Hello,



More of my philosophy about the english language and more of my thoughts..

I have just read the following english webpage about the english verb
tenses etc., i invite you to read it to notice:

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/verb-tenses/


I think i am smart and i say to notice carefully that the verb tenses in
the english language are easy to learn and easy to understand, since i
think that all the verb tenses are easy but i think that the only verb
tenses that are a "little" bit more difficult than others are the
Present perfect or continuous and Past perfect or continuous, since they
refer to actions that occurred in an indefinite time in the past or
began in the past and continued or continuing to the present time, so i
think all the english verb tenses are easy, so i think that the english language is easy to learn and easy to understand, so it is why i think
that the english language has this kind of efficiency, and i think that
it is why so many people in the world speak english.

More precision about more of my philosophy of am i an egoistic person or
not and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


Read again my below thoughts about my new architectural idea of my
philosophy, i have just added more precision to them, so read them again carefully:

I think i am smart, so the smart question is the following:

How do you know that i am an egoistic person or not ?

So i am not egoistic, since it is like the philosopher and economist
Adam Smith ideas, so can we simply say like the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith that human egoism is the engine of the properity
and happiness of nations ?

So it is a really smart question that have just answered by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence by saying the following:

Also here is my new architectural idea of my philosophy:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy, since you are understanding that in my economic model i am
showing that you have to be like a well balance between competition and cooperation or collaboration(with even solidarity like i am saying
above) so that to be the "optimal" properity and happiness of nations.
So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have completed
efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas , so it
is my following opensource software project called StringTree, it was
one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it carefully
and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and my kind of
smartness..

I think i am smart, and so that to know more how i am creative and
inventive, i invite you to read my following thoughts about timesharing
and about coroutines and how i have "quickly" created them, it is my way
of doing, since i am quickly creating my thoughts of my philosophy and
my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion and my new many proverbs
etc. so read carefully my following thoughts about timesharing and about coroutines and how i have quickly thought them and quickly created them
so that you understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about timesharing and about coroutines and more..

I think i am smart, i invite you to read my thoughts about timesharing
and coroutines in my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just posted
about the following video of Laurel and Hardy infectious laughing, but
it doesn't mean that i am laughing at you, since i am not laughing at
you since i am gentleman, but what i want you to understand is
that you have to look carefully at the video below of Laurel and Hardy
that shows and learns you more about the process of "creativity", since
you have to look at the videos of Laurel and Hardy(Read about them here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurel_and_Hardy
) since they learns you more about the process of creativity:

So here is the video of Laurel and Hardy that i have just posted:

Stan Laurel infectious laughing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BAEJyuReWQ

And here is my thoughts about creativity and more so that you notice my
kind of smartness and how i am doing it by inventing quickly my thoughts:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns
and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of
my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and
you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering
smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(and notice below the other
smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i
am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola
Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the
video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also
an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i
don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person like me(and i think
it is also genetical in me), since for example he is saying the
following saying in the above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all,
since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so
that to be efficient, and i also think that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above
saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you
understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called
"The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing
one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is
saying that doing many things at the same time is not good for
productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is
not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time
and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be
like convergent thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like
between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking,
and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0


More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that
is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he
attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a
bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be
the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly
discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is
trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can,
you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the
things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence
is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the
way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply
but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you
enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about
usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of
the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the
factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above
video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be
useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the
reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a
thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich
depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can
be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

More of my philosophy about a well known musician and singer from Morocco..

I invite you to listen to the following well known and good singer and
musician from Morocco and he is a little bit far member of the big
familly of my mother:

Hamid Bouchnak - Khallitini - خلّيتينـــي - Version originale.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaqqfJUQqro

I think i am also genetically an artist since i can invent quickly poems
of Love and poems and i think i can also invent interesting musics..

You can read more about me below:

More of my philosophy of how you can be like me..

I think i am smart, and if you want to know how you can be like me,
here is first my genetical characteristics that permit me to invent
quickly as i am explaining it below:

1- I have genetical characteristics that makes me like an artist, since
i can invent interesting musics and i can for example invent quickly
many interesting poems of Love and poems.

2- I have another genetical characteristic, and it is that i am much
more precise thinking, and much more precision in the thinking
process does not come only from genetical smartness, but it also
comes from the much precise way that you think naturally.

3- I have another genetical characteristic, and it is that i have
like a well balanced thinking since i am also genetically a gentleman
type of person, so i am not genetically violent , since this
genetically "violent" makes your thinking not well balanced.

4- I think i am genetically highly smart, since i have passed some
standardized IQ tests on internet that confirm that i am highly
smart.


And you can read more about my way of doing, as also an inventor, in the following:

More of my philosophy about my next projects..

I think i am really smart, and as you have just noticed that i have
quickly invented my thoughts of my philosophy and i have invented
quickly my new monotheistic religion and i have invented many proverbs
and i have invented many poems of Love and poems and i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms , but here is my next projects
that i will finish quickly:

1- First i will quickly organize my thoughts of my philosophy that i
have invented quickly into an efficient much more organized book in a
PDF and HTML format so that you can download them.

2- And i will organize my poems of Love and poems that i have invented
quickly in both english and french and the many of my proverbs that i
have invented quickly into an efficient HTML book.

3- Here is my other project that i will finish quickly:

More of my philosophy about mathematics and the Minimizers that fit
models and more of my philosophy..

I have just read the following web pages about comparing Minimizers that
fit models, and i invite you to read them here:

https://docs.mantidproject.org/v3.7.1/concepts/FittingMinimizers.html


And i am working with some software projects now that need good
Minimizers that fit models, and i have implemented two of them with the
simplex method and with Levenberg-Marquardt, but i am not satisfied
since i think that the Simplex method is better in convergence than Levenberg-Marquardt since it rarely converges to a local minimum, but i
will implement or build a minimizer from the ground up with artificial intelligence that fits Models and that is much more sophisticated than
the Simplex or Levenberg-Marquardt, so stay tuned since i am actually implementing it !

4- And here another project of mine that i will finish quickly, you can
read about it in my following thoughts in the following web link:

And here is my following thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

5- And my other project that i will finish quickly, it is
that i will invent a compiled programming language that is really
efficient in parallelism programming since i am also an inventor of
many scalable algorithms and algorithms.

And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,



More of my philosophy about the english language and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I have just read the following english webpage about the english verb tenses etc., i invite you to read it to notice:

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/verb-tenses/


I think i am smart and i say to notice carefully that the verb tenses in the english language are easy to learn and easy to understand, since i think that all the verb tenses are easy but i think that the only verb tenses that are a "little" bit more
difficult than others are the Present perfect or Present continuous and Past perfect or Past continuous, since they refer to actions that occurred in an indefinite time in the past or began in the past and continued or continuing to the present time, so
i think all the english verb tenses are easy, so i think that the english language is easy to learn and easy to understand, so it is why i think that the english language has this kind of efficiency, and i think that it is also why so many people in the
world speak english. And i say that the english language is easy, and here is more logical proof of it, read the following so that to notice it:

Why is English Easy to Learn?

https://live-english.net/english-easy-learn/


And here is my new poem about the english language and notice how i have just quickly invented it, so here it is:

--

English is not like the yiddish

Since english is so "easy" but not like the boyish

Since it is not a Darwinian language but a kind of embellish

And i say it with sincerity even if i am not the british

English is not like the yiddish

Since it permits to transcend and to accomplish

And not to stay lonely and as just a simple dervish

English is not like the yiddish

So i am the beautiful white arab and not the Turkish

And i am swimming using the beautiful english so that to not perish

And it is why English is not for me like the yiddish

And my beautiful way is not like smoking the hashish

---'


More of my philosophy about the model and about civilization and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
there is the model and there a bug that makes the model not successful,
so is the model garbage if it contains a bug that makes it not successful ? so now you are understanding my thoughts below that say that humans are by nature civilized, since i think even if the model contains a bug that makes it not successful, the
model can have the great majority of system that is successful or/or still useful.

More of my philosophy about civilization and about competition and progress and more of my thoughts..



I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

Are humans by nature civilized ?


So i think that humans are like civilized by nature, since the wanting to be happy of humans is like inherent to humans, and the wanting to be happy of humans is constrained by the future happiness, so then it is like a powerful mechanism that makes
humans civilized, so you have not to just look at the appearances and think this or that, since i think that humans are by nature civilized, since the being civilized happens rapidly, so it is a rapid process, since the wanting to be happy is so powerful,
and of course i have just said the following:


More of my philosophy about how can we fight corruption and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will ask the following philosophical question:

How can we fight corruption ?


So i will say that we have not to be pessimistic, since i think
that in Democracy, the wanting to be happy of humans is also a powerful way of fighting corruption, since we can notice that the wanting to be happy is also constrained by the future happiness, so it creates responsability, and it creates competition ,
and competition is put in right way by the need of progress so that to be happy, and of course we have to make humans enough wise by educating them correctly.


More of my philosophy about the way of prevention and about the way of statistics and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so as you notice that we have to be vigilant, since i think that Algeria is not Haiti, so i think that Algeria is
not in a bad shape as Haiti or such, but of course i have to be more objective, so as you have just noticed that i have just talked about the good way of statistics as i am explaining it below, so as you notice we can monitor more the system with the
way of statistics, but i think that there is also the way of "prevention", since there is for example the way of learning by making mistakes, but you have to be more smart and know how to be the right prevention from making mistakes, so i think it is the
wise way, so then we can then talk about Democracy and about the separation of powers like in the U.S. Constitution that establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces
the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think we can ask a philosophical question such as of how to "ensure" the separation of powers so that to not corrupt the system and so that to be the right dose of meritocracy or quality ? so i
think that Democracy has the mechanism of "competition" between the actors of Democracy like of that between the medias and congress and the government and the people, and i think that the separation of powers also comes with a kind of competition too
that prevent corruption, so then we have to understand from it that statistics as i am explaining it below are not enough , since the basis of the system has to provide with the right mechanisms such as of Democracy and the separation of powers. And read
my previous thoughts:


More of my philosophy about corruption and about statistics and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so i invite you to look at the following new video of an algerian
journalist that is speaking about the algerian system of governance:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq7oXarkGMc


So i think i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence
in the above video, so notice that the algerian journalist in the above video is saying that the algerian system of governance is fondamentally corrupt and he is saying it hurts a lot the system and it is why it is not working, but notice the mistake
that he is making, that he has first to ask if Algeria has a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics have to be macrostatistics or macroscale
statistics and microstatistics or microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system, so we can not just say as the algerian journalist above that the algerian system of governance is not working
because it is corrupt, since we have to speak and give good statistics as i am saying above, so it is why i think that the above algerian journalist is not objective, so i think that we can logically infer from my thoughts that one of the most important
thing to have as a country is a good organization like statistics Canada that gives good statistics about economy and healthcare system and about the system, and the statistics has to be macrostatistics or macroscale statistics and microstatistics or
microscale statistics so that to show the advantages and disadvantages and the weaknesses of the system.


More of my philosophy about the moral decline of western countries and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
i think that the moral decline of western countries doesn't come from
LGBT rights or such rights, since they have to respect the laws and not be the disorder against the laws, so i think that the problem of moral decline of western countries comes from the what i am explaining below, that modernity is also the wanting to
be happy of modernity, so it is the wanting to be happy, and not egoism, since egoism is a pejorative expression, so i think that we have to say that it is the wanting to be happy of modernity that causes problems, so then since happiness is not only the
today happiness , but it is also the future happiness that is a constraint, so it creates responsability that also says that we have to be "progress", so since we have to be progress , so we have to be competition between humans that merit a reward that
can be the allowing the rich to be rich, and as i am explaining below that this wanting to be happy of humans also causes discrimination and hate between humans and it causes the what we call racism, so i say that if you want to solve those problems that
comes from modern happiness by creating a new type of man, the new type of man has to be able to control himself by tuning his happiness so that to solve those problems.


More of my philosophy about capitalism and about investments in stocks stocks and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,


Microsoft stock price stood in year 2022 at $268.09

According to the latest long-term forecast, Microsoft price will hit $300 by the end of 2022 and then $400 by the middle of 2025. Microsoft will rise to $500 within the year of 2026, $600 in 2027, $700 in 2028, $800 in 2031 and $900 in 2033.


Read more here:

Microsoft Stock Forecast 2022 - 2025 - 2030

https://coinpriceforecast.com/msft#:~:text=Microsoft%20stock%20price%20stood%20at,2031%20and%20%24900%20in%202033.


So i think that my below thoughts about investments in stocks is valid, since look at the above example at the Microsoft stock prices above, the first thing to notice is that it is just a forecast, but as i am saying below that it is too risky, since you
have to diversify your investment by for example investing in index funds as i am explaining it
below, and second important thing to notice is that the stock
price is the current price that a share of stock is trading for on the market , but it looks by analogy like the bitcoin currency, since
it also follows demand and supply, but i think that investing in
the stocks is better than investing in bitcoin, since there is also
a return of investment in stocks that also permits you to sell much easily your shares of stock, and i think that this return of investment doesn't exist in bitcoin, also i think bitcoin has still much lesser value.

More of my philosophy about being a seller of Amazon products and more of my thoughts..


I have just said the following:

"I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, I have quickly taken a look at Amazon profit margin and ROI(Return of investment), and i think by being a sellers of Amazon(or the like) products you
can become rich, since you can buy in more quantity so that to lower the price of an Item of Amazon, so it is better for you if you have more money when you start selling Amazon products, and after that i think that you can use Amazon shipment strategy
that easy the things for you, and after you make much more money by being a seller of Amazon products, you can invest a part of your money in index funds in stocks that have an average ROI of around 10%, so i think you can become rich by this way of
doing, and i think that it is better than Real Estate investment."


But i think there is still a problem in the being a seller of Amazon products, and it is that when you are a seller and you buy more quantity of a product so that to lower the price of an Item, there is a "competition" in this process of buying more
quantity of a product, like in the process of creativity below, so there can be others that can buy much more quantity than you, so that to lower more than you the price of an Item , so it is i think the problem, so i think so that to be successful as a
seller of Amazon products, you have to have much more money when you start selling Amazon products and so that to "also" lower the Risk, also you have to know that in most cases, customers(that i think can be sellers of Amazon products) can request
returns within 30 days of receiving their order, and this shows that it is not easy to become rich a i am saying below.


More of my philosophy about Real Estate investment and about
creativity and about stocks and bonds and more of my thoughts..


According to the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), as of Q1 2021 the average 25-year return for private commercial real estate properties held for investment purposes slightly outperformed the S&P 500 Index, with average
annualized returns of 10.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Residential and diversified real estate investments also averaged returns of 10.3%, and i think that a good ROI for a rental property is usually above 10%, but 5% to 10% is also an acceptable range.
Real estate investing can be lucrative, but it's important to understand the "risks". Key risks include bad locations, negative cash flows, high vacancies, and problem tenants. Other risks to consider are the lack of liquidity, hidden structural problems,
and the unpredictable nature of the real estate market, so i think because of the Risks in Real Estate, i think it is in accordance with what i am saying below that it is not easy to become rich,


More of my philosophy about Benjamin Franklin and about investments..


I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at the following video about the US. president Benjamin Franklin that talks about the EASIEST way to become rich:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hWbRmkVqhQ


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i am not in accordance with the US. president Benjamin Franklin in the above video, since let us take a look at the following interesting web page of
the Investment growth calculator from Fidelity investments in Canada, since i am understanding it easily, and here it is and take a look at it carefully:

https://www.fidelity.ca/en/growthcalculator/


But notice that it is asking to put two important informations that are:

1- Rate of return
2- Inflation rate


But i think that for the long-term investment, the Inflation rate is not so important, so i think that we have to focus on the "Rate of return",
so i think i am highly smart, and i say that you can not be rich easily, since you can not for example invest in stocks of this or that company
since it is so much more risky, so you have to "diversify" correctly by investing in index funds in stocks, since they are much less risky and i think that they have an average of around 10% of rate of return or return of investment, so i think that you
can not get rich easily with it, since the Time to grow in the above calculator has to be set to around 40 years or so and this will permit you to have a "good" retirement, but it will not permit you to easily become rich, and i think that the Bond
that is a fixed-income instrument that represents a loan made by an investor to a borrower (typically corporate or governmental) is not better in rate of return or return of investment than index funds, so then this shows that it is not easy to get
generally rich for the people, and i mean "generally".



More of my philosophy about Type III civilization and the next glacial period and more of my thoughts..

Predicted changes in orbital forcing suggest that the next glacial period would begin at least 50,000 years from now. But i think since
it will take humanity 3,200 years to reach Type II civilization, and 5,800 years to reach Type III civilization, so i think that at Type III
civilization we will be able to solve the problematic of next glacial period and such problematics. But of course we have to know how to manage the exponential progress of our humanity, and i invite you to look at the following interesting video of
Michio Kaku ( Read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku ) about how we’ll be Gods in year 2100 because of the exponential progress of our humanity, and read about the exponential progress of our humanity in my below thoughts, so
here is the video of Michio Kaku and look at it carefully:

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10154204098338527

More of my philosophy about the pie is not fixed in capitalism and more of my thoughts..

And you are understanding from my below thoughts that
i have just said that in our today world we are pushed by capitalism and progress to compete against each other, so then you are noticing that even if there is no fixed pie in capitalism, since because of innovation and industrialization and such, this
make the economic output growing really fast and this permits capitalism to be not a zero-sum game, but you have to understand that this lower competition between people , but i say that there is for example still competition between humans on quality of
products and services in our today world of capitalism and progress.


More of my philosophy about Thomas Hobbes philosophy and about
the how to civilize humans and more of my thoughts..

So i invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Thomas Hobbes and his ideas:

https://www.thecollector.com/thomas-hobbes-lifes-work/


So i think that Thomas Hobbes was making a mistake, since he was not taking into account a variable that is the it’s important to remember that in the prehistoric era, the world was very sparsely populated and according to some estimates, around 15,000
years ago, the population of Europe was only 29,000, and the population of the whole world was less than half a million. So it’s likely there was an abundance of resources for hunter-gatherer groups, so it is why i think that when you look at for
example the normal distribution for the human trait of violence , you will notice that there is only 16.4% of genetically violent humans, and i think that it can also be explained by the fact that since in the prehistoric era there where abundance of
ressources for hunter-gatherer groups, so then i think it has affected the the natural selection process since they were not competing as we think. And of course, you might argue that if this is case, why do present day humans often behave so selfishly
and ruthlessly? Why are these negative traits so normal in many cultures? Perhaps though these traits should be seen as the result of environmental and psychological factors, since i think that in our today world we are pushed by capitalism and progress
to compete against each other.


And read the following thoughts so that to understand more:

"Traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness are natural to human beings. These were the traits that have been prevalent in human life for tens of thousands of years. So presumably these traits are still strong in us now. Of
course, you might argue that if this is case, why do present day humans often behave so selfishly and ruthlessly? Why are these negative traits so normal in many cultures? Perhaps though these traits should be seen as the result of environmental and
psychological factors."

Read more here:

https://theconversation.com/humans-arent-inherently-selfish-were-actually-hardwired-to-work-together-144145



More of my philosophy about violent revolution and more of my thoughts..




I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i invite you to look at the following video so that you understand something important:

Why I QUIT The RAT RACE & The “ American Dream “

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVKb52Fqrko


So i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, since i think that the brown guy in the above video is not
understanding philosophy, since first he has to define what is
personal responsability, so for example can we simply make responsable the governments of USA, so i think you can not do it this way, since rulers in the governments of USA can for example be genetically not so smart and genetically not so apt at being
wise, so you are understanding the difficulty, so then it is why it has to come with a "kind" of "tolerance", so then i think that a violent revolution is not appropriate in USA, but then i think that smart reforms are the way to go.


More of my philosophy about ethics and morality and about happiness and more of my thoughts..

So notice carefully my thoughts below, so i think it is smart,
since so that to model correctly i am using the english sentence below of: "Humans have the strong tendency to want to be happy" , so notice that it is smart, since it englobes the both the facts that it creates human acts that go against ethics and
morality and it also creates human acts that are in accordance with ethics and morality, since happiness is also the today and future happiness that create "responsability", since the future happiness is a constraint, and it can model success too, so
then i think it is smart, so then we have not to be naive as i am saying below, so reread carefully my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ,
so as you notice in my below thoughts that i am not defining the wanting to maximize at best happiness by being ethical as the wanting to be happiness, but i know that in philosophy happiness is defined by the ethical and by morality, and it is in the
ethical and in morality not an all absolute happiness, but you have to understand my views, so the ethical and morality is one thing, but i say that you have not to be naive since i say that humans have the strong tendency to wanting to be happy, so read
my following previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about happiness and more of my thoughts..

I think that, by logical analogy, the mechanism that creates the Mafia and such criminal organizations and that creates the street gangs look like the mechanism of how we become the what we call racism and how we become hate and discrimination between
humans, since i think that it comes from the fact that humans want to be happy, so then this wanting to be happy causes hate and it causes discrimination between humans and it causes the what we call racism and it causes corruption and it creates
criminal organizations and such.


More of my philosophy about discrimination and racism and more of my thoughts...

First you have to understand that science says that there is no human
races, but there is only one race that we call the human race, so i will say the what we call racism and discrimination come from the fact the humans have the strong tendency to be really selective, so they "want" to have high quality things and they
want to be with high quality humans and they want to eat the good things and they want to be rich , so i think that it is not that it is genetical in humans, but it is that humans want to be happy , so then they are really selective and it causes racism
and it causes discrimination.


More of my philosophy about the purpose and meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so
i invite you to read the following article from the Atlantic about the meaning of human life:

https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2021/10/meaning-life-macronutrients-purpose-search/620440/

So notice in the above article that it is saying that Positive Psychology says that human life has to have a Purpose and human life has to have a value, but i think that Positive psychology doesn't answer correctly, since i am explaining smartly in my
below philosophies that there is no meaning of human life, and notice how i am explaining it by also showing the how humans are measuring the meaning of human life by also how they are measuring the value of human life, and see how i am giving my way of
doing so that to transcend the problems caused by lack of meaning, and of course i am also saying that the value of human life today brought by pleasures of life plays the role of an opium of the people or drug, since there is still no meaning of human
life, and of course i am giving in my philosophies the way to smartly transcend this problems of lack of meaning by for example saying that we have to focus much more on the exponential progress of our humanity that will soon make us powerful Gods, and
this way of thinking about this exponential progress of our humanity makes us being hope and makes us being a positive energy and a positive spirit and makes us being patience, but of course you have to know how to manage correctly this exponential
progress of our humanity.


And i think i am a philosopher and so that to know how i am proving that human life has no meaning, read my thoughts of my philosophies in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/PN44Q1m4e8g


And here is how i am proving in the above web link that there is no meaning of human life:

More of my philosophy about nihilism and about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored "above" 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, and i think i am a philosopher, so now i will invite you to look carefully at the following video:

Life Has Never Been Easier: So Why Is Everyone Depressed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ-zyVHYxyw


So i am quickly discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in
the above video, and the patterns are the following:

So notice that the above video is saying that life has never been easier so why everyone is depressed, but i think that i am a philosopher and i say that the above video is making a big mistake and it is that he is comparing our human life with the old
human life and it is a mistake , since by logical analogy i can for example say: What is it that we call a genetically smart human a genetically smart human ? so as you notice that the calling a genetically smart human is a relative way of measuring
against the normal distribution of the genetical smartness, but is it the right answer if we measure like absolutely ? so i think that now you are noticing the big mistake, since humans are not measuring relatively the meaning of human life, but since in
our today world there are many medias and there is democratization of medias and democratization of knowledge and information, so then humans are much more conscious about there human conditions than humans in the old world or in the past, and it is why
they are becoming nihilistic, since they are like measuring absolutely and saying that humans are so weak when they look at all those constraints of human life and the constraints of our universe, so they say that human life is really bad, so then it is
like a kind of nihilism, so the being nihilistic is to flirt with despair and the sentiment that life is not worth living, and of course notice that nihilism is also the sentiment that life is not worth living, so i am a philosopher and i say that a kind
of nihilism can be the also believing that human life is not worth living without the negative emotions that comes with it and even if you live it in a kind of way , and of course i say that in nihilism, the flirting with despair can be not the negative
emotions that comes with it, and of course this kind of nihilism makes humans really impatient and it creates a kind of disorder and it creates violence, and it is why this kind of nihilism is bad, and of course as you notice that i am defining nihilism
as the following so that to construct a meaning of human life or life:

I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about nihilism so that to understand:

https://academyofideas.com/2022/11/nietzsche-and-nihilism-a-warning-to-the-west/

So notice carefully in the above article that it defines nihilism as
the following:


"Nihilism is the conviction that there is no meaning to life, that the world is inhospitable to our highest hopes and values, and that there are no gods or higher purposes to justify our suffering. To be a nihilist is to flirt with despair and the
sentiment that life is not worth living."

So then i can say that in philosophy you have to make a difference between the problematics of the lack of the meaning of human life and of that of the becoming rich by for example the way of the engine of egoism as has said it the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, since i am a philosopher that says that you can become rich as a country, but the lack of meaning of human life can make the "way" or the "path" of the becoming rich of the country not good, since
the lack of meaning of human life makes humans really impatient and it creates a kind of disorder and it creates violence, and it is the deficiency of the philosophy of absurdism of the french philosopher Albert Camus, since Albert Camus says in his
absurdism philosophy that there is a lack of meaning of human life, but he doesn't give us the "right" way to give a meaning to human life and he doesn't talk correctly about the problematics that are caused by the lack of meaning of human life.

More of my philosophy about the too much violence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ, so i will ask the following philosophical question:


And as you have just understood from the below interesting article,
that traits such as cooperation, egalitarianism, altruism and peacefulness are "natural" to human beings. so now i will ask a philosophical question of:

And what about the too much violence of this or that human or group of humans ?

So i think that the too much violence of the this or that human or a group of humans has to be seen as a negative factor that goes against

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)