Hello,



Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about my kind of
learning and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i will explain to you my kind of way of
learning much more clearly:

I don't learn like you are learning, since i have to understand
the architectural ideas more clearly, by inventing them and/or
understanding them much more clearly, and after that this gives a form
to a high level of intelligence that permits me to understand rapidly
and efficiently, so i give you an example, so i have invented many architectural ideas that have given form to my philosophy as a high
level intelligence , and this has allowed me to make you understand more
the weaknesses of the philosophies of other philosophers, so i am doing
it this way for genetic algorithms etc., so i give you an example, so
read my following thoughts in the following web link that i have rapidly invented, and you will notice how i am doing it by reading them
carefully and by noticing my kind of personality, so here is a part of
my philosophy about self-confidence and about how to be the positive
energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM:


More of my philosophy about pedagogy and about the thinking process and
more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you are noticing i have invented ideas
about the genetic algorithm, and read them below, but why i am doing it
like this ? first i have to show that i am capable of being a more sophisticated thinking, but not only that , but it is also related to
pedagogy, since i think that i have become much more efficient by
inventing many architectural ideas that gives a "form" to my efficient thinking, i think that from high quality architectural ideas that you
invent or/and understand you can become really efficient thinking, and
it is how i am doing it below, look for example in my below thoughts how
i am inventing architectural ideas about the genetic algorithms, and i
am doing it by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence on my
own, and it is how i am doing it by inventing the architectural ideas of
my philosophy that gives form to my philosophy, and it is how i have
invented many of my proverbs, and it is how i have also invented many of
my poems, and i really think that by inventing or/and understanding the architectural ideas you can become much more smart and be able to go
much faster in learning, since i also think that the intelligence of
those architectural ideas gives form to a much higher level of intelligence.

More of my philosophy about the violent revolution and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that capitalism can much easily
be smartly reformed so that to be efficient, but i think that one of the
most important problem is how to avoid like fatalism that creates
violent revolutions, since i think that even the Russian war in Ukraine
is a kind of violent revolution that was brought by a kind of fatalism,
so i think that we have to know how to talk and we have to speak a kind
of language that learns the others to not be this too much violence that
brings fatalism , and of course we have also to enforce laws against the
too much violence, so i think that is by logical analogy like the being conformism in the education system in France, and i think that it is
what permits a more economically integrated countries or systems and it
is what creates a peaceful envirenment that is good for business. And so
that to understand about the how to do it, read my following previous
thoughts:


More of my philosophy about what is the important languages and
about diversity and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that we have to know that
a kind of human diversity is necessary for survival, but what kind of
human diversity is it ? so i will ask a philosophical question and i
will answer it and you will notice what kind of human diversity
we need, so here is my philosophical question:

The education system in France and in other countries requires a
kind of conformism, so, is this kind of conformism a correct
way of doing ?

So i think i am highly smart, so i think that this kind of conformism
, such as in the education system of France and such countries, permits
us to control our animal instincts in a kind of way, since those animal instincts can make us like a kind of fatalism that brings
too much dangerous violence and wars, such as the war in Ukraine, since
i think that the war in Ukraine was caused by the fact that like
in the education system of France, president Putin wants and wanted a
kind of conformism that is the basis values of nationalism in Russia, so
you have to be smart and notice that the war in Ukraine is a war between
in the one side like conformism to values of nationalism, and it is
looks like the conformism of the education system of France, and in the
other side the too much liberty that has the tendency
to exhibit the animal instincts in a form of violence and culture of
violence, so i think i can logically infer that a kind of diversity is necessary, and this kind of diversity has to be able to correctly
control the animal instincts so that to be not this too much violence
that makes us like fatalistic and that brings dangerous wars and too
much violence, so i think that that for example gays can make sex and
can marry, and shemales too, but they have not to be this kind of too
much violence, so violence such as the ones that are genetically sadists
or of the too much violent humans are problematic, so i can logically
infer that we have not to make all of us smart, since it is against of
the necessary diversity, but we have to speak a kind of language that
learns the others to not be this too much violence that brings fatalism
that causes wars such as in Ukraine.

More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence
so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we
call "randomness":

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0


So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above
web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:

"I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
algorithms, especially those based on swarm intelligence (SI), two major characteristics of modern metaheuristic methods are nature-inspired, and
a balance between randomness and regularity."

So i think that in the genetic algorithm, there is a part that is hard
coded, like selecting the best genes, and i think that it is what
we call regularity, since it is hard coded like that, but there is
a so important thing in that genetic algorithm that we call randomness,
and i think that it is the genetic mutations that happen with a
probability and that give a kind of diversity, so i think that this
genetic mutations are really important, since i can for example
say that if the best genes are the ones that use "reason", so then
reason too can make the people that has the tendency to use reason do
a thing that is against there survival, like going to war when we
feel that there is too much risk, but this going to war can make
the members or people that use reason so that to attack the other enemy
be extinct in a war when they loose a war, and it is the basis of
randomness in a genetic algorithm, since even when there is a war
between for example two Ant colonies, there are some members that do not
make war and that can survive if other are extinct by making war, and i
say it also comes from randomness of the genetics.

More of my philosophy about the other conditions of the genetic
algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
.
I think i am highly smart, and i think that the genetic algorithm
is interesting too, but i have to speak about one other most important
thing about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask a philosophical
question about it:

Since as i just said previously, read it below, that a good genetic
algorithm has to efficiently balance between global(exploration) and local(exploitation) search , but how can you be sure that you have found
a global optimum ?

I think i am smart, and i will say that it also depends on the kind of
problem, so if for example we have a minimization problem, you can
rerun a number of times the genetic algorithm so that to select the best minimum among all the results and you can also give more time to
the exploration so that to find the a better result, also you have to
know that the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover
steps, but i think that this kind of Elitism can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the
population, so then it depends on wich problem you want to use the
genetic algorithm, also i think that the genetic algorithm is
a model that explains from where comes humans, since i also think
that the genetic mutations of humans, that happens with a probability,
has also not only come from the inside body from the chromosomes and
genes, but they also were the result of solar storms that, as has said
NASA, that may have been key to life on Earth, read here so that to
notice it:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-solar-storms-may-have-been-key-to-life-on-earth

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
talked yesterday about the distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, and i invite you to read it in my below thoughts, and
today i will invent more of my thoughts about the genetic algorithm, so
i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:

Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?

so i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization
problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm
is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called
recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic
algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations
with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to
explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and
exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and
notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with
a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think
the genetic algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much
better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about
this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about evolutionary algorithms and
artificial intelligence so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about fractals and about distributed intelligence
and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked at the model of
fractals here:

https://iternal.us/what-is-a-fractal/

And i think by looking at them, i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence, and it is that they look by logical analogy like a
distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, since you can
consider the small steps(like the individual intelligence of the
collective intelligence) that we repeat, of the model of fractals, like
the individual ants in an Ant colony, and when you look at the final
result of a good fractal you will think that it is so sophisticated,
but i think that from looking at the small steps and there small
interactions you can understand that it is an impression and that it is
not so sophisticated, and the so important question is how from an intelligence, that looks like a problem, can you makes it a distributed intelligence of small parts of intelligence that makes the interactions
and give the result.

More of my philosophy of the model of intelligence of a Cyborg and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just talked about the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, read it below, and
now i will talk about the model of intelligence of a Cyborg, so i think
i am smart and i think that the model of intelligence of a Cyborg looks
also by logical analogy like the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, since i think that with internet and such tools
we are becoming like Cyborgs, since i think that even the data in for
example internet is also a distributed intelligence that we collect so
that to be creativity or innovation that can become a high intelligence,
so in the distributed intelligence model of for example an Ant colony,
the Ants and there knowledge that causes there actions is the
specialization of intelligence of the distributed intelligence, and
notice how even Elon Musk is saying it that "We’re already a cyborg,",
read here so that to notice it:

Elon Musk: We’re already cyborgs

https://www.theverge.com/2016/6/2/11837854/neural-lace-cyborgs-elon-musk


More of my philosophy about the model of intelligence of an Ant colony
and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as i have just said that even relativity
of time in science comes from a distributed intelligence, but i think i
am smart and i will explain one more important pattern so that you
understand correctly, and it is that a distributed intelligence or
collective intelligence of an Ant colony looks really special or amazing
to us, since when you look at the individual Ants you will not
understand correctly how those primitive individual Ants can give a
result of the output that is a highly intelligent collective
intelligence relatively to the single parts that are the individual Ant
of the Ant colony, and it looks like when we look at relativity of time
and say that it is really special and really amazing, but i say that
this looking really sophisticated and/or really special and/or really
amazing as a collective intelligence is only an impression, since you
have to understand the distributed intelligence, that is also the the
systemic interactions between the individual parts that can give more
than the sum of the individual parts, of all the specialized individual
parts so that to understand the whole system that is relativity of time
or consciousness or the collective intelligence of an Ant colony.

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about relativity of time and about consciousness
and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that consciousness is like a "distributed" intelligence, like in an Ant colony, from where has
emerged consciousness, i say it is like how works our heart, since our
heart is not controlled by our brain, but our heart is like a
distributed intelligence from like specializations of small atoms or
such small components of matter that created the distributed
intelligence that we look at as a heart, and i think it is how has
emerged the distributed intelligence of our consciousness, and i think
that relativity of time has emerged from a distributed intelligence from
the specialization of small components of matter in the lower level
layers that has made emerge relativity of time, and i think that this
process of distributed intelligence also can create such processes such
as telekenisis from the brain or remote viewing from the brain, and i
think that even the thing that we call God can be an emergence from a distributed intelligence of the lower level layers of matter.


More of my philosophy of is who we are truly who we are and more of my thoughts..

If what i have just said, read below, is truth, so i think we can not
be confident about who we truly are, since if the mechanism of
telekenisis can be scaled by the black projects that i have just talked
about, so then even the nature of things can be changed rapidly,
i mean that you can rapidly from the lower level layer makes a human
younger or older and such things, so then you become like a God, so
perhaps we are living with other things, such as secret organizations
that have the power of a God over this earth.

More of my philosophy about the reality and about consciousness and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and how can we understand in a much more
interesting way reality? so if i ask the following mathematical
and philosophical question:

What does tells you the difference between:

4 + 0.0001

and

4 + 0.0002

?

So now you have to see the pattern with your fluid intelligence,
as i am seeing it:

Since we can say that consciousness is an appreciable change in the organization of the matter in the brain that makes emerge consciousness,
but we can also say that a small change in the organization of the
matter can by logical analogy makes emerge a pattern like the one of consciousness, so then we can also say that science is not able of
seeing it, since i think that even telekenisis and remote viewing with
the brain has existed in a really really small number of persons,
and i think that it has been decrypted by some advanced black projects
that have made scientific experiences on those really really small
number of persons that had the ability of remote viewing with the brain
and the ability of telekinesis and i say that those
advanced black projects have understood those processes and it has made
them advanced so rapidly.

More of my philosophy about consciousness and about science and about telekinesis and about remote viewing with the brain and more of my
thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, so i will say that since science can not
explain consciousness , and since i say that consciousness is
by logical analogy like a pattern that has emerged from the
organization of matter in the brain from genetics, so then
we can say that telekinesis or remote viewing with the brain too can be
an emergence from the organization of the matter of the brain, like consciousness, that can not be explained by science.

More precision of my philosophy by giving like a logical proof about the bandwidth of our mind or brain and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have to give more precision with
my logical proof about smartness so that you understand my below
thoughts about the bandwidth of our brain, and here it is:

More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..

I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or
human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively
or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a
value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so
can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is
not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it
is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of
human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start
by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain
human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.

Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..

So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people
can understand, so here it is:

If i say: 2 + 2 = 4

So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints
of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so
mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and
learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the
same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,
so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and
technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on
science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high
human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human
IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human
IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart
you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it
is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making
others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this
is not so efficient.

Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:

Is Science Going To End?

Read more here:

https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End


More of my philosophy about the bandwidth of our mind or brain and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
spoken about how our brain can work concurrently and not in parallel,
read about it in my below thoughts, but now i have to speak about
another weakness of our brain, and it is its bandwidth, i mean that the bandwidth of our brain is not so efficient so that to compete with
highly smart machines of the future, so then how can you solve the
problem?, so i think i am highly smart and i say that i am solving it
much more efficiently by a smart way that looks by logical analogy like
by compressing the data or by enlarging the bandwidth without doing
them, i mean that the data of our world is so big, but the high quality
data is much much less bigger or we can say that it is rare, so it
becomes easier, so i think that you can be really efficient by just
knowing how to understand efficiently the necessary rare high quality
data and you will become much more apt at competing with highly smart
machines, and it is how i am doing it, and notice how i am also
inventing high quality architectural ideas of my philosophy and
philosophy that permits me to be efficient, read about it below:

More of my philosophy about the human mind and more of my thoughts..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
spoken about silence and decency of silence, but now i will speak
about another important subject, and it is the one of the human mind,
so i think that our human mind is like a single core processor
that works with a certain frequency, so it can work concurrently , but
not in parallel since it is not like a multicore processor, so i think
that we can be with our human mind a consciousness of an idea in time T1
, and we can be in in the oneself in time T2 after time T1 and we can be another consciousness of an idea in time T3 after time T2
, so it can go on and on "concurrently", but not in parallel, so i think
that a weakness is that we can be too emotional or have bad emotions
when you are a consciousness of an idea or you can have bad emotions
when you don't know how to manage correctly concurrently with your mind,
since our mind doesn't work in parallel, so then you have to know how to
manage this inner of your mind.

More of my philosophy about humanity and about human life and more of
my thoughts..

I think i am really smart, and you have seen me inventing quickly
my poems of Love and poems, and you have seen me inventing my
philosophy, but now i will ask the following philosophical question:

You want to be happy, but is it enough to be happy ? so my philosophical question is how to appreciate human life so that to be the right
morality and be the right consumerism ?


This philosophical question is really smart, since there is a pattern
that is inherent to this question, and it is that when you know how to appreciate correctly human life in an efficient manner, this permits you
to both be better morality and it permits you to be still efficient consumerism, but how to appreciate human life ? i think that
it is by efficiently understanding what is suffering that you
start appreciate pleasures of life, and this appreciation of human life
permits you to be apt at being a decent morality that is also the right patience and the right tolerance etc. and of course this will not hurt consumerism, and so that to understand this part of my philosophy,
i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand correctly:


More philosophy about the strenght of philosophy..

I will ask a smart philosophical question:

Is human life sad ?

I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question:

When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right
"balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like
a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the
same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example
human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty
and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of
alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for
example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned
how to appreciate more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so
the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and
pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are
noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty and pleasure, so you have to read my philosophy below about from
where comes happiness and pleasures of life so that you understand that
human life is not absurd and is not sad.

More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away..

I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie
called Cast Away:

Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar
winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate
and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the
towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx
systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only
just begun...

Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA

I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when
you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of
my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom
Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization
by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand
the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and
pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is
also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from
where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following
thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures
of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the
great movie above that we call Cast Away:

From where comes happiness and pleasures of life?

It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this
alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so
i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that
for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan
Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this
great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning
of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a
rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan
Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know
how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace
by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from
where comes the meaning of human existence,
read all my following philosophy to understand more:

More of my philosophy about pleasures of life..

As you have noticed i have talked before about the meaning and purpose
of life (read below my thoughts)..

And here is more explanation of what i was saying about pleasures of life:

101 Simple Pleasures to Boost Happiness

According to Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project and Happier
at Home. "It's not life changes like a new house or a fancy car that
make the most impact, but sometimes little things like the smell of an
orange, that give the biggest happiness boost," says Rubin.

Read more here:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/simple-pleasures_b_3038326

So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that
doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my
philosophy are the following:

There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so
like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can
say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring
absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd,
but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my
philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes
from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans,
and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the
brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures
of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are
not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning
of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness
so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life
with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be
happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus.

More philosophy and psychology about how to appreciate pleasures of life..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video, because it is
also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my thoughts about it
are below:

The story of my life - From a dream to reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk

I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer that is
locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating pleasures
of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but
the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly,

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)