Hello,


More of my philosophy about how to construct a product or service and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am really smart, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can you construct a product or service and be successful in selling it ?

So it is a very interesting question, so i will answer it as follows:

So if i say:

2 + 2 = 4

So what kind of pattern are you discovering with your fluid intelligence
in the above equality ?

So i am smart and i am discovering quickly patterns with my fluid
intelligence in the above equality and they are the following:

The above equality is an abstraction with a higher precision, so it is
like a small language with wich you can communicate with others, and so
that to communicate with others you need a precise and smart language
that is also an abstraction of the reality, so you are noticing the
first pattern that i am discovering, that precision of the abstraction
,and the nuances that comes with it, is so important, so the very basis
of creativity needs also this kind of more efficient abstraction, since
you can also sell efficient abstractions of a subject, and an efficient abstraction can become a creativity that can be sold, and the other
pattern that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence in the above
equality is that this abstraction in a form of small language is
composed from a low level layer that are a set of primitive objects that construct the high level layer of the abstraction of the small language,
and it is the very basis of creativity that can be sold, since you have
to know how to construct high level layers from low level layers so that
to be efficiency of creativity that can be sold.

More of my philosophy of my way of solving problems and more..

I think i am smart, and my way of solving problems is that i can
solve problems by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence,
like discovering the patterns that explains the how to become rich,
and i have done it, and read about it below, but also my way to solving problems is also to smartly discover all the factors that causes a
problem, like for example knowing about all the factors that make the
tuition of private colleges or universities cost a lot, also my way of
solving problems is also to abstract efficiently and smartly an
interesting subject, so as you notice that there is not
only abstracting , but there is also abstracting smartly so that to be efficient, also my way of solving problems is that i can invent
architectural ideas that make the good creativity, and as you are
noticing i am also using my smartness so that to solve problems, so
as an example, notice carefully how i am inventing from the ground up
my following thoughts where i am explaining that free market is not
realistic since we have to take into account an important factor that is competitiveness and i am explaining the why we still need some form or
kind of protectionism, so as you notice by reading below my thoughts
that i am like inventing and inventing my thoughts of my philosophy:

More of my philosophy about the free market and the invisible hand and
more..

The economists say the following:

"Free markets are theoretically optimal, with supply and demand guided
by an invisible hand to allocate goods efficiently."

And about the invisible hand we have the following:

"Invisible hand, metaphor, introduced by the 18th-century Scottish
philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that characterizes the mechanisms
through which beneficial social and economic outcomes may arise from the accumulated self-interested actions of individuals, none of whom intends
to bring about such outcomes."

I think i am really a smart guy, and i am noticing that the free market
economy has some deficiencies, since i say that the self-interested
actions of individuals in the invisible hand are not guarantied to be "competitive" or efficiently "competitive", so then i say that
competitiveness is a problem in the free market, since i say that
eventhough the Market equilibrium that is to attain a well balance
between the supply and demand is realized, i think that the
transitioning or time to a transitioning to a competitive economy
remains the main problem, so it is why we are noticing that countries
are still using some kind of economic protectionism. And you can easily
notice it by looking at the following video of south Africa that also
shows that south Africa is still using some kind of economic
protectionism since it has not yet transitioned to a competitive
economy, so here is the video:

It’s time to move the needle on economic reform! - Dean Macpherson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9clKJ5is

Also here is my new architectural idea of my philosophy:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree


More of my precision about high cost of private colleges and
universities in USA and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So i think i am smart and i say that the problem of high cost of private colleges and universities in USA is due to the law of supply and demand
in economics, so it is the capitalistic way of doing, and it is also due
to the high cost of services offered by private colleges or universities
and it is also due to the fact that colleges in USA are offering too
much and a lot of services to students so that to "attract" students, so
it is the "capitalistic" way of doing, so a part of the students pay for
this or that service, but all the students have to pay for the workers
and the maintenance and such of those services even if they are not
paying and benefiting from those services, so i think it is also making
the college tuition in USA more expensive, and we have not to forget
that inflation too can make the tuition more expensive, and this is why
i have also just said the following:

I think i am smart and i think that the main problem of why
private colleges and universities of USA are so expensive is
that it is a product of the capitalism way of doing, so it is
the product of supply and demand, since as more people seek a private
colleges or universities degree, schools can charge more for tuition,
and when enrollment drops, private colleges or universities may raise
tuition to make up for financial shortfalls. Since there is a law of
economics that says the following:

"The law of supply and demand is an economic theory that explains how
supply and demand are related to each other and how that relationship
affects the price of goods and services. It's a fundamental economic
principle that when supply exceeds demand for a good or service, prices
fall. When demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise."

And notice that even MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is now
an independent, coeducational, "privately" endowed university organized
into five schools (architecture and planning; engineering; humanities,
arts, and social sciences; management; science).

More of my philosophy about the tuition of full price to attend MIT and
more..

I think i am smart, and i i invite you to read the following
about MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology):

"The full price to attend MIT for the 2019–2020 academic year is
$73,160. ⁠ This total costs includes $53,450 for tuition, $10,430 for housing, $5,960 for food costs, $2,160 for personal expenses, $820 for
books and supplies and $340 to cover the school's student life fee."

So i have just discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence,
and it is that since MIT is so expensive, i think that MIT is for the
highly smart people of 125 IQ or above, since i think if you are only
of 115 IQ or 120 IQ you will have some difficulties or problems to pay
the student loans that permit you to pay for the so expensive MIT. So i
think that the other US universities that looks like MIT, like Harvard
and Stanford, have the same requirement.

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that
is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he
attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a
bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be
the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly
discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is
trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can,
you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the
things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence
is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the
way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply
but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you
enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about
usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of
the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the
factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above
video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be
useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the
reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a
thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich
depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can
be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.


I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)