Hello,




More of my philosophy about the high cost of private colleges and
universities in USA and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart and i think that the main problem of why
private colleges and universities of USA are so expensive is
that it is a product of the capitalism way of doing, so it is
the product of supply and demand, since as more people seek a private
colleges or universities degree, schools can charge more for tuition,
and when enrollment drops, private colleges or universities may raise
tuition to make up for financial shortfalls. Since there is a law of
economics that says the following:

"The law of supply and demand is an economic theory that explains how
supply and demand are related to each other and how that relationship
affects the price of goods and services. It's a fundamental economic
principle that when supply exceeds demand for a good or service, prices
fall. When demand exceeds supply, prices tend to rise."

And notice that even MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is now
an independent, coeducational, "privately" endowed university organized
into five schools (architecture and planning; engineering; humanities,
arts, and social sciences; management; science).

More of my philosophy about the tuition of full price to attend MIT and
more..

I think i am smart, and i i invite you to read the following
about MIT(Massachusetts Institute of Technology):

"The full price to attend MIT for the 2019–2020 academic year is
$73,160. ⁠ This total costs includes $53,450 for tuition, $10,430 for housing, $5,960 for food costs, $2,160 for personal expenses, $820 for
books and supplies and $340 to cover the school's student life fee."

So i have just discovered another pattern with my fluid intelligence,
and it is that since MIT is so expensive, i think that MIT is for the
highly smart people of 125 IQ or above, since i think if you are only
of 115 IQ or 120 IQ you will have some difficulties or problems to pay
the student loans that permit you to pay for the so expensive MIT. So i
think that the other US universities that looks like MIT, like Harvard
and Stanford, have the same requirement.

More of my philosophy about another IQ test for the highly smart..

Here is another problem in form of an IQ test for the highly smart,
so look at the following video about the student loans in USA:

Student Loans: The Most Evil Business in the World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9QT5sj1lAk

And read the following of why is college tuition in the US so expensive?

https://www.gobankingrates.com/saving-money/education/why-is-college-tuition-in-us-so-expensive/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CIn%20general%2C%20rising%20costs%20of,resource%20platform%20called%20Access%20Scholarships.


So i think that the problem above is like an IQ test for the highly
smart, since i think that the pattern that i am discovering with my
fluid intelligence is that colleges in USA are offering too much and a
lot of services to students so that to "attract" students, so it is the "capitalistic" way of doing, so a part of the students pay for those
services, but all the students have to pay for the workers and the
maintenance and such of those services even if they are not paying and benefiting from those services, so i think it is making the college
tuition in USA too much expensive, so i think it is the main problem of
why college tuition in the US so expensive, and it has created the
student Loans problem in USA.

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that
is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he
attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a
bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be
the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly
discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is
trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can,
you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the
things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence
is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the
way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply
but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you
enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about
usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of
the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the
factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above
video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be
useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the
reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a
thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich
depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can
be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.


I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)