Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in Chinanative Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s total,
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And indeed the
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s total,
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And indeed the
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s total,
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And indeed
May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too.The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner in
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s total,
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And indeed
May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner in
Wrong again, Stonedy.
The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And
in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner
Wrong again, Stonedy.
The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
Don't lie, Stonedy.
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
Don't lie, Stonedy.
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China’s
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan. And
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan.
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1% of China
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East Turkestan.
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human
May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner in
You should try to be smarter in your responses.
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human
May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner in
You should try to be smarter in your responses.
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human
May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner in
You should try to be smarter in your responses.
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human
May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner in
You should try to be smarter in your responses.
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 10:15:00 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human
in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner
and worked in China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Middle east, US, Canada, Australia, UK and EU? You will never learn if you talk nonsense.You should try to be smarter in your responses.Nah, you nick picked; the context is there of the writer. One don't write and cut from the brain.. with no edit...as we don't need to be edited by WSJ. Don't be a stupid goon when you have nothing in the know on China and Taiwan. Have you ever lived
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 8:19:42 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less than 1%
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 10:15:00 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called East
right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human
in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right commissioner
and worked in China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Middle east, US, Canada, Australia, UK and EU? You will never learn if you talk nonsense.You should try to be smarter in your responses.Nah, you nick picked; the context is there of the writer. One don't write and cut from the brain.. with no edit...as we don't need to be edited by WSJ. Don't be a stupid goon when you have nothing in the know on China and Taiwan. Have you ever lived
Work in the US. Used to work in Taiwan. So don't be lecturing.
Hsinchu.
You've never been to TW, right?
On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 7:15:32 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:East Turkestan. And indeed the native Uyghurs—who are Turkic Muslims—detest the name Xinjiang, which derives from a Han Chinese word for “New Border Region.” This region makes up a sixth of the map of China. Its population, by contrast, is less
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 8:19:42 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 10:15:00 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 2:51:20 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 5:31:37 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 1:49:15 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 2:36:02 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 11:05:26 AM UTC-7, bmoore wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:51:55 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Monday, August 1, 2022 at 10:58:05 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 9:49:39 PM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 11:44:02 PM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Sunday, July 31, 2022 at 2:56:04 AM UTC-7, stoney wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2022 at 1:58:05 AM UTC+8, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, July 28, 2022 at 10:16:24 AM UTC-7, David P. wrote:
Two Books Decry the Uyghur Tragedy in China
By Tunku Varadarajan, July 15, 2022, WSJ
The name Xinjiang was slapped on the Uyghur homeland in 1884, after its conquest by China’s last imperial dynasty. Located in the vastness of Central Asia, closer to Kashmir than Beijing, the region used to be called
human right commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooeThe Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
China wants land. They care little about the inhabitants.How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN
commissioner in May 2022. Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, tooe"Wrong again, Stonedy.
Stonedy, you said "Since he wrote the books, he will be liable to answer to the authorities for libel and defamatory, too".The 2 books were written by Uyghurs, one of whom is serving a life sentence in China.Your cock brain. Read properly. It referred to the writer of the article is a Indian per se..
The Uyghurs in East Turkestan have been treated horribly by the PRC, and the PRC government lies about it. It's true, no matter what the bullshitters say.
But he didn't write the books. He wrote the article.
It's not nitpicking, given that the author of ones of the books is serving a life sentence in a PRC jail. Your misleading statement below:The entirety is clearly on his article and not on the books but you chose to be nick picked. It is about him and not the book. Goon.Good.Correction: it is article that referred to, not books.If you will be honest, then we can have a real conversation.So you admit that he didn't write the books, as you originally claimed.Don't lie, Stonedy.Since he wrote this article he is liable for the defamatory and libels, too.
"How could this Indian writer had never been to China and never been to Xinjiang and never seen how those Uyghurs were undergoing national education and trade vocational training as they were also visited and seen by the UN human right
lived and worked in China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Cambodia, Middle east, US, Canada, Australia, UK and EU? You will never learn if you talk nonsense.You should try to be smarter in your responses.Nah, you nick picked; the context is there of the writer. One don't write and cut from the brain.. with no edit...as we don't need to be edited by WSJ. Don't be a stupid goon when you have nothing in the know on China and Taiwan. Have you ever
Work in the US. Used to work in Taiwan. So don't be lecturing.
Hsinchu.
You've never been to TW, right?Hsinchu. No need to tell you so much and to your shallowness, too.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 339 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 03:13:06 |
Calls: | 7,467 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,691 |
Messages: | 5,628,147 |