapt efficiently. And i think it is my way of doing, since i am also knowing how to adapt efficiently by mastering the languages of english and french and arabic, and i am showing it here by inventing quickly
my poems and by quickly inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and posting them here, and also the higher and much better level of adaptation is also to master a technical language or technical languages as i am doing it, and a high level of adaptation
is to be smartly creative and inventive as i am doing it, so as you notice it is what is lacking to black americans and to
black africans and maghrebians or maghrebis of France, so it is a matter of good adaptation."

---



So i think i am in accordance with my above thoughts, since i will
give you an example of how i am doing it so that to be a much
better or good adaptation, so i invite you to read the following interesting article:

WHAT IN-MEMORY COMPUTING ACTUALLY MEANS

https://www.nextplatform.com/2015/09/01/what-in-memory-computing-actually-means/


So about in-memory computing , i invite you to look at my
following open source software project that implement a kind of in-memory computing:

Parallel archiver

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver


Notice that i am saying the following about my Parallel archiver:

If you want to use an in-memory archive, pass an empty string to the file name in the constructor, like this:

pzr :=TPLZ4Archiver.Create('',1000,4);

And if you want to read your in-memory archive , read from the Stream property that is exposed(a TStream) like this:

pzr.stream.position:=0;

A_Memory_Stream.copyfrom(pzr.stream,pzr.stream.size)

Yo