Hello..




Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about the reactionary ideologies and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, so i think that Democracy is like a general
way of governing, since it is also based on the very important thing
that brings quality and that we call "competition", and Democracy comes
with like a balanced way of doing, since Democracy is not the being
unity of the country or the people of a country, but theoretically we
can practically make it an efficient system that minimizes at best the
risk of instability brought by the not being this unity, but Democracy
has a really important advantage and it is that it can much better
avoids the being stuck in a dictatorial act or acts of the dictatorship
of the only one political party that governs and that cause(s) big
problems , since the basis of Democracy first and foremost is that
Democracy is not confident in this or that political party, not even in
the one political party of communism of China of today that governs,
since Democracy has to judge the acts of the political party that
governs and it has to act correctly, so then we can think the kind of dictatorship of the one political party that governs as being not the
general correct way of governing, also i think that communism of China
of today is not the general correct way of governing, but it is just a
kind of "reactionary" ideology that comes from a reactionary ideology
that we call communism, like neo-nazism or nazism, that is not the
general correct way of doing.

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about communism of China and about arabs and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i think that western countries are not understanding communism of China and are not understanding Russia and
the like, so i think that the main problem is that communism China is
giving a lot of importance to "unity" of the country and of the people
of the country, so they don't like the risk of being instability that
comes from the not being unity of the country and not being unity of the
people of the country, so it is like a kind of nationalism like the
nationalism of Algeria or the nationalism of Russia that gives a lot of importance to "unity" of the country and of the people of the country,
and of course we can logically infer that there is also many kinds of nationalism.

More of my philosophy about the main problem and about Russia and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the Russia war against
Ukraine was not understood correctly, since i think that president Putin
of Russia and its government were viewing the Ukrainian government as
being an enemy that can attack Russia and/or creates problems to Russia
when it becomes part of Nato and then get more sophisticated weaponery
and such, so i think that this war between Russia and Ukraine is
unfortunate , since i think that the best thing that the government of
Ukraine has to do is to not be part of Nato and not to get sophisticated weaponry that creates problems and it has to be peace with its neighbor
Russia. So i think that Ukraine has lacked the necessary wisdom so that
to not get into those troubles of war with Russia. Other than that i
think that the main problem in our world is that we have to implement Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz the recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics , and read about it below so that to
understand it correctly:

More of my philosophy of does big money brings happiness and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i will answer fast the following
philosophical question:


Does big money brings happiness ?


So i think that so that to maximize at best the being rich you have
also to know that you have to for example maximize at best the being
educated, like i am showing you below about how the jews maximize at
best the being educated , so then as you notice i am not just speaking
of happiness as being just individual happiness, since happiness is also
a "systemic" thing, so then i will say that when you maximize at best
the being educated and the being responsability, you can then say that
big money maximize at best the being happiness, so then i think that the following video where a religious jewish says that money doesn't produce happiness is not true, but notice that he doesn't say as i am saying
that when you maximize at best the being educated and the being
responsability, you can then say that big money maximize at best the
being happiness, so look at the following video so that you notice it:

They Are Programmed to be RICH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIdSFZSueGI


More of my philosophy about jews and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i think that jews(not the religious ones)
are really successful, since they are much more educated, since 61% of
them have higher education, also they are good businessmen and good businesswomen and they create a sophisticated network that is based on
there merit and that brings much more quality. So i invite you to look
at the following video about why the jews are so much successful so that
to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaJ5fCZ3r-A


Also read my below thoughts so that to understand more my views:


More of my philosophy about competition and about quality and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, i think that quality in an atheistic system
comes from "competition", so then so that to be quality , competition is
first and foremost the will to fight, since even America’s military
argues that “will to fight” is the disposition and decision to fight,
act, or persevere, and notice that this will to fight is a cause of
quality that precedes the good smartness or good education as causes of quality, and i think that competition is also the acts of competition of
the acts of being good smartness or/and the acts of being good wisdom
and such , so then what we have to be is to be competition that brings
the right quality, so then you have to be for example a competition in a
fight for life, and you have to be economic competition of Adam Smith
the father of economic Liberalism, and i invite you to read again the
following interesting article that proves that humans are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic:

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

So as you notice on the above interesting article about a study, that
humans are naturally selfish and egoistic since it is like a game of "competition" where you have to get a big profit, but i think that i am
highly smart and i say that the seeking the big profit by being
competition is also regulated by antitrust laws, and individual
self-interest and egoism creates competition and by the mechanism of competition we become self-interest and egoism of a group and of a
society or of a zone such as the European union and then we become collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a society or in a
zone such as the European union or in global world and that creates
prosperity and happiness of nations, and also we have to say that when
we get a big profit we can also help the others by being solidarity,
so then we have not to be pessimistic about humans that are naturally
and individually selfish and egoistic, but we have to be patience since
it takes some time so that this individual self-interest and egoism
becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity as i am
explaining it, and of course we have to be much more optimistic since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of
growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most,
and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of
capital and we have to be much more optimistic since self-interest is
most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption,
fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the father
of economic Liberalism, and notice that we have to look at competition
from a broader point of view since competition is also
competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by
using different political parties and different political groups inside
the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is
also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution
establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the
legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the
law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for
example USA is much less corrupt than African countries or such
countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this
way the powers.

So then i think i am highly smart and notice the following saying of Hitler:

“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would
signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling
can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely
because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law
did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of
organic life would not be conceivable at all.”
― Adolf Hitler

Read the saying of Hitler here so that to notice:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler

I think i am highly smart and i say that Hitler is not at all smart in
his above saying, since we have first to define what is "stronger" , so
for example the stronger is not the smarter and/or the wiser, since you
can be the stronger by having the most powerful military or the most
stronger will to fight without being the smarter and wiser and this can
cause that you win the competition or the fight, so when Hitler says in
the above saying: "the stronger must dominate", i think from my
explanation above that it is stupid to say so, since also the being
stronger is also not the being the smarter and wiser . And i also think
this strictness of Hitler is not correct, since he was not understanding
the disadvantage of when the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in
the crossover steps, since this kind of Elitism in a genetic algorithm
can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the
average members of the population, and you can read more about my below thoughts of the following web links about the genetic algorithm.

Also Hitler says the following:

“Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice.”
― Adolf Hitler

So i think that this strictness of Hitler is not correct,
since we need a level of humanitarianism that also soften morals
and that makes us less violent.


So i think that Hitler is too much strict and too much violent.

And of course you can take a look at my thoughts in the following web
links about competition and about the welfare system and about how
competition regulates egoism and selfishness and more:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/KLEJuMnN3Ho

And read here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8

And now here is a part of my philosophy about how to be self-confidence
and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you
notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM


More of my philosophy of why the market is first and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following interesting video where Benjamin
Netanyahu the previous prime minister of Israel says a very important
thing that i have also just said previously in my own way, so look at
the video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8NarTCoVF0


And here is the very important thing that says Benjamin Netanyahu the
previous prime minister of Israel in the above video:

"You think that mathematicians and computer engineers or mechanical
engineers or doctors are first. They are very important, but they are
not first. They are second.

There was a country that had the best mathematicians, the best
physicists, the best metallurgists in the world. But that country was
very poor. It is called the Soviet Union.

What comes first is markets. This was the main thing that i tried to
bring to Israel economy, in my own way"


So it is why i am highly smart, and i have just said previously that you
can think GDP per capita so that to become a rich country, and read my
previous thoughts so that to understand how:

More of my philosophy about Dubai and about Israel and about tech and
more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked again at the
following video of a jewish that is saying that since Israel is
much more innovative in science and technology than Dubai,
so Dubai is much less successful than Israel( You can look at the video
here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo ), but i think he is
not right since Dubai is not thinking it like that, but it is thinking
it GDP per capita that is also valued in a currency that is convertible
to the US dollar or to gold, and it is what is making Dubai a rich
country, it is by highering GDP per capita, but i say that highering the
GDP per capita doesn't come only by innovating in technology or/and
science, since it can come for example from Foreign direct investments
and from being the good business that can make you a rich country, as i
am explaining below, so read my following thoughts so that to understand
how:

More of my philosophy about the how many african countries
will become 1st World countries in about 2 decades and more of my thoughts..


I think i am smart, and i say that there is many african countries
that will become 1st World countries in about two decades and
you can look at them on the following video:

Top 10 Wealthiest African countries by GDP Per Capita that would become
1st World Countries

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suEqpuoSxnQ


More of my philosophy about the economic miracle of Israel and more of
my thoughts..

I think i am smart, and i say that Israel is an economic miracle,
since even if Israel is relatively "poor" in natural resources,
its GDP per capita is around the GDP per capita of Canada, and it
is 4 times the GDP per capita of Russia, so i think that Israel can
not be economically compared to USA or Canada, since USA and Canada
and Russia too are also really rich in natural ressources, since for
example Canada, where i am living, has long ranked among the world
leaders in the production of uranium, zinc, nickel, potash, asbestos,
sulfur, cadmium, and titanium. Canada is also a major producer of iron
ore, coal, petroleum, gold, copper, silver, lead, and a number of
ferroalloys, but i repeat that even if Israel was and is relatively
"poor" in natural resources, it is an economic miracle, but so that to
know more about the disadvantages of Israel, read my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the GDP per capita and about properity and
more of my thoughts..

The ideal GDP growth rate is between 2% and 3%, and we know that
economic growth is measured as the annual percent change of gross
domestic product (GDP), so notice in the following graphical chart
that Rwanda has highered much more economic growth by attracting Foreign
direct investments, and notice in the following chart how the net inflow
in percentage of GDP between years 2010 and 2020 was very good:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RW



So i think that the economic miracle of Rwanda comes mainly from
Foreign direct investments.

So as you notice that highering much more economic growth by Foreign
direct investments is the best way for Morocco too, and i think that
Morocco can be much more successful than Rwanda since Morocco has also a strategic location, between Europe and sub-Saharan Africa and notice
that so that to attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct
Investments, you have also to ensure good governance, which includes accountability, transparency and efficiency in deploying scarce
resources to key sectors of the national economy.

Other than that i have to speak about the GDP per capita so that
to understand wich of the countries are much more prosperous,
so i think that the GDP per capita of Israel is around the GDP per
capita of Canada, and it is 4x times higher than Russia, so i think that
the GDP per capita is so good in Israel since Israel has efficiently
highered economic growth by attracting Foreign direct investments and
by its good labour resources and also by its good scientific and
technical progress that promotes the efficiency growth of all resources,
but the disadvantages in Israel is that its cost of living is so high
and you can also notice it by reading the following article:

https://www.thetravel.com/tel-aviv-worlds-most-expensive-city/

And the other disadvantage of Israel is the following:

I have just taken a look at the average wage by countries, here it is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_wage


So notice carefully that the average wage of Canada, where i am living,
is greater than Israel by 30%, and i think it is a disadvantage in Israel.


More of my philosophy about the other factors of competitiveness and
innovation and more of my thoughts..

As you have just noticed i have just talked about how Morocco can
higher much more productivity and has a higher "competitive" market
by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or
Maghrebians countries such as Algeria and Tunisia etc., but as you have
just noticed i have not talked about innovation more deeply, but i think
that Morocco can enhance much more its living conditions by following
the way of my thoughts below, but of course you have to notice that it
is "inherent" to my thoughts below that Morocco has to have a well
diversified economy so that to be a "resilient" economy, so read again carefully my following thoughts:

More of my philosophy about economic growth and about economy and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i say that we have not to simplify too
much the Macroeconomic model , so we have to take into account the most important
factors, so i think that the economic growth is provided by attraction
of the investments, and by the labour resources, also by the scientific
and technical progress that promotes the efficiency growth of all
resources, it is why i think that Morocco my country has to much more efficiently attract Foreign Direct Investments that is so important for economic growth, not only that, but Morocco has to higher productivity
by also providing a good education for its people, but i think that
Morocco has a young and relatively well-trained population and a
relatively low labour cost, so i think that the best way for Morocco is
to attract Foreign Direct Investments that enhance quality and
productivity and Morocco has to higher much more productivity, but so
that to attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, i
think Morocco has to also enlarge its market by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or Maghrebians countries such as
Algeria and Tunisia etc. and it has to easy much more the administrative burdens that slow down business activities, and i also think that
Morocco's debt-to-GDP is not so bad, other than that i think we can be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game,
since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver
rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high
rate of return to the owners of capital. Also here is how i have also
explained how to higher much more efficiently productivity:

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and
i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important
idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic
system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient
and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a
job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and
productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting
of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at
best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can
create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following
smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer
scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human
smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel
productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it
can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.



More of my philosophy about moroccan inventors..

As you have notice i come from Morocco so i am moroccan
and i invite you to read the following about moroccan
inventors:

In Switzerland, Mohamed Yalouh won the gold medal for his invention
"Aerial fluid disturbance method without parasitic loads for supersonic flight", during the international competition of inventions and
innovations, held from 18 to 20 July, the Moroccan association said in a statement.

In the United States, Imad El Hana and Mohamed Yalouh won two gold
medals at the AII American DAVINCI International Innovation and
Invention Expo, respectively, for their inventions "Sun Power
Revolution" and "Aerial fluid disturbance method without parasitic loads
for supersonic flight," the statement added.

In Canada, Mustapha Oubouhouch won the gold medal and the award of
excellence for his invention "Underwater Free Breathing Apparatus" at
the International Invention Innovation Competition iCAN 2021, it noted.

In addition, during the IWA 2021 Innovation Week, organized from
September 8 to 12 by OFEED Morocco, Moroccan inventors won 14 awards,
including 6 Gold, 1 Silver and 5 Bronze medals.


Read more here:

https://www.mapnews.ma/en/actualites/general/invention-morocco-stood-out-four-international-competitions

Also i have to talk about a researcher in Artificial intelligence
that comes from Morocco and that is called Yoshua Bengio, and In 2017,
Bengio was named an Officer of the Order of Canada.[27] The same year,
he was nominated Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and received the Marie-Victorin Quebec Prize.[28][29] Together with Geoffrey Hinton and
Yann LeCun, Bengio won the 2018 Turing Award. and In 2020 he was elected
a Fellow of the Royal Society, you can read more about him here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshua_Bengio

I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms, you can read about
some of them in the following web link:

And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

Yet more philosophy about how Morocco is advancing quickly..

Morocco Wins 2 Gold Medals in Pan African Mathematics Olympiads

Morocco was ranked first in the competition, with 147 points,
outperforming South Africa (142 points), and Tunisia (133 points).

Read more here:

https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2019/04/269989/morocco-wins-2-gold-medals-in-pan-african-mathematics-olympiads/

And look at the following video about the Aerospace Industry in Morocco

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEqdgBU7KEE

More philosophy about how Morocco is advancing quickly..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video:

Immersion dans la future cité Mohammed VI Tanger Tech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLAFNgXb87U

China’s challenge in Morocco’s Africa-to-Europe commercial corridor

Read more here:

https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/08/01/chinas-challenge-in-moroccos-africa-to-europe-commercial-corridor/



More of my philosophy about the Market equilibrium and about the
Macroeconomic models..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I will talk more about the Market equilibrium and the Macroeconomic models:

So i think that a market is considered free if the next
conditions are satisfied:

- the market is not regulated by authority directly or indirectly;
- the criminal pressure is absent;
- there is no price collusion between monopolistic suppliers.

And of course the most important thing in the free market is also
self-interest or egoism that is most of the time regulated by
"competition" to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and
cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism,
so the commodity price in a free market with the right competition
depends on the demand and the suggestion only, so then sellers stimulate
the demand by lowering the price if the commodity is in plenty. In so
manner they can force sale and avoid the loss of perishable commodities.
If the commodity is in shortage, sellers do not miss the opportunity to
rise the price, and when above mentioned mechanism works, a dynamical
balance of demand and supply takes place in some time and the price is stabilized at a definite level. But notice that there is also the other mechanism that permits to control "inflation" and it is the by the
supply of money and by interest rates, read about it in my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the modern economics and about Keynesian
economics and more of my thoughts..

And i invite you to read the following interesting article:

Does Keynes’s theory still hold up?

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/02/does-keynes-s-theory-still-hold-up/


More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..

I think i am highly smart and i will invite you to look at the following
new video about how the governments of Europe and USA have spent more in
the economy and were following the Keynesian economics in the period of economic Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even
if it is not the modern way by using the supply of money and by interest
rates, can still has some "advantage" in this kind of economic crisis,
and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is
about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly
influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to look at
the following new video so that to understand the how of it:

The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU


But i will say that Milton Friedman, an American economist awarded the
1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his contribution to
consumption analysis and to monetary history and theory, including his observations of the complexity of stabilization policy, was the founders
of the modern monetarist school of economics, that held that the
business cycle is determined mainly by the supply of money and by
interest rates, rather than by government fiscal policy - contrary to
the long-prevailing view of Keynes and his followers. So then you have
to understand that the modern way in economics with wich we manage
inflation and unemployment is no more using keynesian economics, but it
is by using for example the following way using the supply of money and
by interest rates:

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the Federal Reserve
policymakers of USA are trying to slow down the economy and subdue
inflation by highering interest rates, and highering interest rates make
money costlier and borrowing less appealing and that, in turn, slows
demand to catch up with supply, which has lagged badly throughout the
pandemic, but that's the macroeconomics of it, and its potential effects include lower wages, a halt or even a drop in home prices and a decline
in stock market valuations etc., but notice that the highering of
interest rates reduces the demand, so i think it has a macroeconomic
effects of balancing by creating lower prices in one side and part of
the economy and this compensate much more for the higher prices in the
other side and part of the economy, but notice that it doesn't mean that
the highering of interest rates solves all the problems.


And now i will talk about the macroeconomic models:


The central place in the economic theory are taken by the dynamic
items, namely – the long-term market equilibrium and the growth of the national income which is a main base for well-being of the people. The
economic growth is provided by attraction of the investments, the labour resources, also by the scientific and technical progress that promotes
the efficiency growth of all resources. On this reason the economical
models consider the very important components – the investment, the
manpower resources and the productivity of labour. The growth indicators
are the joint product output and its important part – public consumption funds. And of course you can take a look at my thoughts in the following
web links about competition and about the welfare system and about how competition regulates egoism and selfishness and more:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/KLEJuMnN3Ho

And read here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8

And now here is a part of my philosophy about how to be self-confidence
and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you
notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM


More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..

The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of
course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so notice carefully
that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph
E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that
he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts carefully so that to understand:


And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)