[continued from previous message]

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the
start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


More of my philosophy about pedagogy and more..

As you have noticed i have not talked about how to learn Higher-Order
Thinking skills such as Metacognition or thinking about thinking..
since i think that my pedagogy has an important characteristic
and it is that it has to learn like by examples, and in my pedagogy
the examples must be learning especially by the way of smart
abstractions, and i am talking about it in my thoughts below, so is my
pedagogy a top-down methodology and bottom-up methodology ? no,
since my pedagogy wants to give the certain level of quantity of
learning by smart abstractions that will become the backbone that will
permits the students to go much faster in sophistication of learning,
and of course i am confident about my pedagogy and i will talk
about it in much more details in an HTML book that i will write
soon.

More of my philosophy about morality and more..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have also just
invented a proverb that abstract morality, and i invite you to
read it again, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that you understand more my logical proof of what is morality and
why it is universal:

And here is my other new proverb:

Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or
process of perfecting"

Read here:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection


This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my
explanation of my new proverb.


Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:


My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained
to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in
morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware
of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or
encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.


Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


So here is my new proverb:


"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"


So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think
it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on
the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the
pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty
perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you
have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this
part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It
is what makes it a smart proverb.

More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..

I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:

So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.

More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:

So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.

More of my philosophy of why the way of smart abstractions or
the language of smart abstractions is a powerful way..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, so i invite you to notice how i am talking the
language of smart abstractions again by talking quickly
about timesharing and coroutines in the following link,
so you will notice how i am quickly smartly abstracting
the subject so that to be efficient, read it again carefully
and notice how i am able to talk quickly the language of smart
abstractions:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY

And i invite you to notice again how i have quickly written
my thoughts of my philosophy and notice how i am inventing my thoughts
of my philosophy and how i am smartly abstracting quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA

So as you notice it is the proof that i am talking the language
of smart abstractions..

More of my philosophy about the language of smart abstractions..

I think i am smart, and my way of talking is different, since if you
notice my way of talking here is that i am talking by using smart
abstractions, i give you an example so that you notice it:

So look at my following proverbs that i have invented quickly,
so you will notice that those proverbs of mine are smart abstractions
that i have invented quickly, so i am like talking the language of smart abstractions, so read them carefully here in the following link so that
you notice my way of doing:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


More of my philosophy about responsability and about Oprah Winfrey..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to look at the following video of Oprah Winfrey:

Why I never got married: Oprah confesses

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Y3DqRjqGoU


So i think i am smart, and i am quickly noticing in the above video
that Oprah Winfrey is behaving by logical analogy like a tribalist
since she is speaking about marriage with extremism by saying that
she is her own women that doesn't conform well since she wants to be
free, but i think she is not smart, since she has to understand
philosophy, that there is an important thing in Democracy and in society
and it is also that we have to know how to make the a society grow
"nicely" and "balanced" by using standards like in Evolutionary Design methodology, and i am speaking about it below in my philosophy, also we
have to know how to be compromise so that to be the right responsability
and i have just abstracted it by inventing some new proverbs about
it,and here they are:

Here is the first one:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."


And here is the second one:

"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the
strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you
are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to
marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to
think systemically about order"

And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ag_ziCVV0VA


More philosophy about how to avoid tribalism and how to avoid extremism
that hurts..

I think i am smart, and i will say that so that to avoid tribalism
and extremism that hurts, you have also to know how to be the "positive" energy, since the positive energy is also good for productivity and
quality, here is more logical proof of it, read the following news so
that to notice it:

What impact is a developer's dissatisfaction likely to have on their productivity?

Reality, supported by scientific studies , shows that a worker is more productive when he is happy in the workplace.

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://emploi-developpez-com.translate.goog/actu/328717/Quel-impact-le-mecontentement-d-un-developpeur-est-il-susceptible-d-avoir-sur-sa-productivite-Perte-de-motivation-Manque-de-concentration-Non-respect-des-delais-Partagez-votre-experience/?_x_tr_sl=
auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui

And here is one of my proverbs about the positive energy:

"A beautiful song of Love or a beautiful poem of Love
is like a positive spirit of positive energy that gives a soul to a body
or that gives life to the dead man."

More of my philosophy about the Post Graduate Program on lean Six Sigma
and more..

I think i am really smart and i invite you to read carefully the
following webpage of Alan Robinson Professor of Operations Management at University of Massachusetts and that is a full-time professor at the
Isenberg School of Management of UMass and a consultant and book author specializing in managing ideas (idea-generation and idea-driven
organization) and building high-performance organizations, creativity, innovation, quality, and lean management:

https://www.simplilearn.com/pgp-lean-six-sigma-certification-training-course?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_content=11174393172-108220153863-506962883161&utm_device=c&utm_campaign=Display-MQL-DigitalOperationsCluster-PG-QM-CLSS-UMass-
YTVideoInstreamCustomIntent-US-Main-AllDevice-adgroup-QM-Desktop-CI&gclid=Cj0KCQiA3rKQBhCNARIsACUEW_ZGLHcUP2htLdQo46zP6Eo2-vX0MQYvc-o6GQP55638Up4tex85RBEaArn9EALw_wcB


And notice in the above webpage of the professor, that he is giving Post Graduate Program in Lean Six Sigma and on agile methodology, and i think
that this Post Graduate Program is easy for me since i am really smart
and i can easily understand lean Six Sigma or Six Sigma and i can easily understand agile methodology, and notice that i am in my below thoughts
also explaining much more smartly what is agile methodology, and i think
that the more difficult part of Six Sigma or lean Six Sigma is to
understand the central limit theorem and to understand what is
SPC(Statistical quality control) and how to use the control charts so
that to control the variability of the defects, and notice that i am
talking about it in my below thoughts, but i think that the rest of lean
Six Sigma and Six Sigma is easy for me.

More of my philosophy about Six Sigma and more..

I think i am really smart, and now i will talk more about Six Sigma
since i have just talked about SPC(Statistical quality control), so
you have to know that Six Sigma needs to fulfill the following steps:

1- Define the project goals and customer (external and internal)
deliverables.

2- Control future performance so improved process doesn't degrade.

3- Measure the process so that to determine current performance and
quantify the problem.

4- Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the defects.

5- Improve the process by eliminating the defects.


And you have to know that those steps are also important steps toward
attaining ISO 9000 certification, and notice that you can use
SPC(Statistical process control) and the control charts on step [4] and
step [5] above.

Other than that i have just read the following interesting important
paper about SPC(Statistical process control) that explains all the
process of SPC(Statistical process control), so i invite you to read it carefully:

https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf

So as you notice in the above paper that the central limit theorem
in mathematics is so important, but notice carefully that the necessary
and important condition so that the central limit theorem works is that
you have to use independent and random variables, and notice in the
above paper that you have to do two things and it's that you have to
reduce or eliminate the defects and you have to control the
"variability" of the defects, and this is why the paper is talking about
how to construct a control chart. Other than that the central limit
theorem is not only related to SPC(Statistical process control), but it
is also related to PERT and my PERT++ software project below, and notice
that in my software project below that is called PERT++, i have provided
you with two ways of how to estimate the critical path, first, by the
way of CPM(Critical Path Method) that shows all the arcs of the estimate
of the critical path, and the second way is by the way of the central
limit theorem by using the inverse normal distribution function, and you
have to provide my software project that is called PERT++ with three
types of estimates that are the following:

Optimistic time - generally the shortest time in which the activity
can be completed. It is common practice to specify optimistic times
to be three standard deviations from the mean so that there is
approximately a 1% chance that the activity will be completed within
the optimistic time.

Most likely time - the completion time having the highest
probability. Note that this time is different from the expected time.

Pessimistic time - the longest time that an activity might require.
Three standard deviations from the mean is commonly used for the
pessimistic time.


And you can download my PERT++ from reading my following below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the central limit theorem and about my
PERT++ and more..

The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the
mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly
normal, if the sample size is large enough.

How large is "large enough"?

In practice, some statisticians say that a sample size of 30 is large
enough when the population distribution is roughly bell-shaped. Others recommend a sample size of at least 40. But if the original population
is distinctly not normal (e.g., is badly skewed, has multiple peaks,
and/or has outliers), researchers like the sample size to be even
larger. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about my software
project that is called PERT++, and notice that the PERT networks are
referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks"
(PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent
random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have
finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.

And as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is also so important
for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)):

An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC)

https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx

Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs
are independent random variables with known probability distribution
functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit
theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.

So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal

---


So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions:


function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single;

function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single;

function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended;

For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of
completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard
deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval
or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval.

For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to
Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and
you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal,
and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution.


So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks
are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks"
(PAN) b