[continued from previous message]
And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc
Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:
And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.
More of my philosophy of between nostalgia and hope and the how to be
optimism and more..
First i will give you the definition of "nostalgia", and here it is:
"A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for
a period or place with happy personal associations."
So i think i will explain more my way of being happy and optimism:
I think that it is from the power of the "mind" from where comes
happpiness, since the mind can be "free" and much more powerful by using philosophical mechanisms, it is why i am inventing my poems of Love and
my thoughts and mechanisms of my philosophy below etc. i also mean
that happiness comes also from "nostalgia" in a form of an imaginary
that you believe it is true even if it is not true, also nostalgia is
not sufficient because you have to be a kind of hope and being a kind of positive energy that pushes you forward, so read my thoughts of my
philosophy below about it, so i invite you to look at following video of
a song, and notice in this video how the beautiful Mediterranean sea and
its seashores are so beautiful and it is also giving me a happiness in a
form of "nostalgia" since i come from there, so i think nostalgia is
also powerful and a positive energy:
Geri Halliwell - Mi Chico Latino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgoKfHg1JsU&list=RDXgoKfHg1JsU&start_radio=1
More of my philosophy about my new poem of Love and more..
And now i will explain how i am inventing my new poem of Love:
Here is my new poem of Love again:
--
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !
Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?
Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !
Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!
--
I think i am smart and i am a gentleman type of person and i think
i am a wise type of person and the way of how i am inventing
my new poem of Love is the same way i am using so that
to invent my poems of Love, so it is that i am inventing with my fluid intelligence like architectural idea or ideas in a form of smart pattern
or patterns that guide(s) the rest of the construction of my poem of
Love, so in my poem of Love above, look at its following architectural idea:
"Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?"
So i am "abstracting" sublime of Love as being a "sublime" and i am
saying that the sublime of Love permits to strongly defy space-time,
and notice how i am saying in the start of my poem of Love the following:
"Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?"
So notice that in the start of my poem of Love you will not understand
clearly the why i am saying it, but when you read my above architectural
idea and when you also read the following of my poem:
"Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!"
You will understand that i mean that the sublime of Love
is "King" like the King of time that defies space-time ,
so then this sublime of Love is not just for the onetime but it is for
the forever and for the anytime and of course i am constructing
beautifully the rest of my poem of Love as you are reading it.
Here is my new poem of Love..
I invite you to listen to the following song reading at
the same time my new poem of Love below:
Laura Pausini - La Solitudine (Official Video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpOEN93LX-E
Note that the word "sublime" in my new poem of Love below means:
extremely good, beautiful, or enjoyable.
And here is my new poem of Love:
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !
Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?
Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !
Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !
Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
---
More of my philosophy about the self and the human soul and more..
I think i am smart and i think i am wise type of man,
but i will ask another philosophical question of:
What is the soul of a human ?
I think that the soul of a human is related to the self-confidence
and optimism and positive energy of a human, so the first important
step is to ask what are the engines that gives a human a soul? since i
think that if you are not self-confident and optimism, it is like your
soul is dying, so in philosophy you need to have the "engines" that
gives you a soul, the engines such as the philosophical mechanisms that
i am talking about below, and as you notice it is not sufficient
to have a soul, since you have to have a good soul and not an evil soul,
so take for example the engine that we call "money", so i am smart and
i will quickly say that so that to have much more money , you have for
example to work hard, but since the working hard is also genetical and
since you have also to be