Hello,


More of my philosophy about the stupid and the smart and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

So i invite you to look at the following video of Bob Marley talking
and you will quickly notice the what i am explaining to you below:

BOB MARLEY about God and human beings. 1977, Munich. Exodus tour.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzytFxpuxsc


So notice carefully how Bob Marley in the above video is speaking
a low level standard of english, and he is showing that he is not well educated, so i think he is not smart, so this is why i am explaining
to you that there is around 35% or 40% of the people of a country that
can not adapt correctly and become responsable citizens since they not
enough smart. Read my following thoughts so that to understand more:

More of my philosophy about the state and the private sector and more..

I think i am really a smart guy, and i say that there is still some deficiencies even in western countries, take for example education,
you can naively say that it is the education system that has to make
the responsable citizen, but i think that around 35% or 40% of people of
a country are not able to become responsable citizens by just the power
of the education system, since i think around 35% or 40% of people of a
country are not able to adapt correctly since they are also not enough genetically smart, and the level of education that they have by using
the education system is not enough to make them responsable citizens, so
i think that it is still a deficiency in western countries, so then we
have to be careful about this proportion of people that are also not
enough smart, since how can we be confident of there being educated and "influenced" a lot by the low level standards of show business and
movies of hollywood and such or by porno sex and such low level of
standards ?

More of my philosophy about the competitive economy and the some form of protectionism and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, so as i am explaining below
that we can have some form of protectionism, but we can not hide
the fact the a government is not managing correctly economy,
so by logical analogy i will give you a smart example: So notice in
the following how i am talking about the communist party of China
and about the governance in China, and you will notice
that China governance is using some tactics so that to control the money
of the Chinese people, so the Chinese communist system wants people to
invest there money in China and they are like forcing there people to do
it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really
archaic way of doing, so by logical analogy i am against this way of
doing to like fully or greatly control the money of people of China in
this kind of way, since i say that it has to be like by logical analogy
of the "some" form of protectionism and not fully protectionism , so
read my following thoughts about China so that to understand how the
Chinese system is an archaic system:

More of my philosophy about the inferior and archaic model of China and
more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the
following interesting french video about China, so i invite
you to look at it:

VERS LA FIN DU MIRACLE ÉCONOMIQUE CHINOIS ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoeHklrwq3U


So i think from my looking at the above video that China is
really an inferior and archaic model and inferior and archaic economic
model, for example China is controlling the money of the Chinese people,
so the Chinese communist system wants people to invest there money in
China and they are like forcing there people to do it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really archaic way of doing,
so this has also caused a debt problem and it is also causing an
economic bubble in the real estate sector of China that is too big and
it is causing a big economic problem and it is hurting a lot the
economic growth of China, other than that China is a lot deficient at encouraging innovation in the private sector and it is also an inferior
and archaic way of doing, and read my following writing about what China
is doing outside its territory in Africa and the like so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about China and Africa and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that China is creating a problem
in Africa, and it is that China is creating a problem of too much debt
in Africa, but its investments on projects in Africa have poor economic returns, so they are not so efficient, so i think it is not good,
so i invite you to look at the following video to understand it:

Is CHINA using DEBT to CONTROL Africa? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDInEHUwn5k

Also we have to fear the too much corruption of the Chinese communist
system , so i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U


More of my philosophy about the free market and the invisible hand and
more..

The economists say the following:

"Free markets are theoretically optimal, with supply and demand guided
by an invisible hand to allocate goods efficiently."

And about the invisible hand we have the following:

"Invisible hand, metaphor, introduced by the 18th-century Scottish
philosopher and economist Adam Smith, that characterizes the mechanisms
through which beneficial social and economic outcomes may arise from the accumulated self-interested actions of individuals, none of whom intends
to bring about such outcomes."

I think i am really a smart guy, and i am noticing that the free market
economy has some deficiencies, since i say that the self-interested
actions of individuals in the invisible hand are not guarantied to be "competitive" or efficiently "competitive", so then i say that
competitiveness is a problem in the free market, since i say that
eventhough the Market equilibrium that is to attain a well balance
between the supply and demand is realized, i think that the
transitioning or time to a transitioning to a competitive economy
remains the main problem, so it is why we are noticing that countries
are still using some kind of economic protectionism. And you can easily
notice it by looking at the following video of south Africa that also
shows that south Africa is still using some kind of economic
protectionism since it has not yet transitioned to a competitive
economy, so here is the video:

It’s time to move the needle on economic reform! - Dean Macpherson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9clKJ5is

Also here is my new architectural idea of my philosophy:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree


More precision of my new proverb..

Read again my new proverb , i have just added more precision to it so
that to make it clear:

I am like a wise man that is optimistic since read my following new
proverb so that to understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"When a wise man looks at a chaotic or disorganized society,
he is not pessimistic, but he is optimistic, since he knows how to make
from this chaotic or disorganized society the well organized society,
since the wise man is by logical analogy like the person that knows how
to prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one
that knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized
global world from the people and he is energetic and proactive since it
is the his job to well organize a society !"

More of my philosophy about adaptation and about economy..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i think that the model of supply
and demand is too much abstraction, since i think that we can buy
a product or service because it costs less or/and because it interests
you, but we have to be much more wise and notice that this "interests
you" is too much abstraction, since the "interests you" can become that
you have also to know how to "encourage" the "supply" by being a kind of responsability so that to be a the good business and the good economy,
and i have also abstracted this behavior in a form of a proverb that i
have invented quickly so that you understand it more clearly, and here
it is:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

More of my philosophy about the dynamism of economy and about the right flexibility and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i think that so that
the business or economy be successful, it has to have some kind of "flexibility", since i think when you show too much hate and
agressivity, it is counter-productive for business and economy, this is
why i think there is the model of demand and the supply, but both the
supply and demand have to have some kind of flexibility, since when you
are too much demanding, it is not good for business , like in France
they are too much intellectually demanding and it is like an agressive behavior, so it is not good for business and economy, so hope you are
seeing the pattern and then that you follow this advice of mine.

More of my philosophy about the big business and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i think that the big business is
something so interesting, so what can i do so that to construct many big businesses that are successful, so i think i have just showed you how i
am doing it with my scalable algorithms and algorithms that i have
invented and with my powerful software tools that i have invented, but
i think i can construct another big business with my poems of Love and
my my poems and with my proverbs and with my political commitment etc.
so i think that it has to be like a "mixture" of "many" things, i mean
that i have to write a digital book or books about my philosophy and
political commitment and about my poems of Love and poems and about my
proverbs and about my personality etc. so of course i have to show that
i am a really capable guy.

More of my philosophy about the USA music industry and show business
industry and more..

I think i am a really smart guy, and i am discovering patterns with my
fluid intelligence, and the new pattern that i have just discovered is
that a poem or music or song or an artist can have a story , and i think
it is a big "business" too, since i think that an artist has to write a
small book or the like or to talk in a video about the story of his
musics or his poems or his songs or his life, but not only that but
people needs a kind of sincerity and positive spirit or positive energy
or a good political commitment that make people have hope in the artist
and in human life, so i think that the poems or songs or musics have to
have a positive energy like my poems of Love or a good political
commitment , so i think i will write a small book about my poems of Love
and poems and about the story of them and about my personality that is
writing the poems of Love and poems and i will do it with sincerity and
with a positive spirit and with a positive energy or with a good
political commitment.

So i invite you to read my following new poems of Love and poems that i
have just invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tXC8BVc0W7A

More of my philosophy about Barack Obama and about the Democrats and more..

I think i am smart and i have quickly noticed what has Barack Obama
wanted to do, and it is the following:

"Barack Obama has declared his position on many political issues through
his public comments and legislative records. The Obama Administration
stated that its general agenda was to "revive the economy, provide
affordable and accessible health care to all, strengthen our public
education and social security systems, define a clear path to energy independence and tackle climate change, end the War in Iraq responsibly
and finish our mission in Afghanistan, and work with our allies to
prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon."

But my political agenda is different than Barack Obama, since i am also
like a philosopher and like a wise type of person, so what i am doing
is proving and explaining in my philosophy that morality is "universal",
and i will talk about it more in my next posts, and i am showing my
political views on Western values, read them below, also i have given my architectural ideas, that are related to the philosopher and economist
Adam Smith, that also show that we have to know how to well balance
between competition and cooperation or collaboration so that to be
optimal, read my thoughts below about it, also i am showing my other
ideas of my philosophy so that you understand my political agenda,
also read below since i have just put the link to my new proverbs that i
have just invented quickly.

More of my philosophy about my thoughts of my philosophy and more..

I think i am smart, and you have to understand me more, i am "quickly"
thinking and writing and posting my thoughts of my philosophy and i will
extend them and make them much more efficient and i will organize them
in a digital book, so here are the most important parts of my thoughts
of my philosophy:

I invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy of how you
become self-confidence and how you become this positive energy and
positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

You can read more of my thoughts about my new philosophy in the
following so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

And here are my new proverbs that i have just invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LjeVQZFhK3E


More of my philosophy about the model of supply and demand and about
free market and more..


Why do economists place such great confidence in competitive
free markets? Because the interaction of supply and demand
leads to an outcome in which every unit of output that’s
produced satisfies two excellent conditions:

1- It’s produced at the minimum cost possible, meaning
that there’s no waste or inefficiency.

2- Its benefits are always at least as big as its costs.
That is, competitive free markets produce only output
that makes the world better off or at least no worse off.

And of course you have to manage free market with Antitrust laws,
and here is my thoughts about it:

And here is my other important proverb:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition. Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:


Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

More of my philosophy about economy and the tax cuts and tax multiplier
and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


The tax multiplier is the magnification effect of a change in taxes on aggregate demand. The decrease in taxes has a similar effect on income
and consumption as an increase in government spending. However, the tax multiplier is smaller than the spending multiplier.

And there is greater agreement about tax multipliers. Because tax cuts strengthen the incentive to work and to invest, they increase aggregate
supply as well as aggregate demand. These multipliers get bigger as more
time elapses. Harald Uhlig says that after one year, the tax multiplier
is 0.5 so that the $300 billion tax cut would increase real GDP by about
$150 billion by early 2010. But with two years of time to respond, real
GDP would be $600 billion higher — a multiplier of 2. And after three
years, the tax multiplier builds up to more than 6. The implications of
the work of Barro and Uhlig are that tax cuts are a powerful way to
stimulate real GDP and employment but spending increases are not
effective. And notice that the tax cuts is part of a fiscal stimulus
that refers to increasing government consumption or transfers or
lowering taxes, increasing the rate of growth of public debt. Supporters
of Keynesian economics assume the stimulus will cause sufficient
economic growth to fill that gap partially or completely via the
multiplier effect.

More of my philosophy about to subsidize or not to subsidize companies..

I invite you to read the following interesting new article
about what Europe's $48 billion chips plan could do for quantum computing:

https://interestingengineering.com/europe-silicon-chips-funding-quantum-computing

I think i am smart, and i say that notice how the European Chips Act,
which still has to be approved by EU member states and lawmakers, would temporarily re-write strict rules that regulate when and how individual countries are allowed to subsidize industries within their borders, but
i say that notice carefully that this wanting of European Union to
subsidize Chips companies is due to chip shortage and supply chain
crisis that has injected instability into the global economy , so this
European Chips act is like the exception to the rule of subsidizing
companies, since European union is not going to sacrifice the advantages
of competition to do the same thing that others like China do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because European Union would sacrifice the idea
that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices.

And i invite you to read my thoughts about the other economic problems
of China:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

And here is my thoughts about capitalism:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc


More of my philosophy about democracy and corruption and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i think that corruption is not good
since by logical analogy it looks like favoritism or ideological
favoritism of communism of China of today, since i think that this kind
of favoritism or ideological favoritism of the communist party of China
hurt meritocracy, and it is like corruption too, also corruption hurts
quality and hurts Democracy, you can easily notice it in Italy where
they are really conscious about this big problem of corruption, i mean
that in italy they are and they have been a lot hurt by the mafia and by corruption and they know how it is so problematic. So i invite you to
look at the following video so that to understand how corruption is so problematic:

The World's Most Dangerous Drug Wars | News on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2YfG7NKvoU

More of my philosophy about corruption and Haiti and more..

I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
video about Haiti:

Did Drug Cartels Murder Haiti's President? | The War on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3BqXpcHok4&t=11s


I think that Haiti looks like Trinidad and such countries,
since i think that it's a too much "corrupt" system that is not
working properly, so as you are noticing that corruption is
an important subject that i am talking about, and notice
how i am talking about it by talking about the Chinese communist system
that is too much corrupt and that can much more easily be corrupted than Democracy.

More of my philosophy about corruption and the separation of power in
USA and more..


I think i am smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video so that you notice how corruption can hurt a lot the system:

Corruption, Cocaine and Murder in Trinidad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnpaaVB4XyA


So i say that we have to be smart, so how can we efficiently fight this corruption ? so i think that the China communist party type of system
is not good at fighting corruption, and read my below thoughts about it,
so this is why i think that the Separation of powers under the United
States Constitution is really important and good tool to fight
corruption, and you can read about it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution


And i think that the kind of "decentralization" of governance in USA is
a really important and good tool to fight corruption, so USA is not only Separation of powers under the United States Constitution and is not
only this kind of decentralization of governance, but it is also
Democracy , so by using the mechanisms of Democracy are really important
and good tools to fight corruption, not only that but the much more
successful economic dynamism of USA is also an important and good tool
to fight corruption,. and so that to understand my thoughts about
Democracy and more, i invite you to read all my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the inferior and archaic model of China and
more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the
following interesting french video about China, so i invite
you to look at it:

VERS LA FIN DU MIRACLE ÉCONOMIQUE CHINOIS ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoeHklrwq3U


So i think from my looking at the above video that China is
really an inferior and archaic model and inferior and archaic economic
model, for example China is controlling the money of the Chinese people,
so the Chinese communist system wants people to invest there money in
China and they are like forcing there people to do it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really archaic way of doing,
so this has also caused a debt problem and it is also causing an
economic bubble in the real estate sector of China that is too big and
it is causing a big economic problem and it is hurting a lot the
economic growth of China, other than that China is a lot deficient at encouraging innovation in the private sector and it is also an inferior
and archaic way of doing, and read my following writing about what China
is doing outside its territory in Africa and the like so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about China and Africa and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that China is creating a problem
in Africa, and it is that China is creating a problem of too much debt
in Africa, but its investments on projects in Africa have poor economic returns, so they are not so efficient, so i think it is not good,
so i invite you to look at the following video to understand it:

Is CHINA using DEBT to CONTROL Africa? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDInEHUwn5k

Also we have to fear the too much corruption of the Chinese communist
system , so i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..

I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
has to become Democracy.

And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)