Hello,


I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


U.S. Economy Added 372,000 Jobs in June, Defying Slowdown Fears

"The U.S. economy powered through June with broad-based hiring on par with recent months, keeping the country clear of recession territory even as inflation eats into wages and interest rates continue to rise."

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/08/business/economy/jobs-report-june-2022.html


More of my philosophy about the stability and about the meaning and purpose of human life and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, since i have passed two certified
IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and notice that i have
thought and written rapidly my below thoughts, and now i will talk
a little bit more about what is the meaning and purpose of human life, so i think that the previous old philosophers were pessimistic about the meaning and purpose of human life, but i think i am more optimistic and i am not pessimistic, and i say that
since the meaning of human life comes from a kind of stability that permits us to go forward living our human life with self-confidence, and notice that the being stability is not the resisting to change, since i define the being instability as something
bad that hurts the system, and notice that i am also saying that stability comes mainly from mastery of science and technology, but i think, as i am saying it below , that the thinking it GDP per capita so that to become rich is also an interesting way
of doing, and read about it carefully in my below thoughts, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the meaning of human life, since i think that we can attain a kind of stability that permits us to appreciate pleasures of life and be much
more happy, so i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand how and so that to understand my views about it:

And now here is a part of my philosophy about how to be self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the meaning and purpose of human life and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, since i have passed two certified
IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about
an important subject in philosophy, and it is about the meaning and
purpose of human life, but before, i invite you to look at the
following video that is talking not wisely about the meaning and purpose
of human life, and you have to look at it carefully so that to understand my point of view below:

Why the world is going crazy—and how to win back our minds | Jamie Wheal | Big Think

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqJQvJ7i7Ek


So i think i am highly smart and i will explain my smart way of showing
you what is the meaning and purpose of human life, so how do you think
i will explain what is the meaning and purpose of human life ? it is
by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence, and the patterns
that i am discovering are the following:

I think that the meaning or purpose of human life has to give you like
a kind of stability that permits you to go forward into living
your life with much more confidence, so i think that the pattern
that i am discovering that permits you to resist instabilities is the following:

Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

So as you are noticing that my proverb above is also saying that
by becoming more and more perfect you also easy more and more
the hard work by the process of reusability of your intelligence and
your experience etc. and you better and better resist instabilities,
and of course we have to take into account the exponential progress
of our humanity that is bringing, and really fast, a much more stability that is required by the meaning and purpose of human life, since this exponential progress will make us really soon much much more powerful,
and this much more powerful brings also much more stability and much more quality, so the very important thing to do is to manage well this exponential progress of our humanity, and here is what i am saying about this exponential progress of our
humanity:

And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ

And of course so that to understand much more my point of view of what is the meaning and purpose of human life, i invite you to read all my following thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the essence of competition and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
said that it is from competition that comes quality, but it is
understandable that humans are naturally selfish and egoistic since it is like a game of "competition" where you have to get a big profit,
but as i have just said below, you have to notice carefully that
competition regulates this naturally selfish and egoistic of humans,
since we have to be also egoism of a group by also being economic investment and egoism of a zone such as the European union, so then we have to not only think about competition as an individual competition, but we have to think competition as
competition of a group or of a zone such as the European union, and as you are noticing that it is inherent to my talking below about competition that competition is pushed forward towards more and more perfection, so i think that it is from competition
that comes quality,
so read my below previous thoughts so to understand much more my views.

More of my philosophy about the essence of Democracy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the pattern that i am seeing with my fluid intelligence is that you have to look at Democracy from the competition point of view, since i think that it is from competition that comes quality, since i think that
we have to measure the efficiency of Democracy by how it brings quality, so i think that Democracy has
to ensure like the right competition between actors that represent Democracy so that to bring the right quality, so for example how do we bring "justice" to people ? so i will give you a good example so that
you understand:

So i think that a technocratic dictatorship has the tendency to be
performance oriented, since i think that it like wants people to be like highly performant or be like robots, but it is why i think that Democracy has the tendency to like well balance between the power of the people that are not Elites and the Elites that can have this tendency of being performance oriented, and this permits
to humanize correctly the society and this permits to bring justice.

So as you notice that in Democracy this kind of competition that balances the powers is a good thing. And of course in Democracy there
is a competition between in one side the medias and a part of the congress and in the other side the governance and it is like a well balance that brings quality, and in Democracy there is also a competition that like well balance between in one side the
power of the president or the prime minister that governs and in the other side the congress, and this also brings quality, so as you notice that this
competition that balances the powers in this kind of way is a good thing. So i think that it is from competition that comes quality, and here is more what i have just said about competition:

More of my philosophy about competition and about quality and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, i think that quality in an atheistic system comes from "competition", so then so that to be quality , competition is first and foremost the will to fight, since even America’s military argues that “will to fight” is the
disposition and decision to fight, act, or persevere, and notice that this will to fight is a cause of quality that precedes the good smartness or good education as causes of quality, and i think that competition is also the acts of competition of the
acts of being good smartness or/and the acts of being good wisdom and such , so then what we have to be is to be competition that brings the right quality, so then you have to be for example a competition in a fight for life, and you have to be economic
competition of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and i invite you to read again the following interesting article that proves that humans are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic:

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

So as you notice on the above interesting article about a study, that humans are naturally selfish and egoistic since it is like a game of "competition" where you have to get a big profit, but i think that i am highly smart and i say that the seeking the
big profit by being competition is also regulated by antitrust laws, and individual self-interest and egoism creates competition and by the mechanism of competition we become self-interest and egoism of a group and of a society or of a zone such as the
European union and then we become collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a society or in a zone such as the European union or in global world and that creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and also we have to say that when we get a
big profit we can also help the others by being solidarity,
so then we have not to be pessimistic about humans that are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic, but we have to be patience since it takes some time so that this individual self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and
even solidarity as i am explaining it, and of course we have to be much more optimistic since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a
relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital and we have to be much more optimistic since self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the
father of economic Liberalism, and notice that we have to look at competition from a broader point of view since competition is also
competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA,
since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is
much less corrupt than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers.

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the respectability of Democracy and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i think that Democracy gets its respectability from the mechanisms of Democracy, so since Democracy
is not confident with this or that political party , so the governance in a democratic system has to actively and proactively be judged all along the period of the governance, so then Democracy becomes more "respectable" than dictatorship of the one
political party such as the one of communist China of today, since in communist China of today
we can not be confident with its dictatorship of the one political
party, since it is the mechanisms of Democracy such as the congress and the medias that brings respectability, i am saying that the congress , such as the USA congress, is a mechanism of Democracy since it comes from the multipartism Democracy that is an
enhanced Democracy, and i am saying that medias such as CNN and Fox news are mechanisms of democracy, since they are so strongly connected with Democracy and so strongly important for Democracy that, i think, they become part of Democracy, so it is why i
say that dictatorship of the one political party like in China is less respectable than Democracy, so it makes us less confident with the communist Chinese system.

And read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about Democracy and about China and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i am noticing that communist system of China of today is saying that its dictatorship system of the one political party has an advantage over the democratic system of USA, and it is that it is more meritocratic, but i think
i am highly smart and i say that it is not so smart to say so, since Democracy is not confident with this or that political party, since Democracy with its mechanisms has to actively and proactively judge the governance and acts correctly, and it is
what is lacking in communist system of China of today, so the communist China system of today is not correct governance, and i will add that the democratic system such as USA has also another advantage and it is that eventhough the governance can be less
meritocratic, the governance in a democratic system is actively and proactively judged all along the period of the governance, and of course the governance in a Democracy has to be limited to around 4 years before doing the elections again so that to not
be problematic, and there is another advantage to Democracy and it is that it is like a well balance between the power of the people and the power of the Elites that are actively and proactively judging the governance all along the period of the
governance, such as the medias of CNN and Fox news, and of course those important medias such as CNN and Fox news have not only to be "objective", but they have to be meritocratic system that brings the best of the quality, so i think that being
Democracy is the right thing to do.

More of my philosophy about household leverage and about financial institutions and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you are noticing, i have just explained how to enhance the reliability of financial institutions, so it is about household leverage and about toxic assets and about the stronger capital and liquidity buffers and about
the reduced reliance, and we know that the household leverage, as i am talking about it below, is a ratio that measures the indebtedness of households in relation with their income, that is their spending and saving capacity. High leverage ratios are
often interpreted as a sign of financial vulnerability though not only debt and liabilities but also assets should be considered in such an assessment. High indebtedness levels generally increase the financing costs of the borrower, deteriorate balance
sheet positions and may restrict access to new financing. So i think that so that to enhance reliability of the financial institutions so that to not
have a financial crisis as the USA financial crisis of the 2007-2009, we have to be higher standards of loans by looking carefully at household leverage before giving the loans and we have to avoid toxic assets and and we have to be stronger capital and
liquidity buffers and we have to have a reduced reliance as is explaining it the paper from the Journal of Economic Perspectives below, so read my below thoughts so that to understand more:

I invite you to read the following interesting paper from the Journal of Economic Perspectives, that i have just read carefully, about "The Growth of Finance" by Robin Greenwood and David Scharfstein:

https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/Growth%20of%20Finance_6ec86a21-8e68-4abc-bb09-45abaacd7be5.pdf

I think i am smart, and i say that i think there was a problem
with the financial sector and it is that in the first theoretical implementation of the financial sector was that a primary function of the financial sector is to dampen the effects of risk by reallocating it efficiently to parties that can bear risks
the most easily (read about it on the paper of Merton and Bodie 1995), but there was some practical constraints in the reality and it was about the benefits of expanding access to mortgage credit, there are a number of societal costs from such an
expansion, including instability from excessive household leverage. Moreover, the shadow banking system that facilitated this expansion made the financial system more fragile. And it was also the cause of the financial USA crisis of the 2007-2009 that
began years earlier with cheap credit and lax lending standards that fueled a housing bubble, so i think that we have not to make again those mistakes in the financial sector from toxic assets and from "bad loans", so we have to "higher" the standards of
the loans etc. in the financial sector, but I think from the following report we know that Financial institutions are now generally less vulnerable today than they were before the crisis, with stronger capital and liquidity buffers and a reduced reliance,
read more here to notice it:

Potential Emerging Threats to U.S. Financial Stability

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/261/2011-Potential-Emerging-Threats-to-U.S.-Financial-Stability.pdf

So i think we have not to be too pessimistic about the financial sector.

And of course i say that the biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where
finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most
talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation.

More of my philosophy about downsizing and about outsourcing and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you are noticing i have just spoken
about the downsizing methodology that is used by McKinsey, read it below, but i can go more and more into more details by saying that notice how i am saying that the downsizing higher productivity, and i think i am smart by saying so, since i say that in
management the downsizing can create a cost reduction and it can create more "value", and both cost reduction and this more value can attract investors that makes the company much more productive, so as you notice we have not in management just to focus
on the short term of the cost reduction of downsizing, and of course i can also say that there is also the way of doing some outsourcing in a company so that to higher productivity and reduce the costs as well, but here again, in this case, it can also
attract investors and make the company much more productive.

More of my philosophy about the wage levels and the wage ratios and more of my thoughts..

I will say that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio — the wage of the worker at the 90th percentile divided by the wage of the worker
at the median, but you have to understand that i am talking below about how McKinsey has used the management methodology of downsizing(there is also a destruction of jobs in it) and of part-time employment so that to higher productivity and i am
explaining how it has much more destroyed the Middle Class. So reread my following thoughts carefully:

More of my philosophy about productivity and about economic growth and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you are noticing in my below thoughts that the powerful McKinsey has used the management methodology of downsizing and of part-time employment so that to higher productivity so that to higher economic growth, since the
ideal GDP growth rate is between 2% and 3%, and since we know that economic growth is measured as the annual percent change of gross domestic product (GDP), and we know that when you higher GDP per capita you higher richness of the country, but you have
to notice that this management of the powerful McKinsey was deficient in that it has destroyed much more the Middle Class, and i am
posting the web link below that shows it, and i say that it is why it was not a Long-term good management, but it was done not wisely for short-term benefits of highering productivity, so now it is why it is necessary to implement progressive capitalism,
of Joseph E. Stiglitz the recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, so that to solve those problems, so i invite you to read my below thoughts about progressive capitalism so that to understand it correctly:

More of my philosophy about the US problems and world problems and more of my thoughts..

I think that i am highly smart, and the main problem of USA as i am showing it below by posting the web links, is that Management consultants, like of the powerful McKinsey, implemented and rationalized a transformation in the American corporation by
downsizing in response not to particular business problems but rather to a new managerial ethos and methods; they downsized when profitable as well as when struggling, and during booms as well as busts. So i think it is the main problem, since for
example read in the following paper that says that: "In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants of the U.S. manufacturing sector that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth
in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment."

Read more here so that to understand:

Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228705

But about the other problem of part-time employment, i think American corporations have to understand that this way of managing
by part-time employment is limited, since we know that a 10% increase in the part-time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about McKinsey and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Became One Of The Most Powerful Companies In The World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBmmMj_maII

And i also invite you to read this interesting article about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/how-mckinsey-destroyed-middle-class/605878/

I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the above video and i have
just read the above article, and i think McKinsey was doing it with like the traditional levers, but i think this classical way of managing is not so difficult for countries, but i think this classical way of managing is much less important than the much
important way of doing it
with artificial intelligence, since compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about economic growth in western countries today, since there has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of production capital investment and labor to
propel economic growth in western countries, since i also say that in economic management we know that firms with a large part-time employment share are more productive than firms with a large share of full-time workers, but a 10% increase in the part-
time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so as you notice there is a limit to this way of managing with part-time employment, like was doing it McKinsey, so i think that it is AI(artificial intelligence) that could increase much more the
economic growth rates in western countries by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business can increase much more labor productivity and enable people to make more
efficient use of their time, but the most important thing is that Digital and AI literacy is of utmost importance to help countries businesses scale and compete internationally. Investing in widespread digital and AI literacy for the entire population
will increase domestic demand for technology and technology jobs. A technologically literate population will create more data, which fuels AI and thus the data-driven economy as a whole. It is also necessary for workers to be able to upskill and re-skill
in order to remain productive and competitive in an automated workforce. Countries businesses that adopt AI technology will save from lower production costs, have increased output, and be able to invest more. Increased revenue from this domestic demand,
and with a global reputation for responsible AI, will help countries businesses scale globally and compete on the international level.

And read the two following web links so that to understand more what i am saying:

"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There
has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of
production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."

And it it says the following:

"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies
reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by
changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man
and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to
increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to
make more efficient use of their time."

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada

And McKinsey estimates that AI(Artificial intelligence) may deliver an additional economic output of around US$13 trillion by 2030, increasing
global GDP by about 1.2 % annually. This will mainly come from
substitution of labour by automation and increased innovation in
products and services.

Read more here:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf


More of my philosophy about smartness and about discovering patterns and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, i think that inventing sophisticated theorems in mathematics is also discovering smart patterns with your fluid intelligence, it is why i am inventing my thoughts by also discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence , but
notice that discovering patterns in mathematics is like a low level way of doing like in microeconomics, but discovering patterns can be in a high level way like in macroeconomics, and here is an example of how i am doing it quickly, read my following
thoughts about Nikola Tesla and about Garry Tan that i have invented quickly so that to notice how i am discovering smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a high level way:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(
and notice below the other smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person like me(and i think it is also genetical in me), since for
example he is saying the following saying in the above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all, since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so that to be efficient, and i also think
that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called "The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is saying that doing many things at the same
time is not good for productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be like convergent
thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking, and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)