Hello,



More of my philosophy about what is racism and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am really smart, so what do i think about racism ?

I think racism today is like the being not able to think correctly and
to talk correctly and to manage your life correctly, so when you are in
this state you will be disliked by people(and it is the basis of
racism), so i think racism is mainly about the how you have to be much
more useful so that to not be disliked, so you have to show your
personality to people like i am doing it, so as you notice eventhough i
am thinking and writing to you very quickly , i am able to be a kind of sophistication. And it also is why i have quickly invented my following
new poem so that to show my kind of personality:

--

You want me to talk to you Love near this beautiful river
Since as you notice my beautiful Love is not of the bitter
You want me to talk to you Love near this beautiful river
Since am i not a beautiful white arab and not an impostor ?
And am i not wanting to be the much stronger and not a so rich banker ?
Since as you notice that i am not the islamist terrorist bomber
But i am like your beautiful chauffeur and your so beautiful summer
You want me to talk to you Love near this beautiful river
So, does being morality comes from the thinking that is much deeper and
much broader ?
So i will ask if the beautiful charm is much less important than a
chancellor ?
Since does not the beautiful charm makes you rich and much cuter ?
And does not the very simple idea of believing enough in God makes the
decent brother ?
You want me to talk Love to you near this beautiful river
So as you notice that this poem of mine is not being a complete failure
!
Since my being much more useful is like the being beautiful charm that
brings the good and the so many customers
This is why you want me to talk to you Love near this beautiful river

--



More of my philosophy about the inferior human animal instincts and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that human sex is also an inferior
animal instinct that has to be controlled correctly, and it is by
logical analogy like how we have much more reduced the risk of being in
a state of war by becoming Democracy, also it is by logical analogy like
the essence of a supranational organization such as European union or
IMF or the world Bank that is to put the right mechanisms that make us
the disciplined and the responsable way of governing, so if you are
smart you will make the logical analogy of that of the being the too individualistic way of doing is like being an inferior animal instinct
that has to be transcended by being the prioritizing of the collective intelligence that i am talking about below.

More of my philosophy about sex and more..

So what is the problem with sex ?

I think i am really smart and i am noticing that it is like the
following smart arabic proverb:

"Al 3ilmo fi al raa'sii la' fi al korraassi"

And its translation in english means:

"The knowledge must be in the brain not in the books."

So i say that this smart arabic proverb was not understood correctly,
and i will make you understand it correctly, and i think the this arabic proverb simply means that you have to "prioritize" as i am
prioritizing in my below thoughts, so it means that the knowledge
has not just to stay in the books, so it gives much more priority
to putting the knowledge in the brain, so do you see the pattern
with your fluid intelligence ? So the problem that i am noticing is in
form of a pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence, and
the pattern is that we are not knowing how to prioritize, and more
precisely it means that you can individually think stupidly that you
have to be more viril and "violent" in sex so that to make the good
orgasm by falsely thinking that the good orgasm is necessary for women,
but this stupid violent act is becoming a big problem since we are
noticing that it is making the society much more violent and much less civilized and i think that it is hurting badly the society.


More of my philosophy of what are the best genetical characteristics and
more..



I think i am really smart, so i will ask the important question of:


Is collective intelligence much important than individual intelligence ?


So the problem is how to prioritize, so do we have to prioritize the
group or the individual, so i think i have to discover the pattern with
my fluid intelligence and it is that it looks the same at how you have
to define "utilitarianism", so you will notice that in utilitarianism
you have to maximize at best happiness , but happiness is not just
happiness of our today , but it is happiness of our future, so since
we have also to be happiness in our future, so then it is inherent to
the definition of utilitarianism that we have to be responsability,
so since we have to be responsability , since we have like to
standardize with rules and laws so that to make the responsability,
so i think that it gives more priority to the group than to the
individual, so then we can logically infer that collective intelligence
is more important than individual intelligence , so then i will ask a
very important question that is related to utilitarianism and it is the following

What are the best genetical characteristics ?

So i will say that there is also genetical characteristics of an
ethnical group like of the fact that an ethnical group is less violent
than others and it makes it more civilized, so you are noticing the
pattern that smartness is inherent to the problem, but being less
violent as group that makes the group more civilized is so important,
and we can also approximate and says that we can be more tolerance with
an individual or an ethnical group that are genetically more apt at
being more precision and being the less violent that makes them more
civilized even if they are less smart.

More of my philosophy about what is the usefulness of being of an
ethnical group and more..

I think i am really smart, so we can ask a philosophical question of:

What is the usefulness of being genetically of an ethnical group ?

So i will say to look for example at me, you will notice that i am
genetically more civilized, and this genetical characteristic of being
more civilized can be that you have a less violent character or the
like, so i think that it is what makes the usefulness of an ethnical
group, since an ethnical group can be genetically less violent or such
than other ethnical groups , so it can make it a more civilized ethnical
group.

More precision of my philosophy about the slavic russians and more..

I think i am smart and from the below web page of Genetic studies on the Russian slavic population, i think they are not a mixture with
asian genetics, but they are of a different ethnical group than
Ukranians, i mean that when you say that you are slavic , the slavic is
a set of different ethnical groups, so it is like there is no slavic population, and it is the same in China.


I invite to read the following web page about Genetic studies on the
Russian slavic population:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Russians


So i think i am smart and notice the pattern in the above web page that
it is saying the following:

"Russians are closest to Baltic people"

So notice the pattern that it is the saying of "closest", but i think it
means that Russians that are closest to Baltic people are a different
ethnical group, as Ukranians are of different ethnical group than
russians, so Europe is of different ethnical european groups and not of
one ethnical group.

More of my philosophy about ethnical groups inside a country..

I think i am smart, and i am noticing that even France is not
of only one ethnical group, i mean that the french that you call white
european french from France are also constituted of diverse ethnical
groups, Morocco and Algeria and other countries have also the same
problem, even white europeans of USA are of different ethnical groups,
and this has also created problems in Ukraine, and you can
read about it in my below thoughts.

More of my philosophy about the statistical data about Ukraine and more..

Here is more statistical data so that to understand the conflict between
Russia and Ukraine:


Outside the Crimea, Russians are the largest ethnic group in Donetsk
(48.2%) and Makiyivka (50.8%) in Donetsk Oblast, Ternivka (52.9%) in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Krasnodon (63.3%) and Sverdlovsk (58.7%) and Krasnodonskyi raion (51.7%) and Stanychno-Luhanskyi (61.1%) raion in
Luhansk Oblast, Reni (70.54%) and Izmail (43.7%) in Odessa oblast,
Putyvl Raion (51.6%) in Sumy Oblast.


So you have to view this war like also a war between ethnical groups
of russians and ukrainians inside Ukraine:


More of my philosophy about the separatists of Donetsk and Luhansk and
more..

I think i am smart , and i think that the main problem is the problem
of separatists of Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine, since i think
that some regions of Ukraine, like in Donetsk and Luhansk, are
50% or 40% russians and not ukrainians, and i think that they want to be separated from Ukraine, and i think that Ukraine was attacking
separatists of Donetsk and Luhansk, and those attacks have also hurt
badly the 50% or 40% russians that don't want to be ukrainians, this is
why president Putin has considered those attacks from Ukraine like
neo-nazis or nazis attacks. So i think that president Putin has first
invaded the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, and it was not so
problematic, but when he invaded all Ukraine, i think this
was a strategic mistake from president Putin. Also i am giving
more of my strategy below:

More of my philosophy about the strategy of USA and western countries
against Russia..


I think i am smart, and i think that the best strategy for USA and
western countries, is just to give arms to the Ukrainian army and to
continu the conflict inside Ukraine so that to show that Ukrainian
people are treated badly by the Russian government and so that to show
that Ukrainian people don't want Russia inside Ukraine, but USA and
western countries have not to hurt Russia with severe sanctions so that
to not get into a war with Russia.

More of my philosophy about the war between Russia and Ukraine..

I think i am smart and i am noticing that president Putin is
not good at strategy, since he has just not known how to play it smartly
in his conflict with Ukraine, i mean that the best strategy is
not to totally invade Ukraine and make a total war with Ukraine,
since i say that NATO can not hurt Russia even if Ukraine becomes
part of NATO, so president Putin is showing that
he is not good at strategy, so i think that president Putin
is not so smart, so USA and the western countries have to not
be so severe in how they punish Russia, since it can give bad
results, so they have to know how to tune correctly the sanctions
so that to not hurt a lot Russia so that to not get into
war with Russia and so that to show that president Putin is not good
at strategy and so that to show that he is not so smart.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)