Hello,



More of my philosophy about who are white people and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i think that white supremacists and
neo-nazis define true white people as having blue eyes and having blonde hairs, but i think that it is a big mistake, since look at the following
webpage of the presidents of united states and you will notice
that even the white president Ronald Reagan had brown eyes and dark brown hair, and many other white presidents of united states had brown eyes and brown hair, look in the following webpage so that to notice it:

https://list.fandom.com/wiki/United_States_presidents_by_hair_and_eye_color

I am too a "white" arab that has brown eyes and i think i am smart and i am white and it is why i have invented quickly many poems of Love and poems and posted them here, and i have invented quickly many proverbs and posted them here and i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented my thoughts of my philosophy and i have posted them here, and you can take a look at my photo that i have just put here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem


Also you can read my poems of Love and poems that i have invented
quickly here in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/DkxcwNilFjo


More of my philosophy about the welfare and about capitalism and more of my thoughts..

I have just read again the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And i am not in accordance with the white supremacist views about capitalism on the above webpage, since they are too much pessimistic about capitalism, since i say that we have to be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game,
since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also i am talking below about Progressive Capitalism that explains how to
reform capitalism so that to be efficient, and i am not in accordance with the above white supremacist view about the welfare since i think it is too much strict, since i think we need a level of welfare and here is how i am explaining it:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about Hitler and about neo-nazism and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the quotes of Hitler here:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler

And notice that he says the following:

“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and
narrower mind; for if such a law did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable at all.”
― Adolf Hitler


But i think this strictness of Hitler is not correct, since he was
not understanding the disadvantage of when the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover step, since this kind of Elitism in a genetic algorithm can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the
population, and you can read more about my below thoughts about the genetic algorithm.

Also Hitler says the following:

“Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice.”
― Adolf Hitler

So i think that this strictness of Hitler is not correct,
since we need a level of humanitarianism that also soften morals
and that makes us less violent.


So i think that Hitler is too much strict and too much violent.


And now more of my thoughts about capitalism and about National Vanguard..


I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men
that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be
mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best
with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new
owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with
there smartness (so that to become rich).


And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".


And the above article is saying the following:


"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make
contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."


I think it is not true, because read the following:


https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


And read the following:


Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:


Following are some of the advantages of automation:


1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.


2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.


3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).


4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.


5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.


More of my philosophy about neo-nazism and white supremacism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
video that speaks about how thinks white supremacism and neo-nazism,
so i invite you to look at it:

Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race: War Against the Weak (2003)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfPTaBlheGA&t=2557s


So i think i am highly smart and i think the best way to answer white supremacism and neo-nazism , it is that white supremacism and neo-nazism
wants to "unite" especially western white europeans and they want to
destroy or exterminate the others, but this way of thinking is too simplistic, since western white europeans wants also to decentralize and diversify correctly since the being unity under the white supremacism or neo-nazism as systems is not so efficient
and it can hurt the system since it is not decentralized and diversified correctly, since it is also like when you say arabs, there is a diversity of views or political views and diversity of genetics of arabs, so you have to know how to "decentralize"
and "manage" this diversity so that to be efficient, and of course genetic diversity is also necessary for our world so that to be efficient, so it is why i think we need this genetic diversity of arabs and white europeans etc.

More of my philosophy about materialism and about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i have just taken a look at the
following web page about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville
that studied in the École Normale Supérieure and earned a PhD from Panthéon-Sorbonne University:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Comte-Sponville

So look carefully at the above web page about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville, and notice that he says that he is a proponent of atheism and materialism, but i think i am not like him, since i say
that an idea can has an existence in our minds even if it doesn't exist in the reality, i mean for example we can imagine an
abstract object like a circle into our mind that doesn't exist
in reality, and then we can say that so that to not be an extremist
we can say that the fact that an idea can exist in our mind and not exist in reality is a like a logical proof that an idea can has its proper existence even if it depends and it needs materialism. Also the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville is
making the same mistake as the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in the following video by saying that human life oscillates between boredom and suffering, and he has also explained it by the fact that when you desire and you are lacking what you want that
means you become suffering, and when you have what you are missing you become bored, so look carefully at the following video so that to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcNt-r7LDi0

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..

Today i will talk more about the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and
about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts:


And here is my new proverb:


"When you don't know how to nuance, that's also where the problems begin"

"Quand on ne sait pas nuancer, c'est là aussi que commencent les problèmes"


The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer has said that human life oscillates between boredom and suffering, and he has also explained it by the fact that when you desire and you are lacking what you want that means you become suffering, and when you have what
you are missing you become bored, but i think that like in my above new proverb i say that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was lacking on knowing how to nuance correctly, since lacking what you want doesn't mean that you are suffering and when you
have what you are missing doesn't mean that you are bored. And by logical analogy even the philosopher Albert Camus was lacking on knowing how to nuance correctly, since he has said that when you look at how we are working 8 hours a day or so and when
you look how our universe is like meaningless since the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, so then the
philosopher Albert Camus says that it like render your life meaningless , but here again working in a job doesn't mean that you are suffering or suffering so much by working in this job and read my below thoughts so that to understand the rest, so i
think that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and the philosopher Albert Camus were too pessimistic, and here is more of my thoughts about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus:

More of my philosophy about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus is an open problem, since you can notice that
the philosopher doesn't say how to construct the meaning and
purpose of human life, and notice how the philosopher Albert Camus says that human life is, objectively speaking, meaningless, since according to Camus, the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe
and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, but i think that Albert Camus was not so right, since i say that the meaning and purpose of human existence of life can be "constructed" as i am doing it below, and i also
think that the most important part of my philosophy are the engines that permits you to be self-confidence and that permits you to be a kind of hope and positive energy, but i will now bring more precision to how i am defining the meaning and purpose of
human life, so i say that i think that the meaning and the purpose of human existence is to play it smartly, since you have to play it smartly like in a game of chess, i don't mean that we have to be violent, but we have to be this satisfaction of
playing it smartly as an individual and as a group and as a world, so i think it is how i am doing it, i am playing it smartly so that to also get the satisfaction of playing it smartly, and this satisfaction of playing it smartly is my engine, and i
think it is a good purpose and a good meaning of human existence. But notice carefully that in a game of chess there is a winner and there is a loser, but the loser has to play it smartly too so that to "win" the satisfaction of playing it smartly that
becomes his engine that pushes him forward with a kind self-confidence and hope, and it is how we have to become smart by playing it smartly so that to get the satisfaction of playing it smartly even if humanity is not able to be successful. So as you
notice the how i am constructing the meaning and purpose of human life, that looks by logical analogy, like my following proverb that i am also explaining, since the satisfaction of playing it smartly is the engine even if you fail to be successful, this
engine of satisfaction of playing it smartly permits you to be self-confidence and hope by continuing to playing it smartly, and notice that the playing smartly in my thoughts is not that it is that you have to have a high IQ, since the playing smartly
is also defined by morality that takes into account the societal smartness and not only individual smartness. So here is my new proverb and notice the logical analogy that i am talking about:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"

And read the following part of my philosophy in the following web link about self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM


More of my philosophy about the simplistic language and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just spoken below about the technical language, and i invite you to look carefully at the following short video of a simplistic language that works in a really useful way:

Spreading the joy of laughter on a train

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydAyvvDQrgY


More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Morocco and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and as you have noticed i am a moroccan that lives in Canada since year 1989, but i will speak more about Morocco my country, so i think that Morocco is a beautiful country, and i think Morocco's debt-to-GDP is not so bad, but
i think that so that to enhance much more its economy, Morocco has to do the following:

Morocco is a relatively small internal market, so i think that it has
to enlarge its market by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or Maghrebians countries such as Algeria etc. and it has to higher productivity so that to also attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, and it has to
easy much more the administrative burdens that slow down business activities, other than that i think we can be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver
rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also read my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand more my views:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8


Also read my following thoughts:


More of my philosophy about abstraction and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?

So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are
not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the
thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and
technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that we find in
technical languages like software programming languages, but they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in software
programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and non-
preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w

More of my philosophy about Germany and the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
numbers about the budget balance of Germany in around year 2029 so that to compare it with the numbers of Canada below, and here it is:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/624187/germany-budget-balance-in-relation-to-gdp/

So then in around year 2029, Germany, like Canada, will have balanced the Budget, so i think it is good for both Germany and Canada.

And for the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany, look at it here:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/624193/national-debt-of-germany-in-relation-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp/

So i think the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany will be in year 2029 at around 40%, and it is around the same number as for Canada, so i think that both Germany and Canada are in a good shape in there debt-to-GDP ratio and the balance of the budget. And as i
just said that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced.

And read my previous thoughts:

Germany: Budget balance between 2017 to 2027 in relation to GDP

More of my philosophy about the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..

I think from the following article that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced. And the current debt-to-GDP ratio of USA is 127%, which is expected to rise to 277% by 2029, so i think USA is not in a good shape in its
debt-to-GDP and i think it will not even balance the budget in 2029 and it is not good, and you can read the following article so that to understand it:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2021/05/03/us-national-debt-expected-to-approach-89-trillion-by-2029/?sh=305152295f13

But Canada is in a much better shape in its debt-to-GDP ratio, since its debt-to-GDP will be around 40% in 2029, and Canada will be able to balance the budget in around year 2029, so i think Canada will be in a much better shape in its financial budget
and in debt-to-GDP than USA, so i invite you to read the following article so that to notice it:

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/budget-2022-unveils-billions-in-targeted-new-spending-deficit-projected-at-52-8b-1.5852813


Other than that i will talk more about the human identity, so what
do you think is my human identity? so i think that my human
identity comes from my playing it smartly as i am explaining above,
since look at how i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms , and look at how i have invented quickly many proverbs
and look at how i have invented quickly many poems of Love and poems,
and look at how i have invented my thoughts of my philosophy, so
my being this creative and inventive is what makes my human identity.

More of my philosophy about the higher purpose and meaning and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look
at it:

Meaning without Higher Meaning - Existentialism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaAiHwjDAH4


Here is my new proverb:


"There one type of smartness that is interesting to look at,
and it is also the one that i have just used by explaining to you what is the truth, read it carefully below, and i will call it smartness of the being "resourceful", since i say that resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also
to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the
jobs for you"


And read my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about mathematics and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i think that in the truth what is so important is the general rule that i am talking about in my below thoughts below, and it is from where comes the truth, since we can also say that we need the truth since we also exist
as humans and consciousness of humans, so it is why we have to make it clear that the general rule that i am talking about is the from where comes the truth, so then i can logically infer that this general rule can be used again and again so that to
logically infer the truth, and it is in accordance with the general rule, so then we have to distinguish between the
truth and the reality of the existence, since being truth is not being reality of the existence, since we can use a general rule that is based on the theoretical that doesn't exist, but i think that the general rule can be based on the reality of the
existence, so then from the characteristics that are realistic of the ingredients of general rule you can logically infer some rules that are useful for the reality of the existence, and i think that it is how works mathematics, since for example when
you work in topology in mathematics,
a point is also a concept defined by characteristics that are also reality of the existence, so from a point you can generate a 2d or a 3d object, so then the result of it can still have characteristics that are realistic.

Read my previously thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the Islamic philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and i have just taken a look at the Islamic philosophy here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy

And notice what it is saying about the "truth" in Islamic philosophy:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy#Truth

So it for example says the following:

"In his Quodlibeta, Thomas Aquinas wrote a commentary on Avicenna's definition of truth in his Metaphysics and explained it as follows:

The truth of each thing, as Avicenna says in his Metaphysica, is nothing else than the property of its being which has been established in it. So that is called true gold which has properly the being of gold and attains to the established determinations
of the nature of gold. Now, each thing has properly being in some nature because it stands under the complete form proper to that nature, whereby being and species in that nature is.[30]"


But i think i am highly smart, and i have just thought rapidly of what is the "truth", and here is what i say:

I think the truth needs like a general rule from where you logically infer, and the general rule is like a theorem in mathematics, so i give
you an example so that you understand my views:

So when i say:

This table in front of us is truth, what does it means ?

So i think that the language of humans is composed of abstractions,
and the table is also an "abstraction" as a "concept", so i think
that when we say the table is truth we have to follow like a logical path, in form of a rule, of explaining it, so then we can say that the
table is truth is decomposed in the following rule:

First we have to say that the "table" is a concept, so "then" is this
table in front of us correspond to a concept, so we have to
follow the following rule:

If the table in front of us is truth, so it has to correspond
to the concept of a table, so we have to "verify" if its existence

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)