• US Democracy in practice: Unanimous Vote of US Senate [Putin war crimin

    From A. Filip@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 16 14:10:46 2022
    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/us-senate-passes-resolution-condemning-vladimir-putin-as-a-war-criminal/ar-AAV7mY5
    US Senate passes resolution condemning Vladimir Putin as a war
    criminal ; 2022-03-16T13:16:20.000Z

    The US Senate has *unanimously* approved a resolution branding Russian president Vladimir Putin a war criminal over his ongoing invasion of
    Ukraine. […]

    --
    A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
    | Insufficient facts always invite danger.
    | (Spock, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ltlee1@21:1/5 to A. Filip on Wed Mar 16 11:04:54 2022
    On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 2:10:49 PM UTC, A. Filip wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/us-senate-passes-resolution-condemning-vladimir-putin-as-a-war-criminal/ar-AAV7mY5
    US Senate passes resolution condemning Vladimir Putin as a war
    criminal ; 2022-03-16T13:16:20.000Z

    The US Senate has *unanimously* approved a resolution branding Russian president Vladimir Putin a war criminal over his ongoing invasion of Ukraine. […]

    --
    A. Filip : Big (Tech) Brother is watching you.
    | Insufficient facts always invite danger.
    | (Spock, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9)

    What can such grand posturing achieve if Ukraine cannot win?
    The National Interest article "Biden Embraces a Ukrainian Defeat" certainly considers US response inadequate.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/03/biden-embraces-a-ukrainian-defeat/#slide-1

    "It has become evident the Biden administration has embraced conflict “containment” as its principal objective in dealing with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. According to this theory, while it would be nice if Ukraine survives the war, that is not
    of fundamental importance. What is critical, as far as the Biden administration is concerned, is that the war not spread to involve other parties, notably the U.S. and NATO. Thus, Biden has ruled out providing NATO air support, a no-fly zone, old Warsaw
    Pact MiGs, or even Patriot anti-missile batteries on the supposition that such aid might sufficiently anger Russian dictator Vladimir Putin such that he lashes out at the United States or our NATO allies, thereby drawing us into the war.

    There are a number of flaws in this strategy. In the first place, it leaves Putin not only with the initiative, but also the authority to set the rules as to what the U.S. is permitted or forbidden to do in defense of the free world. In the second place,
    it is based on the conceit that Putin requires a provocation or legal justification to launch an attack on anyone.
    ...
    But the biggest problem with Biden’s strategy is that it fails to look ahead."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)