[continued from previous message]
anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
Now why to be Democracy ?
I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also
smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality
that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important
things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that
Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently
than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also
means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another
political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting
corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a
"competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc
More of my philosophy about the new architectural ideas of my philosophy
and more..
I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:
An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
"solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
, so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree
More of my philosophy about the most important thing that we call
capitalism and more..
I think i am really smart, and i say that the economist Adam Smith the
second father of classical Liberalism, was too much "idealistic",
since he has seen that the engine of egoism is the engine of the
properity and happiness of nations, but he has not seen the other
engine from the future empirical facts that makes properity and
happiness of nations optimal, this is my architectural idea, and you can
notice it by the fact that capitalism is not a closed system, since it
also needs creativity that not only comes from competition but also from
the free cooperation (or collaboration) like by the existing of free
data and information in internet that can enhance much more creativity,
and you can notice it by my saying the following about creativity:
I invite you to look at the following video of a white arab like me that
talks about what is creativity:
Comfort Kills Creativity | Samer Fouad | TEDxUofW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ8BN3o0bkE
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart, so i will answer now the
question of what is creativity:
I think creativity comes from divergent thinking , since when you
"collect" data and information in the divergent thinking process, you
can get the smart idea or the smart architectural idea that makes the creativity, and you can get after that in convergent thinking so that to
make it an even more mature creativity. And talking about convergent and divergent thinking, here is my thoughts about it:
More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..
I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola
Tesla, and you can read about him here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the
video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac
And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also
an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i
don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person like me(and i think
it is also genetical in me), since for example he is saying the
following saying in the above video:
"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"
So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all,
since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so
that to be efficient, and i also think that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above
saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you
understand my kind of personality:
More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..
I invite you to look at the following video:
5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4
I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called
"The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing
one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is
saying that doing many things at the same time is not good for
productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is
not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time
and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be
like convergent thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like
between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking,
and here is my new proverb about my methodology:
"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."
And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:
I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.
And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44
More of my philosophy about competition and cooperation and egoism and
more..
I think i am really "smart", and i will explain something really
important, it is about the being egoistic and the being greed,
so i can ask a very important philosophical question of:
Is saying in capitalism:
"Be greed !"
the same as saying:
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
Since USA has also based its capitalistic spirit on saying to the
capitalist americans to be greed, so is it the right way ?
So i think it is a complete misunderstanding of what said the economist
Adam Smith the second father of classical Liberalism, since i am
explaining below that Adam Smith has said the following:
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
But when you are smart like me you will understand that
Adam Smith has not said that egoism is the only engine, he has
only said that egoism is an "essential" engine, so i think that
the USA tendency to say to capitalist americans to be greed is complete misanderstanding of Adam Smith.
More of my philosophy about Adam Smith and about egoism and more..
I think i am smart, and i will explain something really important,
it is that the economist Adam Smith has said the following:
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations",
but it think it is not "so" true, since when for example the country is
a third world country, so egoism can become an engine that
"can" cause the brain-drain problem that hurts, for example read here so
that to notice it in Algeria:
Is the Algerian brain-drain really decreasing?
https://vivalalgerie.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/is-the-algerian-brain-drain-really-decreasing/
Also notice carefully that the economist Adam Smith has not said that it
is "just" human egoism that is the engine of the properity and happiness
of nations, since i think what Adam Smith means is that the engine of
egoism is "essential", but we can also require a kind of "balance"
between cooperation (or collaboration) and competition, so i invite you
to read my following thoughts about the philosopher and economist Adam
Smith the second father of classical liberalism:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo
More of my philosophy about brain-drain and more..
I think i am smart and as you have just noticed i have just talked about
the problems in Algeria, read it below, but you have to know that even
people of Algeria have to be "responsable" so that Algeria becomes a
better country, so i give you an example of lack of responsability of
higher education and scientific research in Algeria so that you
understand much more clearly the problems of African countries, so
read carefully the following article so that to notice it:
Is the Algerian brain-drain really decreasing?
https://vivalalgerie.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/is-the-algerian-brain-drain-really-decreasing/
More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
China and the West..
I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand
my views (and stay tuned since i will talk more about capitalism in my
next posts):
More of my philosophy about the study that reveals the Richest people
are never the most talented and more..
I have just said yesterday that capitalism is not yet fully
meritocratic, and so that to understand it, you can read my following
thoughts:
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
A 40-Year Scientific Study Reveals the Richest People Are Never the Most Talented (and Why That's a Really Good Thing)Yep: The smartest, most
talented people almost never reach the highest peaks of success.
Read more here:
https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/a-40-year-scientific-study-reveals-richest-people-are-never-most-talented-and-why-thats-a-really-good-thing.html
So as you have just noticed by reading the above interesting article
that a 40-Year scientific study reveals the Richest people are never the
most talented, but it says more precisely that intelligence, skill, and
hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, but the
most successful people are never the most talented, since an element of
luck is evolved, and this element of luck is mostly seizing a "lucky" opportunity, like being at the right place at the right time, meeting
the right person, reacting to an opportunity in the right way.
More of my philosophy about the wich reforms to have and more..
I am not for the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human
condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social
engineering, since i think this way of doing has not worked so
efficiently, but i am for introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, and as you
have noticed i am for the democratic, but for the meritocratic and the technocratic, and what i mean is that it has to be democracy, but with meritocracy and technocracy that makes like the evolutionary algorithm converges efficiently towards the global optimum, so you are
understanding my way that needs the being smart and being good
experience and the being the good education, and as you notice i am also
coming with more and more of my ideas of my philosophy and with my new monotheistic religion and with my new proverbs etc.
More of my philosophy about the far-left and about the PLO and about
Yasser Arafat..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am really smart, and i have just said that Yasser Arafat was
the far-left, and here is more logical proof of it, read carefully the following article that says:
"Among other things, the translated archival sources confirm
Chamberlin’s findings: for communist leaders in the Eastern Bloc, the
PLO was, indeed, a fellow standard-bearer of the socialist revolution,
fighting for the same cause. As a result of this affinity, the Romanian Communist Party duly provided Arafat with support and advice about
political, ideological, organizational, and diplomatic matters."
Read more here:
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/communists-and-terrorists-brothers-arms-or-allies-convenience
And also read the following on wikipedia, it says the following:
"Arafat aligned the PLO with the Communist and Nasserist Lebanese
National Movement (LNM)"
Read more here so that to notice:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasser_Arafat
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about Palestine and about was Yasser Arafat the
far-left or not..
As you have just noticed i just said, read below, that Yasser Arafat was
the far-left that was not liked by USA, and this is understandable since
he was the left that was using the mechanisms of the far-left such as
being this anti-imperialism that was much more violent, and this was counter-productive since this was bringing extremists in the other side
in the government of Isreal, and Yasser Arafat was not liked by USA
so this was not helping palestinians or this was causing a lot of
problems to Palestinians.
More of my philosophy about Israel and about Palestine and more..
I think i am smart, and i will say that when you have a high IQ like
mine you will know how to solve the problem between Israel and
Palestine, first you have not to talk about the consequences of
the problem, so you have to talk about the causes of the problem,
and the causes of the problem is for example that Yasser Arafat was not
liked by USA since he was part the extremist hard left or far-left as
was the Syrian government, and the hard left or the far-left was much
more violent, so it was causing extremism in the other side of Israel by bringing more violent extremists to government, it is like what is
happening today with the Israel government, since the Prime minister of
Israel today that is called Naftali Bennett is an extremist hard-liner
of the "far-right" of the politics, so he is much more violent like the far-left, so what has happened so that such an extremist premier
minister is governing today Israel? i think that it is like what was
happening in the time of Yasser Arafat, i mean that Yasser Arafat was
the far-left that was much more violent, and today there is the Islamist political party of Hamas that is an extremist political party that is
governing a part of Palestine, so then so that to solve the problem is
that Hamas must accept to not govern in the part of Palestine, and
Palestine must not be governed by extremists such as the far-left such
as Yasser Arafat, and Iran has not to help such Islamist political
parties such as Hamas so that we get rid of the extremists in the Israel government, and i think that after that we will easily solve the
problems between Israel and Palestine.
More of my philosophy about Algeria and Syria and such countries and more..
I invite you to look at the following video of an algerian journalist
that is taking refugee in France from his persecusion in Algeria by the algerian government, so look at him carefully in the following video:
Le régime algérien commence la nouvelle année 2022 avec une sévère condamnation des experts de l'ONU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrPfBd1UCbs
I think that France and Morocco and this above journalist are
not knowing how to handle or manage the problem with the dictatorship of
the Algerian government, since i think that causes of the problem that
causes dictatorship in Algeria is also the problem of the divide between Islamists and berbers or berberists and arabists that pushes the
government in Algeria at remaining a distatorship government, so it is
this divide of Islamists and berbers or berberists and arabists that is
causing the problem in Algeria, so when France or Morocco talks about
there problem with Algeria, they are not talking correctly since they
are talking about the "consequences" of the causes of the problem as is
doing it the journalist above, but i think that the problem that is the
main cause of dictatorship in Algeria is the problem of the divide such
as between berberists and islamists and arabists, so this is the main
problem that is causing the problem in Algeria, since the arabist
government of Algeria wants to be arabism since it doesn't want to be
the kind of division that is brought by berbers and berberists or
islamists, so it wants to be part of the much greater and much united
and powerful Arab world, and the arabists or arabs in Algeria are 75% of
the population and the berbers and berberists are 25% of the population
in Algeria.
More of my philosophy about division of Labor and about quality and
about productivity and about specialization and more..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have talked about division of Labor and about specialization, but
notice that when you become much older and you are not too specialized
and you accumulate much more deeper and much more general experience and knowledge and you become an architect or Chief Technology Officer or
such, it is also excellent, you can for example notice it by reading the following about Intel that is hiring and rehiring those types of
architects and veterans so that to be successful:
Shlomit Weiss returns to Intel as Head of Chip Development
Read more here:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.developpez.com%2Factu%2F316610%2FShlomit-Weiss-revient-chez-Intel-au-poste-de-responsable-du-developpement-des-puces-un-nom-de-plus-dans-la-liste-des-veterans-qu-Intel-
continue-de-reembaucher%2F
And about division of Labor and productivity, read my following thoughts:
So i will ask a philosophical question:
How to manage efficiently complexity ?
I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach
to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can
read more about the Division of labour here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour
Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road
rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for
harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using
higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming, and we can
also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can
also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality, and about productivity: I have also just posted about the following thoughts from
the following PhD computer scientist:
https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/
Read more here his thoughts about productivity:
https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/
And i think he is making a mistake:
Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input
But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human
smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel
productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it
can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).
And it looks like the following:
About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..
Gustafson’s Law:
• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size
Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:
• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law
Load balance is also a crucial factor.
So read my following thoughts about the Threadpool to notice that my
Threadpool that scales very well does Load balance well:
---
About the Threadpool..
I have just read the following:
Concurrency - Throttling Concurrency in the CLR 4.0 ThreadPool
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2010/september/concurrency-throttling-concurrency-in-the-clr-4-0-threadpool
But i think that both the methodologies from Microsoft of the Hill
Climbing and of the Control Theory using band pass filter or match
filter and discrete Fourier transform have a weakness, there weakness is
that they are "localized" optimization that maximize the throughput ,
so they are not fair, so i don't think i will implement them, so then
you can use my following invention of an efficient Threadpool engine
with priorities that scales very well (and you can use a second
Threadpool for IO etc.):
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well
And here is my other Threadpool engine with priorities:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/threadpool