https://www.state.gov/the-administrations-approach-to-the-peoples-republic-of-china/values” of democracy, freedom and human rights. It believes this has allowed the world to make much progress over the past 75 years. It wants to “make sure that it (the world order and its universal values), represents the interests, the values, the
A long monologue by the US Secretary, Blinken. Mostly a repeat of what has been said or written before, but with a tinge of mildness.
Summary:
After two world wars, there’s a world order. Since then, this has evolved into a US-led world order. The emphasis of the world order differs with the US Administration. The Democrat Biden Administration pushes an ideology based on the “universal
But China, according to the US, after having benefited from the world order, has grown mighty enough to pose a serious challenge to such a future.
The US will not allow this to happen. It will lead and gather followers to challenge China. But it will not be that simple. Co-operations with China are needed to solve certain global problems.
“That’s why this is one of the most complex and consequential relationships of any that we have in the world today.”
Then he recites a long list of wrongs that China has committed internally and internationally.fiercely with China.
How to counter the China Challenge? Competition, not conflict. A three-prong strategy. Invest in the US to maintain its edge over China. Align and ally with like-minded nations to form a network against China. Then,together with the allies, compete
“To the people of China: we’ll compete with confidence; we’ll cooperate wherever we can; we’ll contest where we must. We do not see conflict.more peaceful, more prosperous, and more free.”
There’s no reason why our great nations cannot coexist peacefully, and share in and contribute to human progress together. That’s what everything I’ve said today boils down to: advancing human progress, leaving to our children a world that’s
From the choice of words, one can detect a lower level of belligerence and aggressiveness compared to previous China Strategy statements.out of it and not side with Russia.
Challenge instead of threat. Competition instead of conflict. Peaceful coexistence and co-operation
Bear in mind that this statement is made when the US-led West is now militarily involved in the Russia-Ukraine War. Though there’s no boots on the ground now, how deeply the US can get involved in this war will depend on how well it can keep China
It's like the Chinese Classic Romance of Three Kingdoms. The world is in a Romance of Three Superpowers. Before any two superpowers fight, eachwill have to make sure that the third remains neutral, or better still, side with it.
https://www.state.gov/the-administrations-approach-to-the-peoples-republic-of-china/values” of democracy, freedom and human rights. It believes this has allowed the world to make much progress over the past 75 years. It wants to “make sure that it (the world order and its universal values), represents the interests, the values, the
A long monologue by the US Secretary, Blinken. Mostly a repeat of what has been said or written before, but with a tinge of mildness.
Summary:
After two world wars, there’s a world order. Since then, this has evolved into a US-led world order. The emphasis of the world order differs with the US Administration. The Democrat Biden Administration pushes an ideology based on the “universal
But China, according to the US, after having benefited from the world order, has grown mighty enough to pose a serious challenge to such a future. The US will not allow this to happen. It will lead and gather followers to challenge China. But it willnot be that simple. Co-operations with China are needed to solve certain global problems.
“That’s why this is one of the most complex and consequential relationships of any that we have in the world today.”fiercely with China.
Then he recites a long list of wrongs that China has committed internally and internationally.
How to counter the China Challenge? Competition, not conflict. A three-prong strategy. Invest in the US to maintain its edge over China. Align and ally with like-minded nations to form a network against China. Then,together with the allies, compete
“To the people of China: we’ll compete with confidence; we’ll cooperate wherever we can; we’ll contest where we must. We do not see conflict.more peaceful, more prosperous, and more free.”
There’s no reason why our great nations cannot coexist peacefully, and share in and contribute to human progress together. That’s what everything I’ve said today boils down to: advancing human progress, leaving to our children a world that’s
From the choice of words, one can detect a lower level of belligerence and aggressiveness compared to previous China Strategy statements.out of it and not side with Russia.
Challenge instead of threat. Competition instead of conflict. Peaceful coexistence and co-operation
Bear in mind that this statement is made when the US-led West is now militarily involved in the Russia-Ukraine War. Though there’s no boots on the ground now, how deeply the US can get involved in this war will depend on how well it can keep China
It's like the Chinese Classic Romance of Three Kingdoms. The world is in a Romance of Three Superpowers. Before any two superpowers fight, each will have to make sure that the third remains neutral, or better still, side with it.
On Saturday, May 28, 2022 at 10:15:26 AM UTC+8, gera...@gmail.com wrote:values” of democracy, freedom and human rights. It believes this has allowed the world to make much progress over the past 75 years. It wants to “make sure that it (the world order and its universal values), represents the interests, the values, the
https://www.state.gov/the-administrations-approach-to-the-peoples-republic-of-china/
A long monologue by the US Secretary, Blinken. Mostly a repeat of what has been said or written before, but with a tinge of mildness.
Summary:
After two world wars, there’s a world order. Since then, this has evolved into a US-led world order. The emphasis of the world order differs with the US Administration. The Democrat Biden Administration pushes an ideology based on the “universal
not be that simple. Co-operations with China are needed to solve certain global problems.But China, according to the US, after having benefited from the world order, has grown mighty enough to pose a serious challenge to such a future. The US will not allow this to happen. It will lead and gather followers to challenge China. But it will
fiercely with China.“That’s why this is one of the most complex and consequential relationships of any that we have in the world today.”
Then he recites a long list of wrongs that China has committed internally and internationally.
How to counter the China Challenge? Competition, not conflict. A three-prong strategy. Invest in the US to maintain its edge over China. Align and ally with like-minded nations to form a network against China. Then,together with the allies, compete
more peaceful, more prosperous, and more free.”“To the people of China: we’ll compete with confidence; we’ll cooperate wherever we can; we’ll contest where we must. We do not see conflict.
There’s no reason why our great nations cannot coexist peacefully, and share in and contribute to human progress together. That’s what everything I’ve said today boils down to: advancing human progress, leaving to our children a world that’s
out of it and not side with Russia.From the choice of words, one can detect a lower level of belligerence and aggressiveness compared to previous China Strategy statements.
Challenge instead of threat. Competition instead of conflict. Peaceful coexistence and co-operation
Bear in mind that this statement is made when the US-led West is now militarily involved in the Russia-Ukraine War. Though there’s no boots on the ground now, how deeply the US can get involved in this war will depend on how well it can keep China
playing his rhetoric with little depths to think they should reverse to where it was and not how it was now now. One can see Blinken did not blink because even he was criticized particularly on human right. China's foreign spoke person Zhao Lijian toldIt's like the Chinese Classic Romance of Three Kingdoms. The world is in a Romance of Three Superpowers. Before any two superpowers fight, each will have to make sure that the third remains neutral, or better still, side with it.Blinken's rhetoric again. There are a lot of bullshits in his rhetoric. If US withdraws all matters not belonging to them, those countries that he mentioned will be able to sort their problems out by themselves. It is weird to see how Blinken is
On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 1:21:31 PM UTC-4, stoney wrote:universal values” of democracy, freedom and human rights. It believes this has allowed the world to make much progress over the past 75 years. It wants to “make sure that it (the world order and its universal values), represents the interests, the
On Saturday, May 28, 2022 at 10:15:26 AM UTC+8, gera...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.state.gov/the-administrations-approach-to-the-peoples-republic-of-china/
A long monologue by the US Secretary, Blinken. Mostly a repeat of what has been said or written before, but with a tinge of mildness.
Summary:
After two world wars, there’s a world order. Since then, this has evolved into a US-led world order. The emphasis of the world order differs with the US Administration. The Democrat Biden Administration pushes an ideology based on the “
will not be that simple. Co-operations with China are needed to solve certain global problems.But China, according to the US, after having benefited from the world order, has grown mighty enough to pose a serious challenge to such a future. The US will not allow this to happen. It will lead and gather followers to challenge China. But it
fiercely with China.“That’s why this is one of the most complex and consequential relationships of any that we have in the world today.”
Then he recites a long list of wrongs that China has committed internally and internationally.
How to counter the China Challenge? Competition, not conflict. A three-prong strategy. Invest in the US to maintain its edge over China. Align and ally with like-minded nations to form a network against China. Then,together with the allies, compete
s more peaceful, more prosperous, and more free.”“To the people of China: we’ll compete with confidence; we’ll cooperate wherever we can; we’ll contest where we must. We do not see conflict.
There’s no reason why our great nations cannot coexist peacefully, and share in and contribute to human progress together. That’s what everything I’ve said today boils down to: advancing human progress, leaving to our children a world that’
China out of it and not side with Russia.From the choice of words, one can detect a lower level of belligerence and aggressiveness compared to previous China Strategy statements.
Challenge instead of threat. Competition instead of conflict. Peaceful coexistence and co-operation
Bear in mind that this statement is made when the US-led West is now militarily involved in the Russia-Ukraine War. Though there’s no boots on the ground now, how deeply the US can get involved in this war will depend on how well it can keep
playing his rhetoric with little depths to think they should reverse to where it was and not how it was now now. One can see Blinken did not blink because even he was criticized particularly on human right. China's foreign spoke person Zhao Lijian toldIt's like the Chinese Classic Romance of Three Kingdoms. The world is in a Romance of Three Superpowers. Before any two superpowers fight, each will have to make sure that the third remains neutral, or better still, side with it.Blinken's rhetoric again. There are a lot of bullshits in his rhetoric. If US withdraws all matters not belonging to them, those countries that he mentioned will be able to sort their problems out by themselves. It is weird to see how Blinken is
I think the US has learnt the wrong historical lessons from the two world wars and from the cold war with the former USSR.and power sufficient to thrust Americans’ notions of “human rights” upon all the world. Even a massive assertion of American power, a crusade for “human rights,” might destroy more than it could restore. America’s undertaking in Vietnam,
At present, it sees China as the enemy #1. But because of its weakened power position, human right appears to it as the
most useful weapon. Of course, it fails to look at its own human right condition.
Let me quote Russell Kirk, America's godfather of conservatism again:
"ln international affairs, nevertheless, the United States needs to beware of what Sir Herbert Butterfield calls “righteousness,” a cardinal error in diplomacy—that is, national self-righteousness. The American Republic does not possess virtue
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 107:00:09 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,478 |