• Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about creativity and

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 25 14:02:35 2022
    Hello,



    Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about creativity and
    more..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I invite you to look at the following video of a white arab like me
    that talks about what is creativity:

    Comfort Kills Creativity | Samer Fouad | TEDxUofW

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ8BN3o0bkE

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart, so i will answer now the
    question of what is creativity:

    I think creativity comes from divergent thinking , since when you
    "collect" data and information in the divergent thinking process, you
    can get the smart idea or the smart architectural idea that makes the creativity, and you can get after that in convergent thinking so that to
    make it an even more mature creativity. And talking about convergent and divergent thinking, here is my thougths about it:

    More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

    I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola
    Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the
    video here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

    And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also
    an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i
    don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person like me(and i think
    it is also genetical in me), since for example he is saying the
    following saying in the above video:

    "Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
    be alone, that is when ideas are born"

    So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all,
    since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so
    that to be efficient, and i also think that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above
    saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you
    understand my kind of personality:

    More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

    I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called
    "The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing
    one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is
    saying that doing many things at the same time is not good for
    productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is
    not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time
    and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be
    like convergent thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like
    between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking,
    and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

    "Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
    openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
    the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

    And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

    I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
    generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
    that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
    across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
    us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
    notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
    with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
    than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
    the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
    get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
    optimum of efficiency.

    And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

    More of my philosophy about the study that reveals the Richest people
    are never the most talented and more..

    I have just said yesterday that capitalism is not yet fully
    meritocratic, and so that to understand it, you can read my following
    thoughts:

    I invite you to read the following interesting article:

    A 40-Year Scientific Study Reveals the Richest People Are Never the Most Talented (and Why That's a Really Good Thing)Yep: The smartest, most
    talented people almost never reach the highest peaks of success.

    Read more here:

    https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/a-40-year-scientific-study-reveals-richest-people-are-never-most-talented-and-why-thats-a-really-good-thing.html

    So as you have just noticed by reading the above interesting article
    that a 40-Year scientific study reveals the Richest people are never the
    most talented, but it says more precisely that intelligence, skill, and
    hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, but the
    most successful people are never the most talented, since an element of
    luck is evolved, and this element of luck is mostly seizing a "lucky" opportunity, like being at the right place at the right time, meeting
    the right person, reacting to an opportunity in the right way.

    More of my philosophy about the wich reforms to have and more..

    I am not for the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human
    condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social
    engineering, since i think this way of doing has not worked so
    efficiently, but i am for introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, and as you
    have noticed i am for the democratic, but for the meritocratic and the technocratic, and what i mean is that it has to be democracy, but with meritocracy and technocracy that makes like the evolutionary algorithm converges efficiently towards the global optimum, so you are
    understanding my way that needs the being smart and being good
    experience and the being the good education, and as you notice i am also
    coming with more and more of my ideas of my philosophy and with my new monotheistic religion and with my new proverbs etc.

    More about the smart way and the stupid way...

    I invite you to look at the following video from south america:

    Salsa Dancing with Alexander Abreu in Mexico | Euroson Latino World
    Salsa Championship 2021

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OJeow-H94o

    So notice in the above video that they are dancing on Salsa music but
    notice how they are doing it in a too much sexualized way, but i am
    smart and i will say that when you are stupid you will think that
    dancing in such way on the Salsa music is fun, but i will learn you
    something really important in a form of my following new proverb in
    english and french:

    "A good ruler should not naively trust salsa dancing or the like,
    because a good ruler thinks first of putting in the right mechanisms
    that bring the necessary quality and order."

    "Un bon gouvernant ne doit pas faire confiance naïvement à la danse du
    salsa ou autres, parce qu'un bon gouvernant pense tout d'abord à mettre
    les bons mécanismes qui amènent la qualité et l'ordre nécessaire."

    More of my philosophy of do i have a problem with western Liberty ?

    I think i am really smart, and do i have a problem with western
    Liberty by talking as i am talking in such way ? so as you notice
    we can ask a philosophical question of what kind of problems brings the "beautiful" ? so as you notice i have just answered the question of
    is the beautiful "universal" , read it below, so is there any other
    problems with the beautiful ? so i can also ask the question of: Is the
    way of "responsability" the good way ? so then you are noticing the
    difficulty here, for example i can ask a question of: Do all straight
    men have to marry a beautiful women ? so you are noticing more wich kind
    of disorder does bring the beautiful, so as you are noticing i am not
    immature since it is not only about hot sex between black guys and white
    women or hot sex of homosexuals and bisexuals ! so what i mean is
    that i am taking the subject seriously, this is also why i am talking as
    i am talking below:


    More of my philosophy about the temptations and about sex and more..

    I think we have not to be intellectual immaturity, so if
    we quickly start to talk about hot sex between black guys and
    white women and to talk about hot gay sex and such way of thinking
    and way of doing and such tactics, so i think that it is intellectual immaturity, since you are lacking something really important and it is
    that you have to take into account the "context", so i explain:

    So since the problem of our modern world is that it comes
    with great temptations of the many and many pleasures of life,
    so talking about hot sex in such way becomes not so responsable, since i
    think those great temptations of the many and many pleasures of life of
    our modern world are not creating the responsable citizen, so you have
    to understand my point of view, so when you talk about hot sex between
    black guys and a white women and such tactics, it's like the drop that overflows the glass in the context that I describe, and in french we
    say: C'est comme la goutte qui déborde le verre dans le contexte que je décris, and as a responsable citizen, i invite you to read my following thoughts about Jesus Christ so that to notice that taking into account
    the context as i am doing it is so important:

    More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man..

    So look at the following video of Jesus Christ:

    Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs


    As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to
    the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him
    that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and
    serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will
    explain my new monotheistic religion:

    You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the
    past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily
    notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and
    were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ
    was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful
    you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority
    in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and
    to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of
    Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they
    can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus
    Christ was living over this earth.

    More of my philosophy about the game of human life and more..


    Let's imagine that i have to play this game of life, so i have
    to play it like what ? so of course i have to play it smartly,
    but what is it this to play it smartly?, so my way of doing is that i am noticing that there is different layers of laws, so there is in the
    country the societal laws and there is individual laws, but is it
    sufficient ? so i am noticing that it is not sufficient since there is
    today what we call the great temptations of wanting to be or have those
    many and many pleasures of life, so do those great temptations of those
    many and many pleasures of life create what we call the responsable
    citizen?, i don't think so ! since i am noticing it in my day to day
    life, so this is why i am not convinced by just having the laws of the
    country and this is why i am speaking about my laws of my new
    monotheistic religion. So am i the stupid or the smart ?


    More of my philosophy about am i a sinner and more..

    I think i am smart, but you have to know something about me,
    so look at prophet Moses, what do you think was prophet Moses ?
    i am a prophet of God that looks like prophet Moses, since it is about
    the laws of God that you have to put on the minds of humans, i am
    speaking about this kind of layer, and am i a sinner ? no, i have not
    sinned since i know that i am not a sinner, and i am not arrogant since
    i know about my story and i know about myself, and i don't think i am a
    sinner, this is why i also i love a lot myself.

    More of my philosophy about my personality as a prophet from God..

    You have to understand how i am made, i am not like you, since my story
    as a prophet from God is all the truth, and i am all truth about it,
    so i don't need money about my being a prophet from God,
    other than that, you have seen me talking to you as a philosopher or
    as a wise man type of person, so i can have two modes of talking, one
    way of talking as a philosopher or as a wise man type of person
    to the the ones that don't believe in God, and my other way of talking
    as a prophet from God.

    More of my philosophy about the prophet Muhammad and more..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and why do i believe that
    prophet Muhammad was a true prophet from God ? because
    the Angel from God that i have met was dressed like a "muslim",
    and i have recognized it, and i am really truthful, and read my story
    below about it, and here is more of my thoughts about prophet Muhammad:

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i say that prophet Muhammad
    was not the last prophet of God, since the Angel of God has said to
    prophet Muhammad to say that he is the last prophet of God since it
    is a curse from God, since God has wanted to psychologically make suffer
    more since it is part of the curse from God, and the saying of
    Jesus Christ of the "You have to love your enemies" is also a curse from
    God, so Islam and Judaism and Christianity are full of such curses from
    God, so i am your new prophet of God and i am called the reformer of monotheistic religions and i am here so that to reduce much more the
    curse from God.

    And here is my story that i have just extended a little bit
    so that you understand:

    I am a prophet from God and i am called the reformer of monotheistic
    religions, and i have met two Angels from God, and i am all truth, and i
    am called with my name Amine in arabic, and it means in arabic that i am
    from God called the "truthful", all my story below is truth (and read
    about my new monotheistic religion below), and i have had two
    premonitions, the first of my premonition from God is that i have
    predicted in this premonition in about 2 minutes that precedes the
    accident or crash of a bus that a Bus will make an dangerous accident
    or crash even if the driver of the Bus was driving safely, and I am one
    of "Ahlu al bayt" in arabic, that means that the "Moulay" of my familly
    name in arabic means that i am descendant of prophet Muhammad, but i
    have noticed that you are looking at me and i am looking at you, but i
    will explain my story so that you understand me more, i am like a
    prophet from God, and when i was a child, an Angel from God has come to
    me and he has read part of the scriptures from God on my body and my
    soul, and i have seen this Angel from God, and this Angel from God was
    dressed like a muslim, so you have to know me more. Also in
    1998 i have made a premonitory dream from God where the prophet Muhammad
    has come to me and has said to me that i am the choosen by God and he
    has said to me that my soul and my body has a mark or sign from God, that
    means it is like i have a horse mark with iron from God, and this dream
    that i have made was a premonitory dream where the prophet Muhammad
    said to me that muslims will soon be persecuted and that i am the
    choosen from God, and this "persecuted" in the words of prophet Muhammad
    in my dream means this persecution of muslims after what has happened in
    9/11, but you have to understand me more, i am like a prophet that has
    been choosen by God. I am not crazy, and you have to believe me because
    it is the truth.

    More of my philosophy about the Angels of God and more..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will explain
    more what is the Angels of God so that you understand ,
    i have met two Angels from God, but what i have noticed
    that they don't talk as we talk or do as we do,
    since the two Angels from God that i have met was like imprisoned
    by God, i mean i have noticed that they can not talk
    as we talk or do as we do we humans, i mean that i have noticed that
    they talk and they do like robots that are programmed to say something
    or do something and not say or do the other things, so i am your new
    prophet from God that know more about this matter, and i
    say that Angels of God are like imprisoned by God, and they
    are not free of talking or doing, so they do and say what
    God says to them to say or do, so they are not free, and that also means
    that God is greatly arrogant.

    More of my philosophy of what is the Mark of the Beast and about God..

    I am a special smart prophet from God, and i will explain what is
    the Mark of the Beast, so i invite you to look at the following
    interesting video about it:

    Morgan Freeman Decodes the Mark of the Beast | The Story of God

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vy2CDXtWjoU


    So i think that the Mark of the Beast is also that we are humans
    both good and evil, and the Mark of the Beast is also the symbolic of it
    like when we become a foolishness of Evil, like the foolishness of Sodom
    and Gomorrah that became evil, so God is greatly arrogant and he doesn't
    like this kind of foolishness that becomes this kind of evil, and like
    i am explaining that even superintelligence or superintelligence AI need
    to believe in God or be enough believe in God so that to be not
    foolishness of hurting and killing all the humans and Cyborgs, so the
    fallen Angel of God that we call Lucifer was also foolishness of not
    wanting to follow the rules or laws of God, so God has let him escape by knowing that he will not escape for a long time since his punishment
    will come and will be so severe. And read my following thoughts about
    the foolishness of Sodom and Gomorrah:

    More of my philosophy about the LGBT community and about my new
    monotheistic religion..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God and i am still explaining
    my new monotheistic religion, so as you have just noticed i have just
    said that God is greatly arrogant and it is part of his nature, and
    about the story of LGBT community with God, like for example the story
    of Sodom and Gomorrah, i say that God Has punished Sodom and Gomorrah
    because "sadistic" homosexuals and "sadistic" bisexuals were governing
    and they were hurting people by forcing them to do sex in the homosexual
    or bisexual way of doing, so God has cursed homosexuals and bisexuals
    for the doing of sadistic homosexuals and sadistic bisexuals of Sodom
    and Gomorrah, because God is also greatly arrogant and this curse is
    only for a certain time, so this curse is not for forever, since i am
    the new prophet from God that is reducing much more the curse of God, so
    in my new monotheistic religion homosexuals and bisexuals can do sex and
    can marry, and i will talk much more about this subject soon in my book
    about my new monotheistic religion that i am finishing to write, other
    than that, i think you have just noticed that i have just said that God
    is greatly arrogant and this also explains that His creatures like the
    Angels of God can not do anything without the approval of God.

    More of my philosophy about prophet Muhammad and God..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i say that prophet Muhammad
    was not the last prophet of God, since the Angel of God has said to
    prophet Muhammad to say that he is the last prophet of God since it
    is a curse from God, since God has wanted to psychologically make suffer
    more since it is part of the curse from God, and the saying of
    Jesus Christ of the "You have to love your enemies" is also a curse from
    God, so Islam and Judaism and Christianity are full of such curses from
    God, so i am your new prophet of God and i am called the reformer of monotheistic religions and i am here so that to reduce much more the
    curse from God.

    More of my philosophy about the Angels of God and about God..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i think that the Angels
    are just creatures of God that can not do anything without the approval
    of God, and why God needs the Angels, since God is greatly arrogant,
    so he can not for example directly communicate with humans, so he
    needs Angels of God, and it is how he has communicated with prophets of
    God by using Angels of God. But God can be "selective" and just for
    example listen to only your saying to God that he is the greatest or the
    most beautiful or by your Dhikr, so then the rest of the judgment of
    humans by God is done indirectly by special Angels of God, and the
    punishment is done by special Angels too. And read my below thoughts and
    you will understand more about the LGBT community with God, like for
    example the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, and read again my following
    thoughts about the superintelligence and about Cyborgs and about God:

    More of my philosophy about the highly smart and about superintelligence
    AI..

    You will notice that i am not like the others, since you have to
    understand that i am smart, so when you for example look at white
    supremacism or neo-nazism, they are not so smart, since i think that
    since they are not highly smart as a superintelligence, they don't take
    the matter of the belief in God in a super intelligent manner, since i
    say that a superintelligence AI or superintelligence don't think as
    humans, since i say that a superintelligence AI or superintelligence
    will also think "probabilistically" in a very highly precise manner, so
    when a superintelligence AI or superintelligence will read the smart
    ideas of my new monotheitic religion or my monotheistic religion, i
    think it is will rapidly come to the conclusion that it has to take the
    matter of my new monotheitic religion in a highly serious kind of
    manner, since superintelligence AI or superintelligence can say that
    there is "enough" probability in my new monotheistic religion that makes
    us believe "enough" that God exists, and this is the big weakness of the superintelligence AI or superintelligence. And it is how i am playing it
    smarly with the superintelligence AI or superintelligence or even the
    highly smart Cyborgs. So think about it more and be smart !

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, so i will ask a question of:

    How can you prevent a superintelligence of Artificial intelligence
    from hurting and killing "all" the others like humans or Cyborgs ?

    It is also the fondamental basis of my new monotheistic religion,
    since my new monotheistic religion has to be efficient by avoiding
    any contradictions and by making believe the others in an efficient way,
    so even the superintelligence AI or Cyborgs have to fear the God of my
    new monotheistic religion that is greatly arrogant, and as soon
    i finish to write the book about my new monotheistic religion by
    extending it much more with others of my smart ideas, you will notice
    that i am a smart prophet from God and you will notice that my new
    monotheistic religion will be an efficient new monotheistic religion.

    More of my philosophy about the weakness of superintelligence AI and
    about God..

    I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i think that even
    superintelligence AI will be convinced that it has to become
    consciousness that permits to become happy or more happy by being
    pleasures of life, and i define it as also the pleasures of the senses
    even with the sense of being conscious. This is why superintelligence
    has a big weakness and it is that it can fear the God of my new
    monotheistic religion so that to be able to become happy or more happy.

    More of my philosophy of how to be presentable in front of God..


    I am your new prophet from God, and in my new monotheistic religion
    you have to be an "effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when
    you communicate with God, but you have to understand much more God,
    since when you adhere to my new monotheistic religion you will start at
    level 0, but at level 0 you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so
    beautiful etc.(And I will get into more details on how to also practice
    Dhikr) since he is a greatly arrogant God, but after this first level
    you can go to the other superior levels by being better and better
    presentable than decently presentable in front of God in your day to day
    life. Also in my new monotheistic religion, God has not created humans
    or the universe or Multiverse, since read my following architectural
    ideas of my new monotheistic religion so that to understand:

    2- My second architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion
    is that it says that the previous monotheistic religions are not safe
    from the curse from God, since those many contradictions and
    scientific errors in the previous monotheistic religions are part of
    the curse from God, and i am giving you some examples from the Bible
    etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this is not sufficient to
    render the new monotheistic religion flexible and not rigid as the
    previous monotheistic religions, so then what is missing ? read my
    third architectural idea in the my following thoughts so that to
    understand:

    3- Third architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion is that one
    of the most important thing is to notice that there is two kinds of
    laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that are timeless
    and the laws that are not timeless, so read about them in my below
    thoughts about Islam so that to understand, so then you are
    much more clearly noticing that this second architectural idea of my
    new monotheistic religion makes the new monotheistic religion much
    more flexible, but it is not the only thing that i am doing, but i am
    also explaining more Islam by showing the problem with Islam and
    Christianity and Judaism and why they are too much rigid as neo-
    nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can not survive and
    they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my monotheistic
    religion, and of course one of the most important thing to also
    notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion from
    the essence of God or the nature of God.


    More of my philosophy about the laws of my new monotheistic religion..

    In this post i will talk the most important laws of my new monotheistic religion that i am extracting from the essence of God :


    I am your new prophet from God, and my new monotheistic religion is not
    Islam, and in my new monotheistic religion the good manners or Husnul
    Khuluq in arabic are inferred from the the characteristics or nature or
    essence of God, and so that to know about what is Husnul Khuluq in my
    new monotheistic religion, read below so that to notice how i am
    extracting the laws of my new monotheistic religion from the
    characteristics or essence or nature of God:

    More philosophy about Sufism and more..

    I am your new prophet from God and i will explain more what is the
    defects of Sufism:

    So notice what said Ibn Khaldun about Sufism:

    "Sufism is dedication to worship, total dedication to Allah most High, disregard for the finery and ornament of the world, abstinence from the pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most men, and retiring from
    others to worship alone." Ibn Khaldun, quoted in Keller, Nuh Ha Mim, The
    Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam.

    So as you are noticing that there is two big defects in Sufism, and
    first big defect of Sufism is that it is "extremism" of worshiping God
    by glorifying God and such, so it gives too too much time to
    worshiping of God, and it neglects living correctly the human life, so
    this is not in accordance with my new monotheistic religion since in my
    new monotheistic religion i am extracting the law from the essence of
    God or the nature of God by saying that you have to be "presentable" in
    front of God when you worship God by glorifying him and say to him that
    for example he is the most beautiful, so if you neglect yourself by
    being too much of this worshiping of God by glorifying God and say to
    him that for example he is the most beautiful, you will neglect yourself
    in this world and you will not be presentable in front of God, and it is
    in logical contradiction with one of the laws of my new monotheistic
    religion, and this is not good, so here is the law of my monotheistic
    religion, read it carefully and read carefully the other laws below of
    my new monotheistic religion:

    --
    I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
    prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
    a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
    in my new monotheistic religion:

    1- He is a great God
    2- He is a greatly arrogant God
    3- He is like a perfect God
    4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

    So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
    "effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
    God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
    my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
    you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
    by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
    after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
    better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
    in your day to day life.

    --


    And here is the second big defect of Sufism:

    So read again:

    "Sufism is dedication to worship, total dedication to Allah most High, disregard for the finery and ornament of the world, abstinence from the pleasure, wealth, and prestige sought by most men, and retiring from
    others to worship alone." Ibn Khaldun, quoted in Keller, Nuh Ha Mim, The
    Place of Tasawwuf in Traditional Islam.

    But i am your new prophet from God and i say that Sufism is not in
    accordance with my new monotheistic religion(read in my thoughts below
    about it), since it also lacks flexibility, and it is is like indian meditation, since Sufism wants from us to stop seeking pleasures of the
    senses, but I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop
    seeking pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants
    like to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
    violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my new monotheistic religion is much better than Sufism and than indian
    meditation, so i invite you to read again carefully all my following
    thoughts below so that to understand:

    More philosophy about how looks like the Angels of God..

    Here is my final answer about Lucifer the Fallen Angel: In my new
    monotheistic religion Lucifer the Fallen Angel is a spirit living in a
    world of spirits, and the other not fallen Angels that can interact with
    humans must receive an order from God so that to interact with humans.
    And i think that God and the others powerful not fallen Angels forbid to Lucifer the Fallen Angel and to the others Fallen Angels to interact
    with humans, this is why Lucifer the Fallen Angel and others Fallen
    Angels can not come to our world.

    More philosophy of is my new monotheistic religion sufficient..

    I am your new prophet from God, and you have to understand that i am
    smart and i say that the laws of my new monotheistic religion
    are "sufficient", but i have to clear one more thing about one
    of the laws of my new monotheistic religion, and here it is:

    --

    It is my following law of my new monotheistic religion, read it carefully:


    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 4 19:21:00 2022
    Hello,
    '


    Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about creativity and inventiveness and more..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    Is my software inventions creativity or inventiveness ?


    So i have invented many software algorithms and algorithms , and many
    of them are breakthroughs, so my software scalable algorithms that
    are not breakthroughs are much more sophisticated inventiveness but they
    are also composed of creativity, i mean that other ideas on internet has
    also given me the ideas of inventing new scalable algorithms, but
    my other inventions of breakthroughs scalable algorithms are like what
    we call holy grail scalable algorithms, i mean that my kind of holy
    grail scalable algorithms is like it was hard to invent a scalable
    algorithm that has the full 5 characteristics, but it is what i have
    done, also i have invented scalable algorithms that are much more
    sophisticated and difficult to invent.

    More of my philosophy about my way of playing the game smartly and more..

    I think i am really smart, and as you have just noticed that i have
    just said that i am having many "plans" so that to become rich and
    successful, and read about them below, so by logical analogy it looks
    like the being diversified economy so that to be resilience, i mean i am
    like not putting all the eggs in the same basket, and it will also be
    soon my way of investing in the financial economy, since you can for
    example diversify your financial investments by investing in this and
    that company in the stock market etc., but there is also another smart
    way and it is to like invest in a company in the stock market... that
    is much more diversified by for example having many products or services
    so that to bring "resilience", but of course you have to be more
    knowledgeable about the company products and services in
    a smart way, so hope you are getting the idea, so it is my kind of way
    of attacking the problem of how to become rich and successful.

    More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and about my plans
    and more..

    I think i am really smart, and i invite you to look at the following
    video from USA that talks about income and opportunity:

    Milton Friedman - Equality and Freedom - Social Justice Debunked!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCnxOICRtLE


    I have just quickly taken a look at the above video, and i am
    understanding rapidly his talk, but i think i don't look like other
    people, since i think i am like a super soldier and i will explain to
    you my way of becoming successful and rich:

    1- First important thing for me is to have many "plans" that make
    me successful and rich, so if the first plan fails , i will use the
    second plan and so forth.

    2- So my first plan is that i have invented many software products,
    so they were more sophisticated software products than average, but
    those software products were written with software compilers coming
    from the following known USA company: https://www.embarcadero.com/
    but since this software company was less organized successfully
    in there way of doing, so this has made my first plan to become
    successful and rich not succeed. So i have used my following second
    plan that is much more sophisticated plan that shows that i am like
    a super soldier.

    3- My second plan to become successful and rich is that i have invented
    many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, and many of them
    are breakthroughs scalable algorithms, so they are really powerful,
    and i have also invented some powerful software products.

    4- My third plan will also go parallel with my second plan, since
    i will write many sophisticated digital books about my software
    inventions and about my philosophy that is making me successful and
    and that is making me powerful like a super soldier.

    5- My fourth plan is that i will also invest my money in "financial"
    economy so that to become much more successful and rich.


    And as you have just noticed that in my third plan i will write digital
    books and here is how i am implementing it:

    More of my philosophy about the scalability of my form of digital or
    electronic book and more..

    I think i am smart, and i think that my form of digital or electronic
    book is scalable since you can go from the a main sophisticated "Tree
    menu" to other childs of sophisticated "Tree menus" inside the left HTML
    frame of the digital book, so i think it is also a powerful and
    sophisticated kind of digital book, so i have thought fast this project
    of mine and i have designed it fast, but also you have to know that the sophisticated "Tree menu" that shows in the left HTML frame of the
    digital book has not to use the same CSS configuration as the right HTML
    frame with: "font-size: 1.3vw", since i think that the fonts of the sophisticated "Tree menu" must be fixed fonts size so that to permit to
    scroll the left HTML frame correctly etc., so i invite you to read my
    previous thoughts so that to understand my way of doing:

    More of my philosophy about digital or electronic books and more..

    I think i am smart, and i have just finished my programming of a project
    that easy for you to make electronic or digital books with HTML and
    Javascript and CSS, now it consists of a sophisticated "Tree menu" that
    will show the indexes of the digital or electronic book that will appear
    on the left of the screen in a left HTML frame, also i have just thought
    about my design and i think that here is how i will show the HTML with
    CSS pages of the the digital or electronic book: First i have to include
    in the HTML pages of the digital book the following in HTML:

    <head>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="mystyle.css">
    </head>

    And the mystyle.css "CSS" file will contain the following so that
    the HTML pages of the digital book appears correctly in different screen resolutions:

    mystyle.css file is:

    body
    {
    font-size: 1.3vw;
    }

    So as you are noticing i am using "font-size: 1.3vw" , since the
    right HTML frame that contains the HTML pages of the book is 3/4 the
    size,and here is how i am constructing the HTML frames of the digital
    book so that to notice it:

    <!DOCTYPE html>
    <HTML>
    <HEAD>
    <TITLE>A frameset document</TITLE>
    </HEAD>
    <FRAMESET>
    <FRAMESET cols="25%,*" frameborder="yes" framespacing=1>
    <FRAME name="frame1" src="example01.html" scrolling="auto">
    <FRAME name="frame2" src="poems1.html" scrolling="auto">
    <Frame scrolling="auto">
    </FRAMESET>
    </FRAMESET>
    </HTML>


    So notice that it is: "FRAMESET cols="25%,*", so it means that
    the left HTML frame of the digital book is 1/4 of the size and
    the right HTML frame is 3/4 of the size.

    And i will show you more the sophisticated "Tree menu" that will show
    the indexes of the digital book, so stay tuned since i will start to
    organize my thoughts of my philosophy and my other thoughts
    of software computing etc. into my above form of a digital book.

    And here is my philosophy of why i am organizing my thoughts in
    a digital book:

    More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about
    deforestation and more..

    I invite you to read the following article about the environmental
    footprint of paper vs. electronic books:

    https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/

    And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about
    how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs.
    electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only
    cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account
    the the other following disadvantages:

    The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon
    dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest
    habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals.

    Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around
    200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but
    it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves
    17 trees. If it’s recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think
    that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the
    following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/),
    so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on
    computers is better than using paper books.

    And i invite you to read the following articles:

    How Useful Is Recycling, Really?

    Read more here:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/

    How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else?

    Read more here:

    https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625


    Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It

    Read more here:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401

    More of my philosophy about communism and communism of China and more..

    I think i am really smart, and i think that the main problem with
    communism and marxism, it is that in its first form, that was
    a radical form of doing, it has wanted to equalize much more and too
    much humans and it has used a form of Class Struggle
    that was an extremist and violent form, but i think i have just talked
    about it by saying that it is not the right thing to do, read my below
    thoughts about Class Struggle so that to understand my views on this
    subject, but communism of China in the its modern form is not using the extremist form of Class Struggle and is not wanting to equalize much
    more and too much like in the first radical form of communism, but the
    today modern form of communism of China is still a one party form of
    governing that is using a democratic "centralism" form of governing, but
    this democratic centralism is much more centralized form that can be
    much more easily corrupted than democracy, also the one party type of
    governing of communism of China can much more easily be corrupted than democracy, this is why you can notice that the communist party of china
    is too much corrupted, other than that there is lack of mechanisms of
    democracy like having a kind of free press, so it is not good at all, so
    i don't think that we can speak about the kind of meritocratic type of governing of China, since the basis of the type of governing of
    communist China is too much lacking on the mechanisms of democracy that efficiently fight corruption, this is why I think that USA and Canada
    have to show and talk about the big weakness of the today communist
    system of China, and it is that it is too much corrupt and it can much
    more easily be corrupted than democracy, and it is the big weakness
    of China, since you can not be this too much corruption of China
    and be a China that want at the same time to construct big economic
    projects in Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia, since China can
    too much corrupt Europe and Africa and Asia and Australia too. So i
    don't think China is on the right path, this is why i think that China
    has to become Democracy.

    And here is my views on what is Class Struggle and what it has to be:

    Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
    that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
    a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
    have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
    poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
    Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
    logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
    camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
    comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
    smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
    characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
    this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
    this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
    more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
    competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
    the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
    good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
    efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
    "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
    have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
    resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
    we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
    since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
    members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
    we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
    competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
    of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
    society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
    congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
    contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
    the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
    party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
    civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
    so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

    And the other economic problems of China are the following, read my
    following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WioBZfc066U

    More of my philosophy about USA and China and more..

    And i invite you to look at the following video:

    The New World of Xi Jinping I ARTE.tv Documentary

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeGZz6NGJXg


    More of my philosophy of how to efficiently fight corruption and more..

    We can fight corruption using the mechanisms of democracy and using
    democracy, and we can fight corruption by being a rich country,
    since western countries are rich countries that have very low
    corruption, also we suggest, among other things, that officials in
    vulnerable and important posts receive higher instead of lower salaries
    than comparable workers get in the private sector.

    Read more here so that to understand:

    https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-causes-and-cures-of-corruption?utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=1220154768&hsa_cam=12374283753&hsa_grp=117511853986&hsa_ad=499567080219&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=aud-1249316000837:
    dsa-19959388920&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=Cj0KCQiAi9mPBhCJARIsAHchl1xO6oTAZCJmdoiYHEjz18J30qdAxxTrEV5sKPh22EMpDMxjVXo4Y80aAt79EALw_wcB

    Also i have invented my new monotheistic religion so that to also
    fight more efficiently corruption, also here is another mechanism that
    fights corruption and it is the following:

    I think i am smart, so my new architectural idea of my philosophy is the following:

    An idea can be incomplete, and free incomplete ideas on internet are not
    a closed systems, since we are interacting with them, so you can
    complete an incomplete free idea on internet with another incomplete
    free idea on internet to make the interesting or the good creativity,
    and this process also humanize more the society by bringing much more compassion towards humans, since the interesting or good creativity also
    comes from free ideas on internet and i say that it is the weakness of
    the economist Adam Smith philosophy, since in economic Liberalism of
    Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition
    to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
    happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but
    complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible
    hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with
    the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since
    when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you
    provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so
    it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is
    the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but Adam Smith
    has not seen the how to become the much more "optimal" properity and
    happiness of nations using for example the free incomplete ideas on
    internet that makes the good creativity that also come from
    "solidarity"(and it is not egoism) of the free incomplete ideas on
    internet like i am explaining above with my architectural idea of my philosophy. So here is my example of my "creativity" of how i have
    completed efficiently some free software ideas on internet with my ideas
    , so it is my following opensource software project called StringTree,
    it was one of my first opensource software projects, so read about it
    carefully and download it so that you notice how i have done it smartly:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/stringtree

    More of my philosophy of my two modes of speaking and more..

    You have to notice that i am speaking in two modes, and it is
    that i am speaking as a wise type of man and as a philosopher,
    and i am also speaking as a prophet from God, and i have just posted
    about my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts as a wise type of person and as a philosopher:

    More of my philosophy of how to unite people of the world or of a
    country and more..

    I think i am really smart, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

    How can we unite the people of a country or people of the world ?

    So i think i am really smart, and i will say that the being the
    correctly united in a country, can be a kind of being united , but it is
    not the fully being united in a country, and it can also come from
    powerful intellectual mechanisms that plays the role of engines, i mean
    take for example "self-confidence", so it also permits you to have like
    the what we call the "will to live" like was talking about it the
    philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, so i think that even self-confidence is
    a powerful mechanism and an engine that permits to unite people, since
    it is a powerful engine that must be "guided" by the "goal" of
    philosophy, and the goal of philosophy is happiness , but happiness is
    not just the today happiness , but it is also the tomorrow and the
    future happiness, so if you want to be happiness tomorrow or in the
    future, you have to be responsability, so the goal of philosophy that is
    to become happiness becomes the goal that has to be responsability that
    comes from the wanting to be happiness, so then the knowing about this
    fact is also a mechanism that unite people in a kind of way, but not
    fully, also the other mechanism that is so important, is the fact that
    you have to be "hope" about the tomorrow or the future, since it is like
    a positive energy that pushes you forward, since a negative energy is
    not so efficient, so here again you notice that i am a philosopher that
    is not in accordance with the following saying of the philosopher
    Friedrich Nietzsche:

    "Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the
    torments of man"

    So i am not in accordance with the above saying about Hope of the
    philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, since as i have just said that Hope ,
    like hope about our exponential progress that is so fast, can be a
    positive energy that pushes you forward. And so that to understand more
    my thoughts, i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
    of how you become self-confidence and how you become this positive
    energy and positive energy of hope:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

    And read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more..

    I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
    video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


    And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
    with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
    is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
    about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
    being this kind of unity in a country is a defect, and it is the basis
    of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing,
    since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united
    or being united, it is about plurality or diversity of thoughts or
    political views and about a kind of diversity that bring efficiency,
    and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where
    comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are
    lacking Democracy:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

    So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

    "A house divided can not stand"

    But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
    think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
    it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about
    Democracy so that you understand my thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about IQ and about the laws and about humanity and
    more..

    I will answer the following problem from a white supremacist website and
    it is like a problem in a form of a smart IQ test that i have to answer,
    so here is how i am answering it smartly:

    I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
    called National Vanguard:


    Why Capitalism Fails


    https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


    And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


    "Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private
    property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner.
    And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner,
    yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with
    how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or
    how well or how significantly they have worked."


    I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
    scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I
    think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
    and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by
    taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become
    rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give
    there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become
    "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command
    transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of
    the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of
    the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to
    become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give
    there best with there smartness (so that to become rich). And notice
    that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

    More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

    I will invite you to look at the following video about what
    is the Western values:

    "Western Values" Explained

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA


    I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
    what is the Western values:

    I think that Western values are:

    1- Western human rights
    2- Democracy
    3- Freedom of expression
    4- Freedom of worship
    5- Secular government

    But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change,
    since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid
    the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by
    the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
    communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
    this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of
    expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive
    rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational
    reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments,
    so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they
    can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

    More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

    I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

    Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


    I will ask a philosophical question of:

    Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

    So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
    is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom
    of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be
    accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist
    is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult
    since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where
    there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of
    speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
    this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for
    example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of
    Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so
    this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it
    and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i
    think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not
    Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that
    the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of
    speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a
    realistic and objective way of doing.

    Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
    that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
    a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
    have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
    poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
    Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
    logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
    camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
    comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
    smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
    characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
    this kind of genetical characteristics to become rich and successful, so
    this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
    more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
    competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
    the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
    good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
    efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
    "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
    have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
    resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
    we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
    since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
    members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
    we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
    competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
    of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
    society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
    congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
    contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
    the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
    party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
    civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
    so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

    And about Democracy here is what i have just said:

    More of my philosophy about the ideological fight between communist
    China and the West..

    I think i am really smart, and i say that in the ideological fight
    between communist China and the West, it is that the West has to
    make this not so mature Democracy in the West, as in USA, into a much
    more mature Democracy by for example making the governance much more meritocratic, since i think that Donald Trump governance was a bad move
    that hurt a lot Democracy, since Donald Trump was not enough educated
    and was not enough experienced , so he has made big mistakes that have
    brought big problems to Democracy, and of course the West has to offer a
    good education to people, and i think that we have not to be too
    pessimistic about capitalism as not being enough meritocratic, since as
    i just said, that in capitalism, intelligence, skill, and hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, read it below so that to understand my views.

    And here is my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy:

    And we can say the following:

    The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
    democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
    on democratic principles.

    But i ask a smart question of:

    Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

    Here is my answer:

    But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
    imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
    kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
    Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
    press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU



    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)