Hello,
More of my philosophy about president Putin..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have just looked at all the following video
of the speech of president Putin about Ukraine
and about NATO etc.:
Discours de Poutine en entier non censuré et non coupé.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWe8YcjFxpY
And i think i am smart, and i have understood president
Putin, so i think that president Putin is a Russian nationalist
that is interpreting NATO(The North Atlantic Treaty Organization) as
a tool that wants to hurt Russia and attack Russia, but i think that it
is not truth, since NATO just wants to protect the freedom of Ukraine
and not to attack Russia and this freedom of Ukraine is interpreted by
NATO as being like the values of western countries that are:
1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government
Also president Putin wants to protect the Russians that lives
in Ukraine since he says that those Russians were attacked
by the government of Ukraine and by extremist groups in Ukraine,
also president Putin says that he doesn't want the be the decadent
morality of USA, and he is then refusing this kind of morality of
Liberalism, so he is like both a kind of conservatism and nationalism.
And here is more of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..
I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:
"Western Values" Explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA
I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:
I think that Western values are:
1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government
But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:
More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..
I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:
Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg
I will ask a philosophical question of:
Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?
So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
realistic and objective way of doing.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)