• We all knew China was weak. How does the US Navy warship challenges Chi

    From Rusty Wyse@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 4 09:52:42 2022
    China - World Leader. ·
    Follow
    Answered by
    Michael Ciao

    Jan 21
    We all knew China was weak. How does the US Navy warship challenges Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea and get away with it?
    Originally Answered: We all knew Chain was weak. How do you explain the US Navy warship challenges Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea?
    To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.- Sun Tzu, Art of War

    It requires paradigm shift in thinking, how do you neutralize the biggest military power in the world? how do you disarm the biggest gun? how do you make the deadliest aircraft carrier impotent? how do you deal with a murderous bully?

    Trillions of dollars worth of weapons are useless against China. They cannot use them.

    1- Mutual economic interdependence.
    2- Powerful defense to hurt invaders badly.
    3- Avoid direct confrontation.
    4- Global diplomatic network of friendly countries.
    5- Denial of all land invasion access.
    6- Denial of all sea invasion access by missiles.

    As you can see, all the American ships in South China Sea are irrelevant and inconsequential.

    1.7K viewsView 53 upvotes
    Profile photo for Rusty Wyse

    Profile photo for L.K. Ee
    L.K. Ee
    · January 26
    It’s obvious the US is very strong militarily. You can’t spend more money than the next 10 strongest countries and still be weak. On the other hand, China is no pushover either. If the US can destroy China as it destroyed Iraq, China would be a
    broken and mangled country by now.

    The Chinese should go down on their knees to thank their leaders for saving them with their successful modernization of the PLA.

    Is it any wonder the Chinese are 100% satisfied with their government while those who wish them ill revile the Chinese government?

    Profile photo for Al Kohol
    Al Kohol
    · Sun
    Attack China? They don’t even dare to touch North Korea.

    Profile photo for Patrick Ching
    Patrick Ching
    · January 30
    While all the American ships in South China Sea are irrelevant and inconsequential to China, they are serving at least two very important purposes:

    1) to justify the extreme high military spending to serve their Military Industrial Complex (MIC) which is critical to the US econmy;

    2) to show to their voters that US is being very firm against China which has been established by their propaganda as an evil empire.

    For the same reason while lots of people see that US had wasted 20 years in Afghanistan, it had served their MIC really well and helped lots of the elites made tons of money.

    Profile photo for Robert Quek
    Robert Quek
    · Mon
    When you said that high military spending serves the MIC & is critical to the US economy, do you mean critical in the positive or negative sense? US may already have reached the point of military diarrhea, good for the MIC and bad for the economy. Bears
    watching. Fed has mothballed the printing machine and may go on reverse-QE.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kico@21:1/5 to Rusty Wyse on Wed Feb 23 01:50:25 2022
    On 5/2/2022 1:52 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
    China - World Leader. ·
    Follow
    Answered by
    Michael Ciao

    Jan 21
    We all knew China was weak. How does the US Navy warship challenges Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea and get away with it?
    Originally Answered: We all knew Chain was weak. How do you explain the US Navy warship challenges Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea?
    To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.- Sun Tzu, Art of War

    It requires paradigm shift in thinking, how do you neutralize the biggest military power in the world? how do you disarm the biggest gun? how do you make the deadliest aircraft carrier impotent? how do you deal with a murderous bully?

    Trillions of dollars worth of weapons are useless against China. They cannot use them.

    1- Mutual economic interdependence.
    2- Powerful defense to hurt invaders badly.
    3- Avoid direct confrontation.
    4- Global diplomatic network of friendly countries.
    5- Denial of all land invasion access.
    6- Denial of all sea invasion access by missiles.

    As you can see, all the American ships in South China Sea are irrelevant and inconsequential.

    1.7K viewsView 53 upvotes
    Profile photo for Rusty Wyse

    Profile photo for L.K. Ee
    L.K. Ee
    · January 26
    It’s obvious the US is very strong militarily. You can’t spend more money than the next 10 strongest countries and still be weak. On the other hand, China is no pushover either. If the US can destroy China as it destroyed Iraq, China would be a
    broken and mangled country by now.

    The Chinese should go down on their knees to thank their leaders for saving them with their successful modernization of the PLA.

    Is it any wonder the Chinese are 100% satisfied with their government while those who wish them ill revile the Chinese government?

    Profile photo for Al Kohol
    Al Kohol
    · Sun
    Attack China? They don’t even dare to touch North Korea.

    Profile photo for Patrick Ching
    Patrick Ching
    · January 30
    While all the American ships in South China Sea are irrelevant and inconsequential to China, they are serving at least two very important purposes:

    1) to justify the extreme high military spending to serve their Military Industrial Complex (MIC) which is critical to the US econmy;

    2) to show to their voters that US is being very firm against China which has been established by their propaganda as an evil empire.

    For the same reason while lots of people see that US had wasted 20 years in Afghanistan, it had served their MIC really well and helped lots of the elites made tons of money.

    Profile photo for Robert Quek
    Robert Quek
    · Mon
    When you said that high military spending serves the MIC & is critical to the US economy, do you mean critical in the positive or negative sense? US may already have reached the point of military diarrhea, good for the MIC and bad for the economy.
    Bears watching. Fed has mothballed the printing machine and may go on reverse-QE.

    Pentagon subcontracted their army war in Afghanistan by paying billion
    of dollars to a mercenary contractor.

    The contractor hired thousands of retired soldiers as employed soldiers
    to kill, maim, rape, destroy, loot, burn, and explode the people and
    Afghan country there. They helped US to steal their financial assets and airfreight to US. Over night, Afghan ran short of money.

    These mercenaries went on a killing sprees because they were afraid of
    dying there, so they have to kill to survive for themselves. If not,
    they get their last contract payment if they were hit and killed there.

    Hence they became ruthless contracted soldiers, instead. Now US is
    suffering the sin from people who attacked their capitol in January 6 2021.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Satish Kumar@21:1/5 to Resty Wyse on Tue Feb 22 13:57:33 2022
    Yale Guen Mar, why do you always lie about George Gee and his daughter? George Gee detested you. He couldn't possibly have asked you to marry his daughter.

    On Thursday, June 19, 2014 at 11:25:54 PM UTC-7, Resty Wyse wrote:
    I was in my early twenties when I met those people.
    They were in their forties and fifties at least at that time.
    George Gee had a daughter my age, and he died suddenly in the late 1960s. Gene Gin must be a hundred years old by now, if he's still alive.


    Yale Guen Mar, two retired restaurant workers in Kansas remember you

    from your days as a colleague at the Gene-Gee restaurant.

    They are the ones who have spilled the beans on you, Yale Guen Mar.

    George Gee could never have wanted a thief like you for his son-in-law. In fact, he fired you from your job for pilfering restaurant supplies.


    Sorry to say, Satish. You are full of baloney.
    You can't even lie properly on this.


    Yale Guen Mar, you are no different than a drunkard who sees another drunkard in everyone else.

    You have always found it difficult, to tell the truth, and now you must blame everyone else to be liars.

    Yale Guen Mar, two retired restaurant workers in Augusta, KS remember you as a fellow worker at the Gene-Gee restaurant in California. Why don't you come to Kansas to confront them if you think they are spreading lies against you?

    They remember that Yale Guen Mar was completely devoid of work ethics and honesty. Yale Guen Mar's pay got docked often enough till he finally got fired by George Gee when Yale Guen Mar got caught pilfering supplies to the restaurant.

    When George Gee died, Yale Guen Mar once again tried to get a job with the Gene-gee restaurant. But Gene had seen enough of Yale Guen Mar and told Yale Guen Mar to get lost. Yale Guen Mar was told never to set foot inside the restaurant even as a
    customer.

    On Monday, March 24, 2014 10:40:38 AM UTC-7, rst9 wrote:
    Satish Kumar Madhavan is a born liar. The only thing you can do is lie.

    George Gee tried to get me to go and marry his daughter.

    Besides, he died in Glendale when I was working at Pacific Missile Range.

    His friend, Gene, supported both both his family and George Gee's family

    after he died suddenly.

    Yale Guen Mar, your values are so warped that you don't know the difference between a truth and a lie.

    Everyone knew about your obsession with finger-fucking pigs in their asshole. Why on earth would George Gee want a husband like you for his daughter?

    You had a very bad service record. Everyone knew of your lack of morals and work ethics. You finally got fired when you got caught pilfering restaurant supplies.

    After George Gee died, you tried to get back your old job at the restaurant. But Gene would have none of that. He forbade you to step foot in the restaurant even as a customer.

    Stop lying, Yale Guen Mar. Not even a sow wants to get into bed with you. That is why you have been finger-fucking pigs in their asshole since you were a boy in mainland China. Today you are a menace to the pigs in all the Hmong-owned piggeries in Merced,
    CA like Loin Eye and Mai Keri Her.

    Yale Guen Mar, you can lie all you want but two of your ex-colleagues in the Gene-gee restaurant have already spilled the beans about your infamy. They live in Augustus, KS. Feel free to visit Kansas to get reacquainted with them.

    Yale Guen Mar, you were not seeing another girl, you were looking for pigs' asshole in nearby piggeries to finger-fuck them.

    George Gee detested you, especially after he found out that you were pilfering supplies from his restaurant. That's why you got fired.

    And even after George Gee's death, Gene wouldn't take you back as a restaurant worker - instead, Gene forbade you to set foot in the restaurant even as a customer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kico@21:1/5 to Rusty Wyse on Sat Feb 26 03:11:16 2022
    On 5/2/2022 1:52 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
    China - World Leader. ·
    Follow
    Answered by
    Michael Ciao

    Jan 21
    We all knew China was weak. How does the US Navy warship challenges Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea and get away with it?
    Originally Answered: We all knew Chain was weak. How do you explain the US Navy warship challenges Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea?
    To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.- Sun Tzu, Art of War

    It requires paradigm shift in thinking, how do you neutralize the biggest military power in the world? how do you disarm the biggest gun? how do you make the deadliest aircraft carrier impotent? how do you deal with a murderous bully?

    Trillions of dollars worth of weapons are useless against China. They cannot use them.

    1- Mutual economic interdependence.
    2- Powerful defense to hurt invaders badly.
    3- Avoid direct confrontation.
    4- Global diplomatic network of friendly countries.
    5- Denial of all land invasion access.
    6- Denial of all sea invasion access by missiles.

    As you can see, all the American ships in South China Sea are irrelevant and inconsequential.

    1.7K viewsView 53 upvotes
    Profile photo for Rusty Wyse

    Profile photo for L.K. Ee
    L.K. Ee
    · January 26
    It’s obvious the US is very strong militarily. You can’t spend more money than the next 10 strongest countries and still be weak. On the other hand, China is no pushover either. If the US can destroy China as it destroyed Iraq, China would be a
    broken and mangled country by now.

    The Chinese should go down on their knees to thank their leaders for saving them with their successful modernization of the PLA.

    Is it any wonder the Chinese are 100% satisfied with their government while those who wish them ill revile the Chinese government?

    Profile photo for Al Kohol
    Al Kohol
    · Sun
    Attack China? They don’t even dare to touch North Korea.

    Profile photo for Patrick Ching
    Patrick Ching
    · January 30
    While all the American ships in South China Sea are irrelevant and inconsequential to China, they are serving at least two very important purposes:

    1) to justify the extreme high military spending to serve their Military Industrial Complex (MIC) which is critical to the US econmy;

    2) to show to their voters that US is being very firm against China which has been established by their propaganda as an evil empire.

    For the same reason while lots of people see that US had wasted 20 years in Afghanistan, it had served their MIC really well and helped lots of the elites made tons of money.

    Profile photo for Robert Quek
    Robert Quek
    · Mon
    When you said that high military spending serves the MIC & is critical to the US economy, do you mean critical in the positive or negative sense? US may already have reached the point of military diarrhea, good for the MIC and bad for the economy.
    Bears watching. Fed has mothballed the printing machine and may go on reverse-QE.


    They dare not touch North Korea is right. This shows their power of ICBM
    is right. Now, North Korea, has recently successfully tested its
    Hypersonic. This shows the power of the guns is right, too. Seriously,
    to war on a country is to have an extra-ordinary power of the guns. US
    has been doing that for years on weak countries. They occupied them and
    then stole their resources and raped them. This shows how other
    countries feel they have to have the same fire power in order to defend
    and counter them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)