Hello,



More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


More of my philosophy about fractals and about distributed intelligence
and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
talked yesterday about the distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, and i invite you to read it in my below thoughts, and
today i will invent more of my thoughts about the genetic algorithm, so
i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:

Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?

so i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization
problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm
is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called
recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic
algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations
with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to
explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and
exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and
notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with
a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think
the genetical algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much
better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about
this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so
that to understand more:

More my philosophy about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off in AI(artificial intelligence)..

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

In Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial intelligence), for each
action (i.e. lever) on the machine, there is an expected reward. If this expected reward is known to the Agent, then the problem degenerates into
a trivial one, which merely involves picking the action with the highest expected reward. But since the expected rewards for the levers are not
known, we have to collate estimates to get an idea of the desirability
of each action. For this, the Agent will have to explore to get the
average of the rewards for each action. After, it can then exploit its knowledge and choose an action with the highest expected rewards (this
is also called selecting a greedy action). As we can see, the Agent has
to balance exploring and exploiting actions to maximize the overall
long-term reward. So as you are noticing i am posting below my
just new proverb that talks about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off
in AI(artificial intelligence).

You have to know about the Exploration/Exploitation trade off in
Reinforcement Learning and PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) in AI by
knowing the following and by reading my below thoughts about artificial intelligence:

Exploration is finding more information about the environment.

Exploitation is exploiting known information to maximize the reward.

This is why i have just invented fast the following proverb that also
talks about this Exploration/Exploitation trade off in AI (artificial intelligence):

And here is my just new proverb:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
abstraction in artificial intelligence..

Read about it here:

https://mattturck.com/frontierai/


And read about PathNet here:

https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46


More about artificial intelligence..

I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is
reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on
right now, see the following video to understand more about it:

Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s

I think that since i have just understood much more artificial
intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project
that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a
powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial
intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain
much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness..

And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial
intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it:

Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization

But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee
the optimal convergence.

So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO:

Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient
parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal
convergence, here is how to do it with PSO:

v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))]

x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1)

constriction coefficient parameter is:

k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi)))

k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729

phi = c1 + c2

To guarantee the optimal convergence use:

c1 = c2 = 2.05

phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729

w=0.7298

Population size = 60;


Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are
much less powerful since they perform only exploitation.

In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching
capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms
( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both
Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as
SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only.

In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the
chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not
have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration).

Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the
lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different
places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in
many valleys simultaneously.

And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO.

I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked at the model of
fractals here:

https://iternal.us/what-is-a-fractal/

And i think by looking at them, i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence, and it is that they look by logical analogy like a
distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, since you can
consider the small steps(like the individual intelligence of the
collective intelligence) that we repeat, of the model of fractals, like
the individual ants in an Ant colony, and when you look at the final
result of a good fractal you will think that it is so sophisticated,
but i think that from looking at the small steps and there small
interactions you can understand that it is an impression and that it is
not so sophisticated, and the so important question is how from an intelligence, that looks like a problem, can you makes it a distributed intelligence of small parts of intelligence that makes the interactions
and give the result.

More of my philosophy of the model of intelligence of a Cyborg and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just talked about the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, read it below, and
now i will talk about the model of intelligence of a Cyborg, so i think
i am smart and i think that the model of intelligence of a Cyborg looks
also by logical analogy like the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, since i think that with internet and such tools
we are becoming like Cyborgs, since i think that even the data in for
example internet is also a distributed intelligence that we collect so
that to be creativity or innovation that can become a high intelligence,
so in the distributed intelligence model of for example an Ant colony,
the Ants and there knowledge that causes there actions is the
specialization of intelligence of the distributed intelligence, and
notice how even Elon Musk is saying it that "We’re already a cyborg,",
read here so that to notice it:

Elon Musk: We’re already cyborgs

https://www.theverge.com/2016/6/2/11837854/neural-lace-cyborgs-elon-musk


More of my philosophy about the model of intelligence of an Ant colony
and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as i have just said that even relativity
of time in science comes from a distributed intelligence, but i think i
am smart and i will explain one more important pattern so that you
understand correctly, and it is that a distributed intelligence or
collective intelligence of an Ant colony looks really special or amazing
to us, since when you look at the individual Ants you will not
understand correctly how those primitive individual Ants can give a
result of the output that is a highly intelligent collective
intelligence relatively to the single parts that are the individual Ant
of the Ant colony, and it looks like when we look at relativity of time
and say that it is really special and really amazing, but i say that
this looking really sophisticated and/or really special and/or really
amazing as a collective intelligence is only an impression, since you
have to understand the distributed intelligence, that is also the the
systemic interactions between the individual parts that can give more
than the sum of the individual parts, of all the specialized individual
parts so that to understand the whole system that is relativity of time
or consciousness or the collective intelligence of an Ant colony.

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about relativity of time and about consciousness
and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that consciousness is like a "distributed" intelligence, like in an Ant colony, from where has
emerged consciousness, i say it is like how works our heart, since our
heart is not controlled by our brain, but our heart is like a
distributed intelligence from like specializations of small atoms or
such small components of matter that created the distributed
intelligence that we look at as a heart, and i think it is how has
emerged the distributed intelligence of our consciousness, and i think
that relativity of time has emerged from a distributed intelligence from
the specialization of small components of matter in the lower level
layers that has made emerge relativity of time, and i think that this
process of distributed intelligence also can create such processes such
as telekenisis from the brain or remote viewing from the brain, and i
think that even the thing that we call God can be an emergence from a distributed intelligence of the lower level layers of matter.


More of my philosophy of is who we are truly who we are and more of my thoughts..

If what i have just said, read below, is truth, so i think we can not
be confident about who we truly are, since if the mechanism of
telekenisis can be scaled by the black projects that i have just talked
about, so then even the nature of things can be changed rapidly,
i mean that you can rapidly from the lower level layer makes a human
younger or older and such things, so then you become like a God, so
perhaps we are living with other things, such as secret organizations
that have the power of a God over this earth.

More of my philosophy about the reality and about consciousness and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and how can we understand in a much more
interesting way reality? so if i ask the following mathematical
and philosophical question:

What does tells you the difference between:

4 + 0.0001

and

4 + 0.0002

?

So now you have to see the pattern with your fluid intelligence,
as i am seeing it:

Since we can say that consciousness is an appreciable change in the organization of the matter in the brain that makes emerge consciousness,
but we can also say that a small change in the organization of the
matter can by logical analogy makes emerge a pattern like the one of consciousness, so then we can also say that science is not able of
seeing it, since i think that even telekenisis and remote viewing with
the brain has existed in a really really small number of persons,
and i think that it has been decrypted by some advanced black projects
that have made scientific experiences on those really really small
number of persons that had the ability of remote viewing with the brain
and the ability of telekinesis and i say that those
advanced black projects have understood those processes and it has made
them advanced so rapidly.

More of my philosophy about consciousness and about science and about telekinesis and about remote viewing with the brain and more of my
thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, so i will say that since science can not
explain consciousness , and since i say that consciousness is
by logical analogy like a pattern that has emerged from the
organization of matter in the brain from genetics, so then
we can say that telekinesis or remote viewing with the brain too can be
an emergence from the organization of the matter of the brain, like consciousness, that can not be explained by science.

More precision of my philosophy by giving like a logical proof about the bandwidth of our mind or brain and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have to give more precision with
my logical proof about smartness so that you understand my below
thoughts about the bandwidth of our brain, and here it is:

More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..

I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or
human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively
or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a
value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so
can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is
not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it
is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of
human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start
by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain
human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.

Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..

So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people
can understand, so here it is:

If i say: 2 + 2 = 4

So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints
of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so
mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and
learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the
same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,
so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and
technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on
science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high
human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human
IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human
IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart
you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it
is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making
others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this
is not so efficient.

Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:

Is Science Going To End?

Read more here:

https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End


More of my philosophy about the bandwidth of our mind or brain and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
spoken about how our brain can work concurrently and not in parallel,
read about it in my below thoughts, but now i have to speak about
another weakness of our brain, and it is its bandwidth, i mean that the bandwidth of our brain is not so efficient so that to compete with
highly smart machines of the future, so then how can you solve the
problem?, so i think i am highly smart and i say that i am solving it
much more efficiently by a smart way that looks by logical analogy like
by compressing the data or by enlarging the bandwidth without doing
them, i mean that the data of our world is so big, but the high quality
data is much much less bigger or we can say that it is rare, so it
becomes easier, so i think that you can be really efficient by just
knowing how to understand efficiently the necessary rare high quality
data and you will become much more apt at competing with highly smart
machines, and it is how i am doing it, and notice how i am also
inventing high quality architectural ideas of my philosophy and
philosophy that permits me to be efficient, read about it below:

More of my philosophy about the human mind and more of my thoughts..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just
spoken about silence and decency of silence, but now i will speak
about another important subject, and it is the one of the human mind,
so i think that our human mind is like a single core processor
that works with a certain frequency, so it can work concurrently , but
not in parallel since it is not like a multicore processor, so i think
that we can be with our human mind a consciousness of an idea in time T1
, and we can be in in the oneself in time T2 after time T1 and we can be another consciousness of an idea in time T3 after time T2
, so it can go on and on "concurrently", but not in parallel, so i think
that a weakness is that we can be too emotional or have bad emotions
when you are a consciousness of an idea or you can have bad emotions
when you don't know how to manage correctly concurrently with your mind,
since our mind doesn't work in parallel, so then you have to know how to
manage this inner of your mind.

More of my philosophy about humanity and about human life and more of
my thoughts..

I think i am really smart, and you have seen me inventing quickly
my poems of Love and poems, and you have seen me inventing my
philosophy, but now i will ask the following philosophical question:

You want to be happy, but is it enough to be happy ? so my philosophical question is how to appreciate human life so that to be the right
morality and be the right consumerism ?


This philosophical question is really smart, since there is a pattern
that is inherent to this question, and it is that when you know how to appreciate correctly human life in an efficient manner, this permits you
to both be better morality and it permits you to be still efficient consumerism, but how to appreciate human life ? i think that
it is by efficiently understanding what is suffering that you
start appreciate pleasures of life, and this appreciation of human life
permits you to be apt at being a decent morality that is also the right patience and the right tolerance etc. and of course this will not hurt consumerism, and so that to understand this part of my philosophy,
i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand correctly:


More philosophy about the strenght of philosophy..

I will ask a smart philosophical question:

Is human life sad ?

I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question:

When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right
"balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like
a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the
same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example
human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty
and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of
alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for
example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned
how to appreciate more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so
the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and
pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are
noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty and pleasure, so you have to read my philosophy below about from
where comes happiness and pleasures of life so that you understand that
human life is not absurd and is not sad.

More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away..

I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie
called Cast Away:

Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar
winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate
and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the
towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx
systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only
just begun...

Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA

I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when
you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of
my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom
Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization
by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand
the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and
pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is
also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from
where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following
thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures
of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the
great movie above that we call Cast Away:

From where comes happiness and pleasures of life?

It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this
alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so
i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that
for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan
Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this
great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning
of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a
rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan
Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know
how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace
by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from
where comes the meaning of human existence,
read all my following philosophy to understand more:

More of my philosophy about pleasures of life..

As you have noticed i have talked before about the meaning and purpose
of life (read below my thoughts)..

And here is more explanation of what i was saying about pleasures of life:

101 Simple Pleasures to Boost Happiness

According to Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project and Happier
at Home. "It's not life changes like a new house or a fancy car that
make the most impact, but sometimes little things like the smell of an
orange, that give the biggest happiness boost," says Rubin.

Read more here:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/simple-pleasures_b_3038326

So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that
doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my
philosophy are the following:

There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so
like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can
say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring
absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd,
but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my
philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes
from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans,
and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the
brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures
of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are
not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning
of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness
so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life
with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be
happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus.

More philosophy and psychology about how to appreciate pleasures of life..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video, because it is
also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my thoughts about it
are below:

The story of my life - From a dream to reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk

I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer that is
locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating pleasures
of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but
the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly,
because she is thinking that happiness comes from those high quality
pleasures of life of the so beautiful Sweden's nature that she is
showing in her videos, but i think it is a mistake, since not all people
have those "high" quality pleasures of life, so in my philosophy(read
about it below) i am explaining that happiness comes not only from
pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being
"hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of
being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate
much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think
this is the secret of life.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)