Hello,



More precision about more of my philosophy of am i an egoistic person or
not and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


Read again my below thoughts about my new architectural idea of my
philosophy, i have just added more precision to them, so read them again carefully:

I think i am smart, so the smart question is the following:

How do you know that i am an egoistic person or not ?

So i am not egoistic, since it is like the philosopher and economist
Adam Smith ideas, so can we simply say like the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith that human egoism is the engine of the properity
and happiness of nations ?

So it is a really smart question that have just answered by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence by saying the following:

Also here is my new architectural idea of my philosophy:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy, since you are understanding that in my economic model i am
showing that you have to be like a well balance between competition and cooperation or collaboration(with even solidarity like i am saying
above) so that to be the "optimal" properity and happiness of nations.
So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have completed
efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas , so it
is my following opensource software project called StringTree, it was
one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it carefully
and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and my kind of
smartness..

I think i am smart, and so that to know more how i am creative and
inventive, i invite you to read my following thoughts about timesharing
and about coroutines and how i have "quickly" created them, it is my way
of doing, since i am quickly creating my thoughts of my philosophy and
my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion and my new many proverbs
etc. so read carefully my following thoughts about timesharing and about coroutines and how i have quickly thought them and quickly created them
so that you understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about timesharing and about coroutines and more..

I think i am smart, i invite you to read my thoughts about timesharing
and coroutines in my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just posted
about the following video of Laurel and Hardy infectious laughing, but
it doesn't mean that i am laughing at you, since i am not laughing at
you since i am gentleman, but what i want you to understand is
that you have to look carefully at the video below of Laurel and Hardy
that shows and learns you more about the process of "creativity", since
you have to look at the videos of Laurel and Hardy(Read about them here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurel_and_Hardy
) since they learns you more about the process of creativity:

So here is the video of Laurel and Hardy that i have just posted:

Stan Laurel infectious laughing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BAEJyuReWQ

And here is my thoughts about creativity and more so that you notice my
kind of smartness and how i am doing it by inventing quickly my thoughts:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns
and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of
my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and
you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering
smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(and notice below the other
smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i
am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola
Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the
video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also
an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i
don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person like me(and i think
it is also genetical in me), since for example he is saying the
following saying in the above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all,
since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so
that to be efficient, and i also think that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above
saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you
understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called
"The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing
one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is
saying that doing many things at the same time is not good for
productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is
not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time
and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be
like convergent thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like
between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking,
and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0


More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that
is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he
attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a
bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be
the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly
discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is
trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can,
you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the
things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence
is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the
way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply
but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you
enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about
usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of
the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the
factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above
video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be
useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the
reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a
thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich
depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can
be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

More of my philosophy about a well known musician and singer from Morocco..

I invite you to listen to the following well known and good singer and
musician from Morocco and he is a little bit far member of the big
familly of my mother:

Hamid Bouchnak - Khallitini - خلّيتينـــي - Version originale.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaqqfJUQqro

I think i am also genetically an artist since i can invent quickly poems
of Love and poems and i think i can also invent interesting musics..

You can read more about me below:

More of my philosophy of how you can be like me..

I think i am smart, and if you want to know how you can be like me,
here is first my genetical characteristics that permit me to invent
quickly as i am explaining it below:

1- I have genetical characteristics that makes me like an artist, since
i can invent interesting musics and i can for example invent quickly
many interesting poems of Love and poems.

2- I have another genetical characteristic, and it is that i am much
more precise thinking, and much more precision in the thinking
process does not come only from genetical smartness, but it also
comes from the much precise way that you think naturally.

3- I have another genetical characteristic, and it is that i have
like a well balanced thinking since i am also genetically a gentleman
type of person, so i am not genetically violent , since this
genetically "violent" makes your thinking not well balanced.

4- I think i am genetically highly smart, since i have passed some
standardized IQ tests on internet that confirm that i am highly
smart.


And you can read more about my way of doing, as also an inventor, in the following:

More of my philosophy about my next projects..

I think i am really smart, and as you have just noticed that i have
quickly invented my thoughts of my philosophy and i have invented
quickly my new monotheistic religion and i have invented many proverbs
and i have invented many poems of Love and poems and i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms , but here is my next projects
that i will finish quickly:

1- First i will quickly organize my thoughts of my philosophy that i
have invented quickly into an efficient much more organized book in a
PDF and HTML format so that you can download them.

2- And i will organize my poems of Love and poems that i have invented
quickly in both english and french and the many of my proverbs that i
have invented quickly into an efficient HTML book.

3- Here is my other project that i will finish quickly:

More of my philosophy about mathematics and the Minimizers that fit
models and more of my philosophy..

I have just read the following web pages about comparing Minimizers that
fit models, and i invite you to read them here:

https://docs.mantidproject.org/v3.7.1/concepts/FittingMinimizers.html


And i am working with some software projects now that need good
Minimizers that fit models, and i have implemented two of them with the
simplex method and with Levenberg-Marquardt, but i am not satisfied
since i think that the Simplex method is better in convergence than Levenberg-Marquardt since it rarely converges to a local minimum, but i
will implement or build a minimizer from the ground up with artificial intelligence that fits Models and that is much more sophisticated than
the Simplex or Levenberg-Marquardt, so stay tuned since i am actually implementing it !

4- And here another project of mine that i will finish quickly, you can
read about it in my following thoughts in the following web link:

And here is my following thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

5- And my other project that i will finish quickly, it is
that i will invent a compiled programming language that is really
efficient in parallelism programming since i am also an inventor of
many scalable algorithms and algorithms.

And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)