Hello,


More of my philosophy about my thoughts of my philosophy and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and you have to understand me more, i am "quickly"
thinking and writing and posting my thoughts of my philosophy and i will
extend them and make them much more efficient and i will organize them
in a digital book, so here are the most important parts of my thoughts
of my philosophy:

I invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy of how you
become self-confidence and how you become this positive energy and
positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

You can read more of my thoughts about my new philosophy in the
following so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0


More of my philosophy about the model of supply and demand and about
free market and more..


Why do economists place such great confidence in competitive
free markets? Because the interaction of supply and demand
leads to an outcome in which every unit of output that’s
produced satisfies two excellent conditions:

1- It’s produced at the minimum cost possible, meaning
that there’s no waste or inefficiency.

2- Its benefits are always at least as big as its costs.
That is, competitive free markets produce only output
that makes the world better off or at least no worse off.

And of course you have to manage free market with Antitrust laws,
and here is my thoughts about it:

And here is my other important proverb:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition. Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:


Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

More of my philosophy about economy and the tax cuts and tax multiplier
and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


The tax multiplier is the magnification effect of a change in taxes on aggregate demand. The decrease in taxes has a similar effect on income
and consumption as an increase in government spending. However, the tax multiplier is smaller than the spending multiplier.

And there is greater agreement about tax multipliers. Because tax cuts strengthen the incentive to work and to invest, they increase aggregate
supply as well as aggregate demand. These multipliers get bigger as more
time elapses. Harald Uhlig says that after one year, the tax multiplier
is 0.5 so that the $300 billion tax cut would increase real GDP by about
$150 billion by early 2010. But with two years of time to respond, real
GDP would be $600 billion higher — a multiplier of 2. And after three
years, the tax multiplier builds up to more than 6. The implications of
the work of Barro and Uhlig are that tax cuts are a powerful way to
stimulate real GDP and employment but spending increases are not
effective. And notice that the tax cuts is part of a fiscal stimulus
that refers to increasing government consumption or transfers or
lowering taxes, increasing the rate of growth of public debt. Supporters
of Keynesian economics assume the stimulus will cause sufficient
economic growth to fill that gap partially or completely via the
multiplier effect.

More of my philosophy about to subsidize or not to subsidize companies..

I invite you to read the following interesting new article
about what Europe's $48 billion chips plan could do for quantum computing:

https://interestingengineering.com/europe-silicon-chips-funding-quantum-computing

I think i am smart, and i say that notice how the European Chips Act,
which still has to be approved by EU member states and lawmakers, would temporarily re-write strict rules that regulate when and how individual countries are allowed to subsidize industries within their borders, but
i say that notice carefully that this wanting of European Union to
subsidize Chips companies is due to chip shortage and supply chain
crisis that has injected instability into the global economy , so this
European Chips act is like the exception to the rule of subsidizing
companies, since European union is not going to sacrifice the advantages
of competition to do the same thing that others like China do, namely to subsidize companies. No, because European Union would sacrifice the idea
that the market is there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices.

And i invite you to read my thoughts about the other economic problems
of China:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

And here is my thoughts about capitalism:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc


More of my philosophy about democracy and corruption and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am smart, and i think that corruption is not good
since by logical analogy it looks like favoritism or ideological
favoritism of communism of China of today, since i think that this kind
of favoritism or ideological favoritism of the communist party of China
hurt meritocracy, and it is like corruption too, also corruption hurts
quality and hurts Democracy, you can easily notice it in Italy where
they are really conscious about this big problem of corruption, i mean
that in italy they are and they have been a lot hurt by the mafia and by corruption and they know how it is so problematic. So i invite you to
look at the following video so that to understand how corruption is so problematic:

The World's Most Dangerous Drug Wars | News on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2YfG7NKvoU

More of my philosophy about corruption and Haiti and more..

I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
video about Haiti:

Did Drug Cartels Murder Haiti's President? | The War on Drugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3BqXpcHok4&t=11s


I think that Haiti looks like Trinidad and such countries,
since i think that it's a too much "corrupt" system that is not
working properly, so as you are noticing that corruption is
an important subject that i am talking about, and notice
how i am talking about it by talking about the Chinese communist system
that is too much corrupt and that can much more easily be corrupted than Democracy.

More of my philosophy about corruption and the separation of power in
USA and more..


I think i am smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video so that you notice how corruption can hurt a lot the system:

Corruption, Cocaine and Murder in Trinidad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnpaaVB4XyA


So i say that we have to be smart, so how can we efficiently fight this corruption ? so i think that the China communist party type of system
is not good at fighting corruption, and read my below thoughts about it,
so this is why i think that the Separation of powers under the United
States Constitution is really important and good tool to fight
corruption, and you can read about it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution


And i think that the kind of "decentralization" of governance in USA is
a really important and good tool to fight corruption, so USA is not only Separation of powers under the United States Constitution and is not
only this kind of decentralization of governance, but it is also
Democracy , so by using the mechanisms of Democracy are really important
and good tools to fight corruption, not only that but the much more
successful economic dynamism of USA is also an important and good tool
to fight corruption,. and so that to understand my thoughts about
Democracy and more, i invite you to read all my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the inferior and archaic model of China and
more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the
following interesting french video about China, so i invite
you to look at it:

VERS LA FIN DU MIRACLE ÉCONOMIQUE CHINOIS ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoeHklrwq3U


So i think from my looking at the above video that China is
really an inferior and archaic model and inferior and archaic economic
model, for example China is controlling the money of the Chinese people,
so the Chinese communist system wants people to invest there money in
China and they are like forcing there people to do it this way by using tactics, and i think it is an extremist and really archaic way of doing,
so this has also caused a debt problem and it is also causing an
economic bubble in the real estate sector of China that is too big and
it is causing a big economic problem and it is hurting a lot the
economic growth of China, other than that China is a lot deficient at encouraging innovation in the private sector and it is also an inferior
and archaic way of doing, and read my following writing about what China
is doing outside its territory in Africa and the like so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about China and Africa and more..

I think i am smart, and i think that China is creating a problem
in Africa, and it is that China is creating a problem of too much debt
in Africa, but its investments on projects in Africa have poor economic returns, so they are not so efficient, so i think it is not good,
so i invite you to look at the following video to understand it:

Is CHINA using DEBT to CONTROL Africa? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDInEHUwn5k

Also we have to fear the too much corruption of the Chinese communist
system , so i invite you to read my following thoughts about it:

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..

I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
has to become Democracy.

And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:

Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

More of my philosophy about USA and China and more..

And i invite you to look at the following video:

The New World of Xi Jinping I ARTE.tv Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeGZz6NGJXg


More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
since western countries are rich countries that have very low
corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
than comparable workers get in the private sector.

Read more here so that to understand:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
fights corruption and it is the following:

I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..

You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:

More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
country and more..

I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?

So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
torments of man"

So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
lacking Democracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

"A house divided can not stand"

But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
more..

I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
so here is how i am answering it smartly:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
"rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)