• Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy of what are the best

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 1 19:53:34 2022
    Hello,




    Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy of what are the best genetical characteristics and more..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I think i am really smart, so i will ask the important question of:


    Is collective intelligence much important than individual intelligence ?


    So the problem is how to prioritize, so do we have to prioritize the
    group or the individual, so i think i have to discover the pattern with
    my fluid intelligence and it is that it looks the same at how you have
    to define "utilitarianism", so you will notice that in utilitarianism
    you have to maximize at best happiness , but happiness is not just
    happiness of our today , but it is happiness of our future, so since
    we have also to be happiness in our future, so then it is inherent to
    the definition of utilitarianism that we have to be responsability,
    so since we have to be responsability , since we have like to
    standardize with rules and laws so that to make the responsability,
    so i think that it gives more priority to the group than to the
    individual, so then we can logically infer that collective intelligence
    is more important than individual intelligence , so then i will ask a
    very important question that is related to utilitarianism and it is the following

    What are the best genetical characteristics ?

    So i will say that there is also genetical characteristics of an
    ethnical group like of the fact that an ethnical group is less violent
    than others and it makes it more civilized, so you are noticing the
    pattern that smartness is inherent to the problem, but being less
    violent as group that makes the group more civilized is so important,
    and we can also approximate and says that we can be more tolerance with individuals or an ethnical group that are genetically more apt at being
    more precision and being the less violent that makes them more civilized
    even if they are less smart.

    More of my philosophy about what is the usefulness of being of an
    ethnical group and more..

    I think i am really smart, so we can ask a philosophical question of:

    What is the usefulness of being genetically of an ethnical group ?

    So i will say to look for example at me, you will notice that i am
    genetically more civilized, and this genetical characteristic of being
    more civilized can be that you have a less violent character or the
    like, so i think that it is what makes the usefulness of an ethnical
    group, since an ethnical group can be genetically less violent or such
    than other ethnical groups , so it can make it a more civilized ethnical
    group.

    More precision of my philosophy about the slavic russians and more..

    I think i am smart and from the below web page of Genetic studies on the Russian slavic population, i think they are not a mixture with
    asian genetics, but they are of a different ethnical group than
    Ukranians, i mean that when you say that you are slavic , the slavic is
    a set of different ethnical groups, so it is like there is no slavic population, and it is the same in China.


    I invite to read the following web page about Genetic studies on the
    Russian slavic population:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Russians


    So i think i am smart and notice the pattern in the above web page that
    it is saying the following:

    "Russians are closest to Baltic people"

    So notice the pattern that it is the saying of "closest", but i think it
    means that Russians that are closest to Baltic people are a different
    ethnical group, as Ukranians are of different ethnical group than
    russians, so Europe is of different ethnical european groups and not of
    one ethnical group.

    More of my philosophy about ethnical groups inside a country..

    I think i am smart, and i am noticing that even France is not
    of only one ethnical group, i mean that the french that you call white
    european french from France are also constituted of diverse ethnical
    groups, Morocco and Algeria and other countries have also the same
    problem, even white europeans of USA are of different ethnical groups,
    and this has also created problems in Ukraine, and you can
    read about it in my below thoughts.

    More of my philosophy about the statistical data about Ukraine and more..

    Here is more statistical data so that to understand the conflict between
    Russia and Ukraine:


    Outside the Crimea, Russians are the largest ethnic group in Donetsk
    (48.2%) and Makiyivka (50.8%) in Donetsk Oblast, Ternivka (52.9%) in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Krasnodon (63.3%) and Sverdlovsk (58.7%) and Krasnodonskyi raion (51.7%) and Stanychno-Luhanskyi (61.1%) raion in
    Luhansk Oblast, Reni (70.54%) and Izmail (43.7%) in Odessa oblast,
    Putyvl Raion (51.6%) in Sumy Oblast.


    So you have to view this war like also a war between ethnical groups
    of russians and ukrainians inside Ukraine:


    More of my philosophy about the separatists of Donetsk and Luhansk and
    more..

    I think i am smart , and i think that the main problem is the problem
    of separatists of Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine, since i think
    that some regions of Ukraine, like in Donetsk and Luhansk, are
    50% or 40% russians and not ukrainians, and i think that they want to be separated from Ukraine, and i think that Ukraine was attacking
    separatists of Donetsk and Luhansk, and those attacks have also hurt
    badly the 50% or 40% russians that don't want to be ukrainians, this is
    why president Putin has considered those attacks from Ukraine like
    neo-nazis or nazis attacks. So i think that president Putin has first
    invaded the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, and it was not so
    problematic, but when he invaded all Ukraine, i think this
    was a strategic mistake from president Putin. Also i am giving
    more of my strategy below:

    More of my philosophy about the strategy of USA and western countries
    against Russia..


    I think i am smart, and i think that the best strategy for USA and
    western countries, is just to give arms to the Ukrainian army and to
    continu the conflict inside Ukraine so that to show that Ukrainian
    people are treated badly by the Russian government and so that to show
    that Ukrainian people don't want Russia inside Ukraine, but USA and
    western countries have not to hurt Russia with severe sanctions so that
    to not get into a war with Russia.

    More of my philosophy about the war between Russia and Ukraine..

    I think i am smart and i am noticing that president Putin is
    not good at strategy, since he has just not known how to play it smartly
    in his conflict with Ukraine, i mean that the best strategy is
    not to totally invade Ukraine and make a total war with Ukraine,
    since i say that NATO can not hurt Russia even if Ukraine becomes
    part of NATO, so president Putin is showing that
    he is not good at strategy, so i think that president Putin
    is not so smart, so USA and the western countries have to not
    be so severe in how they punish Russia, since it can give bad
    results, so they have to know how to tune correctly the sanctions
    so that to not hurt a lot Russia so that to not get into
    war with Russia and so that to show that president Putin is not good
    at strategy and so that to show that he is not so smart.



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)