[continued from previous message]

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

So as you are noticing that my proverb above is also saying that
by becoming more and more perfect you also easy more and more
the hard work by the process of reusability of your intelligence and
your experience etc. and you better and better resist instabilities,
and of course we have to take into account the exponential progress
of our humanity that is bringing, and really fast, a much more stability that is required by the meaning and purpose of human life, since this exponential progress will make us really soon much much more powerful,
and this much more powerful brings also much more stability and much more quality, so the very important thing to do is to manage well this exponential progress of our humanity, and here is what i am saying about this exponential progress of our humanity:

And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


More of my philosophy about how to measure a civilization and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i will ask a very important philosophical question, and it is the following:

How to measure a civilization ?


I think i am highly smart, and i think i am discovery a pattern with
my fluid intelligence that answers the question, and it is the following:

I think we can measure it with happiness that is the goal of philosophy,
but happiness is by logical analogy like utilitarianism, since so that to be happy, happiness has to be not just the today happiness , but the tomorrow and the future happiness, so then the future happiness constrains the today happiness so that to be
responsability, and it is how also emerges morality, so then happiness is not the having big money, but it is also the knowing how to live together in "harmony" in a society or in a world, and i can
ask the philosophical question of does big money brings individual happiness, and here is my answer:

What is the essence of a civilization or what is the important
ingredients that make a civilization ?

I think that the engine of a civilization is not only money,
because big money doesn't add much individual happiness to having individually enough money ( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ),
so i think that the engines of a civilization is both self-improvement
and money , and this self-improvement has to know about the "goals"
that are also the being this well balance between the individual smartness and the societal smartness so that to give form to a civilization and so that to make the good citizen, and of course we have to know how to make loving the way of self-
improvement in such a way.

And here is my new proverb that explains more my views:

"Passion is not a good engine, since it is much less powerful,
so if for example you have passion for sex, then can you make sex
a passion that guides you ? no, so then it is not a general or
much more general way of doing, so i think that individual
happiness comes from the satisfaction of self-improvement,
and does money = happiness? I think that big money doesn't
add much individual happiness to having individually enough money
( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ), but big money
can add much to societal happiness, and big money builds empires."

In my above smart new proverb , i am saying that individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement, and I invite you to read
my following thoughts of my philosophy that talks about it and
about how you become self-confidence and how you become this
positive energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And here is my other new proverb that also talks about how individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"


More of my philosophy about morality and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following video of a techlead about morality and i invite you to look at it:

Stop Being Too Nice... On Power & Money (as a millionaire)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn9FtZbzdxg


So I think i am highly smart, and i think the above techlead is making mistakes, and he is pessimistic about morality, but i say that we have not to be pessimistic about morality , since i say that morality is a systemic thing and morality has to make the system systemically a good system, but the above techlead is not
understanding a very important thing, and it is that selfishness is regulated by the interest(i mean the something that brings advantages) of the individual and of the group or of the world, so, so that to be a much better morality we have to speak about
the interest(i mean the something that brings advantages) of being patriotic or speak about the interest(i mean something that brings advantages) of economic growth in third world countries that attracts investors or speak about the interest of being a
company(i mean something that brings advantages) and such interests, and this self-interest as an individual or interests as a group are also regulated by competition so that to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it
Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism

And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY

And read also here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY


More of my philosophy about capitalism and more of my thoughts..

"America’s brand of capitalism—the version that has been in place for the past half-century or so—has delivered unmatched economic growth and prosperity. GDP per capita has more than doubled over the past 50 years, while personal consumption
expenditure per capita has almost tripled, and there have been significant improvements in longevity and leisure.

While inequality between countries has decreased, inequality within countries has increased, most acutely in the United States. Economic mobility has slowed, and the middle class that has been much celebrated as critical to the American economy has been
especially squeezed, declining over the past half-century from 61 percent of American households to 52 percent. A primary source of this inequality is a fundamental change in the US economy from one driven by manufacturing to one driven by services and
consumption, which has reduced the income available to workers, and this inexorable shift is unlikely to reverse itself. The unequal outcomes for individuals and households over the past 20 years become clearer when considered through the lens of
individuals as workers, consumers, and savers, as we outlined in research earlier this year on the evolving social contract.

USA Investment in public goods, from education, training, and skills for human capital development to foundational R&D and infrastructure, has declined relative both to what is needed to enable individuals to have equality of opportunity and participate
fully in the economy and to what is required for productivity, growth, and competitiveness. Federal spending on education, infrastructure, and scientific research fell from approximately 2.5 percent of GDP in 1980 to less than 1.5 percent of GDP today.."

Read more in the following article of McKinsey:

Rethinking the future of American capitalism

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/long-term-capitalism/rethinking-the-future-of-american-capitalism


More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..

The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so
notice carefully that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts
carefully so that to understand:


And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic
party about his reforms of his
progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
to understand:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc


And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..

I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:

Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI


And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
to understand:

Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of “
People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:

Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html

And I invite you to read the following so that to understand how IMF and World Bank can be reformed:

Reforming the IMF and World Bank

Read more here:

https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/research-impact/reforming-imf-and-world-bank


And read my previous thoughts:


UN, World Bank, IMF in need of urgent reforms: Sitharaman

"Institutions such as United Nations, World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) need to be urgently reformed as they no longer speak for countries whose issues have remained unattended to for decades, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said."

Read more here:

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/un-world-bank-imf-in-need-of-urgent-reforms-sitharaman/article36979090.ece

And so that to understand more, I invite you to read the following interesting paper by John Cavanagh director of the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies, and Jerry Mander a senior fellow at the Public Media Center:

World Bank, IMF turned poor Third World nations into loan addicts

https://www.tru.ca/library/pdf/cavanagh-mander.pdf

And you can read the rest of my philosophical thoughts in the following
web link so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)