• =?UTF-8?Q?China=E2=80=99s_=E2=80=98Zero_Covid=E2=80=99_Mess_Proves_Auto

    From David P.@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 14 00:04:28 2022
    China’s ‘Zero Covid’ Mess Proves Autocracy Hurts Everyone
    By Li Yuan, April 13, 2022, NY Times

    Long before the “zero Covid” policy, China had a “zero sparrow” policy. In the spring of 1958, the Chinese government mobilized the entire
    nation to exterminate sparrows, which Mao declared pests that
    destroyed crops. All over China, people banged on pots and pans,
    lit firecrackers and waved flags to prevent the birds from landing
    so they would fall and die from exhaustion. By one estimation,
    nearly two billion sparrows were killed nationwide within months.

    The near extinction of sparrows led to insect infestations, which
    ruined crops and contributed to the Great Famine, which starved
    tens of millions of Chinese to death in the next three years.

    The fear in China now is that the “zero Covid” policy has become
    another Mao-style political campaign that is based on the will
    of one person, the country’s top leader, Xi Jinping — and that
    it could end up hurting everyone.

    Just as Mao and his lieutenants ignored the opposition to
    their anti-sparrow policy from scientists and technocrats,
    Beijing has ignored experts’ advice that China abandon its
    costly strategy and learn to coexist with the coronavirus,
    especially a milder, if more infectious, variant.

    Instead, Beijing insists on following the same playbook from
    2020 that relies on mass testing, quarantine and lockdowns.
    The approach has put hundreds of millions of lives on pause,
    sent tens of thousands to makeshift quarantine camps and
    deprived many non-Covid patients of medical treatments.

    “They’re not countering the pandemic. They’re creating
    disasters,” Ye Qing, a law scholar who is known by his pen name,
    Xiao Han, wrote in an online article that was swiftly deleted.

    Mr. Xi is keen to stick to the strategy because he is seeking
    a third term at an important Communist Party congress later
    this year. He wants to use China’s success in containing the
    virus to prove that its top-down governance model is superior
    to that of liberal democracies.

    “This disease has been politicized,” Zhu Weiping, an official
    in Shanghai’s disease control apparatus, told a person who
    complained about the city’s response to the outbreak. In a
    recorded phone conversation, the official said she had advised
    the government to let people with no or mild symptoms quarantine
    at home and focus on vaccination drives. But no one listened,
    she said.

    “You’re driven crazy by this?” she asked the caller.
    “Professional institutions like us are going crazy, too.”
    The recording was shared widely before it was censored.

    As the Omicron variant spreads, about 373 million people in
    45 Chinese cities were under either full or partial lockdowns
    as of Monday, according to estimates by economists at the
    investment bank Nomura. These cities account for 26% of
    China’s population and 40 percent of its economic output,
    they wrote; they warned that the risk of recession was rising
    as local governments competed to ratchet up virus-containment
    measures.

    Beijing is now urging local governments to strike a balance
    between pandemic control and economic production. But everyone
    in the bureaucratic system knows where the priority lies.

    In the city of Jixi in China’s northernmost province,
    Heilongjiang, 18 officials, including township leaders, law
    enforcement chiefs as well as directors of a hospital and a
    funeral home, were disciplined or reprimanded recently for
    neglecting their duties and responsibilities in pandemic
    control. Some cadres “weren’t stressed out enough,” the
    announcement said.

    In Shanghai, China’s largest and most affluent city, at least
    8 midlevel officials were removed or suspended from their
    positions after the city’s poorly executed lockdowns caused
    chaos, tragedies and severe food shortages.

    After the city locked down its 25 million residents and
    grounded most delivery services in early April, many people
    encountered problems sourcing food, regardless of their
    socioeconomic status. Some set alarms for the different
    restocking times of grocery delivery apps that start as
    early as 6 a.m.

    In the past few days, a hot topic in WeChat groups has been
    whether sprouted potatoes were safe to eat, a few Shanghai
    residents told me. Neighbors resorted to a barter system to
    exchange, say, a cabbage for a bottle of soy sauce. Coca-Cola
    is hard currency.

    After nearly two weeks under lockdown, Dai Xin, a restaurant
    owner, is running out of food to provide for her household of 4.
    Now she slices ginger paper thin, pickles vegetables so they
    won’t spoil and eats 2 meals a day instead of 3.

    Even the moneyed class is facing food supply shortages. The
    head of a big retailer told me last week that she got many
    requests from Shanghai-based chief executives. But there was
    little she could do under lockdown rules, the executive said,
    who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the political
    sensitivities.

    Wang Lixiong, the author of the apocalyptic novel “China Tidal
    Wave,” which ended with a great famine in the aftermath of a
    nuclear winter, believes that a man-made crisis like the one in
    Shanghai is inevitable under China’s authoritarian system. In
    recent years, he said in an interview, the risk increased after
    Beijing clamped down on nearly every aspect of civil society.

    After moving into a friend’s vacant apartment in Shanghai
    last winter, he stocked up on rice, noodles, canned food and
    whiskey to sustain him for a few months in case of a crisis.

    But many residents in the luxury apartment complex, with units
    valued at more than $3 million, weren’t as prepared when the
    lockdown started. He saw his neighbors, who dashed around in
    designer suits a month ago, venture into the complex’s lush
    garden to dig up bamboo shoots for a meal.

    The worst nightmare for many Shanghai residents is testing
    positive and being sent to centralized quarantine facilities.
    The conditions of some facilities are so appalling that they’re
    called “refugee camps” and “concentration camps” on social media.

    Many people shared packing lists and tips for quarantine.
    Take earplugs and eye masks because it’s usually a giant place
    like the convention center and the lights are on day and night;
    pack lots of disposable underwear because there’s no shower
    facility; and carry large amounts of toilet paper. Some quarantine
    camps were so poorly prepared that people had to fight for food,
    water and bedding.

    The many despairing posts about Shanghai sent residents in
    other parts of China into a hoarding craze last weekend. In
    Beijing, supermarkets were packed, and some grocery apps ran
    out stock.

    A growing number of people are questioning whether the draconian
    and costly strategy is necessary. On Tuesday, the Shanghai health
    authority reported more than 200,000 infection cases since March 1,
    with nine in serious condition and no deaths. Officials haven’t
    addressed reports of mass infections and deaths at elder-care hospitals.

    Even some supporters of the “zero Covid” policy have voiced their
    doubts. When Shanghai carried out citywide Covid tests on April 4,
    Lang Xianping, an economist, said on his verified Weibo account that
    it demonstrated “the power of China.” On Monday, he said his mother
    had passed away after Covid restrictions delayed treatment for her
    kidney condition. “I hope tragedies like this won’t happen again,”
    he wrote.

    The policy still enjoys strong public support. Many people on
    social media said Shanghai wasn’t strict enough in its lockdowns
    and quarantines. A venture capitalist posted on WeChat that he
    would not invest in start-up founders who didn’t back the policy.

    This is not surprising. With limited access to information and
    no tools to hold the authority accountable, the vast majority of
    Chinese generally support whatever the government decides.

    In the past two years, they followed Beijing’s cue and attacked
    critics of its pandemic policy. They rallied around Beijing,
    which increasingly applied the social suppression mechanism in
    Xinjiang to the rest of the country in the name of pandemic
    control. Now, many of them are suffering from the consequences,
    but, in contrast to Wuhan, there are no more citizen journalists
    or large volunteer groups to help them.

    “When repressions didn’t touch them, most Chinese ignored them,” Lawrence Li, a business consultant in Shanghai, said in an
    interview. “We believe that it’s just to sacrifice minority
    interests in favor of the collective.”

    Like many people, he said what was happening in Shanghai echoed
    the anti-sparrow campaign. “History repeats itself again and
    again,” he said.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/china-covid-zero-shanghai.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From borie@21:1/5 to David P. on Fri Apr 15 11:09:51 2022
    On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 3:04:30 PM UTC+8, David P. wrote:
    China’s ‘Zero Covid’ Mess Proves Autocracy Hurts Everyone
    By Li Yuan, April 13, 2022, NY Times

    Long before the “zero Covid” policy, China had a “zero sparrow” policy.
    In the spring of 1958, the Chinese government mobilized the entire
    nation to exterminate sparrows, which Mao declared pests that
    destroyed crops. All over China, people banged on pots and pans,
    lit firecrackers and waved flags to prevent the birds from landing
    so they would fall and die from exhaustion. By one estimation,
    nearly two billion sparrows were killed nationwide within months.

    The near extinction of sparrows led to insect infestations, which
    ruined crops and contributed to the Great Famine, which starved
    tens of millions of Chinese to death in the next three years.

    The fear in China now is that the “zero Covid” policy has become
    another Mao-style political campaign that is based on the will
    of one person, the country’s top leader, Xi Jinping — and that
    it could end up hurting everyone.

    Just as Mao and his lieutenants ignored the opposition to
    their anti-sparrow policy from scientists and technocrats,
    Beijing has ignored experts’ advice that China abandon its
    costly strategy and learn to coexist with the coronavirus,
    especially a milder, if more infectious, variant.

    Instead, Beijing insists on following the same playbook from
    2020 that relies on mass testing, quarantine and lockdowns.
    The approach has put hundreds of millions of lives on pause,
    sent tens of thousands to makeshift quarantine camps and
    deprived many non-Covid patients of medical treatments.

    “They’re not countering the pandemic. They’re creating
    disasters,” Ye Qing, a law scholar who is known by his pen name,
    Xiao Han, wrote in an online article that was swiftly deleted.

    Mr. Xi is keen to stick to the strategy because he is seeking
    a third term at an important Communist Party congress later
    this year. He wants to use China’s success in containing the
    virus to prove that its top-down governance model is superior
    to that of liberal democracies.

    “This disease has been politicized,” Zhu Weiping, an official
    in Shanghai’s disease control apparatus, told a person who
    complained about the city’s response to the outbreak. In a
    recorded phone conversation, the official said she had advised
    the government to let people with no or mild symptoms quarantine
    at home and focus on vaccination drives. But no one listened,
    she said.

    “You’re driven crazy by this?” she asked the caller.
    “Professional institutions like us are going crazy, too.”
    The recording was shared widely before it was censored.

    As the Omicron variant spreads, about 373 million people in
    45 Chinese cities were under either full or partial lockdowns
    as of Monday, according to estimates by economists at the
    investment bank Nomura. These cities account for 26% of
    China’s population and 40 percent of its economic output,
    they wrote; they warned that the risk of recession was rising
    as local governments competed to ratchet up virus-containment
    measures.

    Beijing is now urging local governments to strike a balance
    between pandemic control and economic production. But everyone
    in the bureaucratic system knows where the priority lies.

    In the city of Jixi in China’s northernmost province,
    Heilongjiang, 18 officials, including township leaders, law
    enforcement chiefs as well as directors of a hospital and a
    funeral home, were disciplined or reprimanded recently for
    neglecting their duties and responsibilities in pandemic
    control. Some cadres “weren’t stressed out enough,” the
    announcement said.

    In Shanghai, China’s largest and most affluent city, at least
    8 midlevel officials were removed or suspended from their
    positions after the city’s poorly executed lockdowns caused
    chaos, tragedies and severe food shortages.

    After the city locked down its 25 million residents and
    grounded most delivery services in early April, many people
    encountered problems sourcing food, regardless of their
    socioeconomic status. Some set alarms for the different
    restocking times of grocery delivery apps that start as
    early as 6 a.m.

    In the past few days, a hot topic in WeChat groups has been
    whether sprouted potatoes were safe to eat, a few Shanghai
    residents told me. Neighbors resorted to a barter system to
    exchange, say, a cabbage for a bottle of soy sauce. Coca-Cola
    is hard currency.

    After nearly two weeks under lockdown, Dai Xin, a restaurant
    owner, is running out of food to provide for her household of 4.
    Now she slices ginger paper thin, pickles vegetables so they
    won’t spoil and eats 2 meals a day instead of 3.

    Even the moneyed class is facing food supply shortages. The
    head of a big retailer told me last week that she got many
    requests from Shanghai-based chief executives. But there was
    little she could do under lockdown rules, the executive said,
    who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the political
    sensitivities.

    Wang Lixiong, the author of the apocalyptic novel “China Tidal
    Wave,” which ended with a great famine in the aftermath of a
    nuclear winter, believes that a man-made crisis like the one in
    Shanghai is inevitable under China’s authoritarian system. In
    recent years, he said in an interview, the risk increased after
    Beijing clamped down on nearly every aspect of civil society.

    After moving into a friend’s vacant apartment in Shanghai
    last winter, he stocked up on rice, noodles, canned food and
    whiskey to sustain him for a few months in case of a crisis.

    But many residents in the luxury apartment complex, with units
    valued at more than $3 million, weren’t as prepared when the
    lockdown started. He saw his neighbors, who dashed around in
    designer suits a month ago, venture into the complex’s lush
    garden to dig up bamboo shoots for a meal.

    The worst nightmare for many Shanghai residents is testing
    positive and being sent to centralized quarantine facilities.
    The conditions of some facilities are so appalling that they’re
    called “refugee camps” and “concentration camps” on social media.

    Many people shared packing lists and tips for quarantine.
    Take earplugs and eye masks because it’s usually a giant place
    like the convention center and the lights are on day and night;
    pack lots of disposable underwear because there’s no shower
    facility; and carry large amounts of toilet paper. Some quarantine
    camps were so poorly prepared that people had to fight for food,
    water and bedding.

    The many despairing posts about Shanghai sent residents in
    other parts of China into a hoarding craze last weekend. In
    Beijing, supermarkets were packed, and some grocery apps ran
    out stock.

    A growing number of people are questioning whether the draconian
    and costly strategy is necessary. On Tuesday, the Shanghai health
    authority reported more than 200,000 infection cases since March 1,
    with nine in serious condition and no deaths. Officials haven’t
    addressed reports of mass infections and deaths at elder-care hospitals.

    Even some supporters of the “zero Covid” policy have voiced their doubts. When Shanghai carried out citywide Covid tests on April 4,
    Lang Xianping, an economist, said on his verified Weibo account that
    it demonstrated “the power of China.” On Monday, he said his mother
    had passed away after Covid restrictions delayed treatment for her
    kidney condition. “I hope tragedies like this won’t happen again,”
    he wrote.

    The policy still enjoys strong public support. Many people on
    social media said Shanghai wasn’t strict enough in its lockdowns
    and quarantines. A venture capitalist posted on WeChat that he
    would not invest in start-up founders who didn’t back the policy.

    This is not surprising. With limited access to information and
    no tools to hold the authority accountable, the vast majority of
    Chinese generally support whatever the government decides.

    In the past two years, they followed Beijing’s cue and attacked
    critics of its pandemic policy. They rallied around Beijing,
    which increasingly applied the social suppression mechanism in
    Xinjiang to the rest of the country in the name of pandemic
    control. Now, many of them are suffering from the consequences,
    but, in contrast to Wuhan, there are no more citizen journalists
    or large volunteer groups to help them.

    “When repressions didn’t touch them, most Chinese ignored them,” Lawrence Li, a business consultant in Shanghai, said in an
    interview. “We believe that it’s just to sacrifice minority
    interests in favor of the collective.”

    Like many people, he said what was happening in Shanghai echoed
    the anti-sparrow campaign. “History repeats itself again and
    again,” he said.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/china-covid-zero-shanghai.html

    If Chinese people can comply with personal hygiene in public and private spaces, the risk of infection will be reduced.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gerard jud@21:1/5 to David P. on Sat Apr 16 07:36:25 2022
    On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 7:04:30 AM UTC, David P. wrote:
    China’s ‘Zero Covid’ Mess Proves Autocracy Hurts Everyone
    By Li Yuan, April 13, 2022, NY Times

    Long before the “zero Covid” policy, China had a “zero sparrow” policy.
    In the spring of 1958, the Chinese government mobilized the entire
    nation to exterminate sparrows, which Mao declared pests that
    destroyed crops. All over China, people banged on pots and pans,
    lit firecrackers and waved flags to prevent the birds from landing
    so they would fall and die from exhaustion. By one estimation,
    nearly two billion sparrows were killed nationwide within months.

    The near extinction of sparrows led to insect infestations, which
    ruined crops and contributed to the Great Famine, which starved
    tens of millions of Chinese to death in the next three years.

    The fear in China now is that the “zero Covid” policy has become
    another Mao-style political campaign that is based on the will
    of one person, the country’s top leader, Xi Jinping — and that
    it could end up hurting everyone.

    Just as Mao and his lieutenants ignored the opposition to
    their anti-sparrow policy from scientists and technocrats,
    Beijing has ignored experts’ advice that China abandon its
    costly strategy and learn to coexist with the coronavirus,
    especially a milder, if more infectious, variant.

    Instead, Beijing insists on following the same playbook from
    2020 that relies on mass testing, quarantine and lockdowns.
    The approach has put hundreds of millions of lives on pause,
    sent tens of thousands to makeshift quarantine camps and
    deprived many non-Covid patients of medical treatments.

    “They’re not countering the pandemic. They’re creating
    disasters,” Ye Qing, a law scholar who is known by his pen name,
    Xiao Han, wrote in an online article that was swiftly deleted.

    Mr. Xi is keen to stick to the strategy because he is seeking
    a third term at an important Communist Party congress later
    this year. He wants to use China’s success in containing the
    virus to prove that its top-down governance model is superior
    to that of liberal democracies.

    “This disease has been politicized,” Zhu Weiping, an official
    in Shanghai’s disease control apparatus, told a person who
    complained about the city’s response to the outbreak. In a
    recorded phone conversation, the official said she had advised
    the government to let people with no or mild symptoms quarantine
    at home and focus on vaccination drives. But no one listened,
    she said.

    “You’re driven crazy by this?” she asked the caller.
    “Professional institutions like us are going crazy, too.”
    The recording was shared widely before it was censored.

    As the Omicron variant spreads, about 373 million people in
    45 Chinese cities were under either full or partial lockdowns
    as of Monday, according to estimates by economists at the
    investment bank Nomura. These cities account for 26% of
    China’s population and 40 percent of its economic output,
    they wrote; they warned that the risk of recession was rising
    as local governments competed to ratchet up virus-containment
    measures.

    Beijing is now urging local governments to strike a balance
    between pandemic control and economic production. But everyone
    in the bureaucratic system knows where the priority lies.

    In the city of Jixi in China’s northernmost province,
    Heilongjiang, 18 officials, including township leaders, law
    enforcement chiefs as well as directors of a hospital and a
    funeral home, were disciplined or reprimanded recently for
    neglecting their duties and responsibilities in pandemic
    control. Some cadres “weren’t stressed out enough,” the
    announcement said.

    In Shanghai, China’s largest and most affluent city, at least
    8 midlevel officials were removed or suspended from their
    positions after the city’s poorly executed lockdowns caused
    chaos, tragedies and severe food shortages.

    After the city locked down its 25 million residents and
    grounded most delivery services in early April, many people
    encountered problems sourcing food, regardless of their
    socioeconomic status. Some set alarms for the different
    restocking times of grocery delivery apps that start as
    early as 6 a.m.

    In the past few days, a hot topic in WeChat groups has been
    whether sprouted potatoes were safe to eat, a few Shanghai
    residents told me. Neighbors resorted to a barter system to
    exchange, say, a cabbage for a bottle of soy sauce. Coca-Cola
    is hard currency.

    After nearly two weeks under lockdown, Dai Xin, a restaurant
    owner, is running out of food to provide for her household of 4.
    Now she slices ginger paper thin, pickles vegetables so they
    won’t spoil and eats 2 meals a day instead of 3.

    Even the moneyed class is facing food supply shortages. The
    head of a big retailer told me last week that she got many
    requests from Shanghai-based chief executives. But there was
    little she could do under lockdown rules, the executive said,
    who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the political
    sensitivities.

    Wang Lixiong, the author of the apocalyptic novel “China Tidal
    Wave,” which ended with a great famine in the aftermath of a
    nuclear winter, believes that a man-made crisis like the one in
    Shanghai is inevitable under China’s authoritarian system. In
    recent years, he said in an interview, the risk increased after
    Beijing clamped down on nearly every aspect of civil society.

    After moving into a friend’s vacant apartment in Shanghai
    last winter, he stocked up on rice, noodles, canned food and
    whiskey to sustain him for a few months in case of a crisis.

    But many residents in the luxury apartment complex, with units
    valued at more than $3 million, weren’t as prepared when the
    lockdown started. He saw his neighbors, who dashed around in
    designer suits a month ago, venture into the complex’s lush
    garden to dig up bamboo shoots for a meal.

    The worst nightmare for many Shanghai residents is testing
    positive and being sent to centralized quarantine facilities.
    The conditions of some facilities are so appalling that they’re
    called “refugee camps” and “concentration camps” on social media.

    Many people shared packing lists and tips for quarantine.
    Take earplugs and eye masks because it’s usually a giant place
    like the convention center and the lights are on day and night;
    pack lots of disposable underwear because there’s no shower
    facility; and carry large amounts of toilet paper. Some quarantine
    camps were so poorly prepared that people had to fight for food,
    water and bedding.

    The many despairing posts about Shanghai sent residents in
    other parts of China into a hoarding craze last weekend. In
    Beijing, supermarkets were packed, and some grocery apps ran
    out stock.

    A growing number of people are questioning whether the draconian
    and costly strategy is necessary. On Tuesday, the Shanghai health
    authority reported more than 200,000 infection cases since March 1,
    with nine in serious condition and no deaths. Officials haven’t
    addressed reports of mass infections and deaths at elder-care hospitals.

    Even some supporters of the “zero Covid” policy have voiced their doubts. When Shanghai carried out citywide Covid tests on April 4,
    Lang Xianping, an economist, said on his verified Weibo account that
    it demonstrated “the power of China.” On Monday, he said his mother
    had passed away after Covid restrictions delayed treatment for her
    kidney condition. “I hope tragedies like this won’t happen again,”
    he wrote.

    The policy still enjoys strong public support. Many people on
    social media said Shanghai wasn’t strict enough in its lockdowns
    and quarantines. A venture capitalist posted on WeChat that he
    would not invest in start-up founders who didn’t back the policy.

    This is not surprising. With limited access to information and
    no tools to hold the authority accountable, the vast majority of
    Chinese generally support whatever the government decides.

    In the past two years, they followed Beijing’s cue and attacked
    critics of its pandemic policy. They rallied around Beijing,
    which increasingly applied the social suppression mechanism in
    Xinjiang to the rest of the country in the name of pandemic
    control. Now, many of them are suffering from the consequences,
    but, in contrast to Wuhan, there are no more citizen journalists
    or large volunteer groups to help them.

    “When repressions didn’t touch them, most Chinese ignored them,” Lawrence Li, a business consultant in Shanghai, said in an
    interview. “We believe that it’s just to sacrifice minority
    interests in favor of the collective.”

    Like many people, he said what was happening in Shanghai echoed
    the anti-sparrow campaign. “History repeats itself again and
    again,” he said.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/china-covid-zero-shanghai.html

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/china-covid-zero-shanghai.html

    “Long before the “zero Covid” policy, China had a “zero sparrow” policy.
    In the spring of 1958, the Chinese government mobilized the entire
    nation to exterminate sparrows, which Mao declared pests that
    destroyed crops. All over China, people banged on pots and pans,
    lit firecrackers and waved flags to prevent the birds from landing
    so they would fall and die from exhaustion. By one estimation,
    nearly two billion sparrows were killed nationwide within months.

    The near extinction of sparrows led to insect infestations, which
    ruined crops and contributed to the Great Famine, which starved
    tens of millions of Chinese to death in the next three years. “

    Well, over 1 million Americans have been killed by the pandemic. That would be equivalent to how many sparrows? The infections and dearhs continue to climb, with no end in sight. If this continues, Americans may face near extinction while sparrows
    continue to fly all over the US.


    “Instead, Beijing insists on following the same playbook from
    2020 that relies on mass testing, quarantine and lockdowns.
    The approach has put hundreds of millions of lives on pause,
    sent tens of thousands to makeshift quarantine camps and
    deprived many non-Covid patients of medical treatments.

    “They’re not countering the pandemic. They’re creating
    disasters,” Ye Qing, a law scholar who is known by his pen name,
    Xiao Han, wrote in an online article that was swiftly deleted. “

    The Chinese approach, based on scientific principles, has made China one of the best performers in the world in combating the pandemic. The statistics say it all. China has very low total infections and death. Expressed in per head of pop., its ranking
    becomes more impressive.


    In the US, over 82 million infected, over a million dead. Based on the US pop. of 330 million, that’s about 1 in every 4 Americans infected, 1 in every 330 Americans dead.

    If that were to happen in China, with a pop. of 1.4 billion, which is about 4 times that of the US, the number of infected would be about 330 million and the number of dead would be about 4 million! That would be a real disaster.

    “This disease has been politicized,” Zhu Weiping, an official
    in Shanghai’s disease control apparatus, told a person who
    complained about the city’s response to the outbreak.“

    The pandemic is being politicised in the West, not China. In the West, politics triumph science in deciding on mitigating measures. When protests over these measures increased, policy makers relented. In the US, when surveys show declining popularity of
    the President, mitigating measures are relaxed. More recently, in the UK, PM BoJo was caught breaking the rules he had set for the British to combat the pandemic. After surveys showed a steep decline in his popularity, he announced relaxation of
    mitigating measures, much to the disappointment of the scientific community there.


    “A growing number of people are questioning whether the draconian
    and costly strategy is necessary. On Tuesday, the Shanghai health
    authority reported more than 200,000 infection cases since March 1,
    with nine in serious condition and no deaths. “

    Majority of the cases in Shanghai are imported. This means that many infected foreigners are arriving in China. Western reports don’t highlight this. Is the disease being weaponised? After the US reached a high peak of over a million cases a day, it
    declined rapidly and the number of cases in East Asia began to pick up sharply. China should be alert to the possibility of sabotage committed by the US.


    “This is not surprising. With limited access to information and
    no tools to hold the authority accountable, the vast majority of
    Chinese generally support whatever the government decides. “

    The vast majority of Chinese supports the government not because they are ignorant or less informed. It’s because they have experienced first hand the benefits from decisions made by the government. They have remained non-infected and healthy. The vast
    majority of the Chinese population appreciate those draconian measures taken to control the spread of the disease. They know how their China has performed compared to other countries in combating the spread of the pandemic. Two years into the pandemic,
    while many countries have been ravaged by the pandemic, China largely remain unscathed, even though the first breakout of the pandemic was reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan.




    The pandemic has affected the US much worse than China - over 82 millions infected and over a million dead. This is a very dire situation. It is the result of bad governance. Yet American press and politicians have little to say about this. Instead, they
    blow up the few problems China would encounter every time there is a lockdown in a city or province. They cite this as another example of the failure of “Chinese autocracy”. How ridiculous!

    If the situation in the US were to happen in China, Western nations, using their media power, would create many doomsday scenarios for China. They would agitate the Chinese to rise up against their government and bring about a regime change.

    Ordinary Americans seem oblivious to the dire situation brought on by the pandemic. They have been deeply indoctrinated by the politicians and the press to believe that everything in the US is always OK!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David P.@21:1/5 to gera...gmai on Sat Apr 16 21:24:50 2022
    gera...gmai wrote:
    David P. wrote:
    China’s ‘Zero Covid’ Mess Proves Autocracy Hurts Everyone
    By Li Yuan, April 13, 2022, NY Times
    [....]
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/china-covid-zero-shanghai.html

    “Long before the “zero Covid” policy, China had a “zero sparrow” policy.
    In the spring of 1958, the Chinese government mobilized the entire
    nation to exterminate sparrows, which Mao declared pests that
    destroyed crops. All over China, people banged on pots and pans,
    lit firecrackers and waved flags to prevent the birds from landing
    so they would fall and die from exhaustion. By one estimation,
    nearly two billion sparrows were killed nationwide within months.

    The near extinction of sparrows led to insect infestations, which
    ruined crops and contributed to the Great Famine, which starved
    tens of millions of Chinese to death in the next three years. “

    Well, over 1 million Americans have been killed by the pandemic. That would be equivalent to how many sparrows? The infections and dearhs continue to climb, with no end in sight. If this continues, Americans may face near extinction while sparrows
    continue to fly all over the US.
    -------------------------
    There's nothing "Normal" about adding one billion every 12 years,
    like we've been doing since 1960! Nowhere else in Nature does a
    population increase indefinitely without a crash! Nature's plan is
    that every species has enemies that keep its numbers in check. Our plan
    is to suppress communicable diseases, and we're slowly discovering that
    this has significant costs. We should stop making flu, MMR, & Covid shots,
    to shorten the average life span by a few years, because we didn't
    listen to the scientists who called for Zero Population Growth 50 years ago! When you go too far out on a limb, you need to back up!
    --
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)